Notebookcheck Logo
Modellunderhåll: XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) recension: Core i9 och RTX 4070 för spelare och kreatörer

Skaparens njutning?

Innehållsskapare och gamers utgör målgruppen för XMG Pro 16 Studio: Schenker har satt ihop ett erbjudande som består av en Core i9-processor, RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4-port och en 16:10-skärm (QHD+, 240Hz, sRGB). Bra kylning ska enligt uppgift säkerställas genom användning av en Vapor Chamber.
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) vänder sig till spelare och kreatörer. Motsvarande hårdvara finns ombord: En Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4070 samt en kalibrerad (X-Rite) 16-tumsskärm med ett bildförhållande på 16:10. Ett barebone (PE60SNE-S) från tillverkaren Clevo fungerar som bas för detta. Detta är efterföljaren till XMG Pro 16 (mitten av 23) som visuellt ser likadan ut. Konkurrenter inkluderar Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9, Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024), Lenovo Legion 7 16 G9 och Aorus 16X (2024).

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 150 W PL2 / Short Burst, 135 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2055 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 32.0.15.5599, Optimus + MUX-Switch
Minne
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, glansig: nej, 240 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Hårddisk
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 864 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Mic-in, Kortläsare: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 19.9 x 359.5 x 273
Batteri
73 Wh, 4600 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Driver-DVDs, screws, cloth, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.282 kg, Strömförsörjning: 666 g
Pris
2300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.2 %v8
07/2024
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05/2024
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04/2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04/2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04/2024
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"3200x2000

Observera: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Mer information finns tillgänglig här.

Case och anslutningsmöjligheter - Schenker använder ett barebone från Clevo

Från utsidan har ingenting förändrats: Den senaste Pro 16 använder samma mattsvarta aluminiumhölje som förra årets modell-om du bara tittar på dess yttre hölje. Basenheten och locket kan vridas något, men deras byggkvalitet är bra. Du kommer att leta förgäves efter LED-remsor på ett så seriöst utseende fodral. Lockets maximala öppningsvinkel är 130 grader.

Två USB-A-portar (USB 3.2 Gen 1), två USB-C-portar (1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x TB 4/USB 4) samt tre videoutgångar bör vara tillräckligt för de flesta användare - i värsta fall kanske du måste ta fram en dockningsstation. Power Delivery stöds tack vare TB4-porten. Gigabit Ethernet-porten tillåter datahastigheter på upp till 2,5 Gbit/s.

Under optimala förhållanden (inga WiFi-enheter i närheten, kort avstånd mellan bärbar dator och server-PC) ger Intels WiFi-6E-chip (AX211) bra till mycket bra datahastigheter. FHD-webbkameran (2,1 MP, inget skydd) tar inga överraskande bilder. MicroSD-kortläsaren (referenskort: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) har medelhög hastighet.

XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
Hårdvara XMG Pro 16 Studio (M24)

Storleksjämförelse

363.4 mm 261.75 mm 26.95 mm 2.5 kg357.78 mm 278.63 mm 25.95 mm 2.6 kg359.5 mm 273 mm 19.9 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 262.5 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 254 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster sida: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), mikrofoningång, ljudkombination
Vänster sida: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), mikrofoningång, ljudkombination
Höger sida: microSD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), plats för kabellås
Höger sida: microSD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), plats för kabellås
Baksida: strömanslutning, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
Baksida: strömanslutning, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
76.7 MB/s -11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20 MB/s -77%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s +111%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
89.2 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
25.8 MB/s -71%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC
1793 (1696min, 1700.64P1 - 1886max) MBit/s +57%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1386 (708min - 1471max) MBit/s +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=149, last 2 years)
1233 MBit/s +8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1143 (930min - 1352max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
980 (886min - 1077max) MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (485min - 769max) MBit/s -44%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
469 (304min - 548max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1714 (1696min - 1727max) MBit/s +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC
1685 (1647min, 1651.64P1 - 1715max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1672 (1316min - 1721max) MBit/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1237min - 1665max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)
1394 MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1040 (739min - 1218max) MBit/s -38%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
957 (475min - 998max) MBit/s -43%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1143 (930-1352)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø980 (886-1077)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (485-769)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø469 (304-548)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1362 (708-1471)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1793 (1696-1886)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1671 (1316-1721)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (475-998)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (739-1218)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1237-1665)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1696-1727)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852CE WiFi 6E PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1685 (1647-1715)
ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24): 8.95 ∆E min: 4.27 - max: 12.93 ∆E

Hållbarhet

Den bärbara datorn och tillbehören skyddas av alla typer av plasthylsor (skumplast, film, påse). Namnen på de plaster som används är tryckta på dem. Undantag: Det genomskinliga filmskyddet på locket saknar motsvarande information. Enhetens hårdvara är åtkomlig efter att basplattan tagits bort - så att du kan utföra underhålls- och reparationsarbeten. Mjukvaruuppdateringar bör vara säkrade för de närmaste åren.

Inmatningsenheter - Den bärbara datorn XMG med utbytbart tangentbord

Ofta regeln med Schenker, och ett undantag när det gäller andra tillverkare: Det bakgrundsbelysta (RGB, fyra nivåer) chiclet-tangentbordet kan lätt bytas ut, eftersom det bara hålls på plats av två skruvar (och några clips). Dess platta, släta tangenter har en medelhög rörelse och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Motståndet kunde vara skarpare - men det är en smaksak. En lätt eftergivenhet i tangentbordet bör inte vara i vägen vid daglig användning. Positiva egenskaper: De fyra piltangenterna är i full storlek. En generöst tilltagen multi-touch clickpad (15,1 x 9,1 cm) används för att styra muspekaren.

Tangentbord XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Tangentbord XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)

Skärm - 16:10, IPS, sRGB

Den 16-tums stora skärmen (2.560 x 1.600 pixlar) med bildförhållandet 16:10 är välbekant: Den bärbara datorn använder sig av samma IPS-panel från BOE som redan användes i 2023 års version av Pro 16. Den drar dock nytta av en något högre maximal ljusstyrka. Allt som allt är skärmens värden som vi mätt upp tillräckliga för inomhusbruk. Att läsa utomhus bör vara möjligt så länge solen inte är för stark. Positivt: Den responsiva 240 Hz-panelen uppvisar inget PWM-flimmer. Alternativa visningsalternativ är inte tillgängliga.

Pixeluppsättning
Pixeluppsättning
Blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen är synlig.
Blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen är synlig.
Friluftsliv
Friluftsliv
378
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 427 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 41 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 416 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1095:1 (Svärta: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.02
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.161
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, LED, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Aorus 16X 2024
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
MNG007ZA1-2, IPS, 3200x2000, 16"
Display
20%
0%
-2%
-0%
21%
Display P3 Coverage
68.8
95.9
39%
69.3
1%
67.2
-2%
69.4
1%
95
38%
sRGB Coverage
99.5
99.8
0%
99.4
0%
96.7
-3%
98.2
-1%
100
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.8
86.4
22%
70.1
-1%
69.3
-2%
70.1
-1%
87.2
23%
Response Times
11%
-18%
28%
-9%
-14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.7 ?(6, 6.7)
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
61%
11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4)
6%
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
41%
12.2 ?(5.9, 6.3)
4%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
-13%
Response Time Black / White *
6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8)
8.8 ?(4.7, 4.1)
-40%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
-41%
5.4 ?(1.5, 3.9)
14%
7.7 ?(4, 3.7)
-22%
7.2 ?(2.9, 4.3)
-14%
PWM Frequency
Screen
19%
20%
4%
-5%
23%
Brightness middle
416
521
25%
384
-8%
542
30%
349
-16%
412
-1%
Brightness
392
506
29%
366
-7%
504
29%
348
-11%
396
1%
Brightness Distribution
86
85
-1%
91
6%
86
0%
93
8%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.44
-16%
0.35
8%
0.45
-18%
0.32
16%
0.43
-13%
Contrast
1095
1184
8%
1097
0%
1204
10%
1091
0%
958
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.33
1.74
25%
0.97
58%
2.73
-17%
1.98
15%
0.9
61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.07
3.88
36%
3.57
41%
5.29
13%
7.56
-25%
2
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.02
0.52
49%
0.77
25%
1.32
-29%
1.45
-42%
0.6
41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
3
19%
1.5
59%
2.9
22%
3.3
11%
1.4
62%
Gamma
2.161 102%
2.164 102%
2.24 98%
2.192 100%
2.137 103%
2.23 99%
CCT
7102 92%
6816 95%
6709 97%
6173 105%
6672 97%
6731 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
17% / 18%
1% / 11%
10% / 6%
-5% / -5%
10% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Den installerade panelens färgrymdstäckning är en besvikelse. Endast sRGB-rymden kan återges - inte AdobeRGB- och DCI-P3-rymderna. Detta skiljer sig dock inte från skärmarna hos de flesta konkurrenter. Ändå borde skärmen på en bärbar dator som marknadsförs som en "professionell arbetsstation för innehållsskapande" verkligen erbjuda hela spektrumet. Dess färgåtergivning ser bättre ut: En liten avvikelse på 2,26 (mål: DeltaE < 3) kan minskas till 1,03 genom att utföra en kalibrering.

CalMAN: gråskala
CalMAN: gråskala
CalMAN: färgmättnad
CalMAN: färgmättnad
CalMAN: Färgkontroll
CalMAN: Färgkontroll
CalMAN: gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 jämfört med AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 jämfört med AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 jämfört med DCI-P3
XMG Pro 16 Studio M24 jämfört med DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100 % ljusstyrka
100 % ljusstyrka
75 % ljusstyrka
75 % ljusstyrka
50 % ljusstyrka
50 % ljusstyrka
25 % ljusstyrka
25 % ljusstyrka
0 % ljusstyrka
0 % ljusstyrka

Prestanda - Raptor Lake Uppdatering ersätter Raptor Lake

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24), som av Schenker beskrivs som en "bärbar dator för innehållsskapande", riktar sig till spelare och kreatörer. Alla modeller har en Core i9-14900HX och det tillgängliga GPU-urvalet inkluderar en RTX 4060 och en RTX 4070 - vår testenhet är utrustad med en RTX 4070. Denna variant är tillgänglig för cirka 2 500 USD. Priserna börjar på cirka 1 800 USD.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia systeminformation
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Testförhållanden

Det finns tre tillverkarspecifika prestandalägen att välja mellan (se tabell), som kan växlas mellan med hjälp av programvaran Control Center (den bärbara datorns kontrollcenter). Vi använde lägena prestanda (benchmarks) och tyst (batteritester). Optimus var aktivt.

Prestanda-läge Underhållningsläge Tyst läge (dGPU av)
Effektgräns 1 (HWInfo) 135 watt 55 watt 25 watt
Effektgräns 2 (HWInfo) 150 watt 135 watt 35 watt
Buller (CP 2077 Phantom) 53 dB (A) 49 dB (A) -
Prestanda (CP 2077 Phantom) 78 fps 73 fps -
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter

Problem med underhållningsläget

Profilen "underhållning" orsakade betydande fluktuationer i prestanda under vårt test. Som ett resultat avstod vi från att använda den. Under testets gång kunde Schenker konstatera en väg runt problemet: Aktivering av fläktalternativet "tyst läge" i kontrollcentret. En framtida BIOS-uppdatering bör förhoppningsvis åtgärda detta fel.

Processor

Core Core i9-14900HX (Raptor Lake) används för alla Pro 16-konfigurationsvarianter. Dess 24 kärnor (8P + 16E) kan bearbeta totalt 32 trådar. En överraskning: Även när prestandaläget är aktivt kan processorn inte arbeta med full effekt hela tiden. Kontinuerlig belastning med flera trådar (CB15 Loop) fick CPU-klockan att sjunka avsevärt från den första till den femte körningen. Efter det planade kurvan ut. Dess benchmarkresultat ligger under det tidigare CPU-genomsnittet.

Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0235470705940117514101645188021152350258528203055329035253760399542304465Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3394 (3129.4-4350.66)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3274 (3212.59-3455.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3877 (3701.99-4280.82)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Unterhaltungsmodus + Geräuschlose Modus: Ø2674 (2445.88-3927.73)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4024 (3900.54-4690.98)
CB15 Loop (prestanda-läge)
CB15 Loop (prestanda-läge)
CB15 Loop (underhållningsläge)
CB15 Loop (underhållningsläge)
CB15-slinga (tyst läge)
CB15-slinga (tyst läge)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
83.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.7 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
81.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
76.4 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
74 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
60.3 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
31127 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29686 (26317.7min - 29686max) Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=36)
28815 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28075 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27818 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23207 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21842 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
17706 Points -37%
Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2195 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2188 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=36)
2149 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2122 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2103 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2049 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1927 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)
1888 Points -8%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11898 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11319 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=36)
10958 Points +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10655 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10474 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
8361 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8311 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6773 Points -35%
CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
845 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
841 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=36)
824 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
812 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
803 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
789 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
735 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
726 Points -8%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4691 (3900.54min - 4690.98max) Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4591 (4151.1min - 4590.84max) Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=37)
4420 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4350 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4280 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3455 Points -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3421 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2739 Points -37%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
309 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=36)
305 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
299 Points +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
294 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
281 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
278 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points -1%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
186 Seconds * -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
170.3 Seconds * -31%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
140 Seconds * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
130 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
126 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
123 Seconds * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=36)
121.2 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +13%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115585 MIPS +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=36)
111340 MIPS +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
109964 MIPS +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106866 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104193 MIPS
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
93134 MIPS -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85304 MIPS -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
68491 MIPS -34%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7297 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7204 MIPS +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=36)
7021 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6914 MIPS
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
6890 MIPS 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6776 MIPS -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6458 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6311 MIPS -9%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18126 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18079 Points +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17408 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=36)
17312 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
17292 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17086 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=111, last 2 years)
14175 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
14090 Points -18%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3054 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2980 Points +8%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2975 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=36)
2967 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2889 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2764 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=111, last 2 years)
2648 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2645 Points -4%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21299 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20533 Points +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19607 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=36)
19403 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18749 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
18225 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
15010 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
13072 Points -30%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2183 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2131 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2101 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=36)
2093 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2046 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1941 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1894 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1861 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=36)
29.3 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28.8 fps +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
26.5 fps
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
24.6 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.5 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
18.9 fps -29%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)
47.4 s * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.4 s *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
44.6 s * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
44.2 s * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=36)
43.3 s * +7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
42.5 s * +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
40.7 s * +12%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
38.5 s * +17%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4412 sec * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.4374 sec * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.409 sec *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.393 sec * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3917 sec * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=36)
0.3853 sec * +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.3821 sec * +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3782 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4350 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
257 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
281 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
789 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
10474 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
28075 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2049 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1393 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
118.8 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
96.6 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
81.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.1 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
25381 KRay/s +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
25072 KRay/s +17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=35)
24776 KRay/s +16%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23082 KRay/s +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21864 KRay/s +2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
21558 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
21393 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16419 KRay/s -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129169 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=35)
124243 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117057 Points +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116836 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
110279 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107531 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106582 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83334 Points -24%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
6285 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=35)
6137 MB/s +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5723 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5658 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5615 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5056 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4896 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3809 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
150835 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
142503 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141814 Points +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
139355 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=35)
138178 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136489 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
116926 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
104502 Points -23%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15401 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=35)
15240 Points +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14830 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13926 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13846 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13605 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13244 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10361 Points -25%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
62567 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=35)
61114 Points +16%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
57633 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54174 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53651 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
52621 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47375 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40932 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141059 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=35)
139720 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120213 MB/s +12%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112833 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111489 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109303 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107172 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98391 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1866 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=35)
1792 MB/s +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1662 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1643 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1639 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1494 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1361 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1088 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13776 KRay/s +20%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=35)
13343 KRay/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12370 KRay/s +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12355 KRay/s +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11775 KRay/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11481 KRay/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11438 KRay/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8955 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49676 MPixel/s +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49217 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48831 MPixel/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
48577 MPixel/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47412 MPixel/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=35)
46809 MPixel/s -4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46636 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40126 MPixel/s -18%

Systemets prestanda

Det välfungerande systemet ger tillräckligt med prestanda för spel, rendering och streaming, men den installerade hårdvaran kan inte sätta några nya rekord. RAM-minnets överföringshastigheter ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5-5600 RAM.

RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel-läge.
RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel-läge.
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8550 Points +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8389 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8302 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7768 - 8550, n=8)
8193 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8166 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
8023 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8010 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)
7799 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11940 Points +11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
11708 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11286 Points +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11071 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
10958 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10104 - 11815, n=8)
10896 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years)
10832 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10725 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11103 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11014 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9577 - 11103, n=8)
10431 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10425 Points -5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
10273 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10139 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years)
9904 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9701 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14827 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
13185 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=8)
13160 Points +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
13036 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
12909 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12511 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years)
12117 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11204 Points -10%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2312 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2311 Points +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2235 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=7)
2186 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2067 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2002 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1955 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=146, last 2 years)
1908 Points -8%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2191 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2172 Points +14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2093 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=7)
2066 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1911 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1884 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1827 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=146, last 2 years)
1808 Points -5%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2458 Points +4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2455 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2452 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2371 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2258 - 2458, n=7)
2363 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2287 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=146, last 2 years)
2095 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2028 Points -14%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
2330 Points +34%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2259 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1734 - 2330, n=7)
2056 Points +19%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2053 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1952 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1769 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1734 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=146, last 2 years)
1708 Points -1%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
342 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
330 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
323 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
322 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (269 - 342, n=8)
322 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
320 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
319 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)
304 Points -5%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
307 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 304, n=6)
298 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
297.6 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
291 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years)
267 Points -11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
505 ms * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)
503 ms * -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
461 ms *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
449 ms * +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 469, n=8)
448 ms * +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
447 ms * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
443 ms * +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
436 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8166 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78979 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78859 MB/s 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78854 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78788 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75827 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=35)
74992 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70102 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65265 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86538 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86376 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85746 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85460 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83034 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=35)
81259 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75433 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69175 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77406 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77346 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74500 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73167 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=35)
72271 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72225 MB/s -1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70034 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
67077 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
93.7 ns * -12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.1 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=35)
84.8 ns * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84 ns *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.5 ns * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * +1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

På grund av den bärbara datorns relativt höga latenser är video- och ljudredigering i realtid inte avsedd. Framtida programuppdateringar kan dock leda till förändringar i detta avseende.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1857.6 μs * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1791.8 μs *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1559.5 μs * +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1451.9 μs * +19%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1162.9 μs * +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
989.1 μs * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Schenkers webbutik har en mängd olika SSD-enheter att välja mellan - vår testenhet har en blixtsnabb modell (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2-2280) från Samsung. Positivt: Termiskt inducerad strypning inträffade inte. Den bärbara datorn kan rymma upp till två PCIe 4 SSD-enheter (M.2-2280). RAID-0/1 stöds.

Pro 16 har plats för två PCIe-4 SSD-enheter.
Pro 16 har plats för två PCIe-4 SSD-enheter.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7089 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6849 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 681.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 462.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3840 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4952 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 84.39 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 266.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
93.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
86.8 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
82.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
82.2 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
77 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
74.3 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
71.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
62.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
4175 (4140.41min - 4174.97max) MB/s +63%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4104 (4091.75min - 4103.68max) MB/s +61%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4037 (3964.04min - 4036.7max) MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3475 MB/s +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3157 (2968.73min - 3157.45max) MB/s +24%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2620 (2556.56min - 2619.76max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2556 (2209.35min - 2555.51max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5091 (5032.33min - 5091.26max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4834 (4439.32min - 4834.12max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4757 (4720.06min - 4757.31max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4698 (3640.45min - 4697.66max) MB/s -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4533 (4522.27min - 4532.95max) MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4093 (4016.82min - 4092.8max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3805 MB/s -21%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7090 (6633.87min - 7089.84max) MB/s +1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
7058 (6624.24min - 7058.17max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7049 (5964.33min - 7049.37max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7019 (6133.64min - 7018.76max) MB/s 0%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6636 (6205.02min - 6635.75max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6322 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5181 (4323.23min - 5181.35max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6896 (6883.77min - 6896.11max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6770 (6323.06min - 6770.24max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6500 (6455.66min - 6499.7max) MB/s -6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5265 (5223.42min - 5264.69max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4932.28min - 4948.61max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4850 MB/s -30%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4821 (4606.6min - 4820.72max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
95.2 (94.25min - 95.19max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
92.7 (91.49min - 92.68max) MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
84.6 (83.7min - 84.58max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
84.4 (72.17min - 84.41max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
55.3 (53.37min - 55.32max) MB/s -34%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
47.2 (45.9min - 47.16max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
343 (338.95min - 343.03max) MB/s +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
340 (329.38min - 339.78max) MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
334 (316.9min - 334.07max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
280 (277.46min - 279.66max) MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
270 (268.96min - 269.65max) MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (249.74min - 251.16max) MB/s -10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -20%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5847 (5827.75min - 5846.56max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4923 (4891.68min - 4922.98max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4891.5min - 4914.51max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4055 (4044.11min - 4055.48max) MB/s -17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3764 (3700.88min - 3763.72max) MB/s -23%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s -31%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3302 (3194.22min - 3302.44max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2568 MB/s -48%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4394 (3486.17min - 4394.19max) MB/s +25%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3792 (3142.55min - 3791.52max) MB/s +8%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3717 (3584.28min - 3717.4max) MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3542 (3491.17min - 3541.69max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3522 (3439.08min - 3521.99max) MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3443 (3007.99min - 3443.05max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2133 MB/s -39%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
10769 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10265 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9122 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9056 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8778 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8364 Points -8%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6746 Points -26%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4721 Points +32%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3747 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3590 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3368 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3233 Points -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3152 Points -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points -32%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5126 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4652 Points +26%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4018 Points +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4006 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3703 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3543 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points -16%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5849 MB/s +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5622.8 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5355.36 MB/s +3%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5214.03 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4945 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4797.97 MB/s -8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4161.31 MB/s -20%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5482 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5143.63 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4668.7 MB/s -9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4482.43 MB/s -13%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4431.76 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3950.35 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3760 MB/s -27%
4K Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
84.56 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.62 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
80.9 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.81 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.57 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.2 MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
61.86 MB/s -19%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306.26 MB/s +47%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
283.44 MB/s +36%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
283 MB/s +36%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
231.38 MB/s +11%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213.76 MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
213 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
208.4 MB/s
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3164.36 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3081 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2991.57 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2721.41 MB/s -9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2673.76 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2615.17 MB/s -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s -37%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
4295 MB/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3878.76 MB/s +30%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3338.79 MB/s +12%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3279.44 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2980.22 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2933.74 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2527 MB/s -15%
Access Time Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.088 ms * -175%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.064 ms * -100%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05576 ms * -74%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * -31%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.038 ms * -19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.032 ms *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.016 ms * +50%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.059 ms * -228%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04728 ms * -163%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * -11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.019 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms *
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.017 ms * +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.012 ms * +33%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (4271.48-7056.44)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7013 (6198.53-7048.48)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5723 (3286.38-6614.84)
Aorus 16X 2024 Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5164 (4823.45-5192.86)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7081 (6350.81-7114.2)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5669 (3420.66-6904)

Grafikkort

QHD-spel med höga till maximala inställningar är inget problem för den installerade GeForce RTX 4070 (TGP: 140 watt): Den levererar bildfrekvenser (och benchmarkresultat) som ligger något över GPU-genomsnittet. Lite snävt för dagens krav: GPU:n har bara 8 GB VRAM (GDDR6) till sitt förfogande. Växling mellan dGPU och Optimus kräver en omstart.

Time Spy (ansluten till elnätet, prestandaläge)
Time Spy (ansluten till elnätet, prestandaläge)
Time Spy (batteriläge, prestandaläge)
Time Spy (batteriläge, prestandaläge)
Time Spy (ansluten till elnätet, underhållningsläge + tyst läge)
Time Spy (ansluten till elnätet, underhållningsläge + tyst läge)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
99 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
98.9 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
98.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
94.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
92.7 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
92.1 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
90.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
44538 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43689 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
42753 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41457 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41432 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=63)
40427 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
40259 Points -6%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31105 Points +1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
31091 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
30687 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29892 Points -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
29156 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=67)
29070 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28319 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13336 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
12900 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12174 Points +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12048 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11972 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11959 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=65)
11605 Points -3%
3DMark 11 Performance
34173 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23584 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
12286 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
2598 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
23 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=64)
21.5 Seconds * +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * +9%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19 Seconds * +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=66)
40.3 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.5 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
34 Seconds *
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
33 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
32 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
326 Seconds * -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
294 Seconds * -26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=63)
291 Seconds * -25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
245 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
233 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
227 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
220 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
205 Seconds * +12%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
127544 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years)
127274 Points 0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
126537 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120585 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
118860 Points -7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
113950 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=64)
113923 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112841 Points -12%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
88210 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
78091 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
75575 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=119, last 2 years)
73245 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (28158 - 102618, n=35)
69106 Points -12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
65791 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58476 Points -25%
Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120852 Points +3%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
120176 Points +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
119119 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
117097 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=110, last 2 years)
116145 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
115718 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85488 - 129836, n=40)
113934 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
101474 Points -13%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
109205 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
105334 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
101006 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
90584 Points -10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
89638 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=105, last 2 years)
83044 Points -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18099 - 120033, n=37)
72500 Points -28%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)
2190 mpaths +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1868 mpaths +11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
1805 mpaths +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1737 mpaths +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1690 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=37)
1650 mpaths -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1643 mpaths -3%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)
1574 mpaths +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1333 mpaths +7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
1289 mpaths +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1256 mpaths +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
1244 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=37)
1195 mpaths -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1180 mpaths -5%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
19077 mpaths +14%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
17465 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
16766 mpaths
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
16168 mpaths -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years)
15137 mpaths -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9339 - 20388, n=36)
14421 mpaths -14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11943 mpaths -29%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
709 mpaths +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
686 mpaths +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
675 mpaths +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
649 mpaths +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=48)
603 mpaths +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
599 mpaths
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
587 mpaths -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
579 mpaths -3%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28791 ksamples +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
27701 ksamples +6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
26677 ksamples +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
26235 ksamples
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
24305 ksamples -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21459 ksamples -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=48)
20853 ksamples -21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
18346 ksamples -30%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.7 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.1 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
89.4 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
83.4 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 (48.6min) fps +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.1 (52.5min) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.2 (70min) fps +3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.3 (37.9min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 (68.4min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=34)
79.2 fps -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75.8 (32.9min) fps -8%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.8 (8.14min, 90.9P1) fps +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.2 (5.17min, 83.3P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126 (8.93min, 83.3P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.4 (4.46min, 83.3P1) fps 0%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.1 (4.37min, 76.9P1) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.7 fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 140.5, n=59)
110.7 fps -12%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.2 (4.31min, 71.4P1) fps -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131 fps +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122.1 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.8 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
119.8 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.5 fps -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.5 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=61)
110.9 fps -7%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
234 (27.8min, 175.8P1) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
220 fps +7%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
213 (26.4min, 161.7P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
206 (37.8min, 155P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (69.2min, 153P1) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
202 (47.3min, 151P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=61)
196 fps -5%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
185.3 (161min) fps +15%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
181.7 (153.5min) fps +13%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180.9 (156.5min) fps +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
179.5 (154.3min) fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
162.8 (140.6min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
160.8 (136.5min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 191.2, n=63)
147.9 fps -8%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
138.2 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps +6%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.3 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)
108.2 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (52.1 - 147.9, n=65)
104.6 fps -12%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +12%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 (72.8min, 80.4P0.1, 90.5P1) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (87.2min, 87.8P0.1, 95.1P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=45, last 2 years)
103.5 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66.7 - 128.5, n=24)
101.9 fps -9%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.6 fps +16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.8 (61.9min, 63.9P0.1, 68.7P1) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=34, last 2 years)
82.2 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77.2 (60.8min, 61.7P0.1, 66.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54.4 - 89.6, n=20)
73.8 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.9 fps -7%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (29.5min, 31P0.1, 35.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.3 - 80, n=5)
67.8 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years)
64.5 fps -8%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58.5 (31.3min, 34.1P0.1, 45.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (47.7 - 61.3, n=5)
55.3 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 61.3, n=5, last 2 years)
51.8 fps -11%
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (38.4 - 78.8, n=4, last 2 years)
52 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.2 (33.8min, 36.4P0.1, 43P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (34.3 - 51.2, n=3)
43.9 fps -14%
2560x1440 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (33.3 - 57.3, n=2, last 2 years)
45.3 fps +36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33.3 (25.5min, 26.8P0.1, 29.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (23.7 - 33.3, n=3)
29.7 fps -11%
2560x1440 High Preset + Quality DLSS
Average of class Gaming
  (47.8 - 83.1, n=2, last 2 years)
65.5 fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47.8 (30.3min, 33.1P0.1, 40.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  ()
47.8 fps 0%
Ghost of Tsushima
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.7 (30min, 46.2P0.1, 55.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (68.1 - 73.7, n=4)
70.6 fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.5 - 73.7, n=7, last 2 years)
59 fps -20%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
56.1 (32min, 37.7P0.1, 43.8P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (50.5 - 56.1, n=4)
53.3 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.7 - 56.1, n=5, last 2 years)
44.1 fps -21%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality DLSS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.2 (40.6min, 44.9P0.1, 57.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.6 - 74.2, n=2)
71.9 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (63.6 - 74.2, n=3, last 2 years)
69.1 fps -7%
The First Descendant
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (53.7min, 54.9P0.1, 62.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (73.7 - 83.6, n=5)
79.1 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.4 - 80, n=5, last 2 years)
62.2 fps -22%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.2 (34min, 38.1P0.1, 43.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.2 - 52.5, n=5)
50.5 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.7 - 51.2, n=3, last 2 years)
48.3 fps -6%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + DLSS Quality
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.8 (23.7min, 31.9P0.1, 40.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.6 - 51.8, n=2)
50.2 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.3 - 51.8, n=2, last 2 years)
47.6 fps -8%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
78.2 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64.7 - 78.1, n=8)
71.2 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (57min, 56P1) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 84.7, n=11, last 2 years)
54.6 fps +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 50.9, n=8)
46.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45.1 (36min, 36P1) fps
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (59.2 - 129.5, n=9, last 2 years)
78.4 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.8 (58min, 58P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.2 - 73.9, n=5)
70 fps -3%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø77.5 (72.5-79.1)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Unterhaltungsmodus + Geräuschloser Modus: Ø72.3 (68.6-73.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (prestandaläge)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (prestandaläge)
lågmed.högultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 186.7 184.9 180.9 126 95.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 231 196.2 181.6 160.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 214 163.6 119.7 86.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 178 147.3 119.5
Strange Brigade (2018) 457 297 236 206 135.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 171.8 132 115.3 111.8 77.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 126.3 112.1 95.5 82.5 48.6
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 81 70.4 58.5
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 114.9 102.8 93 73.7 56.1
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) 78.3 64.9 51.2 33.3
F1 24 (2024) 239 238 203 70.4 45.1
The First Descendant (2024) 171 110.9 91.3 80 51.2

Utsläpp &amp; effekt - XMG Pro med hög effektförbrukning

Bullerutsläpp

Cyberpunk 2077 ökar den bärbara datorns ljudutsläpp till upp till 53 dB(A) (prestandaläge ), medan underhållningsprofilen ger något mer måttliga värden. Det tysta läget är inte lämpligt för spel, eftersom dGPU är avstängd. Enhetens ljudnivå är lägre vid tomgångskörning och under daglig användning (kontor, internet): Fläktarna varvar inte upp överdrivet mycket och ibland står de stilla. Ibland hörs ett elektroniskt knastrande från den bärbara datorns insida.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28 / 31 / 35 dB(A)
Hög belastning
52 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.232.137.631.434.235.72524.828.228.425.531.129.23133.937.243.238.544.541.74025.723.127.92728.629.25020.821.822.421.924.324.7632319.825.221.319.523.38023.620.920.319.418.136.810023.718.118.41814.925.21252824.125.825.722.42816030.63130.730.82730.420032.22826.527.421.63325031.523.324.122.718.632.731532.422.224.422.71735.440035.521.724.721.116.136.250038.921.726.420.614.338.963038.423.52521.612.84080040.622.125.618.912.741.3100041.120.425.517.414.940.2125041.719.625.616.611.940.7160042.31826.115.211.541.6200040.417.223.51512.140.3250039.815.422.613.71341315038.414.22113.112.840.440003913.72013.213.138.750004113.51813.41340.2630038.713.417.813.613.436.380003213.615.713.713.633.61000029.113.717.313.713.329.81250026.71315.412.912.825.31600024.512.514.112.412.120.7SPL51.730.635.329.125.851.6N81.42.31.20.88.1median 38.4median 18.1median 24.1median 16.6median 13.3median 36.3Delta5.44.83.84.52.25.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
Noise
3%
10%
-3%
7%
16%
off / environment *
25
25.2
-1%
23.9
4%
26
-4%
25
-0%
24.5
2%
Idle Minimum *
28
27.8
1%
24.3
13%
26
7%
26
7%
24.5
12%
Idle Average *
31
32
-3%
24.3
22%
32
-3%
29
6%
24.5
21%
Idle Maximum *
35
29.6
15%
28.9
17%
38
-9%
34
3%
24.5
30%
Load Average *
52
45.2
13%
45.8
12%
54
-4%
43
17%
34.8
33%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
53
Load Maximum *
52
55.8
-7%
56.6
-9%
55
-6%
48
8%
54.1
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
50
48
54.1

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Den bärbara datorn värms upp märkbart: Cyberpunk och stresstesterna resulterade i temperaturer över 60 grader Celsius vid vissa punkter. Värden över genomsnittet kan också nås under vardaglig användning (kontor, internet). Temperaturerna på handledsstödet är inte lika dåliga.

Det extrema stresstestscenariot (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig drift) kontrollerar systemets stabilitet under full belastning. Enhetens prioriteringar är tydligt fördelade: Medan GPU:n arbetade med full effekt låg CPU-klockan (400 MHz till 2 GHz) under basklockan.

 50 °C48 °C51 °C 
 44 °C49 °C48 °C 
 29 °C31 °C31 °C 
Max: 51 °C
Medel: 42.3 °C
66 °C65 °C58 °C
55 °C58 °C47 °C
34 °C34 °C32 °C
Max: 66 °C
Medel: 49.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  50 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
Prestationsläge Cyberpunk 2077
Prestationsläge Cyberpunk 2077
Prestationsläge Cyberpunk 2077
Prestationsläge Cyberpunk 2077
Prestationsläge Cyberpunk 2077
Prestationsläge Cyberpunk 2077
Prestandaläge Furmark &amp; Prime95
Prestandaläge Furmark &amp; Prime95
Prestandaläge Furmark &amp; Prime95
Prestandaläge Furmark &amp; Prime95
Prestandaläge Furmark &amp; Prime95
Prestandaläge Furmark &amp; Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
9%
11%
14%
2%
22%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
58
-14%
43.8
14%
41
20%
55
-8%
43.7
14%
Maximum Bottom *
66
45.2
32%
55.4
16%
41
38%
66
-0%
42.9
35%
Idle Upper Side *
35
31.1
11%
32.8
6%
37
-6%
33
6%
29.1
17%
Idle Bottom *
39
37.2
5%
36
8%
38
3%
35
10%
30.6
22%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

Det finns en tydlig brist på bas. I övrigt ger stereohögtalarna ett acceptabelt ljud. Deras maxnivå kunde vara något högre.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.234.92531.128.43144.540.14028.628.65024.329.66319.525.98018.124.410014.924.312522.437.61602747.120021.655.325018.663.33151765.140016.166.950014.368.763012.870.280012.768.9100014.970.8125011.968160011.565.4200012.169.525001368.5315012.863.3400013.161.250001360.6630013.459.7800013.657.21000013.352.41250012.853.21600012.151.2SPL25.878.6N0.843.7median 13.3median 63.3Delta2.2830.533.830.523.627.923.621.426.421.421.525.321.522.322.822.325.927.825.926.624.726.627.221.127.235.11735.145.814.745.850.115.150.154.915.654.957.816.657.861.215.661.263.412.863.469.911.669.972.51172.567.810.167.869.91069.968.810.368.869.811.969.869.211.369.267.111.867.164.111.864.167136771.412.571.469.313.169.364.212.664.259.713.459.752.913.552.980.724.380.750.40.650.4median 64.2median 12.8median 64.28.21.78.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

I viloläge är den bärbara datorns strömförbrukning alldeles för hög - betydligt högre än den likadant utrustade föregångarmodellen. Cyberpunk och stresstesterna kördes med något minskande, ständigt fluktuerande strömförbrukning. Strömförsörjningsenheten på 230 watt är fortfarande tillräckligt stor. Kortsiktiga belastningstoppar, som i början av stresstestet, är inget problem för den.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 31 / 33 / 41 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 114 / 250 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Power Consumption
11%
23%
22%
43%
Idle Minimum *
31
26.7
14%
12.5
60%
13
58%
8
74%
Idle Average *
33
24.4
26%
24.6
25%
18
45%
12
64%
Idle Maximum *
41
32.7
20%
24.8
40%
35
15%
23
44%
Load Average *
114
122.1
-7%
109.6
4%
138
-21%
94
18%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
218
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
196.8
Load Maximum *
250
241
4%
284.9
-14%
222
11%
215
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
190.6
218
172.6
181.5

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø152.8 (135.5-250)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø33.1 (31.4-41.5)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø218 (198.6-231)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø102.9 (90.4-157.6)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø154 (147.4-167.4)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø187 (176.6-193.3)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.5 (27.6-33.1)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø196.8 (187.7-222)

Körtider

Pro 16 kräver också mer ström än sin föregångare vid låg belastning i batteriläge. Som ett resultat av detta uppnådde den en drifttid på 5:37 timmar under WiFi-testet (kartläggning av belastningen vid åtkomst till webbplatser med hjälp av ett skript). Därmed ligger den en dryg timme efter sin föregångare-som hade samma batterikapacitet på 73 Wh.

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 126)
5tim 37min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
481 min +43%
Lenovo Legion 7 16 IRX G9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
433 min +28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
405 min +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years)
375 min +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
337 min
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
290 min -14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90.61 Wh
227 min -33%

För

+ 16:10-skärm (WQXGA, 240 Hz)
+ RAM-minne kan bytas ut/uppgraderas
+ två SSD-platser (PCIe 4)
+ RGB-bakgrundsbelysning för tangentbord
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Strömförsörjning

Emot

- 8 GB VRAM inte framtidssäkert
- delar av höljet värms upp mycket
- hög strömförbrukning i viloläge
- ingen DCI-P3

Omdöme - Ett kraftpaket med problem

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24), testexemplar tillhandahållet av Schenker.
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24), testexemplar tillhandahållet av Schenker.

Pro 16:s fokus ligger på permanent hög GPU-kraft med prestandavärden som ligger något över GPU:ns genomsnitt. Processorn måste redan efter en kort stund ta det lugnt - CB15 Loop avslöjade detta.

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) kan tilldelas avdelningen för modellunderhåll. Bortsett från ett byte från Raptor Lake till Raptor Lake Refresh har den bärbara datorn inga betydande nya funktioner.

Enhetens ljud- och värmeutveckling samt dess strömförbrukning i viloläge är alla (för) höga. Med tanke på hur strömhungrig den bärbara datorn är kan vi inte utesluta att vårt testprov har en defekt. Dess körtider är anständiga.

Den installerade 16:10-panelen (16 tum, 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, sRGB, IPS, 240 Hz) är bra, men den saknar DCI-P3-färgrymden som är en förutsättning för en bärbar dator för skapare. Enheten kan fortfarande rymma två PCIe 4 SSD-enheter och RAID 0/1 stöds. En TB-4-port ger expansionsalternativ (extern GPU, dockning) och stöder Power Delivery.

Ett alternativ skulle kunna vara Aorus 16X (2024). Den kan få ut lite mer datorkraft ur samma CPU, har en mycket ljusare skärm (inklusive Dolby Vision) - och dessutom har den bättre körtider.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Den nya XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) kan konfigureras och beställas via bestware.comoch den aktuella testenheten kostar ca 2.500 USD.

Observera: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Mer information finns tillgänglig här.

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) - 07/23/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

Design
77 / 98 → 79%
Tangentbord
78%
Mus
83%
Anslutningar
72 / 80 → 90%
Vikt
61 / 10-68 → 88%
Batteri
67 / 95 → 70%
Skärm
82%
Spelprestanda
87%
Programprestanda
86%
AI Performance
96%
Temperatur
74 / 95 → 78%
Ljudnivå
60 / 90 → 67%
Audio
72%
Camera
40 / 75 → 53%
Medel
60%
81%
Gaming - Vägt medel
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
75.7%
Repairability
70%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 32.2%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) recension: Core i9 och RTX 4070 för spelare och kreatörer
Sascha Mölck, 2024-07-26 (Update: 2024-07-26)