Notebookcheck Logo

Granskning av XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): RTX 4070-bärbar dator för spelare och kreatörer

Harmonisk.

Enligt Schenker är XMG Pro 16 Studio en "professionell arbetsstation för innehållsskapande". Specifikationerna stämmer: Core i9, en RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4 och en 16:10-skärm (QHD+, 240 Hz). En ångkammare säkerställer förmodligen optimal värmeavledning och tyst kylning.

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) - en 16-tums laptop för gamers och kreatörer - är baserad på en barebone (PE60RNE-S) från Clevo och den aktuella varianten kan för närvarande hittas för cirka 2 400 USD. Bland konkurrenterna finnsLenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8, HP Omen Transcend 16, Asus Vivobook Pro 16X ochMSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG.

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2175 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3758, Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, glansig: nej, 240 Hz
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 875 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Mic-in, Kortläsare: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 19.9 x 359.5 x 273
Batteri
73 Wh, 4600 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Mousepad, USB-Thumbdrive (Driver, Applications), Bottle Opener, Thermalpad (SSD), Screw (SSD), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.56 kg, Strömförsörjning: 556 g
Pris
2256 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.9 %
v7 (old)
10/2023
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.2 %
v7 (old)
07/2023
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg22.8 mm16.00"3200x2000
90 %
v7 (old)
07/2023
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
v7 (old)
08/2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.8 %
v7 (old)
07/2023
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.95 mm16.00"2560x1600

Hölje och anslutningsmöjligheter - Clevo barebone med Thunderbolt 4

Det mattsvarta fodralets lock och botten är tillverkade av aluminium och resten är tillverkat av plast. Det subtilt designade fodralet är välbyggt. Basenheten och locket kan vridas en aning, men det är inget att oroa sig för. Batteriet (fastskruvat, inte fastlimmat) och resten av datorns insida är åtkomliga när du tar bort bottenplattan.

Pro har två USB-A-portar (USB 3.2 Gen 1) och två USB-C-portar (1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x Thunderbolt 4). TB-4-porten har stöd för Power Delivery och kan mata ut en DisplayPort-signal. Totalt har den bärbara datorn tre videoutgångar (1x HDMI, 2x DP). Dess MicroSD-kortläsare (referenskort: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) kan klassas som en med medelhastighet. Webbkameran (2,1 MP, max. 1.920 x 1.080 pixlar, inget skydd) är ganska standard.

Under optimala förhållanden (inga WiFi-enheter i närheten, kort avstånd mellan den bärbara datorn och serverdatorn) uppnår den utmärkta WiFi-datahastigheter. Den bärbara datorn använder ett WiFi 6E-chip (Intel AX211), och trådbundna anslutningar hanteras av en Realtek RTL8125-styrenhet (2,5 GBit/s).

XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
XMG Pro 16 Studio
Hårdvara XMG Pro 16 Studio

Storleksjämförelse

359.5 mm 273 mm 19.9 mm 2.6 kg355 mm 251 mm 22.8 mm 2.1 kg357.7 mm 259.3 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg357 mm 269 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 260 mm 19.95 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster sida: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), mikrofoningång, ljudkombination
Vänster sida: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), mikrofoningång, ljudkombination
Höger sida: MicroSD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), plats för kabellås
Höger sida: MicroSD-kortläsare, Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), plats för kabellås
Baksida: Strömanslutning, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
Baksida: Strömanslutning, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C), HDMI 2.1, Mini DisplayPort 1.4a, Gigabit Ethernet (2,5 GBit/s)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
158 (154.8min - 166.31max) MB/s +84%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
120 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
180.68 MB/s +101%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
126 MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.7 MB/s 0%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1147min - 1531max) MBit/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1386 (708min - 1471max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1325 (977min - 1480max) MBit/s -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)
1230 MBit/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1151 (615min - 1213max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1714 (1675min - 1737max) MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1714 (1696min - 1727max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)
1392 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1364 (675min - 1404max) MBit/s -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -22%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1287 (679min - 1410max) MBit/s -25%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1362 (708-1471)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1147-1531)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1131 (615-1213)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (977-1480)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1696-1727)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (1675-1737)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1264 (679-1410)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (675-1404)
ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): 5.8 ∆E min: 1.38 - max: 10.18 ∆E

Inmatningsenheter - Den bärbara XMG-datorn har upplysta tangenter

Chiclet-tangentbordets (RGB-belysning) jämna, släta tangenter har en medelhög lyftkraft och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Tangentmotståndet skulle behöva vara lite mer skarpt. Totalt sett har Schenker levererat ett tangentbord som passar för daglig användning. En klickplatta fungerar som ersättning för en mus (ca 15,1 x 9,1 cm), som har en kort lyfthöjd och en tydlig tryckpunkt.

Tangentbord XMG Pro 16 Studio
Tangentbord XMG Pro 16 Studio

Display - En 16:10-panel med sRGB-täckning

Subpixel-array
Subpixel-array

Enhetens snabbreagerande 240 Hz-panel med ett bildförhållande på 16:10 visar inga tecken på PWM-flimmer vid någon ljusstyrka. Den matta 16-tumsskärmens (2.560 x 1.600 pixlar) ljusstyrka och kontrast når sina respektive mål (> 300 cd/m² och 1.000:1). Alternativa displayer finns inte tillgängliga.

354
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 357 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 348.3 cd/m² Minimum: 35 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 349 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1091:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.45
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.137
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
27%
2%
23%
21%
Display P3 Coverage
69.4
98.4
42%
70.4
1%
99.2
43%
96.4
39%
sRGB Coverage
98.2
99.7
2%
99.4
1%
100
2%
99.7
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.1
95.8
37%
72.5
3%
87.6
25%
84.8
21%
Response Times
85%
-7%
-191%
46%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.2 ?(5.9, 6.3)
1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8)
87%
12 ?(6, 6)
2%
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-116%
4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2)
64%
Response Time Black / White *
7.7 ?(4, 3.7)
1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8)
82%
8.9 ?(5.1, 3.8)
-16%
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-266%
5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4)
27%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
3506 ?(100)
Screen
66%
17%
204%
-19%
Brightness middle
349
347
-1%
474.6
36%
791.1
127%
424
21%
Brightness
348
346
-1%
445
28%
800
130%
411
18%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
86
-8%
95
2%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.32
0.06
81%
0.39
-22%
0.04
87%
0.37
-16%
Contrast
1091
5783
430%
1217
12%
19778
1713%
1146
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.98
1.89
5%
2.12
-7%
4.37
-121%
3.04
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.56
3.26
57%
4.73
37%
10.39
-37%
7.5
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.45
1.97
-36%
0.57
61%
1.04
28%
3.04
-110%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
1.55
53%
2.8
15%
6.5
-97%
4.34
-32%
Gamma
2.137 103%
2.39 92%
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.32 95%
CCT
6672 97%
6458 101%
6542 99%
6000 108%
6952 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
59% / 60%
4% / 10%
12% / 109%
16% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Direkt ur lådan visar skärmen en ganska bra färgåtergivning: Med en avvikelse på cirka 2 uppnås målet (DeltaE < 3). Kalibrering av skärmen leder till en mindre avvikelse på 1,45 och mer balanserade gråtoner. Panelen kan nästan helt återge sRGB-färgrymden - men inte AdobeRGB eller DCI P3. Här har konkurrenterna ibland mer att erbjuda.

CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs sRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs AdobeRGB
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs DCI-P3
XMG Pro 16 Studio vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
7.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.9 ms rise
↘ 6.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Den bärbara datorns betraktningsvinkelstabila IPS-panel är läsbar från alla vinklar. Utomhus kan du läsa på displayen så länge solen inte skiner alltför starkt.

XMG Pro 16 på utsidan.
XMG Pro 16 på utsidan.

Prestanda - Schenkers bärbara dator förlitar sig på Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace

XMG Pro 16 Studio är inriktad på spelare och kreatörer och förlitar sig på Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace. En GeForce RTX Studio-certifiering ska garantera hög prestanda, anpassade drivrutiner, bra programvarustöd och en passande täckning av skärmens färgrymd. Den bärbara datorn kan konfigureras individuellt via Schenkers onlinebutik. Den aktuella varianten kostar ca 2 400 USD och billigare modeller kostar från ca 1 900 USD.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia systeminformation
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
 

Villkor för testning

Pro erbjuder fyra tillverkarspecifika prestandalägen (se tabell) som kan växlas mellan via programvaran Control Center (den bärbara datorns kontrollcenter). "Entertainment Mode" (benchmarks) och "Power Saving Mode" (batteritester) användes. Optimus var aktivt.

Entertainment Mode Performance Mode Power Saving Mode Silent Mode
Effektgräns 1 (HWInfo) 70 watt 100 watt 15 watt 15 watt
Effektgräns 2 (HWInfo) 90 watt 120 watt 30 watt 30 watt
Buller (Witcher 3) 48 dB(A) 55 dB (A) - 42 dB (A)
Prestanda (Witcher 3) ~114 fps ~118 fps - ~100-114 fps
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter

Processor

Core i9-139HCore i9-13900Hs (6P, 8E) 14 CPU-kärnor uppnår en maximal klockfrekvens på 5,4 GHz (P) och 4,1 GHz (E). Permanent flertrådsbelastning (CB15 Loop) fick klockfrekvensen att sjunka något från den första till den fjärde körningen. Efter detta förblev värdena konstanta.

Vi uppmätte benchmarkresultat något över det tidigare fastställda CPU-genomsnittet (anslutet till elnätet). I batteriläge sjönk den mer relevanta single-thread-prestandan (158 poäng; CB15) i större utsträckning än multi-thread-prestandan (1 696 poäng; CB15).

Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0240480720960120014401680192021602400264028803120336036003840408043204560Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø3763 (3529.2-4703.12)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2707 (2663.47-2966.92)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)
CB15 Loop (Underhållning)
CB15 Loop (Underhållning)
CB15 Loop (prestanda)
CB15 Loop (prestanda)
CB15 Loop (strömsparande)
CB15 Loop (strömsparande)
CB15 Loop (tyst)
CB15 Loop (tyst)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.7 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
79.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 -1!
Intel Core i9-13900H
70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.5 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
62.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
62.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
59.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
28963 Points +64%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)
21953 Points +24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
20034 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
19844 (18048.8min - 19843.9max) Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
17706 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11997 - 20385, n=28)
16813 Points -5%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
2029 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1927 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)
1893 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1297 - 2054, n=26)
1887 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1854 Points -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
1825 Points -5%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11260 Points +66%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8336 Points +23%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
7674 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
7640 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6773 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4935 - 7716, n=25)
6533 Points -4%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
775 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
735 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
727 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (428 - 792, n=25)
720 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
719 Points -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
717 Points -2%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4703 (3529.2min - 4703.12max) Points +72%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3433 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
2967 (2663.47min - 2966.92max) Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
2854 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2739 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2061 - 3100, n=26)
2676 Points -2%
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
289 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
278 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
273 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (211 - 297, n=26)
269 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
233 Points -16%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 - 268, n=24)
205 Seconds * -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
186 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
169.7 Seconds * +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
169 Seconds * +9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
136 Seconds * +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +34%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +53%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
104616 MIPS +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85566 MIPS +25%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
76344 MIPS +11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
71321 MIPS +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
68491 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (45045 - 79032, n=25)
66435 MIPS -3%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
6972 MIPS +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6458 MIPS
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
6391 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6318 MIPS -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
6125 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3665 - 6600, n=25)
6054 MIPS -6%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +45%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
18475 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
15073 Points +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
13239 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
13072 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
12766 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9094 - 15410, n=26)
12649 Points -3%
Single-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2001 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
1950 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1897 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1140 - 2043, n=26)
1895 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
1861 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1829 Points -2%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
27 fps +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +25%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
21.5 fps +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
19.7 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
18.9 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)
18.5 fps -2%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
54.6 s * -24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
51.4 s * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)
47.6 s * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
44.2 s *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +1%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
34.4 s * +22%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4498 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)
0.4493 sec * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4412 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.4368 sec * +1%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4182 sec * +5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.4041 sec * +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2739 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
233 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
278 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6773 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
735 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1927 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17706 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.6 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
87.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
67.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21914 KRay/s +33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
21332 KRay/s +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17934 KRay/s +9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17741 KRay/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16419 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6788 - 19557, n=25)
15135 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points +41%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
108001 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106726 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89277 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83334 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81656 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (22551 - 95579, n=25)
76236 Points -9%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
5264 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4910 MB/s +29%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4080 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3973 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3809 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2491 - 4270, n=25)
3561 MB/s -7%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
126758 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120299 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
117145 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105597 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (65121 - 120936, n=25)
105169 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
104502 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
13785 Points +33%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13258 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11232 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11050 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10361 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6108 - 11631, n=25)
9675 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53700 Points +31%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
53398 Points +30%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44368 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44154 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40932 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11283 - 48474, n=25)
37712 Points -8%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
141059 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109216 MB/s -23%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
105169 MB/s -25%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3691 - 149377, n=25)
87238 MB/s -38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81504 MB/s -42%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81046 MB/s -43%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1513 MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1367 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1254 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1088 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (789 - 1254, n=25)
1040 MB/s -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1032 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11803 KRay/s +32%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11431 KRay/s +28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9680 KRay/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9570 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8955 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3655 - 10716, n=25)
8215 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47412 MPixel/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46114 MPixel/s -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43965 MPixel/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40243 MPixel/s -15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10871 - 50488, n=25)
39722 MPixel/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23815 MPixel/s -50%

Systemets prestanda

Det smidigt fungerande systemet saknar inte datorkraft. Gaming, rendering och videoredigering hör till datorns kärnkompetenser. RAM-minnets överföringshastighet ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5-5600 RAM-minne.

RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel mode.
RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel mode.
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8538 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8010 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7803 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5855 - 8538, n=8)
7664 Points -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7329 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
6883 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11940 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11329 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10833 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8835 - 11940, n=8)
10809 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
10547 Points -12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10491 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10991 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10425 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9904 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7967 - 10991, n=8)
9840 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
9376 Points -10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
9030 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13562 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12134 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7738 - 13575, n=8)
11549 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11204 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10860 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
9291 Points -17%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2050 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1974 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1955 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=145, last 2 years)
1910 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1104 - 1974, n=7)
1815 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1789 Points -8%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
1919 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1914 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1884 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=145, last 2 years)
1809 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1058 - 1914, n=7)
1720 Points -9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1705 Points -10%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2353 Points +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=145, last 2 years)
2097 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2084 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2028 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1178 - 2254, n=7)
1982 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1936 Points -5%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1952 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1839 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=145, last 2 years)
1709 Points -12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
1651 Points -15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1037 - 1952, n=7)
1650 Points -15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1635 Points -16%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points -20%
PCMark 10 Score
8010 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70102 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69289 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68474 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65434 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=25)
61864 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37448 MB/s -47%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
75581 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75433 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73950 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69366 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (41599 - 75433, n=25)
62438 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41599 MB/s -45%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72225 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71464 MB/s -1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67649 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
67198 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (36152 - 88505, n=25)
65109 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
36152 MB/s -50%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
93.7 ns * -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.9 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)
89.3 ns * -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.6 ns * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.1 ns *
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * +4%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

Det standardiserade latency monitor-testet (webbsurfning, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 high-load) avslöjade några avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida programuppdateringar kan leda till förbättringar eller till och med försämringar.

Övervakning av latens
Övervakning av latens
Övervakning av latens
Övervakning av latens
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
18226.8 μs * -881%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10410.4 μs * -460%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2472 μs * -33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1857.6 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Pro 16 har plats för totalt två PCIe 4 SSD-enheter med formatet M.2-2280. RAID-0/1 stöds. Samsung SSD (1 TB, PCIe 4, M.2-2280) i vår testenhet levererade utmärkta överföringshastigheter. Positivt: Termisk strypning inträffade inte.

Den bärbara datorn har plats för två SSD-enheter.
Den bärbara datorn har plats för två SSD-enheter.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7122 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6782 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1011 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 730.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3528 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4879 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 78.14 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
91.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.4 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
80.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
75.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
59.7 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
42.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4414 (4394.81min - 4413.86max) MB/s +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)
3475 MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3349 (938.07min - 3349.15max) MB/s +6%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3157 (2968.73min - 3157.45max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2353 (2142.12min - 2352.79max) MB/s -25%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4698 (3640.45min - 4697.66max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4485 (775.32min - 4484.81max) MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4306 (4280.74min - 4306.08max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)
3812 MB/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s -33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2252 (2149.48min - 2252.34max) MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7090 (6633.87min - 7089.84max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6659 (5729.63min - 6659.09max) MB/s -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6460 (6020.84min - 6459.94max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)
6323 MB/s -11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
3974 (3600.81min - 3974.33max) MB/s -44%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6770 (6323.06min - 6770.24max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5007 (4969.96min - 5007.21max) MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)
4851 MB/s -28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4803 (4344.79min - 4802.73max) MB/s -29%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2934 (2895.62min - 2933.5max) MB/s -57%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
94.1 (93.93min - 94.12max) MB/s +70%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s +39%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.9 (64.79min - 67.93max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)
66 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
55.3 (53.37min - 55.32max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
54.4 (50.25min - 54.39max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
343 (338.95min - 343.03max) MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
253 (250.9min - 252.85max) MB/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
252 (249.53min - 252.23max) MB/s -27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -35%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
174.5 (172.12min - 174.51max) MB/s -49%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4923 (4891.68min - 4922.98max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4040 (4013.9min - 4040.16max) MB/s -18%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s -31%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3013 (755.04min - 3013.06max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)
2571 MB/s -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s -81%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
906 (859.8min - 906.06max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4394 (3486.17min - 4394.19max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3555 (3527.21min - 3555.07max) MB/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2736 (1172min - 2736.15max) MB/s -38%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)
2137 MB/s -51%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
554 (543.86min - 553.56max) MB/s -87%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s -89%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10265 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8690 Points -15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7774 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6746 Points -34%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6291 Points -39%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
3959 Points -61%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4721 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3300 Points -30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2959 Points -37%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1523 Points -68%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
1215 Points -74%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4652 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4064 Points -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3766 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3331 Points -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points -33%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2165 Points -53%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5588.41 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5447.03 MB/s +14%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5126 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4945 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4797.97 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
3160 MB/s -34%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4668.7 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4546 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4058.01 MB/s -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3875.81 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3760 MB/s -19%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
2044 MB/s -56%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.39 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.81 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s -6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.7 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.2 MB/s -15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
55.48 MB/s -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
54.59 MB/s -29%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
306.26 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
248.8 MB/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
224.62 MB/s -27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
213 MB/s -30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
207 MB/s -32%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
177.87 MB/s -42%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3164.36 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2669.14 MB/s -16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2378 MB/s -25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s -41%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
909.92 MB/s -71%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
843 MB/s -73%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3878.76 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3498.72 MB/s -10%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3135.34 MB/s -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2669 MB/s -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2527 MB/s -35%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
1712 MB/s -56%
Access Time Read
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
0.141 ms * -120%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.064 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05576 ms * +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * +47%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.033 ms * +48%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.027 ms * +58%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.023 ms * +64%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.057 ms * -375%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.054 ms * -350%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04728 ms * -294%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
0.033 ms * -175%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.02 ms * -67%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * -66%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.012 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7081 (6350.81-7114.2)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ: Ø3923 (3225.79-4033.87)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5933 (3276.75-6654.26)
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH: Ø1946 (1623.72-6448.85)

Grafikkort

RTX 4070GeForce RTX 4070 har 4 608 shaders, en 128 bit bred buss och snabb GDDR6 RAM (8 192 MB). Schenker har satt sin maximala TGP till 140 watt (115 watt + 25 watt Dynamic Boost) - mer är inte möjligt.

Grafikkärnan möjliggör QHD-spel med höga till maximala inställningar. På så sätt uppnår den bildfrekvenser över det tidigare fastställda RTX 4070-genomsnittet. Användning av dGPU-läge (aktiveras via BIOS) leder till en liten ökning av prestandan. Grafikkärnan och minnet kan överklockas via Control Center (Performance Mode -> klicka på de nedåtriktade pilarna). Advanced Optimus stöds inte.

Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, Underhållning)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, Underhållning)
Fire Strike (batteriläge, underhållning)
Fire Strike (batteriläge, underhållning)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, Prestanda)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, Prestanda)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, energisparläge)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, energisparläge)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, tyst)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, tyst)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, Underhållning, dGPU)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, Underhållning, dGPU)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
97.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
97 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
95.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
95.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
90.8 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
88.9 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
68.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
43597 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41432 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
41302 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=63)
40427 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
38784 Points -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
33576 Points -19%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
163483 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
162423 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54238 - 193851, n=27)
146973 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
143583 Points -12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
81407 Points -50%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
30130 Points +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
30051 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
29892 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=67)
29070 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
27343 Points -9%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
24184 Points -19%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
12734 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11972 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
11960 Points 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11955 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=65)
11605 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
9404 Points -21%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
54913 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
34302 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
62061 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
25545 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
12134 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
26 Seconds * -24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
24 Seconds * -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=65)
21.5 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=179, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
19 Seconds * +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
45 Seconds * -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=67)
40.2 Seconds * -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=185, last 2 years)
36.9 Seconds * -9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
36 Seconds * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36 Seconds * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
32 Seconds * +6%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
326 Seconds *
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
299 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
297 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years)
294 Seconds * +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=64)
289 Seconds * +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
249 Seconds * +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
222 Seconds * +32%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years)
127541 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120585 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
118031 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 132836, n=65)
114214 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
112077 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
111995 Points -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
100308 Points -17%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
88210 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=120, last 2 years)
72712 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
69300 Points -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (8146 - 102618, n=36)
67413 Points -24%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
55643 Points -37%
Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
120852 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=111, last 2 years)
116410 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85488 - 129836, n=41)
114102 Points -6%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
109205 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=106, last 2 years)
82352 Points -25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7760 - 120033, n=38)
70796 Points -35%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)
2190 mpaths +33%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1834 mpaths +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1719 mpaths +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=37)
1650 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1643 mpaths
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
1635 mpaths 0%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)
1574 mpaths +33%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1327 mpaths +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=37)
1195 mpaths +1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
1193 mpaths +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
1184 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
1180 mpaths
CPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
17980 mpaths +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years)
15137 mpaths +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9339 - 20388, n=36)
14421 mpaths +21%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
13132 mpaths +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11943 mpaths
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11097 mpaths -7%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
713 mpaths +23%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
616 mpaths +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=49)
603 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
579 mpaths
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
577 mpaths 0%
CPU
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
25644 ksamples +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21537 ksamples +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=49)
21145 ksamples +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
18346 ksamples
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
16974 ksamples -7%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming
  (47.1 - 515, n=20, last 2 years)
313 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (250 - 271, n=5)
258 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
253.3 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 231, n=26, last 2 years)
38.1 fps +72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (21.4 - 25.5, n=8)
23.2 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
22.1 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 59.9, n=26, last 2 years)
40.8 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32.2 - 39, n=8)
35.8 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
32.2 fps
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (99.8 - 687, n=25, last 2 years)
421 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (355 - 472, n=8)
408 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
390 fps
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (20.6 - 76.5, n=26, last 2 years)
48.7 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41.3 - 44, n=8)
42.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41.3 fps
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (95.9 - 122, n=8)
113.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
110.7 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 141.9, n=26, last 2 years)
108.9 fps -2%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=26, last 2 years)
74.2 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.4 - 70.2, n=8)
66 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
64 fps
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 221, n=26, last 2 years)
127.4 fps +28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
99.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (95.3 - 102, n=8)
98.5 fps -1%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.6 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
93.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
86.5 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
80.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118.4 (103min) fps
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.9 (111min) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)
112.5 fps -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (102min) fps -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
98 fps -17%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.4 (4.46min, 83.3P1) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.7 (4.54min, 76.9P1) fps -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.2 (3.93min, 76.9P1) fps -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)
113.7 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 141.6, n=60)
111.2 fps -11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
105.4 (5.19min, 66.7P1) fps -16%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122.7 fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years)
119.9 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.5 fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=62)
111.1 fps -4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84.4 fps -27%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=179, last 2 years)
229 fps +13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
228 (19.8min, 173.1P1) fps +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
208 (60.7min, 153.8P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
202 (47.3min, 151P1) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
200 (31.2min, 147.4P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=62)
196.3 fps -3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
165.4 (5min, 121.3P1) fps -18%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
168.4 (146.6min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
165.3 (144.1min) fps +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
165.2 (140.9min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
162.8 (140.6min) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.7 (131.1min) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)
151.2 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 191.2, n=64)
148.1 fps -9%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
132.9 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
110.2 fps -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
108.8 fps -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)
108.4 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (52.1 - 147.9, n=66)
104.6 fps -12%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (16.7 - 159.7, n=69, last 2 years)
93 fps +7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91 (10.4min) fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.5 (22.3min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48 - 110, n=24)
85.4 fps -1%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years)
69.6 fps +26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
55.4 (44.8min) fps
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54.5 (20.1min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54.4 (10.7min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30 - 63.9, n=24)
53.4 fps -4%
Lies of P
1920x1080 Best Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (137.4 - 148.1, n=4)
142.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140.1 (53.5min, 60.4P0.1, 84.4P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (11 - 187, n=11, last 2 years)
93.7 fps -33%
2560x1440 Best Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (97.2 - 98.8, n=4)
97.7 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
97.3 (36.5min, 49.3P0.1, 56.7P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (54.5 - 136.4, n=5, last 2 years)
88.6 fps -9%
Assassin's Creed Mirage
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset (Adaptive Quality Off)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99 (4min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (91 - 99, n=6)
96.8 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (21 - 160, n=17, last 2 years)
95.6 fps -3%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset (Adaptive Quality Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 136, n=12, last 2 years)
96.5 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (73 - 80, n=6)
76.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75 (7min) fps
Lords of the Fallen
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (44.3 - 67.7, n=4)
56 fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45.9 (30.4min, 31.1P0.1, 37P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.7 - 64.2, n=10, last 2 years)
34 fps -26%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (29.1 - 47.1, n=4)
37.9 fps +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (21.9 - 43, n=5, last 2 years)
29.9 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29.1 (16.5min, 18.6P0.1, 23.4P1) fps
Total War Pharaoh
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (110 - 136.2, n=4)
122.1 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113.3 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (11 - 113.3, n=12, last 2 years)
52.8 fps -53%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (87.2 - 96.6, n=4)
93.8 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.2 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (24.1 - 87.2, n=4, last 2 years)
59.1 fps -32%
F1 23
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71 (58min) fps +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 149.2, n=40, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (49.5 - 100, n=14)
68.5 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67.6 (52min, 51P1) fps
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
51.7 (41min, 40P1) fps -24%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 144.6, n=31, last 2 years)
50.5 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45.6 (35min, 35P1) fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45 (35min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (35.2 - 49, n=13)
42.5 fps -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
32.2 (18min, 25P1) fps -29%
Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85 (39min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)
84.7 fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79 (16min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54 - 90, n=12)
77.4 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61 (8min) fps -28%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (39 - 119, n=21, last 2 years)
70.4 fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64 (19min) fps +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63 (41min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 66, n=12)
57.6 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
52 (12min) fps -17%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average of class Gaming
  (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)
73.5 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (71 - 75, n=5)
73.4 fps +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71 (41min) fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø116.1 (103-121)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø95.5 (89-103)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.7 (100-120)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø117.1 (108-122)
Witcher 3 (Underhållningsläge)
Witcher 3 (Underhållningsläge)
Witcher 3 (tyst läge)
Witcher 3 (tyst läge)
lågmed.högultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 186.8 185.9 181.3 125.4 93.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 474.9 365.4 231.4 118.4 86.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 210 187.5 176.5 162.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 219 159.8 115.5 84.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 166.7 146.4 119.5
Strange Brigade (2018) 544 280 232 202 132.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 147 115 95.3 86.7 55.4
Returnal (2023) 115 112 101 85 63
F1 23 (2023) 279 261 198.2 67.6 45.6
Lies of P (2023) 206 182 159.8 140.1 97.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 131.7 113.2 98.3 87.9 57.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) 143 132 125 99 75
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 385.9 239.5 146.2 113.3 87.2
Lords of the Fallen (2023) 96.9 84.1 63.4 45.9 29.1

Utsläpp och effekt - Pro 16 levererar bra körtider

Utsläpp av buller

När du spelar kan ljudnivån stiga upp till 55 dB(A) (Performance Mode). "Entertainment Mode", som vi använde, ger måttliga bulleremissioner på 48 dB(A). Det skulle kunna vara tystare: I Silent Mode kan du uppnå en ljudnivå på 42 dB(A), på bekostnad av viss spelprestanda. I viloläge och vid daglig användning (kontor, internet) är en av de två fläktarna ofta i drift och ibland är båda avstängda.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
26 / 29 / 34 dB(A)
Hög belastning
43 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.837.94443.137.336.32535.13833.936.332.7383144.746.745.745.54243.9403033.930.83130.829.65041.640.841.141.341.2266327.624.323.524.323.931.38025.522.519.317.816.326.410021.819.116.417.517.422.11252320.416.916.214.626.516025.123.119.62017.328.320032.124.1222221.229.825028.422.720.615.916.1333152721.716.715.512.931.740030.8211813.713.233.6500302418.313.714.335.263032.725.120.414.412.935.280031.924.919.613.11236.3100031.724.518.612.111.336.6125032.523.917.211.611.237.416003323.416.811.811.238.4200031.522.621.811.911.437.2250031.62414.9131236.6315032.120.113.613.712.336.4400029.518.714.314.312.838500026.91713.214.11334.1630024.515.513.416.213.831.4800020.914.513.214.914.527.61000020.215.113.114.913.223.11250021.313.9131412.719.71600025.314.413.613.611.918.8SPL42.734.129.426.125.148N4.11.91.10.80.66.2median 29.5median 21.7median 16.8median 14.1median 12.9median 33.6Delta3.943.41.325.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-4%
10%
-3%
11%
off / environment *
25
25.2
-1%
22.8
9%
22.9
8%
24
4%
Idle Minimum *
26
26.6
-2%
23.6
9%
29.1
-12%
24
8%
Idle Average *
29
26.6
8%
23.6
19%
29.1
-0%
24
17%
Idle Maximum *
34
29.2
14%
25.7
24%
29.1
14%
24
29%
Load Average *
43
53.4
-24%
27.6
36%
45.7
-6%
34.81
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
54.4
-13%
54.3
-13%
44.05
8%
Load Maximum *
48
56.9
-19%
54.4
-13%
54.3
-13%
51.57
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Stresstestet och Witcher 3 test ledde till att den bärbara datorns temperaturer steg avsevärt. I vissa områden uppmätte vi temperaturer över 60 grader Celsius. Vid daglig användning (kontor, internet) förblir dessa värden i allmänhet inom den gröna zonen - men på en högre nivå än konkurrenter somLenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8.

 54 °C55 °C54 °C 
 51 °C51 °C46 °C 
 32 °C33 °C32 °C 
Max: 55 °C
Medel: 45.3 °C
65 °C66 °C61 °C
54 °C60 °C52 °C
34 °C33 °C33 °C
Max: 66 °C
Medel: 50.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  50 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
11%
15%
16%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
55
39.7
28%
49.8
9%
47.4
14%
60
-9%
Maximum Bottom *
66
60
9%
48.8
26%
54.4
18%
61
8%
Idle Upper Side *
33
30.9
6%
29.4
11%
28.4
14%
38.2
-16%
Idle Bottom *
35
34.7
1%
30
14%
29.2
17%
37.7
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Stresstestet (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig användning) simulerar ett extremt scenario för att testa hur stabilt systemet förblir under full belastning. Processorn (P: 3,8 till 3,9 GHz, E: 2,7 GHz) inledde testet med höga klockfrekvenser. Under det fortsatta förloppet sjönk dessa värden ner till ungefär basklocknivån. GPU:n kördes med nästan full effekt.

Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger överlag ett mycket bra ljud. Basen skulle behöva vara mer kraftfull.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.335.62532.733.9314244.34030.8365041.2436323.937.58016.340.310017.447.912514.653.916017.355.420021.253.625016.156.231512.956.340013.25950014.365.863012.967.18001266.6100011.368.5125011.269.1160011.266.9200011.471.425001270.7315012.367.6400012.86550001369.3630013.863.7800014.568.71000013.2701250012.767.71600011.964.9SPL25.180.3N0.649.4median 12.9median 66.6Delta25.130.527.930.526.525.226.522.120.722.122.120.622.120.622.120.620.220.820.238.620.438.647.819.747.851.418.451.456.915.556.960.716.160.765.117.165.16917.76971.715.471.772.115.872.17215.77273.614.373.670.612.770.671.512.971.574.114.174.170.614.370.666.911.966.96512.16569.711.669.774.313.474.374.913.374.978.513.878.575.51375.56612.16660.71460.784.825.784.866.60.766.6median 70.6median 14.1median 70.64.11.74.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Pro 16 uppvisade inga iögonfallande strömförbrukningsvärden. Värdena ligger på en normal nivå för den installerade hårdvaran. Testet Witcher 3 test och stresstest kördes med något minskad strömförbrukning. Strömförsörjningen (230 watt) är tillräckligt stor. Lovvärt: Inom jämförelseområdet har XMG laptop den lägsta totala energiförbrukningen.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 8 / 12 / 23 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 94 / 215 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-23%
-65%
-76%
-8%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
8
13.8
-73%
22
-175%
19.2
-140%
11
-38%
Idle Average *
12
16
-33%
29
-142%
22.7
-89%
18
-50%
Idle Maximum *
23
19
17%
39.5
-72%
55.4
-141%
19
17%
Load Average *
94
147
-56%
98.7
-5%
128.4
-37%
91
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
181.5
147.8
19%
171.8
5%
206
-13%
130
28%
Load Maximum *
215
244
-13%
213.2
1%
292
-36%
228
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø181.5 (173.7-188.4)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø191.4 (173.8-210)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.9 (7.59-23.1)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø113.2 (110.9-118.2)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø134 (108.1-136.7)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø152.1 (142.8-172.5)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø177.1 (172.2-188.6)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.9 (17.7-21.2)

Körtider

I vårt realistiska WLAN-test (som visar belastningen vid uppringning av webbplatser med ett skript) uppnådde den 16-tums bärbara datorn en drifttid på 6:45 timmar - ett generellt bra resultat. I jämförelsefältet har Pro 16 den minsta batterikapaciteten (73 Wh), men den erbjuder de bästa drifttiderna per Wh.

Batteritid
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 118)
6tim 45min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
466 min +15%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23)
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
405 min
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
390 min -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years)
375 min -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
261 min -36%
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
250 min -38%

För

+ 240 Hz QHD+-skärm
+ 16:10-panel
+ hög systemprestanda
+ RAM-minnet kan utökas
+ 2 PCIe 4-kortplatser (RAID-0/1)
+ RGB-belysning av tangenter
+ bra ljud
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Strömförsörjning

Emot

- 8 GB VRAM inte framtidssäkert
- höljet värms upp kraftigt vid vissa punkter
- ingen DCI-P3

Omdöme - Ett harmoniskt kraftpaket

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23), tillhandahållen av Schenker.
XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23), tillhandahållen av Schenker.

Video- och bildredigering, streaming, rendering och spel är alla delar av den bärbara datorns expertis. Den kraft som krävs levereras av enCore i9-13900Hoch enGeForce RTX 4070på en genomgående hög nivå. Det är möjligt att hitta en bra kompromiss mellan prestanda och ljudnivå.

Schenkers XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) visar sig vara ett kraftfullt verktyg för gamers och kreatörer.

Dess QHD+-skärm (16 tum, 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, sRGB, IPS, 240 Hz) med ett arbetsvänligt bildförhållande på 16:10 gjorde ett gott intryck på oss. Men ändå: Skärmen på en bärbar dator för kreatörer bör kunna visa DCI P3-färgrymden. Två SSD-platser (PCIe 4) inklusive RAID-0/1-stöd säkerställer mycket lagringsutrymme och korta laddningstider.

USB-C-portarna (1x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x Thunderbolt 4) gör det enkelt att integrera datorn i befintliga arbetsytor och öppnar upp för ytterligare expansionsalternativ (extern GPU, dockning). TB-4-porten kan mata ut en DisplayPort-signal och har stöd för Power Delivery. Till detta kommer relativt bra körtider.

Ett alternativ skulle kunna varaLenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8: Den har samma CPU och GPU men kan leverera något mer datorkraft. Den bärbara datorns svagheter: Högre strömförbrukning, soldered-on RAM, SSD-strypning.

Pris och tillgänglighet

XMG Pro 16 Studio kan konfigureras individuellt och beställas via Schenkers onlinebutik. Vårt testinstrument kostar ca 2 400 US-dollar.

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) - 10/22/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
77 / 98 → 79%
Tangentbord
78%
Mus
83%
Anslutningar
73 / 80 → 91%
Vikt
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Batteri
73 / 95 → 77%
Skärm
89%
Spelprestanda
100%
Programprestanda
96%
Temperatur
73 / 95 → 77%
Ljudnivå
78 / 90 → 86%
Audio
86%
Camera
48 / 85 → 56%
Medel
78%
88%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Granskning av XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): RTX 4070-bärbar dator för spelare och kreatörer
Sascha Mölck, 2023-10-23 (Update: 2023-10-23)