Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarZotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo recension: RTX 3080-liknande prestanda för 200 dollar mer än RTX 3070
Det här är en live-recension och kommer att uppdateras allt eftersom.
Jämförelse av Zotac Gaming RTX 4070 AMP Aimo med andra Nvidia GPU:er
| Specifikation | RTX 4090 FE | RTX 4080 FE | Asus TUF RTX 4070 Ti | Zotac RTX 4070 AMP Aimo | RTX 3090 Ti FE | RTX 3090 FE | RTX 3080 Ti FE | RTX 3080 FE | RTX 3070 FE | Titan RTX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chip | AD102 | AD103 | AD104 | AD104 | GA102 | GA102 | GA102 | GA102 | GA104 | TU102 |
| FinFET-process | Custom 4N | Custom 4N | Custom 4N | Custom 4N | 8 nm | 8 nm | 8 nm | 8 nm | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CUDA-kärnor | 16 384 | 9 728 | 7 680 | 5888 | 10 752 | 10 496 | 10 240 | 8 704 | 5 888 | 4 608 |
| Texturenheter | 512 | 304 304 | 240 | 184 | 336 | 328 | 320 | 272 | 184 | 288 |
| Tensor Cores | 512 4th Gen. | 304 4th Gen. | 240 4th Gen. | 184 4th Gen. | 336 3rd Gen. | 328 3rd Gen. | 320 3rd Gen. | 272 3rd Gen. | 184 3rd Gen. | 576 2nd Gen. |
| RT Cores | 128 3:e gen | 76 3:e gen | 60 3:e gen | 46 3:e gen | 84 2:a gen | 82 2:a gen | 80 2:a gen | 68 2:a gen | 46 2:a gen | 72 |
| GPU Base Clock | 2 235 MHz | 2 205 MHz | 2 310 MHz | 1920 MHz | 1 560 MHz | 1 395 MHz | 1 365 MHz | 1 440 MHz | 1 500 MHz | 1 350 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2 520 MHz | 2 505 MHz | 2 760 MHz | 2535 MHz | 1 860 MHz | 1 695 MHz | 1 665 MHz | 1 710 MHz | 1 750 MHz | 1 770 MHz |
| Minnesbuss | 384-bitars | 256-bitars | 192-bitars | 192-bitars | 384-bitars | 384-bitars | 384-bitars | 320-bitars | 256-bitars | 384-bitars |
| Minnesbandbredd | 1 008 GB/s | 716,8 GB/s | 504 GB/s | 504 GB/s | 1 008 GB/s | 936 GB/s | 912 GB/s | 760 GB/s | 448 GB/s | 672 GB/s |
| Videominne | 24 GB GDDR6X | 16 GB GDDR6X | 12 GB GDDR6X | 12 GB GDDR6X | 24 GB GDDR6X | 24 GB GDDR6X | 12 GB GDDR6X | 10 GB GDDR6X | 8 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR6 |
| Strömförbrukning | 450 W | 320 W | 285 W | 200 W | 450 W | 350 W | 350 W | 320 W | 220 W | 280 W |
Testbänken: RTX 4070 AMP Aimo paras ihop med Intel Core i9-13900K
Vår testbänk är fortfarande densamma som vi har använt för tidigare RTX 40-recensioner, inklusive RTX 4090 FE, RTX 4080 FE och RTX 4070 Ti. Specifikationerna omfattar:
- Cooler MasterFrame 700 testbänk
- Intel Core i9-13900K
- Moderkort Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master
- Gigabyte Aorus Gen 4 2 TB NVMe SSD för benchmarks och spel
- 2x 16 GB Kingston Fury Renegade DDR5-6400 RAM med timings 32-39-39-80 vid 1,40 V
- Gigabyte M28U 4K 144 Hz-skärm
- Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML360L V2 ARGB AIO-kylare
- Thermaltake ToughPower Grand RGB 850
- En ny installation av Windows 11 22H2 med de senaste patcherna tillsammans med den medföljande testdrivrutinen Game Ready version 531.42
Syntetiska riktmärken: Prestanda på RTX 3080-nivå som ligger långt efter RTX 4070 Ti
Zotac RTX 4070 AMP Aimo sitter precis ovanför den AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT i det totala syntetiska riktmärkesresultatet och leder RTX 3080 med cirka 6 %. RTX 4070 AMP Airo släpar efter RTX 4070 Ti genomsnittet med hela 19 %.
Även om RTX 4070 Ti ligger precis i hälarna på Radeon RX 7900 XT i kumulativa syntetiska tester, klarar AMD:s flaggskepp i andra ledet en bekväm ledning på 34 % jämfört med RTX 4070 AMP Aimo.
Zotacs bästa RTX 4070-erbjudande lyckas ha en hygglig ledning över RTX 3080 genomsnittet i 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics, men det finns ingen betydande fördel med Ultra- och Extreme-varianterna av testet.
I Time Spy Graphics lyckas RTX 4070 AMP Aimo bara med en liten marginal förbi RX 6800 XT. Prestandan gentemot RTX 4070 Ti verkar vara undermålig med 22 procent.
I Unigine Superposition-testerna försöker RTX 4070 AMP Aimo att komma närmare RTX 4070 Ti i genomsnitt vid 720p, men kortet får stryk vid högre upplösningar.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 47838 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 272162 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 80436 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 36970 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 20698 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 18120 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
Beräkningsprestanda: Goda vinster jämfört med Ampere-flaggskeppen i vissa tester
Räkningsjämförelser visar en liknande trend som tidigare med RTX 4070 AMP Aimo som släpar efter RTX 4070 Ti med upp till 20 % i V-Ray 5. I V-Ray 4.1 GPU kommer dock Zotacs senaste erbjudande mycket nära den Aorus RTX 4070 Ti Mastervilket resulterar i en massiv 51-procentig ökning jämfört med RTX 3080-genomsnittet.
Zotacs RTX 4070-kort lyckas slå RTX 3080 Ti genomsnittet med en halv sekund i Classroom Optix.
LuxMark ser att RTX 4070 AMP Aimo övertygande lämnar även RTX 4070 AMP Aimo bakom sig Radeon RX 7900 XTX i Room GPU samtidigt som den är cirka 29 % långsammare än RTX 4080 Founders Edition. AMD RDNA 2-kort fortsätter dock att dominera topplistan i Sala GPU.
| V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition (v4.10.07 ) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average of class Desktop (70 - 1886, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (1056 - 1076, n=3) | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (781 - 877, n=17) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (854 - 855, n=3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (636 - 643, n=2) | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX (386 - 439, n=16) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (v4.10.07 ) | |
| Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure (v4.10.07 ) | |
* ... smaller is better
Spelprestanda
Prestanda för strålspårning
| Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (123.5 - 129.1, n=4) | |
| Average of class Desktop (101.8 - 134.7, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (111 - 120.6, n=3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (91.4 - 122.6, n=5) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (98.1 - 103, n=2) | |
| Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX (63 - 120, n=3) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (SAM ENABLED) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
| Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (98.9 - 99.4, n=2) | |
| Average of class Desktop (75.3 - 99.9, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Ti AMP Extreme Holo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (75.7 - 110, n=3) | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti () | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (70.9 - 71.3, n=2) | |
| Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Nitro+ Pure | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (SAM ENABLED) | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX () | |
| The Callisto Protocol - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 () | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| Average of class Desktop (82 - 97.6, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (82.1 - 97.5, n=4) | |
| Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master | |
| Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti () | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 () | |
| Average NVIDIA Titan RTX () | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 188.3 | 188.1 | 187.3 | 161.7 | 138.4 | 145.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 350 | 168.6 | 116.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 281.8 | 255.9 | 244.3 | 229.9 | 210.7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 237 | 230 | 175.8 | 133.7 | 74 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 244 | 214 | 162.9 | 136.5 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 611 | 478 | 375 | 321 | 222 | 121 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 256 | 239 | 162.6 | 83.7 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 159.4 | 129.4 | 103.8 | 65 | ||
| Control (2019) | 159.5 | 101.8 | 50.2 | |||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 183.2 | 154.5 | 110.8 | 58.8 | ||
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 207 | 141.1 | 72.3 | |||
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 163.7 | 124.4 | 93.3 | 49.5 | ||
| F1 2021 (2021) | 617 | 530 | 421 | 218 | 160.3 | 89.7 |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 188 | 172 | 133 | 74 | ||
| Dying Light 2 (2022) | 135.2 | 92.7 | 45.8 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 139.3 | 124.9 | 80.9 | 36.7 | ||
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 264 | 261 | 165.4 | 73.6 | ||
| F1 22 (2022) | 378 | 372 | 296 | 111.8 | 71.9 | 36.7 |
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 124.7 | 121.4 | 92.8 | 54.8 | ||
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 149 | 143 | 103 | 62 | ||
| The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 185 | 121.6 | 89.6 | 52 | ||
| The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 141.3 | 120.4 | 75.2 | 38.4 |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
