Asus TUF Gaming A15 laptop recension - En budgetspelare med en RTX 4050 och en 144 Hz-skärm

Name: Asus TUF A15 FA507
Brand: Asus

Perfekt för 1080p.

Asus TUF Gaming A15 levererar bra spelprestanda i 1080p tack vare sin AMD Ryzen-processor och GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop. Dess 144-Hz IPS-panel ser också bra ut. Så, är detta den perfekta budgetgamern?

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/15/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook Windows

Asus TUF Gaming-serie ligger under ROG-serien och syftar till att ge ett billigare bärbart alternativ för spelare. Vi testade nyligen16-tums modell med AMD-hårdvaraoch nu är det dags att ta en titt på 15-tumsversionen: TUF Gaming A15 med en AMD-processor (Ryzen 7 7735HS) och nuvarande Nvidia-grafikkort (GeForce RTX 4050 Bärbar dator). Den har ett MRSP på cirka 1 300 USD och kan för närvarande hittas online för 1 169 USD. Dessutom har enheten en matt IPS-panel med en uppdateringsfrekvens på 144 Hz, 16 GB RAM-minne och en 512 GB NVMe SSD. Detaljhandelsversionen av FA507NU-LP031 levereras utan operativsystem, men vår hade redan Windows 11 Home installerat när vi fick den.

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF A15 FA507

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 8 x 3.2 - 4.8 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-HS Refresh

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2355 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 531.68, Advanced Optimus

Minne

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GB

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, N156HMA-GA1, IPS, glansig: nej, 144 Hz

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Hårddisk

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB

, 420 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Anslutningar

2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm Stereo

Nätverk

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 24.9 x 354 x 251

Batteri

90 Wh, 5675 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webbkamera: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 240W PSU, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.154 kg, Strömförsörjning: 735 g

Pris

1199 Kr

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	06/2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.8 % v7 ^(old)	04/2023	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	23.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	01/2023	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	23 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	03/2023	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81 % v7 ^(old)	01/2023	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23.6 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2022	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	03/2022	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	24.95 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Case - En diskret bärbar dator för spel utan belysning

Jämfört med sin föregångare med Intel-processor ärTUF Gaming F15är den här bärbara datorns design praktiskt taget oförändrad. Det finns bara små skillnader, som att WASD-tangenterna inte längre är vita och att de fyra hörnen på locket nu har små staplar istället för cirklar. Den nuvarande modellen har fortfarande inga avancerade belysningsfunktioner och i allmänhet har den bärbara datorn fått en ganska diskret look med sin mörkgrå färg. Speciellt den nedre kanten längs skärmen är ganska stor, eftersom den bärbara datorn fortfarande använder ett 16:9-förhållande. Du kommer sannolikt att behöva rengöra de mörka ytorna ganska ofta, eftersom de är benägna att samla fingeravtrycksmärken.

Den bärbara datorns lock är tillverkat av metall och resten av höljet är av plast. Basenheten är tillräckligt stabil men du kan trycka in mitten av tangentbordet ganska enkelt. Det hörs dock inga knarrande ljud när du försöker vrida och böja enheten. Det tunna locket är inte det bästa, eftersom skärmen redan börjar visa störningar när du trycker ner den med lite tryck eller försöker ändra öppningsvinkeln (max. ~ 135 grader).

Storleksmässigt är alla konkurrenterna ganska lika - men TUF Gaming A15 har den minsta ritningen. Den väger strax över 2,1 kg, vilket gör den bärbara datorn relativt portabel och du kommer sannolikt att kunna få plats med den i de flesta ryggsäckar eller väskor. Den medföljande 240-watts strömförsörjningen väger ytterligare 735 gram.

Storleksjämförelse

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Gigabyte G5 KE MSI Katana 15 B12VEK SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Asus TUF A15 FA507 DIN A4 ❌

Anslutningsmöjligheter - Asus har inkluderat USB 4

Den bakre delen av basenheten upptas av kylaggregatet och nästan alla portar är placerade på enhetens vänstra sida. Endast en USB-port finns på höger sida. Om du använder alla portar kan utrymmet bli lite trångt. Det finns två USB-C-portar varav en stöder USB 4.0 och den andra stöder G-Sync om du ansluter en motsvarande bildskärm.

vänster: strömförsörjning, Ethernet, HDMI 2.1 FRL, USB-C 4.0 (40 GBit/s, DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, Power Delivery, DisplayPort, G-Sync), USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), 3,5 uttag för hörlurar

rätt: USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), Kensington säkerhetsport

Kommunikation

Förutom en Gigabit Ethernet-port använder den bärbara datorn också en MediaTek MT7921 WLAN-modul som stöder Wi-Fi 6- och 160 MHz-bandanslutningar. Dess maximala överföringshastigheter är dock 1 200 bit/s. I vårt test med en referensrouter från Asus bekräftades dessa hastigheter och även om de är anständiga finns det definitivt snabbare WLAN-moduler på marknaden. I slutändan bör detta inte orsaka några problem vid daglig användning (t.ex. vid nedladdning av innehåll).

Networking
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	985 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	917 (min: 797) MBit/s ∼54%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1622 (min: 823) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1686 (min: 1451) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	979 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	952 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	980 (min: 495) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	934 (min: 918) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1529 (min: 623) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1666 (min: 840) MBit/s ∼99%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	816 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	811 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Realtek RTL8852BE
iperf3 receive AXE11000	927 (min: 864) MBit/s ∼55%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12	1045 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	1445 (min: 1383) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus TUF A15 FA507; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

Webbkamera

Trots att kameran i TUF Gaming A15 har en bump är den bara kapabel till 720p, vilket gör det svårt att ta anständiga foton även i bra ljusförhållanden. Skärpan är minimal och färgerna återges inte heller särskilt exakt.

ColorChecker Asus TUF A15 FA507: 17.85 ∆E min: 10.63 - max: 26.82 ∆E

Underhåll

Det nedre locket sitter ganska hårt fast i resten av enheten - även efter att skruvarna har lossats. Att ta bort den här delen av höljet visar sig vara lite krångligt. När du har gjort det kan du komma åt båda RAM-kortplatserna, batteriet, fläktarna och M.2 2280 SSD.

Inmatningsenheter - Stort tangentbord med numerisk knappsats

Tangentbordet har en dedikerad numerisk knappsats och det är bekvämt att skriva på det. Problemet ligger dock i tangentbordets märkning. Bortsett från WASD-tangenterna som är vita, har alla andra tangenter genomskinlig märkning. Även i hyfsade ljusförhållanden är det därför ofta bekvämare att bara aktivera bakgrundsbelysningen. Det finns tre belysningsnivåer och du kan också välja din egen färg - inom en zon. Layouten är bra men man måste vänja sig vid den enradiga enter-tangenten. Ovanför det vanliga tangentbordet finns också fyra specialtangenter: Tre används för att styra volymen och en kan tilldelas personligt. Det måste sägas att piltangenterna är särskilt små för en bärbar dator för spel.

Pekplattan fungerar bra - vanliga fingerrörelser matas in smidigt och dess yta har en trevlig känsla. Dess klickljud är trevligt och tyst. Totalt sett en solid prestanda och naturligtvis kommer de flesta användare ändå att använda en extern mus eller en handkontroll.

Display - en 144-Hz IPS-panel

Den bärbara datorn har en relativt enkel matt IPS-panel i Full HD-upplösning (1 920 x 1 080 pixlar) och i ett 16:9-format. Subjektivt lämnade den ett ganska bra intryck på oss - innehåll avbildades tillräckligt skarpt och ljusare områden såg inte korniga ut. Uppdateringsfrekvensen på 144 Hz hjälper till med snabba rörelser och det finns inget PWM-flimmer, men totalt sett har skärmen inte något att skryta om.

Den annonserade ljusstyrkan är 250 cd/m² men vi uppmätte 270 cd/m² (i genomsnitt). Naturligtvis är detta inte det bästa, men det är tillräckligt för inomhusbruk och utomhus om det inte är för soligt. Svartvärdet är i sin tur mediokert, vilket innebär att kontrastnivåerna endast mäter ~1.700:1 i bästa fall. Enhetens reaktionshastigheter är lite långsamma för en gaming-laptop och när skärmen är helt mörk kan du se en viss synlig blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen. Vid daglig användning bör detta inte vara ett alltför stort irritationsmoment.


270 cd/m²	264 cd/m²	261 cd/m²
269 cd/m²	288 cd/m²	262 cd/m²
271 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	264 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

N156HMA-GA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 288 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 270.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.9 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 288 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1694:1 (Svärta: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) CSOT MNF601CA1-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-37%	5%	-41%	-35%	5%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	64.9	40.7 -37%	68.8 6%	38.1 -41%	42 -35%	69.1 6%	66.4 2%
sRGB Coverage	96.5	61 -37%	99.3 3%	56.8 -41%	62.7 -35%	99.2 3%	97 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.6	42.1 -37%	69.9 5%	39.3 -41%	43.4 -35%	69.9 5%	68.5 3%
Response Times		11%	55%	-29%	-24%	59%	60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6)	26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12) 12%	16 ?(7, 9) 47%	38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2) -28%	35.2 ?(18, 17.2) -16%	13 ?(6.3, 6.7) 57%	5.6 ?(3.2, 2.4) 82%
Response Time Black / White *	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1)	18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82) 10%	7.6 ?(3, 4.6) 63%	26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6) -29%	27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6) -31%	8.4 ?(4.2, 4.2) 60%	12.8 ?(6.8, 6) 38%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-129%	-48%	-133%	-82%	-45%	-3%
Brightness middle	288	269 -7%	378 31%	261 -9%	284.3 -1%	338 17%	353.7 23%
Brightness	271	248 -8%	371 37%	258 -5%	262 -3%	329 21%	340 25%
Brightness Distribution	91	85 -7%	93 2%	92 1%	87 -4%	92 1%	89 -2%
Black Level *	0.17	0.5 -194%	0.33 -94%	0.19 -12%	0.17 -0%	0.27 -59%	0.34 -100%
Contrast	1694	538 -68%	1145 -32%	1374 -19%	1672 -1%	1252 -26%	1040 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.9	4.54 -139%	2.84 -49%	5.57 -193%	4.52 -138%	2.88 -52%	1.74 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.3	17.28 -424%	5.51 -67%	20.6 -524%	18.67 -466%	9.35 -183%	3.63 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.9	3.34 -271%	2.75 -206%	4.63 -414%	1.55 -72%	1.22 -36%	0.5 44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	3.8 -41%	4.08 -51%	3.19 -18%	4.1 -52%	5 -85%	2.1 22%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.17 ^101%	2.4 ^92%	2.45 ^90%	2.3 ^96%	2.162 ^102%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	6535 ^99%	7408 ^88%	5841 ^111%	6146 ^106%	6529 ^100%	7497 ^87%	6257 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-52% / -89%	4% / -22%	-68% / -98%	-47% / -64%	6% / -19%	20% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Med hjälp av den professionella CalMAN-programvaran (X-Rite i1 Pro 2) mätte vi panelen och dess prestanda var mycket bra direkt från start. Det fanns ingen färgton och dess färgåtergivning var redan mycket exakt, vilket innebär att du kan börja arbeta med bildredigering direkt (åtminstone inom den mindre sRGB-färgrymden). Efter vår egen kalibrering (du kan ladda ner den här profilen gratis ovan) kunde vi förbättra detta något, men det är egentligen inte nödvändigt - särskilt inte för spel.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.7 ms rise
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Utomhus har du definitivt nytta av att skärmen är matt, men om det är för ljust kommer du fortfarande att ha svårt att se innehållet på skärmen. Skärmens ljusstyrka skulle behöva vara ljusare. IPS-panelens betraktningsvinkelstabilitet är bra - men från vissa vinklar verkar skärmen ibland för ljus (särskilt uppifrån och från sidan).

Prestanda - TUF Gaming kombinerar en Ryzen 7 med en RTX 4050

Vår testkonfiguration är den svagaste modellen i serien - som tillval kan Asus TUF Gaming A15 utrustas med en nyareRyzen 9 7940HSoch enGeForce RTX 4070 bärbar datori bästa fall. Naturligtvis kommer den bärbara datorn att kosta betydligt mer i den här konfigurationen.

Testförhållanden

Asus använder Armoury Crate-programvaran för sina bärbara speldatorer, där det också finns olika energiprofiler. Det valfria Turbo-läget leder dock inte till en prestandaökning i vår konfiguration, varför vi utförde alla mätningar och riktmärken i Performance-läge. Dessutom var Advanced Optimus aktiv, vilket dock leder till små stammar när du byter grafik (till exempel när du startar spel). Om du inte vill ha detta kan du inaktivera iGPU permanent eller använda den normala Optimus-funktionen.

Processor - Ryzen 7 7735HS

AMD Ryzen 7 77HSAMD Ryzen 7 7735HS används som den bärbara datorns processor, vilket i princip är den gamlaRyzen 7 6800HS men med en 50 MHz högre maximal klocka. Zen3+-chippet har 8 kärnor och kan bearbeta 16 trådar samtidigt. TUF Gaming A15:s effektgränser är 80/65 watt, vilket möjliggör anständig flerkärnig prestanda som ofta ligger före konkurrenter med Alder Lake-processorer. I single-core-testerna hade dock Intel-chipen med prestandakärnorna en klar fördel. Föga förvånande är 7735HS i nivå medSchenker XMG Core 15'sRyzen 7 6800H. Sammantaget är processorn ett bra val för en budgetlaptop för spel. Vid batteridrift förbrukar processorn kortvarigt 45 watt och sjunker sedan tillbaka till 32 watt, vilket är anledningen till att flerkärnighetsprestandan sjunker med 20%. Fler CPU-riktmärken finns tillgängliga här.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2326 (2309.07-2343.16)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)

HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1980 (1935.64-2695.78)

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2176 (2136.52-2272.47)

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	84.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	72.6 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	66.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	65.5 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	62.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	62 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	61.2 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	61 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21842 Points +59%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	17713 (16651.9^min - 17712.9^max) Points +29%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	15537 Points +13%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	15271 (12272^min - 15271.4^max) Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	14686 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14410 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	13155 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11072 - 14131, n=12)	13103 Points -5%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)	1888 Points +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	1771 Points +15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	1756 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1697 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	1681 Points +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1629 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1552 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1288 - 1570, n=12)	1524 Points -1%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8311 Points +55%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	6754 Points +26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	6009 Points +12%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	5921 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	5640 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5582 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (4339 - 5502, n=12)	5080 Points -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5066 Points -5%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	726 Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	681 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	680 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	653 Points +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	652 Points +8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	627 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	605 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (502 - 613, n=12)	595 Points -1%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3421 Points +50%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	2735 (2614.89^min - 2735.42^max) Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	2696 (1935.64^min - 2695.78^max) Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2343 (2309.07^min - 2343.16^max) Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	2272 (2136.52^min - 2272.47^max) Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	2253 (1876.44^min - 2253.14^max) Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1795 - 2355, n=14)	2166 Points -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2112 (1956.47^min - 2112.49^max) Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +12%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	256 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	253 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	250 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	247 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	247 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	245 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (206 - 255, n=13)	245 Points -2%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (214 - 279, n=12)	238 Seconds * -7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	234 Seconds * -5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	234 Seconds * -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	230 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	223 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	216 Seconds * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	182 Seconds * +18%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	170.3 Seconds * +24%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85304 MIPS +41%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	67160 MIPS +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	64333 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	59034 MIPS -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (48327 - 63698, n=12)	59032 MIPS -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54380 MIPS -10%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	50905 MIPS -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	44105 MIPS -27%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6311 MIPS +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	5826 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5779 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (4779 - 5849, n=12)	5676 MIPS -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	5537 MIPS -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	5451 MIPS -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5383 MIPS -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	5381 MIPS -7%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	15010 Points +61%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	12358 Points +32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	11198 Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	10348 Points +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10260 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	10254 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (7368 - 10258, n=12)	9394 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	7962 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1894 Points +26%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	1782 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	1751 Points +16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1667 Points +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1647 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	1624 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1565 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1327 - 1615, n=12)	1541 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.5 fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	20.5 fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	18.2 fps +5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	17.4 fps 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (12.7 - 17.9, n=12)	16.3 fps -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	15.7 fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	15.5 fps -11%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	79.5 s * -57%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	57.7 s * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44.3 - 63.9, n=12)	53.9 s * -7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	49.9 s * +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	49.3 s * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	48.9 s * +3%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)	47.4 s * +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	47 s * +7%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	0.508 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (0.4822 - 0.585, n=12)	0.504 sec * -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	0.4904 sec * +1%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4865 sec * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.4783 sec * +4%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4715 sec * +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4655 sec * +6%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.4374 sec * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2274 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

141.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5354 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

603 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1546 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

13750 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	99.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	76.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	70.3 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	63.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	63 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	60.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21864 KRay/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	16897 KRay/s +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	15620 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (12718 - 17161, n=13)	15187 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13947 KRay/s -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	12692 KRay/s -22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	12542 KRay/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9486 KRay/s -42%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106582 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	105922 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (81722 - 105483, n=13)	95077 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76434 Points -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	68178 Points -33%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	65919 Points -36%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	62814 Points -39%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	41434 Points -59%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4896 MB/s +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3525 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	3337 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3288 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3244 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (2818 - 3494, n=13)	3226 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3212 MB/s -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2876 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	116926 Points +12%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	102409 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (90101 - 108729, n=13)	100876 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	99267 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90468 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87225 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	80703 Points -22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80337 Points -23%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13244 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	13066 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11441 - 13097, n=13)	12501 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9852 Points -22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8694 Points -31%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8415 Points -33%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7388 Points -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7385 Points -41%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58314 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53651 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44756 - 58232, n=13)	52240 Points -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37738 Points -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	33085 Points -40%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	31844 Points -43%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	31516 Points -43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	26379 Points -52%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	110905 MB/s +67%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	110639 MB/s +67%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109303 MB/s +64%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (49927 - 137629, n=13)	84134 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	67816 MB/s +2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66845 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66712 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	60410 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1361 MB/s +109%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1164 MB/s +79%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	924 MB/s +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	919 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	898 MB/s +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	879 MB/s +35%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	808 MB/s +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (651 - 906, n=13)	804 MB/s +24%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11775 KRay/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8980 KRay/s +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8448 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1459 - 9094, n=13)	7511 KRay/s -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7034 KRay/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6989 KRay/s -18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	6790 KRay/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5486 KRay/s -36%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40126 MPixel/s +42%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37023 MPixel/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	33509 MPixel/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	30145 MPixel/s +6%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29085 MPixel/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (19153 - 30542, n=13)	27840 MPixel/s -2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	19764 MPixel/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13686 MPixel/s -52%

Systemets prestanda

TUF Gaming A15 presterade bra i de syntetiska systembenchmarks och kunde placera sig i det övre mittfältet under PCMark 10-testet. Sammantaget var det inte så mycket mellan utmanarna och subjektivt lämnade de alla ett bra intryck på oss när det gällde prestanda. Bortsett från de tidigare nämnda små stammar under GPU-växling (vilket är normalt), körde systemet alltid smidigt i testet.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7799 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	7426 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7250 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	7210 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	7201 Points 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6918 Points -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6892 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6755 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	11150 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10841 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years)	10832 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10573 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	10499 Points -1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10401 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10180 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	10047 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years)	9904 Points +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9744 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9554 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9522 Points +2%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9475 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9313 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9070 Points -3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9053 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years)	12117 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	11672 Points +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10333 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9985 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9593 Points -7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9542 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8957 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8744 Points -15%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=146, last 2 years)	1908 Points +23%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1752 Points +13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1718 Points +11%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1656 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1583 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1550 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=146, last 2 years)	1808 Points +19%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1720 Points +13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1653 Points +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1595 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1523 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1517 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=146, last 2 years)	2095 Points +23%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1840 Points +8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1826 Points +7%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1778 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1767 Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1709 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1771 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=146, last 2 years)	1708 Points +39%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1570 Points +28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1383 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1282 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1231 Points 0%

PCMark 10 Score		7210 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65265 MB/s +35%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56560 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	53661 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	51033 MB/s +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (30324 - 52012, n=13)	48412 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44445 MB/s -8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	42004 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	23850 MB/s -51%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69175 MB/s +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65535 MB/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	59205 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	51619 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33938 - 51856, n=13)	48582 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47514 MB/s -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	46966 MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	24879 MB/s -50%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	67077 MB/s +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58758 MB/s +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	57505 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	55220 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33175 - 55284, n=13)	52789 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46901 MB/s -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	44756 MB/s -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	23543 MB/s -57%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	96.1 ns * -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94.9 ns * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	94.7 ns * -15%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	93.7 ns * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (78.2 - 109.7, n=13)	88.2 ns * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86 ns * -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns *
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	78.7 ns * +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

I vårt standardiserade latens-test (webbsurfning, 4K YouTube-uppspelning, CPU-belastning) visade testenheten vissa begränsningar med den nuvarande BIOS-versionen och är därför inte lämplig för obegränsad ljudprogramvara i realtid.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7213.9 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3384 μs *
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1554.9 μs *
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1418.9 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1002.5 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	719 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Den installerade SSD-enheten är en PCIe 4.0-enhet från Micron (2400). M.2 2280-enheten har en lagringskapacitet på 512 GB, med 420 GB tillgängligt efter den första starten. Den maximala överföringshastigheten för QLC-SSD är 4 200 MB/s, vilket också matchar hastigheterna i våra riktmärken. Överlag är prestandan bra och stabil även under längre belastning. Fler SSD-riktmärken finns listade här.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4315 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1821 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 373 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 406 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.8 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 379 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1082 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	87.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	74.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	74.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	71 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	70.5 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	62.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	47.4 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.4 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	39 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3702 (3637.58^min - 3701.54^max) MB/s +110%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3475 MB/s +98%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3429 (3399.4^min - 3429.12^max) MB/s +95%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2390 (2088.15^min - 2390.38^max) MB/s +36%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2383 (2361.29^min - 2382.94^max) MB/s +35%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2271.71^min - 2290.75^max) MB/s +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2168 (2101.77^min - 2167.68^max) MB/s +23%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1748 - 2253, n=5)	1891 MB/s +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s 0%
seq write
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3805 MB/s +145%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3148 (3102.4^min - 3147.82^max) MB/s +103%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3113 (2869.67^min - 3113.43^max) MB/s +100%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2903 (2823.62^min - 2902.74^max) MB/s +87%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2894 (2651.7^min - 2893.78^max) MB/s +86%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2230 (2171.45^min - 2229.69^max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1607 (1584.61^min - 1607.26^max) MB/s +3%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1519 - 1671, n=5)	1585 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6850 (5680.31^min - 6850.35^max) MB/s +76%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6719 (5699.43^min - 6719.47^max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6322 MB/s +63%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	4725 (4035.45^min - 4724.88^max) MB/s +22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4556 (3742.64^min - 4556.27^max) MB/s +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (3234 - 4294, n=5)	3728 MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3554 (3284.35^min - 3554.02^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2660 (2328.47^min - 2659.74^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4927 (4921.4^min - 4927.47^max) MB/s +200%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4857 (4829.1^min - 4856.73^max) MB/s +196%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4850 MB/s +196%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3411 (3334.51^min - 3410.81^max) MB/s +108%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2869 (2667.88^min - 2869.19^max) MB/s +75%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2255 (2245.25^min - 2255.17^max) MB/s +38%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1610 - 1773, n=5)	1682 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1671 (1644.73^min - 1670.81^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	80.9 (75.58^min - 80.91^max) MB/s +148%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	72.3 (71.34^min - 72.26^max) MB/s +122%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	69.4 (68.09^min - 69.4^max) MB/s +113%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	66 MB/s +102%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	62.6 (62.25^min - 62.63^max) MB/s +92%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	61.1 (60.21^min - 61.13^max) MB/s +87%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)	31.9 MB/s -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	31.8 (31.24^min - 31.76^max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	369 (333.31^min - 369.47^max) MB/s +185%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	267 (258.43^min - 266.75^max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +73%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	211 (210.13^min - 210.73^max) MB/s +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	194.3 (188.32^min - 194.33^max) MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	132.2 (127.58^min - 132.23^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	129.2 (127.83^min - 129.15^max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (106.4 - 132, n=5)	123.7 MB/s -4%
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2568 MB/s +225%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2217 (2210.73^min - 2217.07^max) MB/s +181%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1678 (1211.7^min - 1678.15^max) MB/s +113%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1323 (1320.64^min - 1322.54^max) MB/s +68%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (766 - 1705, n=5)	1017 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1010 (971.83^min - 1010.09^max) MB/s +28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	903 (865.18^min - 903.16^max) MB/s +14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	474 (463.36^min - 474.33^max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2314 (2299.73^min - 2313.93^max) MB/s +637%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2234 (2227.81^min - 2234.36^max) MB/s +611%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2133 MB/s +579%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1509 MB/s +381%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	609 (579.43^min - 608.79^max) MB/s +94%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (313 - 1585, n=5)	595 MB/s +89%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	372 (363.89^min - 371.6^max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	345 (331.77^min - 344.95^max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s 0%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6746 Points +103%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6117 Points +85%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	5541 Points +67%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5285 Points +59%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5168 Points +56%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4020 Points +21%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2845 - 4261, n=4)	3370 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3315 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2702 Points -18%
Score Read
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2446 Points +119%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2291 Points +105%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2128 Points +91%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1726 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1621 Points +45%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1322 Points +18%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1031 - 1830, n=4)	1305 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1116 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	760 Points -32%
Score Write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3361 Points +94%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3112 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2814 Points +62%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2660 Points +53%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2388 Points +38%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1735 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1584 Points -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1257 - 1735, n=4)	1491 Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1456 Points -16%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4945 MB/s +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4874 MB/s +41%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4111.85 MB/s +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3792 MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	3697.92 MB/s +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3466 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2798 - 3691, n=4)	3189 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3013 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2432.02 MB/s -30%
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3760 MB/s +190%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2772 MB/s +114%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2768 MB/s +114%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2711 MB/s +109%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2232.79 MB/s +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2106.21 MB/s +63%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1156 - 1633, n=4)	1329 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1295 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1229.14 MB/s -5%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	82.5 MB/s +171%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	75.66 MB/s +149%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	71.91 MB/s +137%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	66.9 MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.2 MB/s +114%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	63 MB/s +107%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51.2 MB/s +68%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (30 - 42.8, n=4)	35.7 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	30.4 MB/s
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	312.09 MB/s +127%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	242.19 MB/s +76%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	225 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	213 MB/s +55%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	184.8 MB/s +34%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	169.96 MB/s +24%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	137.5 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	136 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)	121.6 MB/s -12%
4K-64 Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1923 MB/s +160%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s +155%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1675.54 MB/s +127%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1296 MB/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1070 MB/s +45%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (721 - 1430, n=4)	953 MB/s +29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	838.49 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	739 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	441.63 MB/s -40%
4K-64 Write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2967.73 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2527 MB/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2407 MB/s +64%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2198 MB/s +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1865.08 MB/s +27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1468 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1003 - 1468, n=4)	1258 MB/s -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1218.61 MB/s -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	954 MB/s -35%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)	0.095 ms * -144%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.073 ms * -87%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.066 ms * -69%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05576 ms * -43%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.046 ms * -18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.039 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.03 ms * +23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.03 ms * +23%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.029 ms * +26%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)	0.1968 ms * -42%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.139 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.108 ms * +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.081 ms * +42%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.074 ms * +47%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04728 ms * +66%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.033 ms * +76%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.029 ms * +79%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.013 ms * +91%

* ... smaller is better

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus TUF A15 FA507: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

Grafikkort - GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop

I vardagligt bruk sköts grafikberäkningen av den integreradeAMD Radeon 680M- för större ansträngningar växlar den automatiskt till den dedikeradeNvidia GeForce RTX 4050 bärbar dator. Den senare har 6 GB RAM och enligt föraren är detta 140-wattversionen. Denna specifikation är dock lite missvisande eftersom den nya GPU:n förbrukar maximalt ~95 watt under spel i alla fall. Så det är den snabbaste versionen av RTX 4050 laptop. Detta återspeglas också i riktmärkena, där TUF Gaming A15 i genomsnitt presterade cirka 10% snabbare än de genomsnittliga värdena vi har för denna GPU i vår databas.

Detta innebär att RTX 4050 bärbar dator också kommer mycket nära den gamla RTX 3060som också förbrukar betydligt mer ström i jämförelseenheterna (mellan 115 och 140 watt TGP). Generellt sett är prestandan mycket bra och det fanns ingen prestandaförlust även under permanent belastning - Time Spy -stresstestet kördes utan problem med en godkändfrekvens på 99,3%. I batteriläge är GPU:ns strömförbrukning begränsad till cirka 50 watt, vilket är anledningen till att grafikprestandan sjunker med cirka 30 %. Mer informationGPU-riktmärken finns listade i vårt teknikavsnitt.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	100 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM ^-4! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	74.1 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	69.6 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	69.3 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	68.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	65.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	64.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	45.9 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	42.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +38%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	31690 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	30959 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	30772 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	29569 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	29568 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=38)	28641 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20869 Points -34%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	19416 Points -39%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +37%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	23443 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	22915 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	22899 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22625 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	22406 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=36)	21155 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	15611 Points -32%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	14628 Points -36%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +51%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9174 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8764 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	8692 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8686 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	8500 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=36)	7812 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	5946 Points -32%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	5481 Points -37%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years)	127274 Points +45%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	105772 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	102470 Points +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	102369 Points +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	87670 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	87554 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=35)	82571 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	71459 Points -18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	68271 Points -22%

Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points +42%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81622 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (66574 - 84452, n=12)	76353 Points -6%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)	709 mpaths +42%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	501 mpaths
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	480 mpaths -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (333 - 565, n=32)	471 mpaths -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	396 mpaths -21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	395 mpaths -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	216 mpaths -57%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)	2190 mpaths +49%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1465 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (618 - 1588, n=22)	1388 mpaths -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1227 mpaths -16%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	679 mpaths -54%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)	1574 mpaths +46%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1075 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (735 - 1174, n=22)	1033 mpaths -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	917 mpaths -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	552 mpaths -49%

3DMark 11 Performance		26692 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20183 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		8902 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender: v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	393 Seconds * -14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	345 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	345 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (345 - 345, n=2)	345 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (63 - 345, n=7, last 2 years)	228 Seconds * +34%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	48 Seconds * -78%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	48 Seconds * -78%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	30 Seconds * -11%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 Seconds * -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=37)	28.8 Seconds * -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	27 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * +23%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	83 Seconds * -66%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83 Seconds * -66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=37)	56.2 Seconds * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	53 Seconds * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	53 Seconds * -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	52 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * +27%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	441 Seconds * -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	423 Seconds * -13%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	416 Seconds * -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=37)	395 Seconds * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	385 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	361 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)	294 Seconds * +22%

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

Vår basvariant av TUF Gaming A15:s spelprestanda var mycket bra - mer än tillräckligt för den inbyggda 1080p-upplösningen, även när vi spelade moderna spel som Hogwarts Legacy eller Cyberpunk 2077 med maximala detaljinställningar. Om du vill använda ray tracing måste du dock använda DLSS-uppskalning. Cyberpunk 2077 kördes t.ex. bara med 24 FPS i 1080p med ray tracing på Ultra, medan det kördes med 74 FPS med DLSS. Skillnaden kan dock vara mindre i andra spel. I princip kan alla moderna spel köras och 6 GB VRAM är för närvarande helt tillräckligt för 1080p. Testet Witcher 3 testet visar också att spelprestandan förblir stabil även under längre sessioner.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	100 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	83.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78.7 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.6 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69.7 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	60.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	58.3 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +56%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.5 (87^min) fps +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81.5 (69^min, 78^P1) fps -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	58.5 (49^min) fps -29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.7 (51^min) fps -33%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.7 fps +36%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	103 (7.98^min, 71.4^P1) fps +23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	97.9 (4.48^min, 62.5^P1) fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	97.3 (8.65^min, 62.5^P1) fps +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92.2 (4.55^min, 55.6^P1) fps +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 (2.82^min, 58.8^P1) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	73.5 (23.5^min, 47.6^P1) fps -12%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	73.1 (6.87^min, 47.6^P1) fps -12%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)	119.8 fps +47%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.9 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.9 fps +13%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90.3 fps +11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.8 fps +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	58.8 fps -28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.7 fps -33%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +56%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	160 (75.9^min, 121^P1) fps +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	153.3 (32.3^min, 117.2^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	152.7 (65.8^min, 117.2^P1) fps +4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	148.7 (20.2^min, 114.3^P1) fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	147 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	101.3 (71.9^min, 78.3^P1) fps -31%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	97.4 (34.3^min, 73.6^P1) fps -34%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	151 fps +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	148 (129.6^min) fps +28%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.3^min) fps +23%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.5 (121.2^min) fps +19%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	123.8 (108.4^min) fps +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	115.8 (102.7^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	112.3 (97.8^min) fps -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	107.8 (97.3^min) fps -7%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)	108.2 fps +39%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	107 fps +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97 fps +25%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.7 fps +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	81.1 fps +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74.2 fps -5%

The Witcher 3 | F1 22 | Far Cry 5 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Hogwarts Legacy

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +56%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.5 (87^min) fps +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81.5 (69^min, 78^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=39)	75.4 fps -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	58.5 (49^min) fps -29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.7 (51^min) fps -33%

F1 22
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (17.1 - 322, n=89, last 2 years)	206 fps +28%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	161.2 (124^min, 72^P1) fps
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	153.3 (137^min, 102^P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (94.4 - 174.7, n=21)	145.6 fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92 (76^min) fps -43%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=96, last 2 years)	84.9 fps +51%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56.4 (44^min, 42^P1) fps
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	55.9 (48^min, 46^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10.9 - 56.4, n=23)	47.6 fps -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	32 (26^min) fps -43%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)	131 fps +32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	119 fps +20%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	118 (90^min) fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	114 (86^min) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	107 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (50 - 127, n=23)	102.5 fps +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	99 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming (12.2 - 205, n=58, last 2 years)	98.5 fps +39%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.5 (12.2^min) fps +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (48 - 91.3, n=14)	67.8 fps -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	46.9 (5.1^min) fps -34%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=69, last 2 years)	93 fps +41%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68 (30.6^min) fps +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (44.4 - 79.4, n=14)	62.1 fps -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	36.8 (5.1^min) fps -44%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89 fps
Average of class Gaming (12.8 - 186.5, n=26, last 2 years)	88.1 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (44.8 - 93.6, n=8)	66.3 fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)	73.7 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (39 - 77.3, n=8)	53.3 fps +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49 fps

CPU/GPU-värden Witcher 3 (Ultra-inställningar)

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø82.2 (79-84)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
GTA V (2015)		168.6	153.1	83.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)			171	82.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	137.4	127.2		115.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	178.9	115.5	81.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	103.5	97	77.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)		111	105	99
Strange Brigade (2018)		211	171	147
F1 2021 (2021)	283	260	209	110.3
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	103	82	71	66
F1 22 (2022)	192.7	191.4	161.2	56.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	122	109	89	49

Emissions - En bärbar dator för spel med ett coolt tangentbord

Utsläpp av buller

För en bärbar dator för spel var vår testenhet relativt tyst. Under enkla uppgifter var kylaren ofta helt tyst och även under belastning blev vi positivt överraskade: Under stresstestet nådde fläktarna en maximal ljudnivå på 43 dB(A). När vi spelade uppmätte vi mellan 40-43 dB(A), vilket innebär att TUF Gaming A15 fortfarande är tystare än sina konkurrenter. Vi antar att de starkare konfigurationerna kommer att ha något mer högljudda fläktar. Vi noterade inga andra elektroniska ljud.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A)
Hög belastning		29.6 / 43 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Noise		-33%	-13%	-10%	-10%	-25%	-14%
off / environment *	23.3	19.52 16%	23 1%	24 -3%	24.8 -6%	25 -7%	23.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	23.3	31.05 -33%	23 1%	24 -3%	26.2 -12%	29 -24%	23.6 -1%
Idle Average *	23.3	31.05 -33%	23 1%	24 -3%	29.2 -25%	30 -29%	23.6 -1%
Idle Maximum *	23.3	31.05 -33%	23 1%	24 -3%	29.4 -26%	32 -37%	25.4 -9%
Load Average *	29.6	55.66 -88%	42.41 -43%	37.71 -27%	29.9 -1%	42 -42%	38 -28%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	55.7 -30%	54.71 -27%	45.75 -6%	41.1 4%	46 -7%	54.1 -26%
Load Maximum *	43	55.51 -29%	55.05 -28%	54.55 -27%	45.5 -6%	54 -26%	57.2 -33%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Det fanns inga temperaturproblem under vardagliga uppgifter och även under belastning hade Asus laptop sina yttemperaturer väl under kontroll. Det övre mittområdet på basenheten blev mycket varmt, nästan 50 °C, men den här hotspoten är ovanför tangentbordet och särskilt WASD-tangentområdet förblev mycket svalt, vilket är viktigt när man spelar. På undersidan uppmätte vi maximalt 44 °C i det bakre området, och du kan till och med placera den bärbara datorn på låren utan problem.

Som förväntat gynnades dGPU:n under stresstestet. Det förekom fortfarande små fluktuationer under de första 15 minuterna innan processorn och grafikkortet sedan stabiliserade sig på 35 respektive 80 watt.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


44.8 °C	48.9 °C	43 °C
35.8 °C	42.6 °C	39.2 °C
27.1 °C	30.6 °C	24.8 °C

Max: 48.9 °C
Medel: 37.4 °C


44.6 °C	41.8 °C	43.5 °C
34.2 °C	31.3 °C	35 °C
23.1 °C	25.1 °C	24 °C

Max: 44.6 °C
Medel: 33.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 42.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


27.1 °C	27.1 °C	26.3 °C
26.9 °C	26.7 °C	26.5 °C
24.5 °C	25.9 °C	24.8 °C

Max: 27.1 °C
Medel: 26.2 °C


27.2 °C	27.4 °C	27.5 °C
26.5 °C	27.3 °C	27.4 °C
23.8 °C	25 °C	25.6 °C

Max: 27.5 °C
Medel: 26.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 23.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


41.1 °C	48.3 °C	43.7 °C
35.7 °C	42 °C	39.6 °C
27.1 °C	29.3 °C	25 °C

Max: 48.3 °C
Medel: 36.9 °C


43 °C	39.1 °C	42.2 °C
36.1 °C	30.9 °C	34.4 °C
23.6 °C	25.8 °C	24.2 °C

Max: 43 °C
Medel: 33.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 40.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

yttemperaturer spänningsprovning (botten)

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Heat		-25%	-9%	-18%	20%	2%	-21%
Maximum Upper Side *	48.9	52.6 -8%	48 2%	47 4%	37.2 24%	47 4%	44.4 9%
Maximum Bottom *	44.6	62.4 -40%	51 -14%	48 -8%	35.4 21%	52 -17%	48.8 -9%
Idle Upper Side *	27.1	33.6 -24%	28 -3%	35 -29%	22.4 17%	25 8%	37.8 -39%
Idle Bottom *	27.5	34.8 -27%	33 -20%	38 -38%	22.6 18%	24 13%	39.6 -44%

* ... smaller is better

Högtalare

TUF Gaming A15 kan verkligen inte skryta med fantastiskt ljud och de två stereohögtalarna är ganska genomsnittliga - men det är ofta fallet med billiga bärbara speldatorer. Musik och filmer är inte riktigt roliga att lyssna på och titta på - vi skulle rekommendera att använda ett headset när du spelar ändå, eftersom fläktarna kan vara irriterande annars.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - Långa drifttider tack vare ett stort batteri

Strömförbrukning

I våra konsumtionsmätningar förblev granskningsprovet mycket sparsamt och även när man spelade förblev A15 mycket effektivare än RTX-3060-bärbara datorer, som inte heller erbjuder mycket mer kraft. Vi bestämde maximalt 185 watt i stresstestet, som sedan snabbt bosatte sig på cirka 155 watt. Med tanke på dessa hastigheter är den medföljande 240-watts strömförsörjningen nästan överdimensionerad för basvarianten och den mer kompakta 200-wattsmodulen för den nuvarandeZenbook Pro 14 skulle ha varit helt tillräckligt.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.28 / 0.6 Watt
Låg belastning	8 / 12.1 / 12.5 Watt
Hög belastning	74.9 / 185 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-19%	-31%	2%	-11%	-7%	-30%	-22%	-63%
Idle Minimum *	8	7.66 4%	11.8 -48%	8.5 -6%	5.1 36%	8 -0%	6.3 21%	9.84 ?(2 - 21.1, n=30) -23%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) -69%
Idle Average *	12.1	10.3 15%	14.7 -21%	10.2 16%	15.1 -25%	10 17%	9.8 19%	14.8 ?(5 - 32, n=30) -22%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -56%
Idle Maximum *	12.5	16.05 -28%	15 -20%	11.3 10%	18.9 -51%	16 -28%	26.5 -112%	19.1 ?(7.9 - 33.9, n=30) -53%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -114%
Load Average *	74.9	115.8 -55%	100 -34%	84 -12%	114.5 -53%	99 -32%	103.8 -39%	87.9 ?(52.4 - 151, n=30) -17%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -42%
Witcher 3 ultra *	136.6	168.7 -23%	184 -35%	128 6%	113.9 17%	144.6 -6%	189 -38%
Load Maximum *	185	234.6 -27%	237 -28%	189 -2%	165.8 10%	168 9%	241.9 -31%	179.6 ?(104.2 - 280, n=30) 3%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -35%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø136.6 (130.6-143)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø156.7 (141.4-185.8)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.48 (5.34-11.4)

power consumption with external monitor

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø8.13 (5.12-10.8)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø104.5 (84.7-111.6)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34.5 (32.8-59.9)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (91-95.8)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø131.7 (128.4-146.1)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø135.2 (129.6-143.3)

Körtider

Den bärbara datorns 90 Wh-batteri ger mycket bra batteritider. Med undantag för några minuter gjorde det ingen skillnad i våra tester om skärmen var i 60 Hz- eller 144 Hz-läge. I WLAN-testet vid 150 cd/m² (vilket motsvarar 73 % av maximal ljusstyrka) noterade vi drygt 11,5 timmar och vid full ljusstyrka fortfarande lite mer än 9,5 timmar. I videotestet vid 150 cd/m² uppmätte vi mer än 12,5 timmar. En fullständig laddning tar 106 minuter när enheten är påslagen. Laddningskurvan planar ut först vid 70%, vilket är fallet efter ~44 minuter.

Batteritid

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 114)		11tim 41min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 114)		9tim 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12tim 27min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		0tim 59min

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 60 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-43%	-13%	-26%	-36%	-50%	-24%	-16%
H.264	747	130 -83%		264 -65%				409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) -45%
WiFi v1.3	701	342 -51%	465 -34%	260 -63%	127 -82%	352 -50%	285 -59%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -47%
Load	59	62 5%	64 8%	89 51%	65 10%		66 12%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 45%
Witcher 3 ultra		79						78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle					155		947	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years)

För

+ bra spelprestanda vid 1080p

+ bra systemprestanda

+ 2x SO-DIMM och USB 4

+ matt 144-Hz IPS-skärm med exakt färgåtergivning

+ superlånga drifttider

+ effektiv kylning

Emot

- medelmåttig webbkamera

- svaga högtalare

- basversionen levereras utan operativsystem

Omdöme - En bra gaminglaptop för 1080p-spel

Asus TUF Gaming A15 recension. Testenheten tillhandahölls av Asus Tyskland.

Med lanseringen av TUF Gaming A15 har Asos koncentrerat sig på det viktigaste: spelprestanda. Vår basversion, som kan köpas för cirka 1 169 USD, har redan tillräckligt med kraft för att spela aktuella spel smidigt i en inbyggd upplösning på 1080p och med maximala detaljer - tack vare den nyaNvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop. Om du använder uppskalning kan du till och med köra ray tracing. Zen3+-processorn är en gammal bekant, men ändå lyckas den erbjuda solid prestanda. RAM och SSD kan utökas - även om 16 GB och 512 GB bör vara bra att börja med.

Den bärbara datorns fodralskvalitet är bra; den har inte någon form av tjusig belysning (vilket inte nödvändigtvis behöver vara en dålig sak). Etiketterna på tangentbordet har lite låg kontrast och du måste ofta förlita dig på bakgrundsbelysningen för att kunna se dem tydligt. Men tangentbordet lyckas hålla sig trevligt och svalt medan du spelar och fläktarna blir inte för högljudda.

Basversionen av nya Asus TUF Gaming A15 är en bra gaminglaptop och dess RTX 4050 Laptop levererar tillräckligt med prestanda för 1080p-skärmen.

Skärmen gör vad den är tänkt att göra. Dess 16:9 matta IPS-panel har uppdateringsfrekvenser på 144 Hz och bra färgåtergivning, men dess reaktionstider och ljusstyrka skulle behöva vara lite bättre. Vi uppmätte 300 cd/m² för den senare. Anslutningsmöjligheterna inkluderar även USB 4.0 och du kan ansluta en G-Sync-skärm. Det enda problemet är det faktum att nästan alla av den bärbara datorns portar finns på framsidan till vänster och i mitten av enheten.

Den bärbara datorn visade egentligen inte upp några riktiga svagheter, men du måste komma ihåg att basversionen levereras utan ett operativsystem installerat. På många områden levererar enheten standardfunktioner (WLAN, högtalare, webbkamera) - men på alla kärnområden är dess prestanda tillfredsställande. Priset på cirka 1 169 USD är också ganska konkurrenskraftigt.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Den enhet vi testade kan hittas för cirka 1 169 USD på Amazon.

Asus TUF A15 FA507 - 06/13/2023 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Design

79 / 98 → 80%

Tangentbord

79%

Mus

85%

Anslutningar

58 / 80 → 73%

Vikt

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Batteri

89 / 95 → 93%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

97%

Programprestanda

93%

Temperatur

88 / 95 → 92%

Ljudnivå

94 / 90 → 100%

Audio

78%

Camera

33 / 85 → 39%

Medel

79%

86%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 350 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Asus TUF Gaming A15 laptop recension - En budgetspelare med en RTX 4050 och en 144 Hz-skärm

Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-15 (Update: 2023-06-15)