Notebookcheck Logo

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS recension: AMD-bärbar dator med upp till 20 timmars drifttid

Långdistanslöpare.

Asus har valt AMD-hårdvara - en Ryzen 9 7940HS och Radeon RX 7600S - för att driva den bärbara speldatorn. En snabbreagerande 16:10 16-tumsskärm (WUXGA, 165 Hz, FreeSync) och utmärkta körtider kompletterar installationen.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition - en bärbar dator för spel i mellanklassen - förlitar sig på AMD-hårdvara: ARyzen-9-7940HSaPU ochRadeon-RX-7600SgPU driver enheten. Bland konkurrenterna finnsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8, denMSI Katana 15 B12VEK, denMedion Erazer Defender P40och Gigabyte G5 KE.

För mer detaljerad information om den bärbara datorns hölje, anslutningsmöjligheter och inmatningsenheter, ta en titt på vår recension av A16:s identiskt byggda systermodell.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (TUF Gaming A16 Serie)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 8 x 4 - 5.2 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Grafikkort
AMD Radeon RX 7600S - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2207 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.14003.25002, MUX Switch, AMD Smart Access Graphic
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixlar 142 PPI, BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, FreeSync, glansig: nej, 165 Hz
Moderkort
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Hårddisk
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 400 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC256
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 22.1 x 355 x 252
Batteri
90 Wh, 5845 mAh Litiumpolymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.184 kg, Strömförsörjning: 548 g
Pris
1699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86.9 %
v7 (old)
06/2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
2.2 kg22.1 mm16.00"1920x1200
87.9 %
v7 (old)
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.9 %
v7 (old)
03/2023
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.6 %
v7 (old)
05/2023
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg33 mm17.30"2560x1440
81.8 %
v7 (old)
04/2023
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2 kg23.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

Fodral och anslutningsmöjligheter - små förändringar jämfört med systermodellen

Jämfört med sin systermodellensvälkända svarta fodral, har A16 ett tvåfärgat fodral. Baksidan av locket och botten av fodralet är sandfärgade ("Sandstorm"). Anslutningsmöjligheterna är också lite annorlunda: En av de två USB-C-portarna har uppgraderats till USB-4-standard.

Storleksjämförelse

397 mm 264 mm 33 mm 2.9 kg363.4 mm 260.4 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg359 mm 259 mm 24.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 238 mm 23.9 mm 2 kg355 mm 252 mm 22.1 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
höger sida USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
höger sida USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
vänster sida: strömanslutning, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), ljudkombination
vänster sida: strömanslutning, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), ljudkombination
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1622 (823min - 1820max) MBit/s +109%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1529 (623min - 1608max) MBit/s +97%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1445 (1373min - 1515max) MBit/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=149, last 2 years)
1233 MBit/s +59%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
908 (806min - 973max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
802 (579min - 1120max) MBit/s +3%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (536 - 925, n=42)
792 MBit/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
776 (392min - 802max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1734 (1706min - 1750max) MBit/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1686 (1451min - 1716max) MBit/s +86%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1666 (840min - 1685max) MBit/s +84%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)
1394 MBit/s +54%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1223 (1136min - 1272max) MBit/s +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Realtek RTL8852BE
905 (765min - 969max) MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
899 (755min - 936max) MBit/s -1%
Average Realtek RTL8852BE
  (455 - 984, n=43)
847 MBit/s -6%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø763 (392-802)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (623-1608)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1373-1515)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1595 (823-1820)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (765-969)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (840-1685)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1733 (1706-1750)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1685 (1451-1716)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)
ColorChecker
16.3 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS: 15.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.28 ∆E

Display - 16:10-panel med sRGB-täckning

Subpixlar
Subpixlar

A16 är utrustad med samma 165-Hz-panel som finns på dess systermodell systermodell. Den matta 16-tumsskärmen (1 920 x 1 200 pixlar, IPS) har ett 16:10-format och den får poäng tack vare FreeSync-stödet, avsaknaden av PWM-flimmer och snabba reaktionshastigheter. Kontrasten är acceptabel, men ljusstyrkan skulle behöva vara lite bättre.

292
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE NE160WUM-NX2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 303 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 301 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1433:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.265
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Medion Erazer Defender P40
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Gigabyte G5 KE
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
Display
3%
-44%
-0%
-39%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
69.3
71.2
3%
38.1
-45%
68.3
-1%
40.7
-41%
69.4
0%
sRGB Coverage
97.3
98.8
2%
56.8
-42%
98.1
1%
61
-37%
97.8
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.7
73.3
4%
39.3
-44%
69.8
-1%
42.1
-40%
70.9
0%
Response Times
2%
-159%
10%
-79%
-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)
14.5 ?(7, 7.5)
7%
38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2)
-149%
14.6 ?(7.1, 7.5)
6%
26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12)
-71%
17 ?(8, 9)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5.7, 4.3)
10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7)
-4%
26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6)
-168%
8.7 ?(3.6, 5.1)
13%
18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82)
-87%
10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7)
-1%
PWM Frequency
Screen
5%
-115%
7%
-113%
4%
Brightness middle
301
405.7
35%
261
-13%
364
21%
269
-11%
308
2%
Brightness
294
368
25%
258
-12%
343
17%
248
-16%
293
0%
Brightness Distribution
94
87
-7%
92
-2%
86
-9%
85
-10%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.21
0.38
-81%
0.19
10%
0.28
-33%
0.5
-138%
0.23
-10%
Contrast
1433
1068
-25%
1374
-4%
1300
-9%
538
-62%
1339
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.79
1.65
8%
5.57
-211%
1.67
7%
4.54
-154%
1.47
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.48
4.2
-21%
20.6
-492%
2.78
20%
17.28
-397%
2.98
14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.2
0.53
56%
4.63
-286%
1.14
5%
3.34
-178%
1.02
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
1.2
52%
3.19
-28%
1.4
44%
3.8
-52%
2.2
12%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.3 96%
2.45 90%
2.091 105%
2.17 101%
2.228 99%
CCT
6157 106%
6453 101%
6146 106%
6568 99%
7408 88%
6228 104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 4%
-106% / -106%
6% / 6%
-77% / -92%
-0% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Ex works, skärmen har bra färgåtergivning: En avvikelse på ca 1,8 är acceptabel (DeltaE < 3). Kalibrering sänker detta värde till 1,2 och leder till mer balanserade gråtoner. Panelen kan avbilda hela sRGB-färgrymden, men inte AdobeRGB och DCI P3. Detta liknar de flesta av konkurrenternas skärmar.

CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Mättnad
CalMAN: Mättnad
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Mättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Mättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs sRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs sRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs AdobeRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs AdobeRGB
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs DCI-P3
Asus TUF Gaming A16 vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 4.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.3 ms rise
↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Den bärbara datorns betraktningsvinkelstabila IPS-panel är läsbar från alla vinklar. Det går att titta på panelen utomhus - så länge solen inte skiner för starkt.

A16 utanför.
A16 utanför.
betraktningsvinklar
betraktningsvinklar

Prestanda - Asus använder sig av AMD:s kraft

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS är en bärbar speldator i mellanklassen. AMD-hårdvara ger den nödvändiga datorkraften. Den nuvarande modellen kan köpas för cirka 1 700 USD.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
 

Testförhållanden

Med tangentkombinationen "Fn" + "F5" kan man växla mellan de tre tillverkarspecifika prestandaprofilerna (se tabell). Profilerna "Prestanda" (benchmarks) och "Tyst" (batteritester) användes. GPU-läget var inställt på "Standard" (= växla grafik). I notebookens kontrollcenter ("Armoury Crate") kan du skapa individuella profiler ("Manual"), som inkluderar inställning av PPT- och fläktkurvor.

Turbo Prestanda Tyst
Effektgräns 1 (HWInfo) 120 watt 105 watt 75 watt
Effektgräns 2 (HWInfo) 144 watt 114 watt 90 watt
Buller (Wichter 3) 53 dB(A) 51 dB(A) 46 dB(A)
Prestanda (Witcher 3) ~100 fps ~100 fps ~94 fps
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd
Kista för vapenförråd

Processor

CPU-delen avRyzen-9-7940HS-APU (Phoenix, Zen 4) har åtta processorkärnor med 16 trådar. En basklockfrekvens på 4 GHz kan höjas till upp till 5,25 GHz (en kärna). Våra uppmätta benchmarkresultat är ungefär desamma som de tidigare testade bärbara 7940HS-datorerna. Användning av profilen "Turbo" leder till lite bättre prestanda (4-5 procent).

systermodellens Ryzen-7-7735HS-APU (Rembrandt R, Zen 3+) är klart slagen av Ryzen 9, även med samma antal kärnor och samma effektgränser. Tack vare dess bättre arkitektur och högre klockfrekvenser är dess prestanda per watt högre.

CB15-slingtestet visar detta: Kontinuerlig flertrådsbelastning leder till att processorn arbetar med konsekvent höga turboklockfrekvenser - oavsett vilken prestandaprofil som valts.

Observera: Detaljerad information om den installerade APU:n och dess arkitektur finns i vår analysartikel omZen4.

multitrådad (ansluten till elnätet)
multitrådad (ansluten till elnätet)
enkeltrådad (ansluten till elnätet)
enkeltrådad (ansluten till elnätet)

Cinebench R15 multi continuous test

01653304956608259901155132014851650181519802145231024752640280529703135Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø3057 (3008.42-3230.23)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2369 (2270.92-3189.19)
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)
CB15-slinga (prestanda)
CB15-slinga (prestanda)
CB15 loop (turbo)
CB15 loop (turbo)
CB15-slinga (tyst)
CB15-slinga (tyst)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
78.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
74.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
71.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
 
70.7 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
68.6 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
58.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
56.3 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
54.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)
21784 Points +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20341 Points +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
19987 (10270.1min - 19987.3max) Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
16907 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (15556 - 18131, n=10)
16867 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
15537 Points -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13995 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
13155 Points -22%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1886 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1791 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1733 - 1832, n=10)
1788 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1697 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1668 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1629 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1561 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years)
8290 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
7710 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
6889 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6277 - 7111, n=10)
6604 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6571 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
6009 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5441 Points -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5066 Points -23%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years)
725 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
702 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (680 - 714, n=10)
701 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
652 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
652 Points -7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
644 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
627 Points -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
612 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years)
3413 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3230 (3008.42min - 3230.23max) Points +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
3189 Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (2470 - 2848, n=10)
2673 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2666.7 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2299 (2235.89min - 2298.72max) Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
2253 (1876.44min - 2253.14max) Points -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
2112 (1956.47min - 2112.49max) Points -21%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
283 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (277 - 288, n=10)
283 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years)
277 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
265 Points -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
248 Points -12%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
247 Points -13%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
245 Points -13%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
243 Points -14%
Blender
v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
234 Seconds * -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
230 Seconds * -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
225 Seconds * -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
198 Seconds * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (182 - 202, n=9)
191.1 Seconds * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
189 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=183, last 2 years)
170.9 Seconds * +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
151 Seconds * +20%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H (3.3.3)
441 Seconds * -47%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H (3.3.2)
423 Seconds * -41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (3.3.3)
376 Seconds * -25%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)
345 Seconds * -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (287 - 331, n=10)
308 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (3.3.3)
301 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX (3.3.3)
264 Seconds * +12%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=187, last 2 years)
85120 MIPS +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
78076 MIPS +11%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
72220 MIPS +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (66408 - 73434, n=10)
70912 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
70081 MIPS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61292 MIPS -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
59034 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
54380 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (6417 - 6776, n=10)
6645 MIPS 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6621 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=187, last 2 years)
6306 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5779 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5718 MIPS -14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
5552 MIPS -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
5537 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
5383 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=188, last 2 years)
14972 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14222 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
14144 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12111 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (11207 - 12500, n=11)
11902 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
11198 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
10260 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9836 Points -19%
Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2032 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (1823 - 2032, n=11)
1983 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=188, last 2 years)
1892 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1777 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
1667 Points -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
1666 Points -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
1647 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1574 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
24.2 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=187, last 2 years)
23.4 fps +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (20.1 - 22.6, n=9)
21.1 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
20.8 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.8 fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
17.4 fps -16%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
16.6 fps -20%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
59.1 s * -42%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
57.7 s * -38%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
49.8 s * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=184, last 2 years)
47.4 s * -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
47 s * -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (36.9 - 54.8, n=10)
45.4 s * -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
41.7 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
36.5 s * +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.5 sec * -18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.493 sec * -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.4904 sec * -15%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H
0.4865 sec * -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX
0.4769 sec * -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=188, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=10)
0.4297 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4253 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2666.7 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
188.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
283 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6571 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
702 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
16907 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1791 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
 
94.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
91.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
89.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
84.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
71.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68.1 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
63.6 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
60 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
28033 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (25226 - 29109, n=8)
27015 KRay/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=184, last 2 years)
21813 KRay/s -22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
20413 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
16661 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
15620 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
15397 KRay/s -45%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
12542 KRay/s -55%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
122098 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (106512 - 123214, n=8)
115513 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=184, last 2 years)
106435 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
103903 Points -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
101275 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
77807 Points -36%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
76434 Points -37%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
65919 Points -46%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=184, last 2 years)
4884 MB/s +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (4566 - 5119, n=8)
4877 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
4633 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
4566 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
3494 MB/s -23%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3412 MB/s -25%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
3244 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
3212 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
124433 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (118174 - 124783, n=8)
121129 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=184, last 2 years)
116781 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
113990 Points -8%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
113837 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
104709 Points -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
87225 Points -30%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
80337 Points -35%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
15380 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (14663 - 15551, n=8)
15145 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
13285 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=184, last 2 years)
13235 Points -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
12691 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
10407 Points -32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
8694 Points -43%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
7388 Points -52%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
63432 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (56839 - 66238, n=8)
61581 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
55209 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=184, last 2 years)
53598 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
50250 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
38311 Points -40%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
37738 Points -41%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
31844 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (86309 - 169946, n=8)
128009 MB/s +48%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
110639 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=184, last 2 years)
108960 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
94177 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
86309 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
72510 MB/s -16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
66845 MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
64725 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=184, last 2 years)
1358 MB/s +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
1339 MB/s +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
1089 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (866 - 1152, n=8)
1062 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
981 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
924 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
883 MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
879 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
15209 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (13175 - 15675, n=8)
14510 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=184, last 2 years)
11747 KRay/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
11057 KRay/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
8923 KRay/s -41%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
8448 KRay/s -44%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
8145 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
6989 KRay/s -54%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=185, last 2 years)
40045 MPixel/s +34%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
37023 MPixel/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)
36147 MPixel/s +21%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
36118 MPixel/s +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (29922 - 41024, n=8)
35306 MPixel/s +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.75.6100)
29922 MPixel/s
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)
29085 MPixel/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S (v6.85.6300)
27871 MPixel/s -7%

Systemets prestanda

Det välfungerande systemet ger tillräcklig prestanda för krävande användningsområden, såsom rendering, videoredigering och spel - de goda PCMark-resultaten kan bekräfta detta. RAM-minnets överföringshastigheter ligger på en normal nivå för DDR5 4800 RAM-minne. Det är viktigt att notera: Den automatiska växlingen mellan dGPU och iGPU (Smart Access Graphic) tar alltid en sekund eller två. Under denna tid fryser systemet.

RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel mode.
RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel mode.
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
7927 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
7927 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7789 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
7691 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7332 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
7201 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
6909 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6892 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
11150 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
10872 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10844 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
10844 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years)
10828 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10622 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10180 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
10505 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
10505 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years)
9897 Points -6%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9760 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9744 Points -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9475 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9332 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
9131 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
12434 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years)
12085 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
11868 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
11868 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10790 Points -9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
9593 Points -19%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
9393 Points -21%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8957 Points -25%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)
1905 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1774 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1774 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1774 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1752 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1718 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points -6%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)
1805 Points +5%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1720 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1715 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1715 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1653 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1643 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1618 Points -6%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)
2090 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1992 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1990 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1990 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1840 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1778 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1710 Points -14%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1771 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)
1704 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1663 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
1577 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1570 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1388 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
1388 Points 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5937 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6458 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
7927 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (59712 - 78739, n=8)
65738 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=184, last 2 years)
65173 MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
59712 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58458 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57466 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
56560 MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
48549 MB/s -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44445 MB/s -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=184, last 2 years)
69015 MB/s +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67644 MB/s +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67639 MB/s +10%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
65535 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
61609 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (50399 - 61836, n=8)
60105 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
50338 MB/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
47514 MB/s -23%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (72541 - 91567, n=8)
81839 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
72541 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=184, last 2 years)
66990 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65896 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
57744 MB/s -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
57505 MB/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55012 MB/s -24%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
46901 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96.1 ns * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
94.9 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=184, last 2 years)
94 ns * -4%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
93 ns * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
  (87.6 - 111.1, n=8)
92.7 ns * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
90.4 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.6 ns * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81.9 ns * +9%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

Det standardiserade latency monitor-testet (webbsurfning, uppspelning av 4k-video, Prime95 high-load) avslöjade några avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida programuppdateringar kan leda till förbättringar eller till och med försämringar.

Övervakning av latens
Övervakning av latens
Övervakning av latens
Övervakning av latens
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7213.9 μs * -539%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4343.1 μs * -285%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1128.7 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1002.5 μs * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
869.7 μs * +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
237.9 μs * +79%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Asus har utrustat A16 med en 512 GB SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) från Micron - (för) lite lagringsutrymme för en gaming-notebook. Den levererar hyfsade datahastigheter men är inte en av toppmodellerna bland alla tillgängliga SSD-enheter. Speciellt skrivhastigheterna är långt under dagens möjligheter.

En PCIe-4 SSD fungerar som systemdisk.
En PCIe-4 SSD fungerar som systemdisk.
Det finns plats för en andra SSD.
Det finns plats för en andra SSD.
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4285 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1772 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 482 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2316 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1674 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.92 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
87.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
77.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
64.8 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
59.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
54.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
45 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
 
33.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
5346 (4832.89min - 5346.06max) MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)
3468 MB/s +54%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2501 (2479.67min - 2500.68max) MB/s +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2460 (2456.1min - 2460.17max) MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2390 (2088.15min - 2390.38max) MB/s +6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2271.71min - 2290.75max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
2253 (2206.83min - 2252.55max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1748 - 2253, n=5)
1891 MB/s -16%
seq write
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4675 (4517.46min - 4675.27max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)
3802 MB/s +128%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2991 (2932.66min - 2991.48max) MB/s +79%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2903 (2823.62min - 2902.74max) MB/s +74%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2230 (2171.45min - 2229.69max) MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1671 (1641.02min - 1670.59max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1519 - 1671, n=5)
1585 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1495 (1277.34min - 1495.48max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
7127 (6535.15min - 7127.37max) MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)
6305 MB/s +47%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
5009 (4674.55min - 5008.89max) MB/s +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
4725 (4035.45min - 4724.88max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4633 (4029.05min - 4633.45max) MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4556 (3742.64min - 4556.27max) MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
4294 (3669.6min - 4293.91max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (3234 - 4294, n=5)
3728 MB/s -13%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
4903 (812.65min - 4902.98max) MB/s +177%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)
4841 MB/s +173%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
4797 (4359.23min - 4796.61max) MB/s +171%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3415 (3353.98min - 3415.42max) MB/s +93%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3411 (3334.51min - 3410.81max) MB/s +92%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2255 (2245.25min - 2255.17max) MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1773 (1734.23min - 1773.16max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1610 - 1773, n=5)
1682 MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
65.9 (62.88min - 65.94max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s +101%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
62.6 (62.25min - 62.63max) MB/s +91%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
51.1 (49.74min - 51.1max) MB/s +56%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
35.5 (35.31min - 35.47max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
32.8 (32.61min - 32.76max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)
31.9 MB/s -3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
31.8 (31.24min - 31.76max) MB/s -3%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
369 (333.31min - 369.47max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
328 (300.52min - 328.36max) MB/s +148%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
281 (267.52min - 281.12max) MB/s +113%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
267 (258.43min - 266.75max) MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +69%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
181.3 (175.93min - 181.25max) MB/s +37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
132 (125.41min - 131.99max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (106.4 - 132, n=5)
123.7 MB/s -6%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3335 (3324.73min - 3334.83max) MB/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
2889 (2819.64min - 2889.22max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)
2561 MB/s +50%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2025 (1213.07min - 2024.78max) MB/s +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1705 (1701.1min - 1704.63max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1678 (1211.7min - 1678.15max) MB/s -2%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1323 (1320.64min - 1322.54max) MB/s -22%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (766 - 1705, n=5)
1017 MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3737 (3683.15min - 3737.15max) MB/s +136%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2256.15min - 2290.93max) MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2234 (2227.81min - 2234.36max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)
2132 MB/s +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1585 (1554.44min - 1585.47max) MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1509 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1457 (1124.17min - 1456.77max) MB/s -8%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (313 - 1585, n=5)
595 MB/s -62%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
9125 Points +114%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
7599 Points +78%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=157, last 2 years)
6736 Points +58%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5903 Points +39%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
5541 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
4261 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4020 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (2845 - 4261, n=4)
3370 Points -21%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
3235 Points +77%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2625 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=157, last 2 years)
2442 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2348 Points +28%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2128 Points +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1830 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1726 Points -6%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1031 - 1830, n=4)
1305 Points -29%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
4288 Points +167%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3618 Points +126%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=157, last 2 years)
3109 Points +94%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2404 Points +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2388 Points +49%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1604 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1257 - 1735, n=4)
1491 Points -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1456 Points -9%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
5856.12 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=157, last 2 years)
4933 MB/s +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3976.53 MB/s +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3792 MB/s +3%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
3697.92 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
3690.93 MB/s
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3667.76 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (2798 - 3691, n=4)
3189 MB/s -14%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
4750.28 MB/s +191%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3884.67 MB/s +138%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=157, last 2 years)
3755 MB/s +130%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3020.8 MB/s +85%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2772 MB/s +70%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
2106.21 MB/s +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1633.49 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1156 - 1633, n=4)
1329 MB/s -19%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
82.5 MB/s +93%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
77.12 MB/s +80%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=157, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +53%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
63.89 MB/s +49%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
51.2 MB/s +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
49.25 MB/s +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
42.75 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (30 - 42.8, n=4)
35.7 MB/s -16%
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
312.09 MB/s +164%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
276.66 MB/s +134%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
225 MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=157, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +79%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
207.32 MB/s +75%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
152.75 MB/s +29%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)
121.6 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
118.17 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
2572.63 MB/s +80%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
2194.79 MB/s +54%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1901.41 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=157, last 2 years)
1877 MB/s +31%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1675.54 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1429.83 MB/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1296 MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (721 - 1430, n=4)
953 MB/s -33%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
3536.78 MB/s +151%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
3021.8 MB/s +114%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=157, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1949.13 MB/s +38%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
1865.08 MB/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
1411.25 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (1003 - 1468, n=4)
1258 MB/s -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
954 MB/s -32%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)
0.095 ms * -64%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
0.08 ms * -38%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
0.066 ms * -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.058 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=156, last 2 years)
0.05556 ms * +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.05 ms * +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
0.044 ms * +24%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.029 ms * +50%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
  (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)
0.1968 ms * -67%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM
0.118 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.108 ms * +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.105 ms * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
0.053 ms * +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=157, last 2 years)
0.04807 ms * +59%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
0.033 ms * +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
0.013 ms * +89%

* ... smaller is better

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø3496 (2896.67-3526.02)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4460 (3778.02-4582.76)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 Phison PS5021-E21 1TB: Ø5011 (4694.47-5029.18)
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10: Ø2113 (226.43-4712.52)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)

Grafikkort

AMD:s Radeon RX 7600Shar 1 792 shaders, en 128-bitars bred buss och snabb GDDR6-lagring (8 192 MB). Dess maximala TGP (95 watt) utnyttjas inte till sin fulla potential enligt Witcher 3 testet. Benchmarkresultaten är precis som förväntat och att använda profilen "Turbo" leder inte till någon förbättrad prestanda.

Konkurrenterna till mellanklass-GPU:n finns i GeForce -modellerna RTX 4060,RTX 4050och RTX 3060's fulla konfigurationer (= maximal TGP). Även om den inte riktigt kan hålla jämna steg med RTX 4060, gjorde den fortfarande bättre ifrån sig i 3DMark-benchmarks än båda de andra GeForce -modellerna. I praktisk spelanvändning kunde vi inte få en konsekvent bild: Beroende på spelet presterade ibland den ena GPU:n bättre, ibland den andra - åtminstone i de spel vi testade.

Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, prestanda)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, prestanda)
Fire Strike (batterianvändning, prestanda)Fire Strike (batterianvändning, prestanda)
Fire Strike (batterianvändning, prestanda)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, turbo)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, turbo)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, tyst)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, tyst)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, turbo, dGPU)
Fire Strike (ansluten till elnätet, turbo, dGPU)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.5 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
86.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
84.4 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
82.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
81.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
80.6 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
77.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
72.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
37654 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
36470 Points +10%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (33037 - 35278, n=4)
34188 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
33988 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
33037 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
30959 Points -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
29569 Points -10%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
159354 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
157190 Points +1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (150582 - 164406, n=3)
156931 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
155806 Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
150582 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
143583 Points -8%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
136826 Points -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
27122 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
26561 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
26154 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (25514 - 26154, n=3)
25856 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
25514 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
23443 Points -10%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
22625 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
10855 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
10329 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9203 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (9080 - 9208, n=3)
9164 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9080 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
8686 Points -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
8500 Points -8%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
55435 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
28721 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
64441 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23346 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
9530 poäng
Hjälp
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=190, last 2 years)
126769 Points +95%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
104225 Points +60%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
102522 Points +57%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
102369 Points +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
100490 Points +54%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
87670 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
66133 Points +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (65110 - 66133, n=2)
65622 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
65110 Points
Vulkan Score 5.5
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=120, last 2 years)
72840 Points +101%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
55994 Points +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
48885 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
36222 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (26646 - 36222, n=2)
31434 Points -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
26646 Points -26%
Geekbench 6.0
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming
  (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)
115603 Points +76%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
96539 Points +47%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
65701 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
65701 Points 0%
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
83464 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
83464 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)
48002 Points -42%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX
4237 Points -95%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)
2190 mpaths
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1817 mpaths
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1690 mpaths
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)
1197 mpaths
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)
1574 mpaths +425%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1231 mpaths +310%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
1176 mpaths +292%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)
909 mpaths +203%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)
300 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
300 mpaths 0%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years)
15137 mpaths +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
14543 mpaths +20%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (5.0.1)
12370 mpaths +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (5.0.1)
12169 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
12169 mpaths 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (5.0.1)
9406 mpaths -23%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
709 mpaths +639%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )
618 mpaths +544%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )
480 mpaths +400%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
396 mpaths +313%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
390 mpaths +306%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )
96 mpaths
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (83 - 96, n=2)
89.5 mpaths -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )
83 mpaths -14%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21459 ksamples +22%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX (v4.10.07 )
19237 ksamples +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (v4.10.07 )
17623 ksamples
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (14759 - 17623, n=2)
16191 ksamples -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (v4.10.07 )
14759 ksamples -16%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
14218 ksamples -19%
Gigabyte G5 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H (v4.10.07 )
14118 ksamples -20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H (v4.10.07 )
13494 ksamples -23%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
231 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
230.8 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 231, n=26, last 2 years)
38.1 fps -83%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
17.5 fps -92%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
56.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
56.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 59.9, n=26, last 2 years)
40.8 fps -28%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
30 fps -47%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (99.8 - 687, n=25, last 2 years)
421 fps +30%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
323 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
322.7 fps
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
201.6 fps -38%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
53.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
53.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.6 - 76.5, n=26, last 2 years)
48.7 fps -9%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
20.6 fps -61%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
126.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
126.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 141.9, n=26, last 2 years)
108.9 fps -14%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
86.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=26, last 2 years)
74.2 fps +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
73.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
73.4 fps 0%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
53.9 fps -27%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 221, n=26, last 2 years)
127.4 fps +89%
Gigabyte G7 KE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
89.4 fps +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
67.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
67.5 fps 0%

Spelprestanda

FA617 är utformad för spel med höga till maximala inställningar. Fullskärmsupplösningen (1.920 x 1.200 pixlar) kan användas. Högre upplösningar kan användas när en motsvarande skärm är ansluten - med delvis reducerade inställningar. Profilen "Turbo" ökar inte bildfrekvensen.

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
96.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 -1!
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95.1 pt
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75.5 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
73.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
69.8 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
67.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
65.3 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.6 (101min) fps +10%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
103 (89min) fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (neu)
98.1 (84min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (91 - 98.1, n=2)
94.6 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
91 (77min) fps -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87.6 (77min, 77.42P1) fps -11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
83 fps -15%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
119.6 (3.03min, 76.9P1) fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
113.9 (5.92min, 76.9P1) fps +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.7 fps +22%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
103 (7.98min, 71.4P1) fps +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
92.9 (26.7min, 62.5P1) fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
92.2 (4.55min, 55.6P1) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (85.5 - 92.9, n=2)
89.2 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
85.5 (3.46min, 62.5P1) fps -8%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
119.8 fps +41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
109.8 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
100.8 fps +18%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
90.3 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)
85.2 fps
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.3)
82.8 fps -3%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (78.2 - 85.2, n=2)
81.7 fps -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.3)
78.2 fps -8%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +40%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
188.3 (28min, 137.1P1) fps +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
163.3 (16.3min, 119.3P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (162.7 - 163.3, n=2)
163 fps 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
162.7 (111.4min, 120.7P1) fps 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
153.3 (32.3min, 117.2P1) fps -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
148.7 (20.2min, 114.3P1) fps -9%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
161.8 (140.3min) fps +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)
150.4 fps +24%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
144.3 (117.7min) fps +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
142.5 (121.3min) fps +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
137.5 (121.2min) fps +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
121.6 (100.8min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (110 - 121.6, n=2)
115.8 fps -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
110 (85.8min) fps -10%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
121.9 fps +113%
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
109.3 fps +91%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
107.8 fps +88%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
97 fps +69%
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86.7 fps +51%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
57.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (55 - 57.3, n=2)
56.2 fps -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
55 fps -4%
Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)
84.7 fps +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
70 (38min) fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
67 (34min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
67 fps 0%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average of class Gaming
  (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)
73.5 fps +79%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
41 (16min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
41 fps 0%
Atomic Heart - 1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)
72.8 fps +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
56.6 (31.1min, 47.6P0.1, 49.1P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
56.6 fps 0%
Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
76.7 (36.2min, 50.2P0.1, 56.6P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
76.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)
68.8 fps -10%
Resident Evil 4 Remake - 1920x1080 Max Preset
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
72.7 (14.6min, 26.1P0.1, 52.5P1) fps +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.7 - 143.2, n=15, last 2 years)
70.7 fps +35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
52.3 (6.38min, 13.8P0.1, 34.2P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
52.3 fps 0%
The Last of Us - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (31.6 - 105, n=13, last 2 years)
61.2 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
51.5 (4.4min, 32.8P0.1, 43.4P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
51.5 fps 0%
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming
  (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)
73.7 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
55.4 (27min, 28.2P0.1, 39P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
55.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Average of class Gaming
  (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)
46.3 fps +64%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
28.3 (13.7min, 14.6P0.1, 17.8P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
28.3 fps 0%
Company of Heroes 3 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average of class Gaming
  (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)
129 fps +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
97.2 (41.4P0.1, 54.7P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
97.2 fps 0%
Dead Island 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
148.5 (19.5min, 20.4P0.1, 94.8P1) fps +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
113.1 (18.3min, 19P0.1, 73P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
113.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 181.7, n=11, last 2 years)
97.9 fps -13%
Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (24.7 - 74, n=8, last 2 years)
50.5 fps +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
42.7 (29.5min, 33.8P0.1, 36.4P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
42.7 fps 0%
Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 167, n=27, last 2 years)
111.4 fps +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
104.7 (86min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
104.7 fps 0%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (71.9 - 119, n=9, last 2 years)
93.6 fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
78.5 (36min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
78.5 fps 0%

För att kontrollera om bildfrekvensen förblir i stort sett konstant under en längre period körde vi spelet The Witcher 3 i cirka 60 minuter med Full HD-upplösning och maximala kvalitetsinställningar. Spelkaraktären flyttades inte. Någon prestandaförlust noterades inte.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S; neu: Ø95.2 (89-101)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø96.9 (93-103)
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)
Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø100.7 (96-104)
Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø84.8 (81-91)
lågmed.högultra
GTA V (2015) 184.7 171.7 92.9
The Witcher 3 (2015) 382 166.5 98.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 157.5 143.1 132.2 121.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 215 117.2 85.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 85.1 72 57.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 135 120 115 108
Strange Brigade (2018) 440 228 190.8 163.3
Metro Exodus (2019) 187.3 116.5
The Division 2 (2019) 232 167 131 95
Control (2019) 235 116.6 83.5
Doom Eternal (2020) 376 209 184.3 179
Gears Tactics (2020) 381.4 216.1 138.1 95.4
Death Stranding (2020) 189.5 144.1 133.6 129.6
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 134.9 85.5 60.1 42.7
Crysis Remastered (2020) 294 190.9 90.6 38.6
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 122.6 118.5 106.6 69.5
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 203 124 102 88
Hitman 3 (2021) 270 178.2 157.4 145.7
Far Cry 6 (2021) 151 133 119 104.7
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 197 144 135 74
GRID Legends (2022) 214.9 182.8 156.5 129.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 198.1 156.8 105.7 82.2
F1 22 (2022) 263 244 190 50.5
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 98.2 78 66.1 55.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 118.4 88.7 72 55.4
Returnal (2023) 91 88 78 67
Atomic Heart (2023) 167.1 125.5 71.6 56.6
Company of Heroes 3 (2023) 143.4 125.9 97.4 97.2
Sons of the Forest (2023) 93.2 81.4 78 76.7
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) 107.4 83.2 78.9 52.3
The Last of Us (2023) 81.4 67.6 60.2 51.5
Dead Island 2 (2023) 201 168.1 122.7 113.1

Emissioner - FA617XS kan bli ganska högljudd

Utsläpp av buller

Vid daglig användning (kontor, internet etc.) arbetar A16 vanligtvis tyst, ofta ljudlöst - oavsett vald profil. Ljudtrycksnivån kan stiga till 53 dB(A) ("Turbo") eller 51 dB(A) ("Performance") i spelläge. Med profilen "Quiet" kan man uppnå en totalt sett lägre ljudnivå. Beräkningseffekten reduceras då endast i mycket liten utsträckning.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
25 / 26 / 28 dB(A)
Hög belastning
43 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.541.342.841.138.738.52538.73939.542.138.738.73147.945.143.547.644.647.94031.62831.13227.931.65028.924.927.32925.428.96330.229.230.428.62230.28033.820.623.218.718.533.810023.719.820.517.518.623.712525.622.618.318.21925.616027.925.420.418.619.227.92003128.325.122.921.23125031.124.820.719.51831.131530.623.715.618.215.430.640032.726.616.118.21232.750035.431.514.118.711.935.46303830.812.816.811.83880038.831.811.920.811.338.8100038.331.211.41511.338.31250403211.814.211.240160041.634.411.916.311.841.6200041.23113.414.412.541.2250037.829.713.214.613.337.8315038.630.91315.113.338.6400036.728.912.913.913.736.7500039.431.913.413.913.939.4630038.826.513.814.814.238.8800034.521.613.414.413.834.51000028.920.313.114.913.628.91250025.619.212.913.913.225.61600021.22112.212.512.321.2SPL50.642.625.828.125.350.6N7.44.10.810.77.4median 35.4median 28.3median 13.4median 15.1median 13.3median 35.4Delta5.64.42.22.12.15.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Noise
8%
7%
-11%
-11%
3%
off / environment *
25
23
8%
24
4%
25
-0%
19.52
22%
24
4%
Idle Minimum *
25
23.1
8%
24
4%
26
-4%
31.05
-24%
24
4%
Idle Average *
26
23.1
11%
24
8%
27
-4%
31.05
-19%
25
4%
Idle Maximum *
28
26.6
5%
24
14%
32
-14%
31.05
-11%
28
-0%
Load Average *
43
34.7
19%
37.71
12%
53
-23%
55.66
-29%
42
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
47.6
7%
45.75
10%
56
-10%
55.7
-9%
50
2%
Load Maximum *
53
54.8
-3%
54.55
-3%
64
-21%
55.51
-5%
50
6%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Den bärbara datorn blir märkbart varm vid belastning, men inte överdrivet varm. Temperaturerna ligger inom en grön zon vid daglig användning. Det senare var inte fallet i systermodellen- vi antar ett fel / defekt på enheten.

 50 °C53 °C45 °C 
 40 °C47 °C44 °C 
 38 °C26 °C31 °C 
Max: 53 °C
Medel: 41.6 °C
48 °C44 °C46 °C
37 °C33 °C37 °C
27 °C25 °C30 °C
Max: 48 °C
Medel: 36.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  54 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KE
Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Heat
1%
-8%
9%
-14%
-17%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
42.8
19%
47
11%
42
21%
52.6
1%
54
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
48
50
-4%
48
-0%
45
6%
62.4
-30%
47
2%
Idle Upper Side *
30
29.6
1%
35
-17%
28
7%
33.6
-12%
40
-33%
Idle Bottom *
30
34
-13%
38
-27%
30
-0%
34.8
-16%
40
-33%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Stresstestet (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig drift) simulerar ett extremt scenario för att testa systemets stabilitet under full belastning. CPU (3,4 till 3,5 GHz) och GPU (~1 500 MHz) kördes genom testet med klockfrekvenser under respektive basklocka.

Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Stresstest
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger överlag ett bra ljud.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.139.542.12540.24340.23148.549.948.54033.836.733.85037.64137.66333.228.933.28037.123.237.110042.922.742.912543.725.743.716048.525.748.520051.425.651.425056.825.256.831557.818.957.840061.815.761.850064.813.964.863069.215.469.280068.91168.9100070.110.770.1125068.89.868.8160068.510.368.5200067.81167.8250061.811.661.8315067.811.767.840006711.767500065.212.165.2630061.11361.1800062.312.162.31000059.611.859.61250052.911.352.91600046.910.846.9SPL78.825.978.8N44.70.844.7median 61.8median 12.1median 61.8Delta7.847.836.73536.730.923.130.928.722.328.725.917.825.923.622.123.623.123.523.124.419.924.42016.32023.314.723.331.314.231.338.312.238.344.411.144.444.814.744.851.812.151.856.110.456.160.911.960.96396363.29.363.261.19.161.1629.96257.41057.459.110.359.153.911.353.956.211.256.258.711.758.76111.76165.911.965.963.512.163.558.212.458.249.312.449.372.723.172.730.50.430.5median 57.4median 11.7median 57.491.79hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XSLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - bärbar speldator med bra drifttid

Strömförbrukning

Det finns inga avvikelser när det gäller strömförbrukning. Förbrukningen ligger på en normal nivå för den installerade hårdvaran. Stresstestet och Witcher 3 test kördes med konstant strömförbrukning. Strömförsörjningen (240 watt) är mer än tillräckligt stor.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 7 / 10 / 15 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 86 / 172 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-107%
2%
-25%
-16%
-7%
-4%
-66%
Idle Minimum *
7
24.5
-250%
8.5
-21%
8
-14%
7.66
-9%
8
-14%
7.5 ?(7 - 8, n=2)
-7%
Idle Average *
10
29.2
-192%
10.2
-2%
12
-20%
10.3
-3%
11
-10%
10.5 ?(10 - 11, n=2)
-5%
Idle Maximum *
15
34.3
-129%
11.3
25%
18
-20%
16.05
-7%
16
-7%
15.5 ?(15 - 16, n=2)
-3%
Load Average *
86
98.7
-15%
84
2%
101
-17%
115.8
-35%
97
-13%
91.5 ?(86 - 97, n=2)
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
160.6
178.6
-11%
128
20%
180.8
-13%
168.7
-5%
161.5
-1%
Load Maximum *
172
249.6
-45%
189
-10%
284
-65%
234.6
-36%
168
2%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø160.6 (159.6-162.3)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø159.3 (157.9-160.8)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.82 (7.33-14.6)

power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.9 (91.1-102.9)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.1 (98.2-128)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø156.4 (155-168.2)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø156.5 (155.1-169.5)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17 (11.6-29.8)

Batteriets livslängd

16-tumsenheten uppnådde körtider på 12:25 h och 12:26 h i vårt WLAN-test (ringa upp webbplatser via ett skript) respektive videotest (kortfilmen Big Buck Bunny (H.264-kodning, FHD) i en loop). Under båda testerna var den bärbara datorns energisparfunktioner inaktiverade och skärmens ljusstyrka var inställd på ca 150 cd/m². De trådlösa modulerna var också inaktiverade för videotestet

FA617 levererade utmärkta drifttider och lämnade konkurrenterna i sticket. Kombinationen av en sparsam APU och stor batterikapacitet lönar sig definitivt här.

Batteriet har en kapacitet på 90 Wh.
Batteriet har en kapacitet på 90 Wh.
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 17min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 113)
12tim 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 26min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 52min
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS
R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK
i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh
Medion Erazer Defender P40
i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Gigabyte G5 KE
i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-53%
-20%
-29%
-39%
23%
-21%
Reader / Idle
1217
401
-67%
528
-57%
1212
0%
H.264
746
264
-65%
339
-55%
130
-83%
WiFi v1.3
745
205
-72%
260
-65%
373
-50%
342
-54%
724
-3%
Load
52
41
-21%
89
71%
76
46%
62
19%
90
73%
Witcher 3 ultra
79

För

+ matt WUXGA-skärm (165 Hz) i 16:10-format
+ bra systemprestanda
+ två M.2-platser (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)
+ expanderbart RAM-minne
+ USB 4
+ Power Delivery
+ lång batteritid

Emot

- kan bli högljudd under belastning
- Lågkvalitativ SSD med lite lagringsutrymme
- medelmåttiga WLAN-datahastigheter
- svampig återkoppling från tangentbordet
- besviken webbkamera

Omdöme - Asus bärbara dator med (för) lite lagringsutrymme

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS, testenhet som tillhandahålls av Asus Tyskland.
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS, testenhet som tillhandahålls av Asus Tyskland.

A16 är konfigurerad för WUXGA-spel med höga till maximala inställningar, men den bör vara användbar inom många andra områden, till exempel videoredigering och rendering. Ett AMD-team bestående av enRyzen 9 7940HSochRadeon RX 7600Sger den bärbara datorn sin nödvändiga prestanda. Båda komponenterna körs med konsekvent höga klockfrekvenser.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition är en väl avrundad bärbar dator i mellanklassen vars imponerande batteritider är dess stolthet och glädje.

Jämfört medRyzen-7-7735HSaPU som finns i desssystermodellhar 7940HS-APU betydligt bättre CPU-prestanda att erbjuda trots att den har samma antal kärnor och samma effektgränser. Här märks den moderna arkitekturen (Zen 4 vs. Zen 3+) och de högre klockfrekvenserna.

Enhetens fantastiska körtider är verkligen dess unika försäljningsargument: Dess praktiska mätningar på cirka 12,5 timmar uppnås i allmänhet inte av många andra bärbara kontorsdatorer. En positiv sak: Batteriet kan laddas med en USB-C-strömförsörjning (min. 65 watt, 20 V) - en USB-C-port stöder Power Delivery. Den proprietära strömförsörjningen skulle inte nödvändigtvis behöva bäras med dig.

Den installerade IPS-skärmen (16 tum, 1 920 x 1 200 pixlar) har ett arbetsvänligt förhållande på 16:10 och lämnade i allmänhet ett gott intryck på oss - om något skulle ljusstyrkan behöva vara lite starkare. Den installerade SSD-enheten skulle passa perfekt för en enkel kontorslaptop - men inte för en gaminglaptop för 1 700 USD. Det erbjudna lagringsutrymmet (512 GB) och data lever varken upp till användarnas krav eller deras förväntningar.

DenLegion Pro 5 16IRX8kan vara ett lämpligt alternativ. Den har bättre prestanda och en ljusare skärm än A16 - men den har uppenbarligen inte samma imponerande körtider att erbjuda. DenGigabyte G5 KEkan vara ett bra budgetalternativ: Du får en liknande nivå av grafikprestanda till ett mycket lägre pris. Men: Den här bärbara datorn levereras inte med ett förinstallerat Windows-operativsystem.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Versionen av A16 med 16 GB RAM och en 512 GB SSD kan köpas på Asus webbplats för cirka 1 371 dollar.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS - 06/05/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
79 / 98 → 81%
Tangentbord
77%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
63 / 80 → 79%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batteri
89 / 95 → 94%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
99%
Programprestanda
96%
Temperatur
83 / 95 → 87%
Ljudnivå
79 / 90 → 87%
Audio
77%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Medel
79%
87%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS recension: AMD-bärbar dator med upp till 20 timmars drifttid
Sascha Mölck, 2023-06- 8 (Update: 2023-06- 8)