Intel behövs inte: Asus TUF FX505DT - Test med Ryzen 7 och GeForce GTX 1650

Name: Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Brand: Asus

Ett alternativ till Intel Core i5.

Det visar sig att Nvidias mittenskiktsgrafikkort passar väldigt bra ihop med AMD:s senaste processorserie Ryzen H. Asus släpper ännu fler Intel-fria speldatorer som gamers med tight budget bör överväga.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/08/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Xotic PC

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 (TUF FX505D Serie)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 4 x 2.3 - 4 GHz, Picasso (Zen+)

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1395 MHz, Minne: 2001 MHz, GDDR5, 430.86, Optimus

Minne

8 GB

, DDR4-2666, Enkel kanal, SK Hynix, 17-17-17-39

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, NCP0036, 120 Hz, glansig: nej

Moderkort

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Hårddisk

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB

Ljudkort

AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26.8 x 360.4 x 262

Batteri

48 Wh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: 720p

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2 W stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LifeSafe, Asus Armoury Crate, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.23 kg, Strömförsörjning: 417 g

Pris

900 USD

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus FX504GD Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 MSI GF63 8RC Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW DIN A4 ❌

Vänster: AC-adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, USB 2.0 Typ A, 2x USB Typ A 3.1 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s +11%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	617 MBit/s
Asus FX504GD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	614 MBit/s 0%
Asus TUF FX505DY Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	267 MBit/s -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s +16%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	671 MBit/s +15%
Asus FX504GD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	657 MBit/s +12%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	586 MBit/s
Asus TUF FX505DY Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	324 MBit/s -45%


283.7 cd/m²	274.6 cd/m²	274.8 cd/m²
258.4 cd/m²	286.2 cd/m²	257 cd/m²
240.5 cd/m²	274.1 cd/m²	252.5 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Panda LM156LF-GL tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 286.2 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 266.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16.7 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 286.2 cd/m²
Kontrast: 867:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.47
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.91% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.56% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus FX504GD AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 LG LP156WFC-SPD1 (LGD0563), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus TUF FX505DY Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GF63 8RC AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		59%	-6%	-4%	1%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	39.56	64.9 64%	37.09 -6%	37.97 -4%	40.04 1%	39.43 0%
sRGB Coverage	59.5	91 53%	55.8 -6%	57 -4%	60.2 1%	59.3 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.91	65.9 61%	38.34 -6%	39.23 -4%	41.4 1%	40.73 0%
Response Times		72%	4%	-18%	-30%	-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30.4 ?(14, 16.4)	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4) 76%	41.6 ?(19.6, 22) -37%	42 ?(20.8, 21.2) -38%	44.8 ?(18.8, 26) -47%	33.2 ?(15.2, 18) -9%
Response Time Black / White *	27.6 ?(17.6, 10)	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 68%	15.2 ?(10, 5.2) 45%	26.8 ?(16, 10.8) 3%	30.8 ?(17.6, 13.2) -12%	27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6) 1%
PWM Frequency					20830 ?(30)
Screen		31%	-20%	13%	6%	0%
Brightness middle	286.2	286 0%	260 -9%	238 -17%	211.5 -26%	266.6 -7%
Brightness	267	275 3%	241 -10%	226 -15%	200 -25%	257 -4%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	85 1%	83 -1%	82 -2%	89 6%
Black Level *	0.33	0.37 -12%	0.55 -67%	0.27 18%	0.23 30%	0.29 12%
Contrast	867	773 -11%	473 -45%	881 2%	920 6%	919 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.45	2.19 60%	7 -28%	4.11 25%	3.92 28%	5.93 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.08	4.4 76%	22.52 -25%	6.89 62%	17.63 2%	16.28 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.47	2.27 49%	5.27 -18%	3.76 16%	4.16 7%	3.6 19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.3	2.2 58%	6.1 -15%	1.78 66%	3.1 42%	6.8 -28%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.41 ^91%	1.97 ^112%	2.41 ^91%	2.23 ^99%	2.43 ^91%
CCT	7679 ^85%	6405 ^101%	7894 ^82%	6311 ^103%	6578 ^99%	7192 ^90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37.6	59 57%	35.5 -6%	36 -4%	38.1 1%	37.6 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	59.1	91 54%	61 3%	57 -4%	60 2%	59.3 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		54% / 41%	-7% / -14%	-3% / 6%	-8% / 1%	-1% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.6 ms rise
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)

Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø725 (718.93-754.96)

Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø707 (700.72-757)

Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø823 (815.58-828.24)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware m17 P37E Intel Core i9-8950HK	191 Points +22%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points +20%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H	177 Points +13%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H	176 Points +12%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U	174 Points +11%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	173 Points +10%
MSI GF63 8RC Intel Core i5-8300H	170 Points +8%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	157 Points
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points -1%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	145 Points -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (135 - 157, n=7)	143.9 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points +115%
Alienware m17 P37E Intel Core i9-8950HK	1238 Points +55%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H	1182 Points +48%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H	1116 Points +40%
MSI GF63 8RC Intel Core i5-8300H	812 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	799 Points
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	757 Points -5%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H	757 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 3750H (672 - 805, n=7)	743 Points -7%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	733 Points -8%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Intel Core i7-8565U	677 Points -15%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

157 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

799 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

85.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1793 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

386 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)	7789 Points +65%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	5654 Points +19%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4973 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4732 Points
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD	4527 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4405 Points -7%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	3808 Points -20%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years)	10828 Points +30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	9231 Points +10%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8819 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD	8457 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8355 Points
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	7949 Points -5%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	6583 Points -21%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years)	9897 Points +52%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	7661 Points +18%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7310 Points +12%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6518 Points
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	6446 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD	6385 Points -2%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	5927 Points -9%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years)	12085 Points +129%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	6936 Points +31%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5282 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5178 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD	4665 Points -12%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4528 Points -14%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	3843 Points -27%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +33%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4560 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD	3931 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	3917 Points
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	3909 Points 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +30%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	5223 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAL + HGST ST1000LM049 1 TB HDD	5208 Points +11%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	5018 Points +7%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4701 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3917 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4701 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		4732 poäng
Hjälp

	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus TUF FX505DY WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11
AS SSD		7%	11%	-53%	5%
Seq Read	1019	1059 4%	1808 77%	490.6 -52%	1617 59%
Seq Write	889	1180 33%	1429 61%	390.2 -56%	1017 14%
4K Read	48.22	37.55 -22%	46.1 -4%	19.47 -60%	40.03 -17%
4K Write	115.5	110.6 -4%	97 -16%	72.2 -37%	103.4 -10%
4K-64 Read	321.5	619 93%	536 67%	236.2 -27%	477.3 48%
4K-64 Write	787	502 -36%	273.6 -65%	276.7 -65%	281.5 -64%
Access Time Read *	0.065	0.087 -34%	0.085 -31%		0.069 -6%
Access Time Write *	0.047	0.034 28%	0.038 19%	0.063 -34%	0.063 -34%
Score Read	472	762 61%	763 62%	305 -35%	679 44%
Score Write	992	730 -26%	514 -48%	388 -61%	487 -51%
Score Total	1717	1899 11%	1663 -3%	850 -50%	1495 -13%
Copy ISO MB/s	942	1166 24%		321.3 -66%	1595 69%
Copy Program MB/s	444.5	507 14%		141.7 -68%	485.8 9%
Copy Game MB/s	867	480.3 -45%		239.4 -72%	1029 19%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1732 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 959 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 340.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 237.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1564 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 984 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 137.5 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points +105%
Aorus 15 W9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H	15501 Points +64%
Aorus 15-SA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	15164 Points +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H	13355 Points +42%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	11483 Points +22%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	9428 Points
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	9195 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (7741 - 9810, n=32)	9195 Points -2%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	7791 Points -17%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	6356 Points -33%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	6327 Points -33%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	2874 Points -70%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points +117%
Aorus 15 W9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6007 Points +68%
Aorus 15-SA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5931 Points +66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H	4867 Points +36%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3572 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	3568 Points
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	3492 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (2900 - 3700, n=31)	3430 Points -4%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	2536 Points -29%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	1790 Points -50%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	1597 Points -55%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	862 Points -76%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points +95%
Aorus 15-SA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	20862 Points +54%
Aorus 15 W9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H	20464 Points +51%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H	17170 Points +26%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	14550 Points +7%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13759 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	13575 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (10885 - 13575, n=30)	12797 Points -6%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	9466 Points -30%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	8181 Points -40%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7133 Points -47%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3560 Points -74%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points +101%
Aorus 15-SA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	11914 Points +74%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X	11707 Points +71%
Aorus 15 W9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H	9981 Points +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (5870 - 12662, n=28)	9097 Points +33%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	8540 Points +25%
Asus FX503VM-EH73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7696 Points +13%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7025 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H	6838 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H	6644 Points -3%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	6447 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FN-A6023T NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i7-8565U	3707 Points -46%

3DMark 11 Performance		10963 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		21151 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8154 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		3559 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	90 fps +120%
Alienware 17 R4 Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	79 (52^min) fps +93%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	78 fps +90%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	76.7 fps +87%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	65 fps +59%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	49 fps +20%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	44 (9^min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (34 - 47, n=15)	43.2 fps +5%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	41 fps
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	31 fps -24%
Asus GL753VD Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	26 (3^min) fps -37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	23 fps -44%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	134 fps +116%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	133 fps +115%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	126.8 fps +105%
Alienware 17 R4 Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	95 (65^min) fps +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (57 - 128, n=13)	94.2 fps +52%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	93 fps +50%
Asus GL753VD Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	71 (48^min) fps +15%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	63 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	62 fps 0%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	62 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	54 fps -13%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	72.7 (61^min - 82^max) fps +101%
CUK Model Z GK5CQ7Z Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	63 fps +74%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	62 (43^min - 74^max) fps +71%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	55.1 fps +52%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	48.8 fps +35%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	36.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (29.9 - 40.3, n=31)	35.6 fps -2%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	35.4 (28^min) fps -2%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	25.8 fps -29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	20.6 fps -43%

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø62.9 (55-68)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	183.9			73.9
The Witcher 3 (2015)	146.4		62.7	36.2
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	88		67	44
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	117.8		64.4	54.4
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)		40	36
Overwatch (2016)	165.2		133.2	86.4
Rocket League (2017)	213.9	162.5	127.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	62	52	45	41

	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)	Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	MSI GF63 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049	Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Noise		-15%	1%	-6%	-4%	-1%	-2%
off / environment *	28.2	30 -6%	28.1 -0%	30 -6%	28 1%	28.2 -0%	30.2 -7%
Idle Minimum *	28.2	31 -10%	29 -3%	30 -6%	33.8 -20%	28.2 -0%	30.9 -10%
Idle Average *	28.2	33 -17%	29.2 -4%	31 -10%	34 -21%	28.2 -0%	30.9 -10%
Idle Maximum *	31.4	38 -21%	29.7 5%	33 -5%	34.2 -9%	28.2 10%	31.6 -1%
Load Average *	39.8	50 -26%	44.3 -11%	46 -16%	37.3 6%	43.9 -10%	42.3 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	47	53 -13%	40.7 13%	46 2%	43.4 8%	49 -4%
Load Maximum *	50.2	56 -12%	47.7 5%	49 2%	46 8%	50.6 -1%	40 20%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		28.2 / 28.2 / 31.4 dB(A)
Hög belastning		39.8 / 50.2 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


33 °C	35 °C	37 °C
29.8 °C	41.2 °C	28.2 °C
25 °C	25.4 °C	25.6 °C

Max: 41.2 °C
Medel: 31.1 °C


40 °C	34 °C	39 °C
26.6 °C	32.8 °C	30 °C
27 °C	27.6 °C	26.8 °C

Max: 40 °C
Medel: 31.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 51 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


30.8 °C	32.6 °C	31 °C
31 °C	34.6 °C	32 °C
28 °C	27.8 °C	28.2 °C

Max: 34.6 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C


34.4 °C	32.4 °C	33.6 °C
31 °C	32 °C	29.8 °C
29.2 °C	28.6 °C	27.8 °C

Max: 34.4 °C
Medel: 31 °C

Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


33.8 °C	35 °C	37 °C
30.4 °C	42 °C	30.4 °C
28.2 °C	27 °C	27.4 °C

Max: 42 °C
Medel: 32.4 °C


41.6 °C	34.2 °C	38 °C
27.8 °C	32 °C	31 °C
27.2 °C	27.6 °C	27 °C

Max: 41.6 °C
Medel: 31.8 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 50 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.06 / 0.92 Watt
Låg belastning	7 / 9.9 / 12 Watt
Hög belastning	68.4 / 130.9 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus FX504GD i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus TUF FX505DY R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Legion Y7000P-1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-138%	-2%	7%	13%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	7	24 -243%	7.2 -3%	5 29%	5.2 26%	4.9 30%
Idle Average *	9.9	27 -173%	10.2 -3%	7 29%	7.5 24%	8.1 18%
Idle Maximum *	12	33 -175%	10.9 9%	11 8%	9.4 22%	16.5 -38%
Load Average *	68.4	129 -89%	93.3 -36%	89 -30%	73 -7%	109.2 -60%
Witcher 3 ultra *	94.9	176 -85%	95.8 -1%	90 5%	90 5%	124.6 -31%
Load Maximum *	130.9	216 -65%	102.5 22%	132 -1%	120.7 8%	175.2 -34%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		7tim 46min
WiFi Websurfing		4tim 45min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 27min

	Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh	Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh	Asus FX504GD i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh	Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 57 Wh	MSI GF63 8RC i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 51 Wh	Asus TUF FX505DY R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		-25%	-21%	65%	1%	13%
Reader / Idle	466	353 -24%	449 -4%	1044 124%	571 23%	520 12%
WiFi v1.3	285	220 -23%	223 -22%	486 71%	332 16%	327 15%
Load	87	62 -29%	56 -36%	88 1%	56 -36%	97 11%

För

+ prestanda jämförbar med Core i5-modeller vid Höga grafikinställningar

+ kompakt för att vara en budgetspellaptop; tunn infattning

+ lätt att serva; 2 lagringsplatser

+ 120 Hz-skärm finns som tillval

+ inbyggt numeriskt tangentbord

+ RGB-tangentbord

Emot

- långsammare bilduppdatering än väntat vid Låga grafikinställningar

- RAM med enkel kanal är standard

- låter mycket när man spelar; pulserande fläktar

- batteritiden kunde varit bättre

- högtalare som är sämre än genomsnittet

- inget stöd för G-Sync

- böjligt lock

Recension av Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73. Recensionsex från Xotic PC

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

I likhet med de flesta modeller som drivs av AMD är priset en stor fördel med Asus TUF FX505DT. Detta system för 9.000 kronor kommer utrustat med en 120 Hz-skärm och en NVMe SSD-enhet på 512 GB medans likvärdigt prissatta alternativ med en Core i5-9300H CPU och samma GTX 1650 GPU istället hade haft en 60 Hz-skärm och bara hälften så mycket SSD-lagring. Du får fler funktioner för pengarna utan att behöva offra särskilt mycket spelprestanda och fördelarna med 120 Hz märks även om de flesta spel inte kan uppnå en stabil bilduppdatering på 120 FPS.

Prestandan vid lägre upplösningar eller grafikinställningar kunde varit bättre då spelen blir begränsade av CPU:n snabbare med Ryzen 7 än med en motsvarande Core i5. Vi rekommenderar att sikta på 30 FPS eller 60 FPS för att få ut mesta möjliga ur kombinationen Ryzen 7 och GeForce GTX 1650. Om riktigt snabb bilduppdatering är en prioritet är en vanlig Intel Core i7- och GeForce-PC ett bättre alternativ.

När det kommer till själva chassit kunde Asus definitivt ha löst att fläktarna pulserar när man spelar, att batteritiden är medelmåttig, att styrplattan känns klistrig och att locket böjer sig. G-Sync hade också varit ett utmärkt alternativ, särskilt med tanke på att GTX 1650 oftast kan köra nyare spel i runt 40 - 60 FPS då G-Sync passar som bäst. Men även med dessa brister i åtanke är FX505DT en lätt och riktigt välbalanserad spelmaskin för sin budgetkategori och är inte helt olik Zephyrus G GA502DU. Var bara säker på att du till varje pris undviker FX505DY!

Innan Ryzen släpptes var det svårt att ens rekommendera en AMD-driven spellaptop till casualspelare. Asus TUF FX505DT och även Zephyrus G GA502 har återigen gjort AMD-modeller till ordentliga alternativ för gamers med liten budget.

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 - 07/04/2019 v6 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

76 / 98 → 78%

Tangentbord

87%

Mus

75%

Anslutningar

41 / 81 → 51%

Vikt

62 / 10-66 → 92%

Batteri

80%

Skärm

83%

Spelprestanda

90%

Programprestanda

92%

Temperatur

90 / 95 → 95%

Ljudnivå

84 / 90 → 94%

Audio

50%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Medel

74%

80%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5249 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Intel behövs inte: Asus TUF FX505DT - Test med Ryzen 7 och GeForce GTX 1650

Allen Ngo, 2019-07- 8 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison