Medion Erazer Beast X40 recension: Gaming notebook med RTX 4090

Name: Medion Erazer Beast X40
Brand: Medion

Översyn.

Gå stort, inte gå hem: Med Core i9-13900HX och GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop har Medion gett den här bärbara datorn den senaste och mest kraftfulla hårdvaran som finns tillgänglig just nu. Enheten har också en snabb 16:10-skärm (2 560 x 1 600), ett mekaniskt tangentbord och en ganska bra batteritid.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/24/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

Även om den hör till kategorin bärbara datorer för spel är Erazer Beast X40 också avsedd för andra mycket krävande användningsscenarier. Den nödvändiga datorprestandan tillhandahålls av en Raptor Lake CPU och en Ada Lovelace GPU. Jämfört med sina föregångare har den bärbara datorn fått en stor översyn: Medion har gett den ett nytt bildskärmsformat (16:10 i stället för 16:9), ett kylsystem med vattenkylning som tillval och ett mekaniskt tangentbord.

X40 bygger på en Tongfang barebone (GM7PX9N) som i stort sett är identisk med den som användes för XMG Neo 17. Den konkurrerar med liknande produkter som MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI, Alienware x17 R2 P48E, Razer Blade 16 (början av 2023)och Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY.

Test device courtesy of Medion

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Medion Erazer Beast X40 (Erazer Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2040 MHz, Minne: 2375 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus

Minne

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Skärm

17.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 178 PPI, BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, G-Sync, glansig: nej, 240 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Hårddisk

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB

, 1884 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1x combo audio jack, 1x mic-in, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Nätverk

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 33 x 383 x 272

Batteri

99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Mechanical, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.88 kg, Strömförsörjning: 986 g

Pris

4499 Euro

Länkar

Medion hemsida
Medion kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	03/2023	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
89 % v7 ^(old)	02/2023	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.5 kg	23 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
91.2 % v7 ^(old)	02/2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	09/2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	05/2022	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	20.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	02/2023	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.1 kg	30.8 mm	18.00"	2560x1600

Hölje - Erazer har ett metallchassi

Erazer Beast X40 undviker en högljudd och flashig look till förmån för en dämpad design som inte skulle sticka ut i en professionell miljö. Precis som sina föregångare använder X40 ett svart metallchassi med matt finish. Basdelen är täckt av en greppvänlig gummibeläggning. Tangentbordets bakgrundsbelysning (RGB) samt två fullt konfigurerbara LED-remsor (RGB) ovanför de bakre utblåsningsventilerna ger den bärbara datorn en färgklick. Batteriet, som är fastskruvat i stället för fastlimmat, och resten av de inre delarna är tillgängliga när det nedre locket har tagits bort.

Vi märkte inga problem med tillverkningen på vår recensionsenhet. Luckorna i chassit är fina och täta och det finns inga överskottsmaterial kvar från tillverkningsprocessen. Det är praktiskt taget omöjligt att vrida basdelen. Locket kan böjas något, men mängden eftergift är fullt acceptabel. Gångjärnen håller skärmen stadigt på plats och gör att skärmen kan vikas tillbaka i upp till ungefär 140 grader. Den bärbara datorns lock kan inte öppnas med en hand.

Medion Erazer Beast X40 är en av de mest kompakta enheterna i vår jämförelse och ligger någonstans i mitten när det gäller vikt.

Storleksjämförelse

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Alienware x17 R2 P48E MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Medion Erazer Beast X40 SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 DIN A4 ❌

Specifikationer - Thunderbolt 4 för odjuret

Erazer har tre USB-A-portar (2x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2) och en USB-C-port (Thunderbolt 4) ombord. Den sistnämnda har inte stöd för Power Delivery men kan ge ut DisplayPort-signaler. Den bärbara datorn har totalt två videoutgångar (HDMI 2.1, DP), två ljuduttag (headset och mic-in), en Gigabit Ethernet-port och en Kensington-plats. På baksidan hittar du även kontakter för den valfria vattenkylningslösningen.

Till vänster: Kensington-plats, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), mikrofoningång, kombinerat ljuduttag

På baksidan: 2 kontakter för vattenkylning, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, strömport

SD-kortläsare

SD-kortläsaren är en medelhastighetsmodell som tillsammans med vårt referenskort AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60 lyckades nå hastigheter på upp till 77 MB/s vid överföring av 250 JPEG-bilder på cirka 5 MB vardera och 86 MB/s vid kopiering av stora datamängder.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)	182.9 MB/s +138%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	125 MB/s +62%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +24%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	83.5 MB/s +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	69 MB/s -10%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)	220.6 MB/s +157%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	207.6 MB/s +141%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +39%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	86.2 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	86 MB/s

Anslutningsmöjligheter

Under optimala förhållanden (inga andra Wi-Fi-enheter i omedelbar närhet, kort avstånd mellan den bärbara datorn och serverdatorn) levererade Erazer utmärkta överföringshastigheter via Wi-Fi eftersom Medion har valt att använda en Intel AX211 Wi-Fi 6E-modul. Trådbundna nätverksanslutningar hanteras av Realtek RTL8125 Gigabit Ethernet-chipet, som klarar hastigheter på upp till 2,5 Gbit/s.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1582 (1517^min, 1518.74^P1 - 1636^max) MBit/s +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1466 (748^min - 1542^max) MBit/s +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1364 (1079^min - 1473^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1155 (495^min - 1441^max) MBit/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	936 (898^min - 971^max) MBit/s -31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1890 (1843^min - 1936^max) MBit/s +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1578 (1516^min - 1627^max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1545 (1508^min, 1510.9^P1 - 1569^max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1328 (1093^min - 1448^max) MBit/s -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608	967 (949^min - 978^max) MBit/s -39%

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (1036-1505)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1283-1580)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1364 (1079-1473)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1582 (1517-1636)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (898-971)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (748-1542)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1578 (1516-1627)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1545 (1508-1569)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 MediaTek RZ608; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (949-978)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1890 (1843-1936)

Webbkamera

Webbkameran på 2,1 MP tar bilder med en maximal upplösning på 1 920 x 1 080. Den saknar färgprecision: de färger som kameran producerar avviker avsevärt från referensfärgerna. Det finns ingen mekanisk sekretessbrytare på webbkameran.

ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X40: 8.69 ∆E min: 3.5 - max: 14.3 ∆E

Tillbehör

Den bärbara datorn levereras utan andra tillbehör än den vanliga dokumentationen och en nätadapter. Medion erbjuder en extern vattenkylningslösning som tillval till ett pris av cirka 250 euro (270 dollar), som företaget också tillhandahöll oss för testning.

Den lilla kylningsenheten är ganska enkel att använda: fyll den helt enkelt med destillerat vatten, anslut kablarna och slangarna och sätt på den. Den bärbara datorn och den externa kylenheten kommunicerar med varandra via Bluetooth, och anslutningen upprättas automatiskt. Den bärbara datorns laddare förser både X40 och kylenheten med ström. Vattenrören hålls på plats magnetiskt - inga skruvar behöver dras åt. Några droppar vatten kan dock läcka ut när du kopplar bort rören.

Underhåll

För att ta bort bottenskyddet måste du lossa alla skruvar på undersidan samt ytterligare två skruvar på baksidan bredvid vattenkylningskontakterna. Därefter kan bottenlocket dras av i en skarp rörelse vid utblåsningsventilerna. När du tar bort locket får du tillgång till minnesplatserna (båda används), två PCIe 4.0 SSD-enheter, Wi-Fi-modulen, fläktarna, BIOS-batteriet och det uppladdningsbara batteriet.

Garanti

Medion ger två års garanti på Erazer. Uppgraderingsalternativ finns tillgängliga, men de måste köpas tillsammans med den bärbara datorn i Medions webbutik. Du kan inte uppgradera eller förlänga garantin efter att du har köpt den bärbara datorn. Det kostar nästan 200 euro (216 dollar) att förlänga garantin med ett år.

Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniskt tangentbord med Cherry MX-switchar

Tangentbord

Mekaniska tangentbord är allmänt kända för sina exakta inmatningar och återkopplingar samt sin förstklassiga skrivkänsla - detta är inte annorlunda med X40:s tangentbord. Dess Cherry MX-switchar erbjuder en måttlig rörelse och en hörbar och taktil aktiveringspunkt. Tangentbordet böjs inte när du skriver. Det finns två funktionstangenter så att du kan justera RGB-belysningen per tangent till en av de fyra ljusstyrkorna. På det hela taget har Erazer Beast X40 ett i alla avseenden fantastiskt tangentbord.

Pekplatta

Multitouch-klickplattan mäter ca 15,5 x 10 cm (6,1 x 3,9") och har en slät yta som gör att du enkelt kan glida över med fingrarna. Den erbjuder en kort resa och en tydlig klickpunkt. Det finns statusljusdioder i de övre hörnen av plattan. Genom att trycka på den vänstra lysdioden aktiveras eller inaktiveras hela pekplattan, medan den högra lysdioden används för att aktivera eller inaktivera endast den högra halvan av plattan.

Skärm - QHD+ med 16:10 bildförhållande

Den 17-tums matta IPS-skärmen (2 560 x 1 440) har ett bildförhållande på 16:10 och utmärker sig med tillräcklig ljusstyrka, snabb responstid, hög uppdateringsfrekvens (240 Hz) och avsaknad av PWM-flimmer. Men dess kontrastförhållande är inte tillräckligt bra (>1 000:1).

Panelen har stöd för G-Sync, en teknik som hjälper skärmens uppdateringsfrekvens att dynamiskt anpassa sig till den bildfrekvens som GPU:n matar ut. Detta är utformat för att ge en jämnare visningsupplevelse, särskilt när du spelar.


377 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	372 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	368 cd/m²
398 cd/m²	383 cd/m²	369 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

BOE NE170QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 398 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 377.2 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 384 cd/m²
Kontrast: 853:1 (Svärta: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.74
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.017

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18"
Display		24%	24%	0%	10%	21%
Display P3 Coverage	68.6	94.9 38%	98.5 44%	69 1%	79.2 15%	97.2 42%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	99.9 0%	100 0%	99.8 0%	99.8 0%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.4	92.4 33%	89.7 29%	69.6 0%	79.6 15%	84.9 22%
Response Times		-248%	-9%	12%	-17%	19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	11.3 ?(5.4, 5.9)	38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n) -240%	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2) 42%	10.8 ?(5.1, 5.7) 4%	12.4 ?(6.4, 6) -10%	5.41 ?(2.57, 2.84) 52%
Response Time Black / White *	7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)	26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n) -255%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -60%	6.1 ?(2.5, 3.6) 19%	9.2 ?(5.2, 4) -23%	8.62 ?(3.68, 4.94, n) -15%
PWM Frequency		2380 ?(100)
Screen		78886%	-6%	11%	-22%	-92%
Brightness middle	384	606 58%	456.8 19%	415 8%	365.4 -5%	490 28%
Brightness	377	602 60%	437 16%	399 6%	344 -9%	468 24%
Brightness Distribution	90	93 3%	83 -8%	90 0%	85 -6%	86 -4%
Black Level *	0.45	0.0001 100%	0.35 22%	0.43 4%	0.29 36%	0.54 -20%
Contrast	853	6060000 710334%	1305 53%	965 13%	1260 48%	907 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.05	4.8 -134%	3.7 -80%	1.44 30%	3.17 -55%	4.97 -142%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.64	8.2 -125%	6.42 -76%	2.33 36%	7.69 -111%	11.02 -203%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.74	1.8 -143%	0.66 11%	0.89 -20%	0.51 31%	2.97 -301%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	6.5 -183%	2.6 -13%	1.8 22%	5.3 -130%	7.2 -213%
Gamma	2.017 ^109%	2.63 ^84%	2.3 ^96%	2.132 ^103%	2.18 ^101%	2.161 ^102%
CCT	6546 ^99%	6596 ^99%	6108 ^106%	6327 ^103%	5879 ^111%	6515 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		26221% / 50682%	3% / -0%	8% / 9%	-10% / -15%	-17% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

Skärmen har redan från början en fantastisk färgåtergivning. Den genomsnittliga färgskillnaden på cirka 2 är betydligt lägre än tröskeln för vad som anses vara bra (Delta E < 3). Kalibrering av skärmen minskade den genomsnittliga färgskillnaden till 0,74 och gjorde gråskalan mer balanserad. Panelen kan täcka hela sRGB-färgrymden, men inte AdobeRGB och DCI-P3. Skärmarna på några av de konkurrerande bärbara datorerna presterar bättre när det gäller färgtäckning.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.3 ms rise
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.4 ms rise
11.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS-panelen har en bred betraktningsvinkel och är lätt att läsa från alla positioner. Skärmen är definitivt användbar utomhus, förutsatt att solen inte är alltför stark.

Föreställning - Raptor Lake möter Ada Lovelace

Även om Erazer Beast X40 i första hand är utformad för QHD+-spel, gör den också bra ifrån sig i tillämpningar som videoredigering och rendering. De nödvändiga datormusklerna tillhandahålls av Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace. X40-modellen i den här recensionen kan köpas för cirka 4 500 euro (4 856 dollar). Men Medion erbjuder även en något lägre specificerad konfiguration (RTX 4080 och 1 TB SSD; i övrigt identisk) för 3 500 euro (3 777 USD).

Provningsvillkor

Det finns tre tillverkarspecifika prestandalägen: Office, Balance och Turbo. Vi använde Turbo-läget för benchmarking och Office-läget för våra batteritidstester och aktiverade Nvidia Optimus i båda fallen. Efter att ha genomfört dessa tester körde vi fler benchmarks med dGPU-läget aktiverat och den externa vattenkylaren ansluten. Du kan hitta resultaten av dessa ytterligare tester i jämförelsetabellen, men de tas inte i beaktande för betygsättningen.

Användare kan växla mellan de tre lägena med hjälp av en dedikerad knapp precis bredvid strömknappen. En statuslysdiod visar vilket läge som för närvarande är aktiverat. Anpassade profiler kan också skapas med hjälp av den förinstallerade Control Center-programvaran. Du kan till exempel ange CPU:s effektgränser, GPU:s TGP, temperaturgränser och så vidare.

Obs: Vi använde det engelska användargränssnittet i Control Center-programvaran eftersom det finns vissa problem med den tyska översättningen. I programvaran kan du växla mellan de två språken.

	Turbo Mode	Balance Mode	Office Mode
Effektbegränsning 1	160 Watt	160 Watt	160 Watt
Effektbegränsning 2	160 Watt	160 Watt	160 Watt

Processor

Core i9-13900HX (Raptor Lake) består av åtta prestandakärnor (Hyper-Threading, 2,2-5,4 GHz) och sexton effektivitetskärnor (ingen Hyper-Threading, 1,6-3,9 GHz), vilket ger totalt 40 logiska kärnor. De resultat som erhållits i benchmarken är något högre än vad processorn i genomsnitt kan producera.

Med Erazer Beast X40 inkopplad körde dess CPU Cinebench R15 vid höga till maximala klockfrekvenser. På batteridrift var enkeltrådsprestandan endast marginellt lägre (poäng: 228), medan flertrådsprestandan tog en rejäl smäll (poäng: 1 154). Att köra Cinebench 15 i en slinga visade att processorn kan köra konstant med höga boosthastigheter när den är på nätström.

Användningen av vattenkylningsenheten medförde ingen dramatisk ökning av prestandan. Trots detta var CPU:ns prestanda stabilare vid ihållande belastning med flera trådar (CB15-slinga), och den genomsnittliga CPU-temperaturen sjönk med cirka 5 °C (9 °F).

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4532 (4437.05-4828.15)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2230 (2203.37-2292.39)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2889 (2849.61-2917.79)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX; dGPU, Cooling: Ø4680 (4646.3-4744.4)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4735 (4684.94-4780.69)

CPU-klockhastigheter när CB15 körs i en slinga (turboläge)

CPU-klockhastigheter när CB15 körs i en slinga (balanserat läge)

CPU-klockhastigheter när CB15 körs i en slinga (Office-läge)

CPU-klockhastigheter när CB15 körs i en slinga (turboläge, dGPU, vattenkylning)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	84.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	83.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	82.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	81 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	77.7 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	72.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	63.5 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	60.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	47.6 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	33277 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	31572 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30932 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	30886 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	26736 (22394.1^min - 26736.1^max) Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	18870 (18654.1^min - 18869.7^max) Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14152 Points -54%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2140 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2100 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2083 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2035 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2029 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1905 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1557 Points -23%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	12648 Points +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	12073 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	11788 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	11780 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	8697 Points -26%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	7169 Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5549 Points -53%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	824 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	793 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	782 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	742 Points -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	727 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	605 Points -23%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	5227 (4889.98^min - 5226.71^max) Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4828 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	4823 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	4744 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4781 (4684.94^min - 4780.69^max) Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4529 (4463.29^min - 4528.99^max) Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	2918 (2849.61^min - 2917.79^max) Points -40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2296 Points -52%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	312 Points +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	300 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	297 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	295 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	278 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	274 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	272 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	248 Points -16%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	216 Seconds * -108%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	173.6 Seconds * -67%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * -65%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	114 Seconds * -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	104 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	103 Seconds * +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	102 Seconds * +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	100 Seconds * +4%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	127295 MIPS +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	123833 MIPS +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	121921 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	121631 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	109330 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	69146 MIPS -43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	64439 MIPS -47%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	7084 MIPS +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	6918 MIPS 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	6897 MIPS 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6890 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6445 MIPS -6%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5872 MIPS -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	5803 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	20847 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	20634 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	20350 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	18152 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	13717 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10126 Points -50%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2099 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2047 Points +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2043 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2036 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	1878 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1805 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1590 Points -22%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	33.4 fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	32.7 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	32.7 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30.5 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28.7 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps -24%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	21.4 fps -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	17.5 fps -43%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	56 s * -30%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	47.5 s * -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.5 s * -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43 s *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	40.7 s * +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	38.2 s * +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	36 s * +16%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4808 sec * -20%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK	0.4323 sec * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4121 sec * -3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4033 sec * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4014 sec *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	0.3954 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.3793 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4828 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

261 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

297 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

11780 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

782 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2035 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

30932 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	91.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	88.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	28957 KRay/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	28701 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	27615 KRay/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	27524 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	25857 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	16115 KRay/s -41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	9759 KRay/s -65%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	144303 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	138190 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	136688 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	134221 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125944 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	98800 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	43695 Points -67%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	7093 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6949 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	6799 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	6758 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6350 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s -28%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	3504 MB/s -48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	3422 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	141427 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	139649 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	134571 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	133226 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	133197 Points
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	107120 Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	102167 Points -23%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	17117 Points +7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	17057 Points +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	16037 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	15947 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15813 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	12783 Points -20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	10402 Points -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	71038 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	70739 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	69202 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	67872 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	63308 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	54060 Points -20%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points -21%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	27285 Points -60%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	136551 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	135833 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	134166 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	129440 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	127548 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125644 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s -14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	106367 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	2059 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	2030 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	1950 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	1928 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1850 MB/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s -30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	1203 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	845 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15573 KRay/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15540 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	15279 KRay/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	14995 KRay/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	13844 KRay/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s -22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	8529 KRay/s -43%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	5748 KRay/s -62%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	50834 MPixel/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, dGPU, Cooling)	44270 MPixel/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	44016 MPixel/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	43025 MPixel/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	40896 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)	34534 MPixel/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.70.6000)	30226 MPixel/s -30%

Systemprestanda

Hårdvaran i detta snabba system ger mer än tillräckligt med prestanda för uppgifter som spel och rendering. Den bärbara datorn levereras med 32 GB minne som körs i dubbelkanalläge. Och minnets överföringshastigheter är typiska för DDR5-4800 RAM-minne. Dessutom levererade systemet också fantastiska PCMark-resultat i våra tester.

PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	9331 Points +18%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8884 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	8764 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8)	8466 Points +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8186 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	7932 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7888 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6966 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11761 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	11512 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8)	11364 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11275 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	11205 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11078 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9740 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	11680 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11321 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8)	10423 Points -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	10144 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9851 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9564 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8271 Points -27%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	16424 Points +55%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	16395 Points +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	14535 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8)	14052 Points +32%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13098 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	10611 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9848 Points -7%

CrossMark / Overall
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2150 Points +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2139 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2125 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8)	2107 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2080 Points -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1903 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1699 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1592 Points -25%

CrossMark / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2014 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1978 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1977 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8)	1960 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1909 Points -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1808 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1646 Points -17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1509 Points -24%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	2455 Points +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2423 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	2392 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2389 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8)	2379 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2095 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1867 Points -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1780 Points -25%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	1902 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1861 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1857 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8)	1833 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1666 Points -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1634 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1405 Points -24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1342 Points -28%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4936 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6075 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		7932 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77060 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67716 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67561 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63863 MB/s -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	53861 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	50231 MB/s -26%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84869 MB/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74518 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74284 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62807 MB/s -15%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	57237 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51403 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	80441 MB/s +23%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67449 MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	65472 MB/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	60389 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55263 MB/s -16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	54443 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.5 ns * -12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98.4 ns * -10%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.8 ns * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	90.8 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.3 ns * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.1 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjning

Vårt standardiserade latensmätningstest, som omfattar webbsurfning, uppspelning av 4K-video och Prime95 högbelastning, avslöjade vissa problem. Systemet verkar vara olämpligt för video- och ljudbearbetning i realtid. Vi hoppas att framtida mjukvaruuppdateringar kommer att bidra till att rätta till dessa problem.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4710.9 μs * -107%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4362 μs * -92%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2448.6 μs * -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2275.2 μs *
Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1101.9 μs * +52%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1095 μs * +52%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Medion utrustade vår X40-granskningsenhet med två 1 TB SSD-diskar (PCIe 4.0, M.2-2280) från Phison. En av dem fungerar som systemenhet och den andra används för datalagring. SSD-enheterna bildar inte bara ingen RAID-konfiguration, utan den bärbara datorn i sig stöder inte heller RAID. De medföljande enheterna är inte bland de bästa SSD-enheterna på marknaden. Trots det levererar de fortfarande bra prestanda. En annan positiv sak att nämna är att vi inte märkte några prestandaförluster orsakade av termisk strypning.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7077 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4783 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 962.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 705.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3250 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3156 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.25 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 265.1 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	78.3 pt
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	72.9 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	71.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	69.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	62.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	60.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	59.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	54.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5598 (5462.22^min - 5597.85^max) MB/s +79%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4931 (4875.77^min - 4930.83^max) MB/s +58%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4842 (4719.64^min - 4842.11^max) MB/s +55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3872 (3855.82^min - 3871.97^max) MB/s +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3844 (3257.93^min - 3843.87^max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +12%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3127 - 3582, n=3)	3287 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3127 (2701.13^min - 3126.72^max) MB/s
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7533 (7482.85^min - 7532.79^max) MB/s +134%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4819 (4728.89^min - 4819.25^max) MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4242 (4225.7^min - 4241.7^max) MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4199 (3998.61^min - 4199.12^max) MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3242 (1498^min - 3241.78^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3218 (2245.63^min - 3218.43^max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2507 - 3714, n=3)	3146 MB/s -2%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	13195 (9412.86^min - 13194.8^max) MB/s +90%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11242 (10740.3^min - 11242.2^max) MB/s +62%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	10774 (9137.92^min - 10774^max) MB/s +55%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (6956 - 6976, n=3)	6966 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	6956 (5970.17^min - 6956.25^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6872 (4963.33^min - 6872.25^max) MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6384 (5573.36^min - 6384.17^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9942 (9912.92^min - 9941.76^max) MB/s +99%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	8404 (8165.05^min - 8403.71^max) MB/s +69%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	8227 (8104.29^min - 8226.71^max) MB/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5043 (5032.12^min - 5043.21^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4986 (4917.82^min - 4985.65^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -3%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3723 - 5011, n=3)	4573 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4244 (427.59^min - 4244.22^max) MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	83.1 (79.37^min - 83.07^max) MB/s +46%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	79.3 (77.82^min - 79.25^max) MB/s +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	79.1 (78.08^min - 79.08^max) MB/s +39%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (56.8 - 84.3, n=3)	66.1 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	57.5 (57.09^min - 57.53^max) MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	56.8 (53.63^min - 56.77^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	56.5 (49.8^min - 56.49^max) MB/s -1%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (275 - 295, n=3)	284 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	283 (273.23^min - 283.12^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	220 (56.84^min - 219.56^max) MB/s -22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	213 (205.52^min - 212.72^max) MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	195.1 (194.02^min - 195.09^max) MB/s -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	170.2 (168.21^min - 170.2^max) MB/s -40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	103.7 (103.17^min - 103.74^max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4483 (4465.42^min - 4482.78^max) MB/s +27%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3543 - 3578, n=3)	3557 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3543 (3529.91^min - 3542.8^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3111 (2388.54^min - 3111.42^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s -28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1469 (1266.81^min - 1469.47^max) MB/s -59%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	874 (867.39^min - 873.79^max) MB/s -75%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	711 (692.26^min - 710.64^max) MB/s -80%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4383 (4358.15^min - 4383.06^max) MB/s +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3688 (3576.03^min - 3687.54^max) MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3398 - 3688, n=3)	3564 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s -43%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1424 (1251.47^min - 1423.75^max) MB/s -61%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1282 (960.6^min - 1281.78^max) MB/s -65%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	461 (442.02^min - 461.29^max) MB/s -87%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	350 (343.49^min - 350.45^max) MB/s -91%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9218 Points +9%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (8477 - 8906, n=3)	8641 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	8477 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7311 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points -21%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	4941 Points -42%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4850 Points -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	4364 Points -49%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3428 Points +1%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3332 - 3464, n=3)	3397 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3394 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3308 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points -28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points -40%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1948 Points -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1858 Points -45%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4113 Points +21%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3399 - 3707, n=3)	3563 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3399 Points
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2428 Points -29%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	2137 Points -37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1877 Points -45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1691 Points -50%
Seq Read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9511 MB/s +98%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	7888 MB/s +64%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	6561.69 MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5157 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5144.76 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s +3%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (4774 - 5200, n=3)	4925 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4799.93 MB/s
Seq Write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7181 MB/s +83%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	5041 MB/s +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3925.33 MB/s
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3290 - 4309, n=3)	3842 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3733 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s -5%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	3480.87 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3058.47 MB/s -22%
4K Read
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (60.6 - 97.3, n=3)	76 MB/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72.8 MB/s +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	69.21 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	68.93 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	60.64 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	58 MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.65 MB/s -18%
4K Write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (168.4 - 294, n=3)	213 MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	184.49 MB/s +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	177.9 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	175.47 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	157.01 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	144.8 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	114.7 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2853.84 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2842.96 MB/s 0%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2784 - 2854, n=3)	2828 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2744.3 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -34%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1223.07 MB/s -57%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1011 MB/s -65%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1011 MB/s -65%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3582.58 MB/s +27%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2831 - 3086, n=3)	2966 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2830.74 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1944.47 MB/s -31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	1604.89 MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	1072 MB/s -62%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	981 MB/s -65%
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.085 ms *
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (0.078 - 0.086, n=3)	0.083 ms * +2%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * +35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	0.044 ms * +48%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.036 ms * +58%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.034 ms * +60%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.03 ms * +65%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.028 ms * +67%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.082 ms * -257%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)	0.066 ms * -187%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -111%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)	0.035 ms * -52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.025 ms * -9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.023 ms * -0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.023 ms *
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (0.013 - 0.023, n=3)	0.01967 ms * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R: Ø6904 (5576.5-6952.06)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6785 (2053.41-13760.21)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6279 (4891.05-6318.25)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0): Ø13136 (12495.08-13196.72)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0): Ø10730 (8845.37-10809.96)

Grafikkort

GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop är Nvidias nuvarande flaggskepp för mobila grafikprocessorer. Den har 9 728 skuggningsenheter, en 256-bitars minnesbuss och 16 384 MB höghastighets-GDDR6-minne. RTX 4090 har upp till 175 watt TGP till sitt förfogande (150 watt + 25 watt Dynamic Boost) - det är så högt det går. Men TGP utnyttjades inte fullt ut under vårt test på Witcher 3

Benchmarkresultaten är i nivå med (Optimus-läge) eller något bättre än (dGPU-läge) vad vi hittills har sett från RTX 4090 Laptop i genomsnitt. Den bärbara datorn har också stöd för Advanced Optimus. För att växla mellan dGPU- och Optimus-läge krävs ingen omstart av datorn.

Den valfria vattenkylningen kan ge en liten prestandaförbättring i vissa benchmarks och spel. Witcher 3, till exempel, kördes med högre bildfrekvens under vår testning. Den genomsnittliga GPU-temperaturen var också lägre än när endast luftkylning användes.

Fire Strike (inkopplad, Turbo-läge, Optimus)

Fire Strike (på batteri, Turbyläge, Optimus)

Fire Strike (inkopplad, turboläge, dGPU)

Fire Strike (inkopplad, turboläge, dGPU, vattenkylning)

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	99.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	96.8 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	96.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	95.1 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	92.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	91.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	81.8 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	70.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	62.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	69777 Points +2%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	69211 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	68692 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	67073 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (54073 - 73027, n=42)	65041 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	63818 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56565 Points -18%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	44381 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	43823 Points -36%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points -37%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	164399 Points +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	159724 Points +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	150156 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	142552 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	142520 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (95671 - 164399, n=14)	142227 Points 0%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	49247 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	49220 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	48101 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40259 - 53059, n=41)	46365 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	46047 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	44759 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	40570 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	33120 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	32849 Points -27%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points -30%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	22479 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22254 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	21900 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	21278 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	21167 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16950 - 23292, n=43)	20950 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	18441 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	13455 Points -37%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	12684 Points -40%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		60717 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance		47487 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		66757 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		34788 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		19708 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * -50%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	15 Seconds * -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	14 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=39)	12.1 Seconds * +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Cooling)	12 Seconds * +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	11 Seconds * +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	10 Seconds * +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU)	10 Seconds * +29%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -93%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds * -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	19 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Cooling)	19 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16 - 24, n=39)	18.3 Seconds * +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	18 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	17 Seconds * +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU)	18 Seconds * +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	17 Seconds * +11%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	215531 Points +8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	215425 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	215359 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (6841 - 237138, n=39)	201434 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	198772 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	190582 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	173311 Points -13%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	147189 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	138625 Points -30%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)	125975 Points -37%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Cooling)	134644 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (49663 - 163089, n=28)	102459 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	90003 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK	76932 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU)	76039 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	75965 Points
Average of class Gaming (7995 - 163089, n=123, last 2 years)	71890 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	71346 Points

Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1827 - 159996, n=9)	53177 Points +460%
Average of class Gaming (1827 - 159996, n=45, last 2 years)	48002 Points +405%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	9497 Points
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	213472 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	208453 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (160333 - 213472, n=10)	192750 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points -46%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)	3590 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)	3569 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	3551 mpaths
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	3533 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1982 - 3824, n=29)	3476 mpaths -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)	3335 mpaths -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	2655 mpaths -25%
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)	2181 mpaths -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5.0.1)	1880 mpaths -47%
GPU CUDA
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)	2644 mpaths +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	2589 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)	2589 mpaths 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	2582 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1454 - 2797, n=29)	2537 mpaths -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)	2424 mpaths -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	1945 mpaths -25%
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)	1568 mpaths -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (5.0.1)	1384 mpaths -47%
CPU
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Cooling)	21230 mpaths +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	21011 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU)	20543 mpaths -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (5.0.1)	20438 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (12404 - 25897, n=27)	20296 mpaths -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	18935 mpaths -10%
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths -28%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK (5.0.1)	12463 mpaths -41%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	1261 mpaths +1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (v4.10.07 )	1252 mpaths 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	1252 mpaths
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU)	1244 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (873 - 1334, n=30)	1213 mpaths -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Cooling )	1122 mpaths -10%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)	701 mpaths -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	511 mpaths -59%
CPU
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (v4.10.07 )	32727 ksamples +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Cooling)	32036 ksamples +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	31821 ksamples 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	31769 ksamples
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU)	31120 ksamples -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (18206 - 37629, n=30)	29643 ksamples -7%
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)	21367 ksamples -33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	14909 ksamples -53%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming (16.2 - 231, n=27, last 2 years)	37.3 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (31.3 - 37.6, n=8)	34.8 fps +4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	34.28 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	33.6 fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	30 fps -11%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	59.5 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56.7 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (50 - 59.9, n=8)	55.3 fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	49.97 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 59.9, n=27, last 2 years)	40.3 fps -32%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	610.71 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (529 - 687, n=7)	605 fps +14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	555.93 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	528.8 fps
Average of class Gaming (99.8 - 687, n=26, last 2 years)	416 fps -21%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	76.1 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	74.95 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (70.6 - 76.5, n=8)	73.4 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	62.41 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (20.6 - 76.5, n=27, last 2 years)	47.6 fps -37%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	138.99 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	131.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (113.3 - 141.9, n=8)	131 fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	130.27 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (44 - 141.9, n=27, last 2 years)	107.9 fps -18%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	116.64 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	112.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (17.8 - 117.2, n=8)	101.4 fps -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	98.79 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (17.8 - 117.2, n=27, last 2 years)	73.4 fps -35%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	212.6 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	206.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (128 - 221, n=8)	198.6 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	177.9 fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (25.7 - 221, n=27, last 2 years)	125.8 fps -39%

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

X40 låter användare spela spel i QHD+ och med maxinställningar. Det är möjligt att använda en högre upplösning om du ansluter den bärbara datorn till en lämplig bildskärm. Spelen vi testade körde generellt sett med bildfrekvenser som liknar vad vi har sett från RTX 4090 fram till nu. Beroende på spelet kan du kanske få högre bildfrekvens genom att driva skärmen direkt från GeForce GPU.

Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98.2 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W ^-1! Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.5 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.3 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	90.7 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	71.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	68.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	206 (178.6^P1) fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	204.9 (178^min) fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	198.9 (190^min, 191^P1) fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=35)	198.5 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	195.1 (169^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps -9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	128 (124^min) fps -34%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121 (98^min) fps -38%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	151.6 (4.06^min, 90.9^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	151.3 (2.81^min, 111.1^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	149.8 (3.42^min, 111.1^P1) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141.3 (4.69^min, 100^P1) fps -7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.9 (3.54^min, 83.3^P1) fps -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140.7 (3.02^min, 100^P1) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.1 - 167.7, n=40)	138.6 fps -8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.3 (5.94^min, 90.9^P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101.8 (18.4^min, 71.4^P1) fps -33%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)	187.4 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU)	187.4 fps +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU, Cooling)	186.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)	177.6 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.3)	176.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (122.2 - 201, n=40)	173.4 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	157.8 fps -10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	127.8 fps -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)	122.8 fps -30%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps -32%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Cooling)	378 (79.8^min, 269^P1) fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU)	376 (53.4^min, 284^P1) fps +3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	373 (29.9^min, 272^P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	366 (29.1^min, 263^P1) fps 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	365 (90.9^min, 268^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (233 - 421, n=39)	357 fps -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	323 (61.7^min, 222^P1) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps -38%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	213 (71.8^min, 156.1^P1) fps -42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	201 (41.3^min, 148.1^P1) fps -45%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	194.7 (160^min) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	190.2 (160.9^min) fps +11%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	185.9 (157.5^min) fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	184.5 (155.3^min) fps +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	182.3 (154.8^min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (115.7 - 220, n=42)	176.3 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	171.5 (144.2^min) fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	158.9 (139.1^min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.4 (106.8^min) fps -29%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	142.8 fps +11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	137 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	136.8 fps +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Cooling)	136.6 fps +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.2 fps +5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.1 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (77.8 - 166.2, n=46)	130.7 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.3 fps
Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	112.9 fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	80.3 fps -37%

Returnal | Atomic Heart | Hogwarts Legacy | Company of Heroes 3 | Sons of the Forest

Returnal
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141 - 155, n=3)	147.3 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	146 (65^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)	84.7 fps -42%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (113 - 119, n=3)	115.7 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	113 (67^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (39 - 119, n=21, last 2 years)	70.4 fps -38%
1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (126 - 128, n=2)	127 fps +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	126 (63^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (4 - 128, n=11, last 2 years)	73.5 fps -42%

Atomic Heart
1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (128.6 - 166, n=3)	144.4 fps +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.6 (29^min, 91.2^P0.1, 105.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)	72.8 fps -43%
2560x1440 Atomic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (93.8 - 135, n=3)	112.2 fps +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93.8 (31.5^min, 68.5^P0.1, 76^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (33.3 - 135, n=11, last 2 years)	68.8 fps -27%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	166.1 (7.97^min, 44.8^P0.1, 101.4^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (41.2 - 166.1, n=4)	93 fps -44%
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)	73.7 fps -56%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	125.9 (16.5^min, 32.2^P0.1, 83.3^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40.6 - 125.9, n=4)	78.4 fps -38%
Average of class Gaming (29.8 - 125.9, n=18, last 2 years)	60.8 fps -52%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	65.5 (24.6^min, 27.1^P0.1, 39.9^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (52.2 - 67, n=3)	61.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)	46.3 fps -29%

Company of Heroes 3
1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (215 - 235, n=2)	225 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	215.2 (32.4^P0.1, 87.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)	129 fps -40%
2560x1440 Maximum Settings
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (176.4 - 194.8, n=2)	185.6 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	176.4 (58.8^P0.1, 92.22^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (62.9 - 194.8, n=9, last 2 years)	122 fps -31%

Sons of the Forest
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (85.7 - 93.9, n=2)	89.8 fps +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85.7 (46.8^min, 52.9^P0.1, 64.8^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)	68.8 fps -20%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (85.2 - 89.6, n=2)	87.4 fps +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85.2 (38^min, 57.3^P0.1, 64.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (45.5 - 89.6, n=9, last 2 years)	65.3 fps -23%

För att testa om den bärbara datorn kan köra spel med mestadels stabila bildfrekvenser under en längre tid körde vi Witcher 3 i ungefär 60 minuter i Full HD och med maximala kvalitetsinställningar utan att flytta spelarens karaktär. Vi observerade inte någon nedgång i bildfrekvensen.

Witcher 3 FPS graph

Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.4 (179-197)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø198.9 (190-214)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø119.7 (105-125)

Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø121.3 (111-128)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; dGPU, Cooling: Ø200 (186-211)

GPU-mätvärden under Witcher 3 -testet (Optimus)

GPU-mätvärden under Witcher 3 -testet (dGPU, vattenkylning)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	187.5	187.1	186	151.3	145.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	586.4	511.4	363.8	195.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	215	193.5	182.6	171.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	232	207	176.2		146.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	187.1	162.9	128.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	199	172	167	158	151
Strange Brigade (2018)	515	387	369	365	292
Hunt Showdown (2020)	367	285	262		168
Death Stranding (2020)	179	171.4	166.6	163	162.1
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020)	179.7	167.7	166.6	152.3	138.1
Back 4 Blood (2021)	403		309	309	327
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021)	163	160	158	152	141
Riders Republic (2021)	209	200	185	179	146
Elex 2 (2022)	118.2	117.1	116.2	116.2	116.7
F1 22 (2022)	301	290	268	118.2	79.9
The Quarry (2022)	278	211	177.3	146.1	100.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	242	204	186.5	166.1	125.9
Returnal (2023)	178	171	164	146	113
Atomic Heart (2023)	205	161.8	144.2	128.6	93.8
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	285.3	262.9	235.2	215.2	176.4
Sons of the Forest (2023)	96.1	90	87.9	85.7	85.2

Utsläpp - Erazers bärbara dator kan vara ganska bullrig

Bullerutsläpp

Den bärbara datorn är relativt tyst vid daglig användning (t.ex. kontorsprogram, webbsurfning). Fläktarna kan till och med sluta snurra då och då. Föga förvånande kan X40 bli ganska högljudd vid hög belastning, och producerar så mycket som 53 dB(A) ljud under stresstestet och Witcher 3 -testet. Trots de ganska höga ljudnivåerna är ljudet som produceras av de två fläktarna tolererbart som helhet: ett susande ljud åtföljs av ett ljudligt surrande som gradvis övergår till ett lätt visslande med ökande fläkthastighet.

Den bärbara datorns fläktar avtar när den externa vattenkylarenheten är ansluten. Själva enheten bidrar dock också till det totala ljudet: även om pumpen är relativt tyst när den används gör fläkten inuti kylaren mer oväsen. Allt som allt tycker vi att det totala ljudet är behagligare när vattenkylningsenheten används.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		25 / 29 / 35 dB(A)
Hög belastning		51 / 53 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX	Alienware x17 R2 P48E GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX
Noise		-3%	13%	-3%	15%	4%
off / environment *	24	24.6 -3%	23 4%	26 -8%	22.7 5%	23.9 -0%
Idle Minimum *	25	29.2 -17%	23 8%	26 -4%	23.1 8%	23.9 4%
Idle Average *	29	29.2 -1%	23 21%	29 -0%	23.1 20%	32.6 -12%
Idle Maximum *	35	29.2 17%	23.6 33%	40 -14%	23.1 34%	32.6 7%
Load Average *	51	50.7 1%	39 24%	47 8%	31.9 37%	35.9 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	51	53.3 -5%	51.6 -1%	52 -2%	52.5 -3%
Load Maximum *	53	61 -15%	51.3 3%	54 -2%	52.5 1%	55.8 -5%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Chassitemperaturerna håller sig inom ett acceptabelt intervall i vardagliga användningsfall, t.ex. vid körning av kontorsprogram och webbläsare. Den bärbara datorn blir märkbart varm men inte alltför varm under belastning, vilket vi noterade under stresstestet och Witcher 3 -testet. CPU-temperaturerna gav oss inte heller någon anledning till oro.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


46 °C	48 °C	44 °C
45 °C	45 °C	40 °C
33 °C	28 °C	29 °C

Max: 48 °C
Medel: 39.8 °C


50 °C	52 °C	44 °C
38 °C	40 °C	36 °C
32 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Max: 52 °C
Medel: 39.9 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 47 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	30 °C
30 °C	29 °C	29 °C
27 °C	25 °C	26 °C

Max: 30 °C
Medel: 28.2 °C


31 °C	31 °C	31 °C
29 °C	30 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Max: 31 °C
Medel: 29.2 °C

Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


46 °C	47 °C	46 °C
46 °C	46 °C	41 °C
34 °C	29 °C	31 °C

Max: 47 °C
Medel: 40.7 °C


50 °C	52 °C	44 °C
43 °C	42 °C	38 °C
33 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Max: 52 °C
Medel: 41 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 47 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Alienware x17 R2 P48E Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		13%	9%	-2%	4%	-0%
Maximum Upper Side *	48	40.6 15%	40 17%	49 -2%	49.6 -3%	54 -13%
Maximum Bottom *	52	41.1 21%	37.6 28%	52 -0%	42.4 18%	46 12%
Idle Upper Side *	30	26.2 13%	32.4 -8%	30 -0%	29.2 3%	30 -0%
Idle Bottom *	31	30.3 2%	31.4 -1%	33 -6%	32 -3%	31 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

För stresstestet lät vi Prime95 och FurMark köras under en längre tid. Det utgör ett extremt scenario som är utformat för att utvärdera hur stabilt systemet är under full belastning. CPU:n började med höga klockfrekvenser (P-kärnor: 4 GHz, E-kärnor: 3,3 GHz) medan GPU:n fluktuerade mellan 1 och 1,5 GHz. Efter ungefär fem minuter sjönk CPU:s P-kärnor och E-kärnor gradvis till 2 GHz respektive 1,8 GHz, men GPU:s klockfrekvens steg till cirka 2,3-2,4 GHz

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna låter hyfsat men ger knappt någon bas. Vi rekommenderar att du använder ett par hörlurar eller externa högtalare för en bättre ljudupplevelse.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömhantering - X40 har ganska bra uthållighet

Effektförbrukning

X40:s strömförbrukning var i genomsnitt 280 watt i Witcher 3 -testet och nådde kortvarigt 363 watt i stresstestet. Medan strömförbrukningen sjönk något under loppet av Witcher 3 -testet, fluktuerade den under hela stresstestet. Vid tomgång drar den bärbara datorn en ganska normal mängd ström för hårdvaran inuti. Den medföljande laddaren är dimensionerad för 330 watt och kan därmed leverera tillräckligt med ström till den bärbara datorn.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / Watt
Låg belastning	11 / 18 / 30 Watt
Hög belastning	136 / 363 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-5%	-14%	31%	-42%	-30%	-18%	7%
Idle Minimum *	11	14 -27%	15.2 -38%	7 36%	24.1 -119%	17.3 -57%	16.9 ?(6 - 33.8, n=29) -54%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -23%
Idle Average *	18	21.6 -20%	22.8 -27%	11 39%	28.5 -58%	27 -50%	24 ?(10.9 - 42.6, n=29) -33%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Maximum *	30	24.8 17%	49.8 -66%	17 43%	60 -100%	46 -53%	35.1 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29) -17%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	136	122.5 10%	121.2 11%	92 32%	128.7 5%	133 2%	130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29) 4%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) 22%
Witcher 3 ultra *	280	265 5%	242 14%	221 21%	254 9%
Load Maximum *	363	418 -15%	273.7 25%	306 16%	323 11%	329 9%	324 ?(221 - 418, n=29) 11%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) 31%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø280 (254-311)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø259 (234-307)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø19.1 (11.1-96.6)

Power consumption with external monitor

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø184 (178.8-203)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø222 (202-262)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø243 (231-254)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø285 (269-318)

Medion Erazer Beast X40; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø27.2 (20.4-72)

Batteriets livslängd

Den bärbara 17-tumsdatorn klarade 6 timmar 22 minuter respektive 6 timmar 56 minuter i Wi-Fi-testet (åtkomst till webbplatser automatiskt med hjälp av ett skript) och videotestet (looping av kortfilmen Big Buck Bunny, kodad i H.264, i Full HD). För båda testerna var alla energisparfunktioner inaktiverade på den bärbara datorn och skärmens ljusstyrka var inställd på cirka 150 cd/m². Den trådlösa adaptern var också avaktiverad när vi utförde videotestet.

På det hela taget levererar Erazer en bra batteritid för en sådan högpresterande bärbar dator. Den kan överträffa de flesta konkurrenterna, även de med identisk batterikapacitet.

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		9tim 25min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)		6tim 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6tim 56min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 54min

	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-18%	-13%	15%	-63%	-13%	-7%
Reader / Idle	565		533 -6%	722 28%	234 -59%		565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 0%
H.264	416	358 -14%		398 -4%		419 1%	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) -2%
WiFi v1.3	382	319 -16%	365 -4%	537 41%	117 -69%	428 12%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) -2%
Load	114	86 -25%	81 -29%	109 -4%	46 -60%	56 -51%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -25%
Witcher 3 ultra						53	78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

För

+ 16:10 QHD+-skärm

+ bra färgåtergivning

+ G-Sync

+ Avancerad Optimus

+ smal ram

+ robust metallchassi

+ hög systemprestanda

+ 2 PCIe 4.0 SSD-diskar på 1 TB vardera

+ Thunderbolt 4

+ mekaniskt tangentbord

+ bra batteritid

+ vattenkylning som alternativ finns tillgänglig

Emot

- skärmen skulle behöva mer kontrast

- högljudd vid belastning

- ingen Power Delivery

Bedömning - Exceptionell bärbar dator för spel i toppklass

Erazer Beast X40 tillhandahölls vänligen av Medion.

Medion Erazer Beast X40 är en bärbar dator som är utformad för mycket krävande användningssituationer, t.ex. videoredigering, rendering och spel. Den datormassa som krävs för dessa tillämpningar tillhandahålls av en av de mest kraftfulla CPU-GPU-kombinationerna just nu: en Core i9-13900HX i kombination med en GeForce RTX 4090.

Processorn och grafikkortet kan köras konsekvent med höga klockfrekvenser, och X40 producerar en ganska normal mängd värme och buller för den här klassen av enheter.

På det hela taget är Erazer Beast X40 en övertygande bärbar dator för spel och andra krävande tillämpningar.

Den matta 17-tums 16:10-skärmen (QHD, IPS, 240 Hz, G-Sync, sRGB) på 17 tum ser bra ut för det mesta. Den enda nackdelen är att dess kontrast är något för låg. Det fantastiska mekaniska tangentbordet (med RGB-belysning) gör att den bärbara datorn ser ännu mer attraktiv ut. De som aldrig har använt ett mekaniskt tangentbord tidigare får en ny skrivupplevelse. Thunderbolt 4-porten på den bärbara datorn öppnar upp för expansionsmöjligheter (t.ex. extern GPU, dockningslösning) men stöder inte Power Delivery.

Ett möjligt alternativ till Erazer Beast X40 är den Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY. Asus ROG sticker ut med sin 18-tums 16:10 QHD+-panel i 16:10-format, mer RAM-minne (64 GB) och RAID-stöd. Med en prisnivå på cirka 4 800 euro (5 177 USD) ligger den i samma prisklass som Beast. Om pengar inte är något problem kan du ta en titt påMSI Titan GT77 HX 13V som ett annat alternativ. Det erbjuder något högre CPU-prestanda, tre SSD-platser, RAID-stöd och fyra RAM-platser. Den exceptionellt ljusstarka mini-LED-skärmen med utmärkt kontrast är en höjdpunkt på enheten. Men det totala paketet kommer att kosta dig omkring 6 600 euro (7 120 dollar).

Domen om vattenkylning

Den valfria vattenkylningsenheten gör i grunden det den ska: förbättrar prestandan (Medion lovar upp till 10 % ökning) och minskar värme och buller. Vid faktisk användning är dock prestandaförbättringen ganska blygsam, och den bärbara datorn är begränsad till en stationär plats. De enda fördelar som återstår är lägre temperaturer och bullernivåer. Det är upp till varje X40-ägare att avgöra om dessa fördelar är värda de extra 250 euro (270 US-dollar).

Pris och tillgänglighet

I Tyskland finns den granskade konfigurationen av Medion Erazer Beast X40 tillgänglig på Saturn.de och har ett pris på 4 499 euro (4 856 USD).

Medion Erazer Beast X40 - 03/20/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Design

84 / 98 → 86%

Tangentbord

89%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

69 / 80 → 86%

Vikt

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Batteri

70 / 95 → 74%

Skärm

90%

Spelprestanda

100%

Programprestanda

95%

Temperatur

83 / 95 → 87%

Ljudnivå

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

76%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Medel

78%

88%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 178 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Medion Erazer Beast X40 recension: Gaming notebook med RTX 4090

Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-24 (Update: 2023-03-24)

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Hölje - Erazer har ett metallchassi

Storleksjämförelse

Specifikationer - Thunderbolt 4 för odjuret

SD-kortläsare

Anslutningsmöjligheter

Webbkamera

Tillbehör

Underhåll

Garanti

Inmatningsenheter - Mekaniskt tangentbord med Cherry MX-switchar

Tangentbord

Pekplatta

Skärm - QHD+ med 16:10 bildförhållande

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Föreställning - Raptor Lake möter Ada Lovelace

Provningsvillkor

Processor

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Systemprestanda

DPC-fördröjning

Masslagring

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Spelprestanda

Witcher 3 FPS graph

Utsläpp - Erazers bärbara dator kan vara ganska bullrig

Bullerutsläpp

Temperatur

Stresstest

Högtalare

Medion Erazer Beast X40 audio analysis

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI audio analysis

Strömhantering - X40 har ganska bra uthållighet

Effektförbrukning

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

Batteriets livslängd

För

Emot

Bedömning - Exceptionell bärbar dator för spel i toppklass

Domen om vattenkylning

Pris och tillgänglighet

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison