Test: Aorus 15-W9 (i7-8750H, RTX 2060) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 80 %
Mitt på batteriet: 295 cd/m²
Kontrast: 868:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.44
ΔE Greyscale 4.98 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Aorus 15 W9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080 | Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US AUO80ED, IPS, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 1% | -2% | -1% | -1% | 1% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 64.9 1% | 65.8 2% | 63.5 -1% | 63.5 -1% | 63.5 -1% | 65.3 2% | 64.9 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 93.5 | 95.6 2% | 92.1 -1% | 89.4 -4% | 92.4 -1% | 93.1 0% | 94.9 1% | 90.1 -4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.6 | 66.3 1% | 67 2% | 64.5 -2% | 64.7 -1% | 64.5 -2% | 66.3 1% | 65.8 0% |
Response Times | 7% | -7% | -1% | -8% | -2% | 5% | 36% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.8 ? | 15.2 ? 10% | 20 ? -19% | 18 ? -7% | 18.8 ? -12% | 16.4 ? 2% | 16.8 ? -0% | 7 ? 58% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 12.4 ? 3% | 12 ? 6% | 12 ? 6% | 13.2 ? -3% | 13.6 ? -6% | 11.6 ? 9% | 11 ? 14% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||||
Screen | 12% | -3% | -5% | -2% | 19% | 8% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 295 | 305.1 3% | 250.9 -15% | 353.6 20% | 320.4 9% | 250 -15% | 314.7 7% | 323 9% |
Brightness | 292 | 295 1% | 257 -12% | 346 18% | 298 2% | 235 -20% | 312 7% | 309 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 78 -2% | 83 4% | 86 8% | 85 6% | 85 6% | 90 13% | 93 16% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.33 3% | 0.32 6% | 0.3 12% | 0.42 -24% | 0.29 15% | 0.38 -12% | 0.29 15% |
Contrast | 868 | 925 7% | 784 -10% | 1179 36% | 763 -12% | 862 -1% | 828 -5% | 1114 28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.89 | 2.58 34% | 2.77 29% | 4.55 -17% | 3.21 17% | 1.46 62% | 2.56 34% | 4.33 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.28 | 4.32 41% | 5.89 19% | 7.91 -9% | 5.54 24% | 2.47 66% | 4.89 33% | 7.64 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.44 | 1.33 8% | 2.5 -74% | 3.37 -134% | 2.36 -64% | 1.71 -19% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.98 | 3.4 32% | 4 20% | 4.1 18% | 3.6 28% | 1.27 74% | 3.4 32% | 4.12 17% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.28 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.27 97% | 2.27 97% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.43 91% |
CCT | 6407 101% | 6374 102% | 6901 94% | 7434 87% | 6503 100% | 6749 96% | 6435 101% | 7427 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60.7 1% | 60 0% | 57.9 -3% | 59 -2% | 60 0% | 60.7 1% | 59 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 95.2 2% | 92 -1% | 88.9 -4% | 92 -1% | 93 0% | 94.6 2% | 90 -3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
9% | -3% /
-3% | -3% /
-4% | -4% /
-2% | 5% /
12% | 5% /
7% | 14% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 W9 |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Aorus 15 X9 (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Aorus 15 W9 (Edge 44) | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US (Microsoft Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=57, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US (Microsoft Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Aorus 15 W9 (Edge 44) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg (Microsoft Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q (Edge 42.17134.1.0) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Aorus 15 X9 (Edge 42.17134.1.0) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 W9 (Edge 44) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Gaming (29 - 465, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 W9 (Edge 44) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 7400 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5077 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5955 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5899 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5839 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Aorus 15 W9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 35% | -6% | -15% | -10% | -3% | -1% | -20% | |
Write 4K | 99.2 | 147.2 48% | 91.5 -8% | 107.4 8% | 81 -18% | 97.1 -2% | 93.9 -5% | 100.8 2% |
Read 4K | 54.1 | 63.7 18% | 40.41 -25% | 42.91 -21% | 36.03 -33% | 53.7 -1% | 40.56 -25% | 48.75 -10% |
Write Seq | 1524 | 1573 3% | 1528 0% | 467.5 -69% | 1687 11% | 1526 0% | 1468 -4% | 975 -36% |
Read Seq | 2325 | 2602 12% | 1235 -47% | 2335 0% | 1835 -21% | 2020 -13% | 1540 -34% | 1344 -42% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 259.2 | 531 105% | 259 0% | 289.7 12% | 205.3 -21% | 285.6 10% | 293.5 13% | 283.7 9% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 328.9 | 598 82% | 364.9 11% | 354.4 8% | 229 -30% | 321.8 -2% | 346 5% | 330.3 0% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1566 | 1592 2% | 1529 -2% | 460.9 -71% | 1683 7% | 1533 -2% | 1941 24% | 986 -37% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2767 | 2981 8% | 3472 25% | 3111 12% | 3363 22% | 2351 -15% | 3266 18% | 1579 -43% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 36381 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 16598 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 164238 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31982 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13646 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5984 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 X9 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US | |
Aorus 15 X9 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 W9 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 439.7 | 393 | 367.3 | 192.9 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 282.4 | 241.1 | 227 | 135.9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 244.6 | 174.7 | 109.1 | 58 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 104.7 | 92.4 | 78.3 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 143.7 | 130.4 | 105.2 | 104.4 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 86 | 80 | 77 | 69 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 109.1 | 67.1 | 50.7 | 41.6 |
Anthem (2019) | 89.7 | 78.2 | 71 | 68.8 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 170.7 | 134.6 | 112.5 | 66.3 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 134 | 108 | 85 | 67 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 34 / 36 / 38 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 52 / 53 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
Aorus 15 W9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | 15% | 14% | 14% | 8% | 18% | 15% | |
off / environment * | 29 | 28.2 3% | 28.4 2% | 28.6 1% | 28 3% | 30 -3% | 28.8 1% | 30.3 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 34 | 32.6 4% | 28.4 16% | 28.6 16% | 32.6 4% | 32 6% | 28.8 15% | 30.3 11% |
Idle Average * | 36 | 32.7 9% | 28.4 21% | 28.6 21% | 32.7 9% | 34 6% | 28.8 20% | 33.2 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 38 | 32.7 14% | 29.6 22% | 28.6 25% | 32.7 14% | 36 5% | 29.4 23% | 33.2 13% |
Load Average * | 52 | 38.9 25% | 43.5 16% | 40.8 22% | 33.3 36% | 42 19% | 35.7 31% | 32.3 38% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 51.8 -0% | 45.7 12% | 49.6 5% | 41.6 20% | 44 15% | 42.5 18% | |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 64.1 -21% | 45.7 14% | 49.6 6% | 45.2 15% | 48 9% | 45 15% | 39 26% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Aorus 15 W9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | -7% | -6% | -1% | -6% | 6% | 7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 36.6 17% | 46.8 -6% | 52 -18% | 37.6 15% | 56 -27% | 49 -11% | 47.7 -8% |
Maximum Bottom * | 63 | 56.8 10% | 59.8 5% | 55.6 12% | 45.2 28% | 66 -5% | 49 22% | 46.1 27% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 28.2 -4% | 28.6 -6% | 29.8 -10% | 32.2 -19% | 27 -0% | 25.4 6% | 26.2 3% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 35 -21% | 34.4 -19% | 31 -7% | 37.2 -28% | 27 7% | 27.2 6% | 27.1 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus 15 W9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.2 / 1.4 Watt |
Låg belastning | 18 / 20 / 28 Watt |
Hög belastning |
87 / 175 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Aorus 15 W9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -33% | 22% | 20% | -9% | 9% | 15% | 10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 18 | 26 -44% | 8.7 52% | 7.6 58% | 22.9 -27% | 16 11% | 10.4 42% | 13.8 23% |
Idle Average * | 20 | 30.8 -54% | 13 35% | 13.8 31% | 27.2 -36% | 18 10% | 14.6 27% | 20.9 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 28 | 34.9 -25% | 14.3 49% | 14.6 48% | 27.5 2% | 23 18% | 16.3 42% | 26 7% |
Load Average * | 87 | 90.7 -4% | 107.4 -23% | 97.6 -12% | 83.4 4% | 88 -1% | 88.5 -2% | 89 -2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 135 | 175 -30% | 129 4% | 145.8 -8% | 143.6 -6% | 120 11% | 155.4 -15% | |
Load Maximum * | 175 | 241.2 -38% | 151.5 13% | 172.5 1% | 160.5 8% | 167 5% | 182.4 -4% | 131 25% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus 15 W9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 53 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -33% | 75% | 170% | 3% | 166% | 157% | 37% | |
Reader / Idle | 176 | 105 -40% | 627 256% | 235 34% | 549 212% | 682 288% | ||
H.264 | 137 | 364 166% | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 141 | 95 -33% | 372 164% | 463 228% | 166 18% | 382 171% | 387 174% | 193 37% |
Load | 81 | 61 -25% | 70 -14% | 103 27% | 46 -43% | 174 115% | 88 9% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med Aorus 15-W9 levererar Gigabyte en spellaptop i 15.6-tumsformat. Det här är den kompaktare och lättare efterföljaren till Aorus X5 v8. Den inbyggda Core-i7-8750H-processorn har mer än tillräckligt med datorkraft för att driva alla de vanliga applikationstyperna i flera år framåt. GeForce RTX-2060-kortet visar alla moderna datorspel smidigt på Full HD-skärmen och det går alltid att välja höga eller maximala inställningar.
Vid belastning blir enheten riktigt varm och producerar dessutom mycket oljud. Utöver det vanliga surret från de två fläktarna så går det ibland också att höra ett visslande ljud från en av dem.
Även om Aorus 15-W9 gör vad det är tänkt att göra, vilket är att köra spel smidigt, så är den heller inte utan brister.
En snabb NVMe SSD säkrar att systemet körs smidigt och det finns dessutom en extra hårddisk på 2 TB, så det kommer inte uppstå någon lagringsbrist på ett tag. Dessutom är det möjligt att utöka lagringen eftersom datorn har en ledig M.2 2280-plats. För att komma åt datorns lagringsmedia behöver du dock öppna höljet.
IPS-skärmen med 144 Hz bilduppdatering gjorde oss nöjda med stabila betraktningsvinklar och korta responstider. Även om ljusstyrka och kontrast ligger på acceptabla nivåer bör de vara högre på en laptop från det här prisskiktet. Det inbyggda tangentbordet lämnade ett gott intryck. Batteritiden är inte värd att nämna.
Den som äger en Aorus X5-modell och vill byta till Aorus 15-W9 (eller till Aorus 15-X9 som har en starkare GPU) riskerar att bli besviken då detta innebär en del kompromisser. Som exempel har SD-kortläsaren i full storlek som fanns i X5 bytts ut mot en microSD-modell i 15-W9. 15-W9 har heller inte stöd för G-Sync och batteritiden visar sig vara sämre än på X5. Dessutom har Thunderbolt 3-anslutningen som fanns på Aorus X5 v8 bytts ut mot en USB 3.1 Gen 2, vilket är ett steg bakåt. En model från Gigabytes Aero 15-serie kan därför vara ett bättre val för många intresserade köpare.
Aorus 15 W9
- 04/21/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck