Test: Asus ROG Chimera G703GI (i9 8950HK, GTX 1080, Full HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X9 DT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X9 DT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G703 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Asus G703 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Asus G703 | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 82 %
Mitt på batteriet: 285 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1295:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.73
ΔE Greyscale 2.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| Asus Chimera G703GI B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus G703 AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080 | Aorus X9 DT AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 25% | 0% | 29% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.8 | 65.5 0% | 90.9 38% | 66.8 2% | 86.4 31% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.6 | 92.4 0% | 100 8% | 92.1 -1% | 100 8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67 | 66.6 -1% | 86.2 29% | 67.3 0% | 99.1 48% |
| Response Times | -90% | 12% | -100% | -359% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.4 ? | 17.6 ? -175% | 8 ? -25% | 18.4 ? -188% | 44 ? -588% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 ? | 11.2 ? -4% | 5.6 ? 48% | 12 ? -11% | 24.8 ? -130% |
| PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | ||||
| Screen | -15% | 9% | 15% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle | 285 | 274 -4% | 240 -16% | 280 -2% | 332 16% |
| Brightness | 275 | 268 -3% | 248 -10% | 262 -5% | 313 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 80 -2% | 83 1% | 86 5% | 88 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.29 -32% | 0.22 -0% | 0.22 -0% | 0.28 -27% |
| Contrast | 1295 | 945 -27% | 1091 -16% | 1273 -2% | 1186 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.18 | 3.99 -25% | 2.14 33% | 1.78 44% | 3.86 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.99 | 7.33 -22% | 5.04 16% | 3.91 35% | 5.88 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.73 | 1.79 -3% | 1.54 11% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.93 | 4.14 -41% | 1.62 45% | 0.74 75% | 4.33 -48% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.58 85% | 2.28 96% | 2.43 91% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 7165 91% | 7352 88% | 6846 95% | 6494 100% | 6595 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 77 28% | 60 0% | 88 47% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 92 -1% | 100 8% | 92 -1% | 100 8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-21% | 15% /
12% | -28% /
-3% | -110% /
-43% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Asus G703 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 6093 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6281 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6607 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Asus Chimera G703GI 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID) | Asus G703 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0) | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Aorus X9 DT Transcend TS1TMTE850 | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -20% | -28% | -57% | -24% | |
| Seq Read | 4886 | 3177 -35% | 3058 -37% | 1518 -69% | 2533 -48% |
| Seq Write | 4110 | 2556 -38% | 2196 -47% | 1019 -75% | 1771 -57% |
| 4K Read | 57.4 | 47.61 -17% | 38.37 -33% | 22.23 -61% | 43.65 -24% |
| 4K Write | 141.3 | 148.4 5% | 97.7 -31% | 98.9 -30% | 139.5 -1% |
| Score Read | 1999 | 1633 -18% | 1691 -15% | 828 -59% | 1716 -14% |
| Score Write | 1855 | 1519 -18% | 1553 -16% | 916 -51% | 1615 -13% |
| Score Total | 4843 | 3962 -18% | 4066 -16% | 2145 -56% | 4173 -14% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| Asus G703 | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Asus G703 | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23488 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 214443 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38913 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18999 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Asus G703 | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 145 | 76.7 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 113 | 103 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30 / 34 / 42 dB(A) |
| Hårddisk |
| 31 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 53 / 53 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -1% | -8% | -2% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 30 -3% | 30 -3% | 30 -3% | 30 -3% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 35 -17% | 32 -7% | 36 -20% | 34 -13% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 36 -6% | 34 -0% | 37 -9% | 35 -3% | 27.2 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 42 | 38 10% | 37 12% | 43 -2% | 40 5% | 30.4 ? 28% |
| Load Average * | 53 | 46 13% | 43 19% | 50 6% | 45 15% | 42.7 ? 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 48 6% | 57 -12% | 57 -12% | 52 -2% | |
| Load Maximum * | 53 | 54 -2% | 62 -17% | 61 -15% | 60 -13% | 53.4 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | 9% | 8% | 6% | 4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 55 -10% | 47 6% | 43 14% | 41 18% | 46.2 ? 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 54 -8% | 53 -6% | 55 -10% | 48 4% | 49.1 ? 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 29 9% | 26 19% | 27 16% | 30 6% | 31.3 ? 2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33 | 32 3% | 27 18% | 29 12% | 35 -6% | 32.3 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Chimera G703GI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 29 / 37 / 46 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
156 / 314 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | -1% | 5% | 5% | 39% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 26 10% | 31 -7% | 28 3% | 32 -10% | 13.5 ? 53% |
| Idle Average * | 37 | 30 19% | 35 5% | 37 -0% | 38 -3% | 18.9 ? 49% |
| Idle Maximum * | 46 | 37 20% | 45 2% | 40 13% | 45 2% | 26.7 ? 42% |
| Load Average * | 156 | 123 21% | 130 17% | 109 30% | 96 38% | 106.3 ? 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 252 | 257 -2% | 268 -6% | 256 -2% | 237 6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 314 | 341 -9% | 374 -19% | 353 -12% | 331 -5% | 249 ? 21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Chimera G703GI i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | Asus G703 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Aorus X9 DT i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 13% | 29% | 49% | 14% | 163% | |
| Reader / Idle | 169 | 200 18% | 225 33% | 252 49% | 164 -3% | 565 ? 234% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 130 | 151 16% | 190 46% | 142 9% | 375 ? 188% | |
| Load | 51 | 54 6% | 63 24% | 77 51% | 70 37% | 85.6 ? 68% |
| H.264 | 143 | 174 | 148 | 409 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Likt sin föregångare så är Coffee Lake-versionen av Asus ROG Chimera G703 en av dom bästa toppskikts-modellerna för ivriga gamers.
Om vi bortser från dess höga vikt och tjocka konstruktion så har höljet många fördelar. Attraktionen i detta kraftpaket på 17 tum finns inte bara i dess snabba och kontrastrika 144 Hz-skärm med stabila betraktningsvinklar och stöd för G-Sync utan också hos dom moderna anslutningarna (Thunderbolt 3) och dom bra inmatningsenheterna.
I fråga om prestanda finns det helt enkelt inget att kritisera. I enhetens inbyggda upplösning kör dess sex-kärniga CPU och GeForce GTX 1080 alla spel på marknaden med smidig bilduppdatering. Datorn låter en hel del vid belastning, men andra konkurrenter såsom MSI GT75 8RG och Aorus X9 DT blir ännu mer högljudda i 3D-läge.
När alla aspekter har övervägts får datorn precis tillräckligt för betyget "Väldigt Bra". I vår Topp 10-lista över spellaptops tar den återigen första platsen.
Asus Chimera G703GI
- 06/07/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
