Test: Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU - Debut för AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.2 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
83.3 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 20.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
83.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | Eluktronics RP-15 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 1.9 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 255.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1163:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.15 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.83
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.22% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Eluktronics RP-15 BOE NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 114% | 4% | 74% | -0% | 71% | 61% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.9 | 87 124% | 40.33 4% | 69.4 78% | 38.8 0% | 67.5 74% | 63.7 64% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 100 71% | 60.6 4% | 98.8 69% | 57.8 -1% | 98.3 68% | 92 57% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.22 | 99.9 148% | 41.69 4% | 70.5 75% | 40.09 0% | 68.9 71% | 65.2 62% |
Response Times | -63% | -24% | 78% | 14% | 55% | 45% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24.4 ? | 56.4 ? -131% | 34 ? -39% | 3.2 ? 87% | 26 ? -7% | 12 ? 51% | 17.2 ? 30% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 24.4 ? 5% | 28 ? -9% | 8 ? 69% | 17 ? 34% | 10.4 ? 59% | 10.4 ? 59% |
PWM Frequency | 21280 ? | 23580 ? | |||||
Screen | 57% | -4% | 30% | 6% | 28% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 255.9 | 398 56% | 240.1 -6% | 345.4 35% | 301 18% | 272 6% | 298.6 17% |
Brightness | 246 | 385 57% | 231 -6% | 342 39% | 277 13% | 259 5% | 289 17% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 90 1% | 85 -4% | 90 1% | 77 -13% | 91 2% | 90 1% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.28 -27% | 0.34 -55% | 0.34 -55% | 0.26 -18% | 0.27 -23% | 0.35 -59% |
Contrast | 1163 | 1421 22% | 706 -39% | 1016 -13% | 1158 0% | 1007 -13% | 853 -27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.15 | 1.53 70% | 4.2 18% | 3.18 38% | 5.12 1% | 2.42 53% | 5.01 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.11 | 3.69 78% | 17.8 -4% | 6.57 62% | 8.86 48% | 6.93 59% | 7.06 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.83 | 0.77 84% | 4.09 15% | 1.77 63% | 4.88 -1% | 0.88 82% | 2.52 48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.4 43% | 2.8 33% | 3.8 10% | 3.47 17% | 4.5 -7% | 5.4 -29% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.15 102% | 2.37 93% | 2.188 101% | 2.54 87% |
CCT | 7500 87% | 6996 93% | 6925 94% | 7109 91% | 7062 92% | 7369 88% | 7461 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.9 | 100 171% | 38.4 4% | 64.3 74% | 37 0% | 69 87% | 59.1 60% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 100 72% | 60.4 4% | 99 71% | 57 -2% | 91 57% | 91.6 58% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
53% | -8% /
-5% | 61% /
44% | 7% /
6% | 51% /
39% | 40% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise | |
↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
MSI GS75 10SF-609US | |
Eluktronics RP-17 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Essentials | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Productivity | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4913 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5901 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5291 poäng | |
Hjälp |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 60% | -20% | 56% | 1% | 72% | |
Seq Read | 1197 | 2981 149% | 907 -24% | 1957 63% | 2012 68% | 2612 118% |
Seq Write | 1637 | 2783 70% | 926 -43% | 2092 28% | 1261 -23% | 2368 45% |
4K Read | 56.3 | 43.98 -22% | 47.26 -16% | 50.2 -11% | 43.66 -22% | 51.1 -9% |
4K Write | 159 | 113.9 -28% | 98.7 -38% | 96.5 -39% | 109.3 -31% | 135.9 -15% |
4K-64 Read | 583 | 1519 161% | 321.5 -45% | 1594 173% | 851 46% | 1635 180% |
4K-64 Write | 838 | 1296 55% | 736 -12% | 2005 139% | 780 -7% | 1831 118% |
Access Time Read * | 0.062 | 0.062 -0% | 0.064 -3% | 0.057 8% | 0.117 -89% | 0.042 32% |
Access Time Write * | 0.128 | 0.033 74% | 0.045 65% | 0.112 12% | 0.036 72% | 0.028 78% |
Score Read | 759 | 1861 145% | 459 -40% | 1840 142% | 1096 44% | 1947 157% |
Score Write | 1160 | 1688 46% | 927 -20% | 2310 99% | 1016 -12% | 2204 90% |
Score Total | 2350 | 4492 91% | 1641 -30% | 5103 117% | 2643 12% | 5138 119% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1376 | 2438 77% | 905 -34% | 1793 30% | 1481 8% | 2334 70% |
Copy Program MB/s | 568 | 604 6% | 496.9 -13% | 573 1% | 467.5 -18% | 569 0% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1180 | 1404 19% | 819 -31% | 1418 20% | 734 -38% | 1401 19% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 35% | -33% | 21% | -14% | 16% | |
Write 4K | 189.6 | 127.6 -33% | 132.2 -30% | 139.8 -26% | 145.4 -23% | 156.3 -18% |
Read 4K | 61.7 | 48.4 -22% | 55.5 -10% | 48.62 -21% | 51.6 -16% | 47.65 -23% |
Write Seq | 1730 | 2958 71% | 986 -43% | 2260 31% | 1007 -42% | 2374 37% |
Read Seq | 1620 | 2984 84% | 1318 -19% | 2135 32% | 1145 -29% | 2045 26% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 474.2 | 472.7 0% | 220.3 -54% | 499.3 5% | 468.4 -1% | 431.3 -9% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 528 | 529 0% | 315.5 -40% | 552 5% | 528 0% | 509 -4% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1795 | 3431 91% | 987 -45% | 2960 65% | 1381 -23% | 2385 33% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1880 | 3536 88% | 1416 -25% | 3269 74% | 2291 22% | 3505 86% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 48% /
51% | -27% /
-25% | 39% /
43% | -7% /
-5% | 44% /
51% |
* ... smaller is better
Kontinuerlig inläsning: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25384 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 17377 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38220 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12739 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 5461 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 257.5 | 166.5 | 94.5 | 51.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 119 | 112 | 106 | 103 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 131 | 74.1 | 54.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 93.7 | 80.4 | 67.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 113 | 85 | 75 | 67 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 129.5 | 66.5 | 49.1 | 38.3 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 116.5 | 81.5 | 54.9 | 42.3 |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Eluktronics RP-15 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -7% | -0% | -3% | -9% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 26.3 | 30 -14% | 28 -6% | 27 -3% | 30.7 -17% | 25 5% | 28 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.7 | 33 -24% | 29.4 -10% | 27 -1% | 30.7 -15% | 29 -9% | 28 -5% |
Idle Average * | 26.7 | 34 -27% | 31.9 -19% | 27 -1% | 30.7 -15% | 30 -12% | 28 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.9 | 35 -10% | 33 -3% | 27 15% | 30.7 4% | 40 -25% | 31.5 1% |
Load Average * | 38.9 | 48 -23% | 41.2 -6% | 44.7 -15% | 36.6 6% | 51 -31% | 44 -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 48 6% | 53.8 -5% | 51.2 -0% | 47 8% | 48 6% | 48.8 4% |
Load Maximum * | 54.9 | 49 11% | 55.7 -1% | 54 2% | 50.9 7% | 54 2% | 54.1 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 26.7 / 26.7 / 31.9 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 38.9 / 54.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 26.3 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.12 / 1.2 Watt |
Låg belastning | 5.1 / 8.4 / 9.1 Watt |
Hög belastning |
55.1 / 140.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Eluktronics RP-15 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -204% | -68% | -147% | -17% | -95% | -176% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 23 -351% | 7.4 -45% | 14.3 -180% | 3.2 37% | 7 -37% | 21.7 -325% |
Idle Average * | 8.4 | 30 -257% | 8.6 -2% | 22.3 -165% | 8.3 1% | 18 -114% | 30.1 -258% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.1 | 39 -329% | 39.1 -330% | 36.9 -305% | 8.7 4% | 31 -241% | 35 -285% |
Load Average * | 55.1 | 156 -183% | 65.9 -20% | 118.4 -115% | 82 -49% | 107 -94% | 112.6 -104% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 97.5 | 152 -56% | 106.9 -10% | 153.7 -58% | 151 -55% | 146 -50% | 134.4 -38% |
Load Maximum * | 140.2 | 208 -48% | 141.3 -1% | 220.8 -57% | 195 -39% | 186 -33% | 201.5 -44% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 99.9 Wh | Eluktronics RP-15 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 46.7 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | 58% | 21% | 36% | 2% | -32% | |
Reader / Idle | 425 | 480 13% | 916 116% | 848 100% | 537 26% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 315 | 185 -41% | 482 53% | 380 21% | 433 37% | 381 21% | 213 -32% |
Load | 116 | 72 -38% | 123 6% | 84 -28% | 69 -41% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Det råder ingen tvekan om att Zephyrus G15 GA502IU är en stor förbättring i fråga om processorkraft jämfört med GA502DU. Tack vare kombinationen av en 7 nm Ryzen CPU och en GeForce Max-Q GPU är prestandan per watt fantastisk samtidigt som chassit är både litet och tilltalade för det här priset. Vid en jämförelse med andra billiga konkurrenter som Acer Nitro 5, MSI GL/GF-serierna, Dell G-serien eller Aorus G-serien, kommer Zephyrus G15 definitivt att stå ut.
De största nackdelarna med GA502IU är priset och skärmen. För 13.000 kronor är den dyrare än de flesta andra alternativ som har en GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU. Du betalar helt enkelt extra för en ny AMD CPU och ett tjusigt chassi, saker många andra billiga spellaptops saknar. Samtidigt blev vi en aning besvikna över 144 Hz-skärmens medelmåttiga färgomfång och responstider. Den lyxigare 240 Hz-konfigurationen verkar åtgärda detta, men den kräver också mer av plånboken. Trots detta är Zephyrus G15 GA502IU en bra budget-laptop från mittenskiktet, särskilt om du kan hitta den på rea.
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU har utmärkt processorprestanda i ett tilltalande chassi, vilket är svårt att slå till det här priset. Grafikprestandan, tangentbordets återkoppling samt skärmens responstider och färgåtergivning var däremot lite av en besvikelse. Det är synd att en såpass bra processor inte används på särskilt många andra modeller just nu.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
- 09/10/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo