Test: Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Black Edition (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 7386 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 329.8 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1268:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.03
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.082
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 AUO252B, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 B140HAN05.8, IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng InfoVision, M133NVF3 R2, IPS, 120 Hz, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 LP133WF7-SPA1, IPS LED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 SHP14A2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 Chi Mei CMN1385 / 133DCE / Dell 3GRT6, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | -4% | 1% | 5% | 5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.6 | 67.1 2% | 63 -4% | 65.2 -1% | 68.6 5% | 68.2 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 94.2 | 98.2 4% | 90.8 -4% | 97 3% | 99.6 6% | 99.8 6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 68.9 4% | 63.8 -4% | 67.3 1% | 70 5% | 70 5% |
Response Times | -2% | 40% | 7% | 0% | 10% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.4 ? | 61.6 ? -9% | 35 ? 38% | 59.2 ? -5% | 56 ? 1% | 57 ? -1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 37.6 ? | 35.2 ? 6% | 22 ? 41% | 30.8 ? 18% | 38 ? -1% | 30 ? 20% |
PWM Frequency | 4065 ? | 1667 ? | 26000 ? | |||
Screen | -14% | -5% | -32% | -0% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 329.8 | 372 13% | 633 92% | 319 -3% | 277.2 -16% | 318 -4% |
Brightness | 325 | 368 13% | 675 108% | 306 -6% | 263 -19% | 278 -14% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 75 -20% | 90 -4% | 83 -12% | 81 -14% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.22 15% | 0.55 -112% | 0.15 42% | 0.2 23% | 0.18 31% |
Contrast | 1268 | 1691 33% | 1151 -9% | 2127 68% | 1386 9% | 1767 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.05 | 4.6 -51% | 3.12 -2% | 6.1 -100% | 2.1 31% | 2.91 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.01 | 7.8 -56% | 6.37 -27% | 9.7 -94% | 5.91 -18% | 6.11 -22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.03 | 0.9 56% | 1.83 10% | 1 51% | 1.03 49% | 2.91 -43% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 5.9 -181% | 3.89 -85% | 8.6 -310% | 3.4 -62% | 4.37 -108% |
Gamma | 2.082 106% | 2.58 85% | 2.39 92% | 2.62 84% | 2.241 98% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6713 97% | 6516 100% | 6476 100% | 6613 98% | 6030 108% | 6448 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 62.7 3% | 59 -3% | 61.9 1% | 64 5% | 70 15% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 97.8 4% | 91 -3% | 96.8 3% | 100 6% | 93 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-9% | 10% /
1% | -8% /
-21% | 2% /
1% | 1% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise | |
↘ 28.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3178 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4333 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4038 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 154% | 14% | -14% | 31% | |
Seq Read | 984 | 2888 193% | 1412 43% | 2289 133% | 1122 14% |
Seq Write | 320.1 | 2381 644% | 540 69% | 1163 263% | 619 93% |
4K Read | 66.2 | 45.66 -31% | 32.24 -51% | 22.29 -66% | 39.58 -40% |
4K Write | 128 | 162.4 27% | 74.7 -42% | 28.92 -77% | 108.5 -15% |
4K-64 Read | 365.9 | 1276 249% | 567 55% | 415.6 14% | 776 112% |
4K-64 Write | 673 | 1432 113% | 700 4% | 199.5 -70% | 671 0% |
Access Time Read * | 0.065 | 0.088 -35% | 0.049 25% | 0.122 -88% | 0.045 31% |
Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.023 50% | 0.048 -4% | 0.143 -211% | 0.033 28% |
Score Read | 531 | 1610 203% | 741 40% | 667 26% | 928 75% |
Score Write | 833 | 1832 120% | 829 0% | 345 -59% | 841 1% |
Score Total | 1628 | 4245 161% | 1913 18% | 1300 -20% | 2228 37% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1810 | 521 | 1767 | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 498.3 | 253.1 | 379.4 | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 921 | 392.9 | 1055 | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 78% | -18% | -1% | -17% | |
Write 4K | 99.7 | 194.3 95% | 88.3 -11% | 35.06 -65% | 97.4 -2% |
Read 4K | 113.7 | 51.2 -55% | 34.84 -69% | 23.64 -79% | 38.05 -67% |
Write Seq | 511 | 1773 247% | 740 45% | 1537 201% | 656 28% |
Read Seq | 1431 | 2512 76% | 985 -31% | 1782 25% | 1043 -27% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 313.5 | 431.7 38% | 313.7 0% | 100.3 -68% | 331.5 6% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 289.1 | 539 86% | 243.1 -16% | 62.7 -78% | 253.8 -12% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1274 | 2538 99% | 846 -34% | 2698 112% | 879 -31% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2500 | 3489 40% | 1783 -29% | 1073 -57% | 1639 -34% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 867 | 305.7 | |||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1315 | 698 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 116% /
122% | -2% /
1% | -8% /
-9% | 7% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 2131 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8645 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1194 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Metro: Last Light | |
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (23.3 - 41, n=5) | |
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (16.4 - 28, n=4) | |
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13 - 16, n=3) | |
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6 - 8, n=3) |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6.5 - 49.3, n=62) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.9 - 32, n=42) | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3 - 14.5, n=11) |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 64 | 33 | 29 | 10 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 35 | 28 | 16 | 8 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21 | 13 | 7 | 6 |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -9% | 2% | 10% | 0% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 30.5 -8% | 29.2 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 30.3 -7% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 32.2 -14% | 29.2 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 30.4 -8% |
Idle Average * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 32.2 -14% | 29.2 -4% | 28.2 -0% | 30.4 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 31.1 -10% | 32.2 -14% | 29.2 -4% | 28.3 -0% | 30.4 -8% |
Load Average * | 37.3 | 32.7 12% | 40.8 -9% | 35 6% | 28.2 24% | 34.3 8% |
Load Maximum * | 44.4 | 32.7 26% | 41.9 6% | 35 21% | 28.8 35% | 34.2 23% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 37.3 / 44.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.7 °C / -8.4 F).
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.42 / 0.78 Watt |
Låg belastning | 4.6 / 7.5 / 7.8 Watt |
Hög belastning |
37.6 / 65.3 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 120 Hz, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | 19% | 2% | 22% | -26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.6 | 3.8 17% | 3.2 30% | 3.46 25% | 2.6 43% | 6.5 -41% |
Idle Average * | 7.5 | 6.1 19% | 2.8 63% | 5.88 22% | 4.3 43% | 12.2 -63% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 9.1 -17% | 12.4 -59% | 9.12 -17% | 5.5 29% | 12.7 -63% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 38.6 -3% | 24.2 36% | 45.6 -21% | 32 15% | 39 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 65.3 | 64.5 1% | 50 23% | 65.9 -1% | 78.8 -21% | 39 40% |
* ... smaller is better
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2019-20QGS00A00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Envy x360 13-ar0601ng R7 3700U, Vega 10, 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 7386 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 2% | -1% | -2% | 84% | -38% | |
Reader / Idle | 759 | 632 -17% | 402 -47% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 397 | 541 36% | 437 10% | 492 24% | 732 84% | 235 -41% |
Load | 125 | 85 -32% | 130 4% | 91 -27% | 91 -27% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 Black Edition för 12.500 kronor (i vår konfiguration) kan verka väldigt lik sin föregångare, men den åtgärdar faktiskt några av de största problemen vi hade med Inspiron 7386 2-in-1. Bland dessa kan nämnas hög energiförbrukning vid tomgång, som nu nästan halverats och kort batteritid, som nu är 40% längre. Vi noterade heller inget spoltjut på vår recensionsenhet och skärmen är en aning mer ljusstark än innan. Till och med CPU-prestandan är en aning högre än tidigare trots faktum att båda maskinerna drivs av samma chip.
Vidare är UHD-skärmen tilltalande med ganska bra färgåtergivning och bra kalibrering direkt vid leverans. Den nya designen på startknappen (med sin inbyggda fingeravtrycksläsare) och tangentbordets layout fungerade båda bra i vårt tycke. Höljet har en konstruktion och design som är bra för den här klassen och som känns en aning mer robust än vissa av de tunnare metallkonkurrenterna. Till sist är Dells smarta gångjärnsdesign, som innehåller en magnetisk hålighet för Dells Active Pen, en av den smartaste lagringslösningarna vi sett för en stylus i full storlek.
Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 är på många sätt bättre än sin föregångare — som exempel har den mycket bättre batteritid och ännu bättre prestanda. Trots några små brister som rör inmatningsenheterna och det tveksamma värdet av en Core i7 CPU är den ett seriöst alternativ till konkurrenter från andra tillverkare som Lenovo och HP.
Men en del klagomål återstår. Prestandan är fortfarande en besvikelse i ljuset av resultaten från cTDP Up-konkurrenter som Lenovo’s ThinkBook 13s, som faktiskt är bättre. Portutbudet är tunt och bristen på Thunderbolt 3 och Kensington-lås kommer störa en del användare. Tangentbordet är skapligt men kunde varit bättre rörande återkoppling och den kraft som krävs för anslag. På samma sätt kräver styrplattans inbyggda knappar alldeles för mycket kraft för att aktiveras, vilket gör den ganska uttröttande att använda efter ett tag. Slutligen, även om skärmen definitivt är trevlig, hade det varit bra med ett FHD-alternativ, vilket hade bättrat på batteritiden rejält — den extra ytan kommer de flesta användare inte sakna.
Konkurrenter som är värda att överväga inkluderar ThinkPad X1 Yoga, HP Envy x360 13, ThinkPad X390 Yoga, och — på den dyrare sidan — Latitude 7400 2-in-1. Men bortsett från irritationsmomenten rörande inmatningsenheterna och jämmer över dyrare chip som inte riktigt drar sitt strå till stacken är Inspiron 7390 2-in-1 ett rimligt alternativ till de populära Yoga och x360-serierna och når mycket längre än sin föregångare.
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1
- 08/23/2019 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein