Test: Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga (i7, FHD) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 318 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2127:1 (Svärta: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 LP133WF7-SPA1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 Lenovo M133NWF4 R3, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Chi Mei CMN1380, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 AUO462D, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Lenovo LEN40A9, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 1% | -7% | -1% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.2 | 65.9 1% | 66.1 1% | 62.5 -4% | 65.3 0% | 60.9 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97 | 95.8 -1% | 97.8 1% | 86.1 -11% | 95.9 -1% | 86.4 -11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.3 | 67.8 1% | 67.8 1% | 62.9 -7% | 66.6 -1% | 61.9 -8% |
| Response Times | 11% | 26% | 10% | -4% | 19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 59.2 ? | 50 ? 16% | 39.2 ? 34% | 48.8 ? 18% | 57.6 ? 3% | 40.4 ? 32% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 29 ? 6% | 25.6 ? 17% | 30.4 ? 1% | 34 ? -10% | 28.8 ? 6% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 26040 ? | ||||
| Screen | -2% | 0% | -37% | 12% | -30% | |
| Brightness middle | 319 | 314 -2% | 470.1 47% | 318.2 0% | 356 12% | 267.2 -16% |
| Brightness | 306 | 302 -1% | 443 45% | 312 2% | 336 10% | 239 -22% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 88 -2% | 83 -8% | 88 -2% | 75 -17% |
| Black Level * | 0.15 | 0.16 -7% | 0.38 -153% | 0.3 -100% | 0.16 -7% | 0.27 -80% |
| Contrast | 2127 | 1963 -8% | 1237 -42% | 1061 -50% | 2225 5% | 990 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 5.73 6% | 2.47 60% | 4.25 30% | 3.6 41% | 3.5 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.7 | 10.43 -8% | 5.73 41% | 9.49 2% | 5.5 43% | 6.4 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.52 -52% | 4.38 -338% | 1.1 -10% | 3.81 -281% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.6 | 7.39 14% | 3.7 57% | 2.1 76% | 4.7 45% | 1.3 85% |
| Gamma | 2.62 84% | 2.14 103% | 2.35 94% | 2.311 95% | 2.48 89% | 2.146 103% |
| CCT | 6613 98% | 6351 102% | 7373 88% | 6588 99% | 6374 102% | 6523 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.9 | 61 -1% | 62 0% | 56 -10% | 61.3 -1% | 56 -10% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.8 | 96 -1% | 98.2 1% | 85 -12% | 95.7 -1% | 86 -11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
1% | 9% /
4% | -11% /
-26% | 2% /
8% | -7% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 59.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3668 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5071 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4134 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 3% | -65% | -8% | 6% | -11% | -20% | -8% | |
| Write 4K | 144.1 | 135.9 -6% | 64.3 -55% | 131.7 -9% | 138.8 -4% | 120.7 -16% | 122.1 -15% | 133.9 ? -7% |
| Read 4K | 63.5 | 34.13 -46% | 46.01 -28% | 45.21 -29% | 58.5 -8% | 44.38 -30% | 59.1 ? -7% | |
| Write Seq | 1496 | 1683 13% | 466.4 -69% | 1256 -16% | 1896 27% | 1491 0% | 1253 -16% | 1378 ? -8% |
| Read Seq | 2677 | 2195 -18% | 498.3 -81% | 1852 -31% | 2070 -23% | 2760 3% | 1232 -54% | 2341 ? -13% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 357.4 | 437.3 22% | 193.3 -46% | 600 68% | 483.3 35% | 237.5 -34% | 198.2 -45% | 355 ? -1% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 482.3 | 338.8 -30% | 179.7 -63% | 387.7 -20% | 451.8 -6% | 336.1 -30% | 288.8 -40% | 429 ? -11% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1558 | 1994 28% | 396.8 -75% | 1374 -12% | 2066 33% | 1512 -3% | 2007 29% | 1514 ? -3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3021 | 3407 13% | 547 -82% | 2585 -14% | 3423 13% | 3154 4% | 3409 13% | 2677 ? -11% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2020 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8504 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1152 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 73.8 | 37.47 | 31.25 | 10.51 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.7 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 70 | 47.9 | 20.5 | 18.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.3 | 14.2 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 26.8 | 17.4 | 15.8 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 35 / 35 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.43 / 0.74 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.46 / 5.88 / 9.12 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
45.6 / 65.9 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | 9% | 28% | 3% | 13% | 5% | -23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.46 | 4 -16% | 3.8 -10% | 2.6 25% | 3.4 2% | 3 13% | 3.81 ? -10% | 5.18 ? -50% |
| Idle Average * | 5.88 | 4.9 17% | 7.5 -28% | 5.7 3% | 5.6 5% | 5.4 8% | 6.94 ? -18% | 8.18 ? -39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.12 | 6.9 24% | 8.6 6% | 6 34% | 8.7 5% | 7.5 18% | 8.75 ? 4% | 11.1 ? -22% |
| Load Average * | 45.6 | 36 21% | 33.1 27% | 29.2 36% | 43.6 4% | 40.1 12% | 35 ? 23% | 46.8 ? -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 65.9 | 34.4 48% | 31.8 52% | 38.8 41% | 65 1% | 57.1 13% | 47.5 ? 28% | 67.2 ? -2% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X380 Yoga 20LJS02W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LD0015US i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | 65% | 30% | 10% | 40% | 25% | |
| H.264 | 600 | 550 -8% | 764 27% | 770 ? 28% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 492 | 511 4% | 602 22% | 553 12% | 499 1% | 651 32% | 599 ? 22% |
| Load | 91 | 138 52% | 189 108% | 135 48% | 94 3% | 135 48% | 113.1 ? 24% |
| Reader / Idle | 1250 | 1381 | 1218 | 1330 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
ThinkPad X390 Yoga fortsätter den stolta traditionen av omvandlingsbara ThinkPad-modeller. Denna ultrabook på 13.3 tum har mycket att erbjuda. Men vi måste också nämna några svagheter.
Som exempel saknas "Lift&Lock"-tangentbordet, som brukade skydda knapparna när datorn användes i surfplatteläge. Det är synd, för det var en unik funktion som inte fanns på någon annan omvandlingsbar modell. Det går heller inte längre att lägga till stöd för WWAN i efterhand. Vidare irriterades vi av spoltjutet och hade önskat att Lenovo använde en mer ljusstark skärm - särskilt med tanke på den reflekterande ytan. Det kommer tydligen inte komma ett alternativ för 32 GB RAM, till skillnad från vanliga ThinkPad X390, där detta finns som tillval. Detta är extra irriterande eftersom datorns RAM är fastlött och inte går att utöka eller byta. LCD-skärmens responstider var också en besvikelse.
På den positiva sidan har vi det nya uppdaterade höljet, som fortfarande är stabilt och robust samtidigt som det är tunnare och lättare jämfört med föregångaren. Även om tangentbordet saknar "Lift&Lock"-funktionen är det onekligen av utmärkt kvalitet - åtminstone om du ignorerar faktum att det är en aning mindre än vanligt. De olika musalternativen (styrplatta, TrackPoint, tryckkänslig skärm och Digitizer-penna) är alla riktigt lättanvända. Ytterligare en aspekt av denna omvandlingsbara ThinkPad-modell är portutbudet. Den har nu en extra USB C-port som inte fanns på föregångaren. Det gör att man kan ansluta mekaniska dockningsstationer som också är kompatibla med andra ThinkPad-modeller - en viktig faktor för stora företag. Utöver den blanka ytan erbjuder skärmen på X390 Yoga ett högt kontrastförhållande och bra färgrymdstäckning. CPU-prestandan har också förbättrats. Den är fortfarande inte särskilt imponerande och kan inte hålla jämna steg med andra ThinkPad-modeller, men den kan nu hålla igång längre vid belastning än på föregångaren X380 Yoga. Ytterligare fördelar med X390 Yoga är de lugna fläktarna och den generösa garantin.
ThinkPad X390 Yoga är en högkvalitativ omvandlingsbar gjord för företagsmiljöer. I synnerhet är de utmärkta inmatningsenheterna tilltalande.
Totalt sett överväger de positiva aspekterna av Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga tydligt dess tillkortakommanden och vi kan därför rekommendera den. Konkurrenterna Dell Latitude 7390 2-in-1 och HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 har dock också en hel del att erbjuda och kan till och med överträffa ThinkPad på en del områden. HP EliteBook har till exempel en mer ljusstark skärm och bättre batteritid. ThinkPad Yoga segrar när det kommer till inmatningsenheterna och har dessutom företagsfunktioner som en smart card-plats och en mekanisk dockningsport, vilket bör göra den särskilt intressant för företag.
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
- 06/11/2019 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
