Test: Dell Latitude 5495 (Ryzen 7 Pro, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 210 cd/m²
Kontrast: 922:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.94% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 CMN14C9, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X AU Optronics AUO263D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -11% | -2% | 47% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.94 | 36.28 -11% | 40.24 -2% | 61.3 50% |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.4 | 54.6 -11% | 60 -2% | 87.6 43% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.32 | 37.48 -11% | 41.57 -2% | 62.3 47% |
| Response Times | -9% | -41% | 16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 46.9 ? -14% | 44.8 ? -9% | 35 ? 15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 31.2 ? -4% | 35.2 ? -17% | 25 ? 17% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 1000 ? -96% | ||
| Screen | -13% | -13% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 212 | 227 7% | 275 30% | 421 99% |
| Brightness | 200 | 211 6% | 272 36% | 398 99% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 85 -4% | 86 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.19 17% | 0.26 -13% | 0.27 -17% |
| Contrast | 922 | 1195 30% | 1058 15% | 1559 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.34 | 5.6 -29% | 5.9 -36% | 4.08 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.01 | 22.4 -149% | 20 -122% | 7.48 17% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.81 | 2.4 15% | 3.6 -28% | 2.92 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.44 90% | 2.36 93% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6286 103% | 6506 100% | 6798 96% | 7043 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 34.5 -12% | 38.1 -2% | 57 46% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61 | 54.4 -11% | 59.6 -2% | 87 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.9 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-12% | -19% /
-16% | 33% /
35% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 30 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3256 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2438 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2585 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 Intel SSDSCKKF256G8 | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Average Intel SSDSCKKF256G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 31% | 146% | 108% | 0% | |
| Write 4K | 48.45 | 90.4 87% | 114.8 137% | 119.5 147% | 48.5 ? 0% |
| Read 4K | 25.11 | 28.24 12% | 41.33 65% | 31.9 27% | 25.1 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 341.2 | 433.7 27% | 1271 273% | 351.1 3% | 341 ? 0% |
| Read Seq | 521 | 469.3 -10% | 1171 125% | 1665 220% | 521 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 202 | 297.6 47% | 218.4 8% | 268.4 33% | 202 ? 0% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 243.5 | 293.9 21% | 308.5 27% | 333.1 37% | 244 ? 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 320.8 | 534 66% | 1460 355% | 351.8 10% | 321 ? 0% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 555 | 531 -4% | 1529 175% | 2705 387% | 555 ? 0% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3129 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8942 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1659 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 85.7 | 14.4 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 33 | 10.7 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 37.6 | 12.3 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 30.7 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 35.4 / 43 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Dell Latitude 14 5495 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.23 / 0.9 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 4.3 / 6.6 / 7.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
32 / 40 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 R7 2700U, Vega 10, Intel SSDSCKKF256G8, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | -30% | -16% | -13% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 3.3 23% | 5.3 -23% | 4.9 -14% | 4.73 ? -10% | 4.54 ? -6% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 5.54 16% | 8.3 -26% | 8.1 -23% | 7.61 ? -15% | 7.49 ? -13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 6.59 14% | 11.4 -48% | 10.6 -38% | 9.63 ? -25% | 9.14 ? -19% |
| Load Average * | 32 | 42.4 -33% | 42 -31% | 32.2 -1% | 33.3 ? -4% | 42.8 ? -34% |
| Load Maximum * | 40 | 67.6 -69% | 48.8 -22% | 42.3 -6% | 45.1 ? -13% | 61.3 ? -53% |
* ... smaller is better
| Dell Latitude 14 5495 R7 2700U, Vega 10, 61 Wh | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | -44% | -35% | 3% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1089 | 1556 43% | 671 -38% | 639 -41% | 1300 ? 19% |
| H.264 | 708 | 791 12% | 368 -48% | 426 -40% | 704 ? -1% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 562 | 897 60% | 330 -41% | 394 -30% | 600 ? 7% |
| Load | 136 | 97 -29% | 68 -50% | 95 -30% | 118.1 ? -13% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Dell Latitude 5495 kunde ha varit en riktigt bra laptop med AMD Ryzen mobile. Fokus här ligger på "kunde", då Dell gör nästan lika många saker fel som de gör rätt.
Men en sak i taget: Vi var riktigt nyfikna på hur bra Latitude kunde utnyttja Ryzens prestandapotential – omdömet på den punkten är "riktigt bra". Latitude 5495 lyckas slå sin Intel-baserade systermodell Latitude 5490 och även välkända konkurrenter som Lenovo ThinkPad A485 och HP EliteBook 745 G5. Dessa två är dessutom sämre när det kommer till batteritid, trots att Latitude har ett batteri med mindre kapacitet än vad man gör reklam för. Utöver dessa fördelar har Latitude 5495 också en riktigt snabb SD-kortläsare, ett robust chassi med bra uppgraderingsmöjligheter och i huvudsak bra inmatningsenheter. Fläkten höll sig dessutom tyst när datorn inte arbetade samtidigt som chassit inte blev särskilt varm ens vid belastning.
Men där det finns ljus finns det också skugga. I det här fallet representeras skuggan av skärmen. Skärmen lyser förvisso, men ganska svagt på endast 200 cd/m² i genomsnitt. Detta kan och bör vara bättre, då 200 cd/m² kan vara problematiskt till och med i ljusstarka inomhusmiljöer. Dessutom led skärmen av blödande bakgrundsbelysning och den hade ett otillräckligt färgomfång. Skärmen är det mest framträdande problemet, men inte det enda. Chassit är tyngre och mycket tjockare än på konkurrenterna, vilket troligen förklarar hur Dell lyckades få plats med ett så stort batteri. Dell Latitude 5495 saknar också en del funktioner som vi förväntar oss från en företagslaptop i det här prisskiktet. Exempel är fingeravtrycksläsare, styrpinne och bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord – funktioner som bara finns tillgängliga som dyra tillval. Thunderbolt 3 finns inte heller, men i det fallet finns det inte ens som tillval. Dell väljer också att spara pengar när det kommer till SSD-enheten – det är enda sättet vi kan förklara den långsamma SATA III SSD:n på. Detsamma gäller den korta standardgarantin som bara är på 12 månader.
Svår att utvärdera: Dell Latitude 5495 har många positiva aspekter, men också många brister.
I fall av det här slaget är det svårt för oss att varken rekommendera enheten eller att avråda från köp. Dell Latitude 5495 har definitivt sina fördelar, men för oss är den mörka skärmen inte ett alternativ – vi vet dock att många företagskunder prioriterar annat än skärmkvalitet. Allt som allt hade vi nog föredragit konkurrenterna Lenovo ThinkPad A485 och HP EliteBook 745 G5, även om deras sämre batteritid är ett argument för Latitude. Oavsett så gäller fortfarande faktum att den perfekta bärbara datorn med AMD Ryzen ännu inte har uppfunnits.
Dell Latitude 14 5495
- 04/06/2019 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
