Test: Lenovo ThinkPad T495s - AMD fungerar bra i denna kontorslaptop, men fläkten är irriterande (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=32, last 2 years) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 380 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1727:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 N140HCG-GQ2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 NE140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 LP140WF9_SPF1, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 0% | -1% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67 | 67 0% | 67.1 0% | 69.3 3% | 64.5 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.8 | 98.5 2% | 97.6 1% | 92.2 -5% | 95.8 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.3 | 69.2 1% | 68.5 0% | 67.4 -1% | 65.7 -4% |
Response Times | 54% | -2% | -22% | 27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.8 ? | 32.4 ? 47% | 61.6 ? -1% | 74 ? -22% | 44.8 ? 26% |
Response Time Black / White * | 37.6 ? | 15.2 ? 60% | 38.8 ? -3% | 45.6 ? -21% | 27.6 ? 27% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 2451 ? | |||
Screen | 8% | 4% | -16% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 380 | 420 11% | 391 3% | 418 10% | 381 0% |
Brightness | 381 | 391 3% | 389 2% | 400 5% | 375 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 87 0% | 88 1% | 94 8% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.29 -32% | 0.23 -5% | 0.24 -9% | 0.24 -9% |
Contrast | 1727 | 1448 -16% | 1700 -2% | 1742 1% | 1588 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 2.1 47% | 3.4 15% | 4.7 -18% | 4.6 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.7 | 5.5 4% | 4.7 18% | 8.7 -53% | 8.5 -49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 0.7 42% | 1.1 8% | 2.1 -75% | 1.2 -0% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 3.4 23% | 4 9% | 5.9 -34% | 5.1 -16% |
Gamma | 2.54 87% | 2.22 99% | 2.49 88% | 2.06 107% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 6963 93% | 7168 91% | 6809 95% | 7350 88% | 7052 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.2 | 63.5 2% | 62.4 0% | 59.9 -4% | 60.7 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.6 | 98.6 2% | 97.4 1% | 92.1 -5% | 95.7 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 21% /
12% | 1% /
3% | -13% /
-14% | 5% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4161 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5077 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3762 poäng | |
Hjälp |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3883 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6532 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2187 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 827 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 106.4 | 22 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 73 | 63 | 36.5 | 33 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 28.4 | 22 | 19.7 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 28.9 / 28.9 / 28.9 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 31.5 / 33.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 Vega 10, R7 PRO 3700U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 Vega 8, R5 PRO 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | -3% | 2% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 28.9 | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.9 | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% |
Idle Average * | 28.9 | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.9 | 29.4 -2% | 30.9 -7% | 28.6 1% | 29.4 -2% |
Load Average * | 31.5 | 29.9 5% | 33.3 -6% | 31.5 -0% | 34.7 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 31.4 7% | 33.3 1% | 33.1 2% | 37.2 -10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.7 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.26 / 0.67 Watt |
Låg belastning | 4.7 / 7.28 / 9.48 Watt |
Hög belastning |
35.3 / 55.5 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | -1% | 3% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 2.62 44% | 5.1 -9% | 3 36% | 3.4 28% |
Idle Average * | 7.28 | 5.16 29% | 7.7 -6% | 6.3 13% | 7.5 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.48 | 8.7 8% | 10.7 -13% | 8.9 6% | 10.8 -14% |
Load Average * | 35.3 | 40 -13% | 35.8 -1% | 40.8 -16% | 55.4 -57% |
Load Maximum * | 55.5 | 64 -15% | 43.2 22% | 67.5 -22% | 70.3 -27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | -13% | -24% | -13% | -9% | |
H.264 | 750 | 834 11% | 708 -6% | 550 -27% | 688 -8% | 703 ? -6% |
WiFi v1.3 | 675 | 607 -10% | 544 -19% | 530 -21% | 562 -17% | 598 ? -11% |
För
Emot
Verdict – The AMD ThinkPad offers a better price-performance ratio
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med ThinkPad T495s följer Lenovo upp ThinkPad T495 med ytterligare en riktigt bra kontorslaptop. Det går förvisso inte att utnyttja Ryzen 7 Pro processorn fullt ut, men det gäller också för Intel-processorn som sitter i T490s. Båda systemen har tillräckligt med prestanda för de flesta kontorsuppgifter. Batteritiden är särskilt uppmuntrande då AMD-modellen inte längre ligger efter på den punkten. Båda modellerna har identiska höljen och tangentbord.
Men det finns en stor nackdel: fläkten producerar ett riktigt högfrekvent ljud som är riktigt irriterande, vilket inte fläkten på T490s gör. Även om fläkten är avstängd vid mindre krävande uppgifter hade Lenovo lätt kunnat undvika det här problemet. Att den däremot saknar en Thunderbolt 3-anslutning bör inte vara ett problem för de flesta användare.
Med ThinkPad T495s erbjuder Lenovo ett riktigt bra, och framför allt billigare, alternativ till den Intel-baserade ThinkPad T490s. Om det inte vore för det högfrekventa fläktljudet hade vi kunnat rekommendera T495s fullt ut.
Sen har vi priset att överväga och där ligger den AMD-baserade ThinkPad-modellen tydligt före. Förvänta dig en prisfördel på minst 3.000 kronor och campus-modellen för 12.990 kronor som vi har här är en förkämpe när det kommer till prestanda i förhållande till priset.
Observera: På grund av uppgraderingen till v7 av vårt omdömessystem har poängsumman för ThinkPad T490s sänkts från 92% till 89%. Faktum att ThinkPad T495s hamnar under det på 88% beror i huvudsak på det högfrekventa fläktljudet.
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00
-
09/24/2019 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff