Test: Samsung Galaxy S21 - Billigast i Galaxy-toppskiktet (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.5 % v7 (old) | 02/2021 | Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14 | 169 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.20" | 2400x1080 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | Apple iPhone 12 A14, A14 Bionic GPU | 162 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 2532x1170 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | Google Pixel 4a 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.20" | 2340x1080 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 209 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 199 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.78" | 3168x1440 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G SD 865, Adreno 650 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight-Scene 1Daylight-Scene 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light-Photo
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 790 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.13
Samsung Galaxy S21 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.2" | Apple iPhone 12 OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1" | Google Pixel 4a 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.2" | Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6" | OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 19% | 14% | 5% | 27% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 790 | 642 -19% | 669 -15% | 584 -26% | 796 1% | 714 -10% |
Brightness | 793 | 639 -19% | 671 -15% | 576 -27% | 779 -2% | 721 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 94 -3% | 95 -2% | 94 -3% | 95 -2% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 0.9 59% | 1 55% | 1.1 50% | 0.68 69% | 1.8 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 2.42 42% | 1.8 57% | 2.3 45% | 1.55 63% | 5.1 -21% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 0.8 50% | 1.5 6% | 1.8 -13% | 1.1 31% | 2 -25% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.188 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.237 98% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 6497 100% | 6404 101% | 6685 97% | 6355 102% | 6310 103% | 6588 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise | |
↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (15718 - 16777, n=3) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (12255 - 14362, n=3) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (600164 - 633158, n=3) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 | |
Apple iPhone 12 | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (226728 - 241222, n=3) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (65.1 - 76.6, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (98.8 - 127.3, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (74.1 - 85.8, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (102 - 132, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Huawei P40 Pro |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (25656 - 28247, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G (Chrome 81.0.4044.138) | |
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (1744 - 1810, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone 12 (Safari 14) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S21 | Google Pixel 4a 5G | Huawei P40 Pro | OnePlus 8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -51% | -22% | -24% | -24% | -18% | 12% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1648 | 945 -43% | 1775 8% | 1627 -1% | 1528 -7% | 1602 ? -3% | 1887 ? 15% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1095 | 228.7 -79% | 395.7 -64% | 730 -33% | 676 -38% | 748 ? -32% | 1471 ? 34% |
Random Read 4KB | 309.7 | 168.6 -46% | 228.1 -26% | 208.3 -33% | 228.4 -26% | 243 ? -22% | 278 ? -10% |
Random Write 4KB | 282.6 | 186.7 -34% | 271.8 -4% | 197.7 -30% | 218.4 -23% | 244 ? -14% | 311 ? 10% |
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy S21 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy S21 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.09 Watt |
Låg belastning | 1.1 / 1.61 / 1.78 Watt |
Hög belastning |
6.47 / 10.12 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy S21 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 12 2815 mAh | Google Pixel 4a 5G 3885 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G 4500 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 45% | 26% | -57% | 26% | 9% | 8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 0.7 36% | 0.92 16% | 2.2 -100% | 0.75 32% | 0.967 ? 12% | 0.882 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 1.61 | 1.5 7% | 0.96 40% | 1.41 12% | 3.3 -105% | 1.41 12% | 1.357 ? 16% | 1.448 ? 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.78 | 1.8 -1% | 0.98 45% | 1.47 17% | 3.7 -108% | 1.44 19% | 1.437 ? 19% | 1.603 ? 10% |
Load Average * | 6.47 | 5.5 15% | 2.95 54% | 3.35 48% | 5.9 9% | 3.84 41% | 6.42 ? 1% | 6.57 ? -2% |
Load Maximum * | 10.12 | 10.4 -3% | 5.2 49% | 6.37 37% | 8.3 18% | 7.67 24% | 10.2 ? -1% | 9.92 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S21 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone 12 2815 mAh | Google Pixel 4a 5G 3885 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G 4500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 38% | 39% | 5% | 28% | 21% | |
Reader / Idle | 1713 | 2602 52% | 2459 44% | 1474 -14% | 2103 23% | 2010 17% |
H.264 | 941 | 1135 21% | 1337 42% | 1137 21% | 1023 9% | 1232 31% |
WiFi v1.3 | 544 | 945 74% | 768 41% | 743 37% | 923 70% | 763 40% |
Load | 267 | 283 6% | 341 28% | 198 -26% | 296 11% | 255 -4% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Försiktig uppgradering med fräsh design
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
En del av Samsungs smartphone-filosofi är att kunna erbjuda varje användare en enhet som passar helt rätt. Detta gäller även Galaxy S21-serien.
Galaxy S21 är till för den största gruppen av Galaxy S-fans. Det är den billigaste enheten i Galaxy S21-serien men har med ett fåtal undantag nästan samma funktioner som sina dyrare motsvarigheter, Galaxy S21 och Galaxy S21 Ultra. Den är dessutom precis lika snabb eftersom alla använder samma SoC, en Exynos 2100.
Jämfört med Galaxy S20 har Samsung tagit bort några funktioner från den minsta av sina flaggskeppstelefoner, men de har också lagt till en del saker. Detta inkluderar en fräsch ny design som gör att Galaxy S21 känns mycket modernare. En ny Exynos SoC och en ljusstark AMOLED-skärm är också klara pluspoäng.
Samsung Galaxy S21 har utmärkt prestanda till ett rimligt pris. Men det är bara några få saker som har ändrats jämfört med dess föregångare, Galaxy S20.
Plastbaksidan kan räknas som en brist, även om den varken ser ut eller känns som plast. Däremot får telefonen klara minuspoäng för att den saknar ljudanslutning och microSD-plats. Batteritiden är heller inte särskilt imponerande.
Totalt sett är ändringarna jämfört med Galaxy S20 ganska små. Äger man redan föregångaren behöver man egentligen inte uppgradera till Galaxy S21. Är man ny är den däremot värd att skaffa och då får man en kraftfull toppskiktstelefon till ett relativt lågt pris.
Samsung Galaxy S21
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero