Test: Samsung Galaxy S21+ - Galaxy S21 i storlek Large (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.6 % v7 (old) | 03/2021 | Samsung Galaxy S21+ Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14 | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max A14, A14 Bionic GPU | 228 g | 128 GB NVMe | 6.70" | 2778x1284 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Huawei P40 Pro Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16 | 209 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.58" | 2640x1200 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 199 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.78" | 3168x1440 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 02/2021 | Xiaomi Mi 11 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 196 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.81" | 3200x1440 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.70" | 3200x1440 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Ultra wideangle5x zoomLowlight Scene
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 814 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.12
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max OLED, 2778x1284, 6.7" | Huawei P40 Pro OLED, 2640x1200, 6.6" | OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | Xiaomi Mi 11 LED DotDisplay, 3200x1440, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S20+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 14% | -1% | 23% | 5% | -14% | |
Brightness middle | 814 | 855 5% | 584 -28% | 796 -2% | 840 3% | 740 -9% |
Brightness | 814 | 857 5% | 576 -29% | 779 -4% | 845 4% | 747 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 95 -2% | 94 -3% | 98 1% | 94 -3% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.1 45% | 1.1 45% | 0.68 66% | 1.2 40% | 2.6 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.6 | 2.51 30% | 2.3 36% | 1.55 57% | 2.7 25% | 4.57 -27% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.4 -0% | 1.8 -29% | 1.1 21% | 2 -43% | 1.5 -7% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.237 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.269 97% |
CCT | 6568 99% | 6337 103% | 6355 102% | 6310 103% | 6492 100% | 6284 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (15718 - 16777, n=3) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (12255 - 14362, n=3) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
OnePlus 8 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (600164 - 633158, n=3) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max | |
Huawei P40 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (226728 - 241222, n=3) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (65.1 - 76.6, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14) | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (98.8 - 127.3, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (74.1 - 85.8, n=3) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80) | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (102 - 132, n=3) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
Huawei P40 Pro |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (25656 - 28247, n=3) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80) | |
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
Huawei P40 Pro (Huawei Browser 10.1) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G (1744 - 1810, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152) | |
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S21+ | Huawei P40 Pro | OnePlus 8 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 | Samsung Galaxy S20+ | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -21% | -23% | -9% | -22% | -16% | 15% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1623 | 1775 9% | 1627 0% | 1615 0% | 1603 -1% | 1602 ? -1% | 1887 ? 16% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 1037 | 395.7 -62% | 730 -30% | 754 -27% | 694 -33% | 748 ? -28% | 1471 ? 42% |
Random Read 4KB | 309.6 | 228.1 -26% | 208.3 -33% | 278.5 -10% | 199.6 -36% | 243 ? -22% | 278 ? -10% |
Random Write 4KB | 283.3 | 271.8 -4% | 197.7 -30% | 289.3 2% | 229.8 -19% | 244 ? -14% | 311 ? 10% |
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy S21+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.1 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.74 / 1.27 / 1.33 Watt |
Hög belastning |
6.32 / 9.61 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy S21+ 4800 mAh | Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max 3687 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 4600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 2100 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | 7% | -103% | -46% | -31% | -11% | -12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.74 | 0.8 -8% | 0.92 -24% | 2.2 -197% | 1.57 -112% | 1 -35% | 0.967 ? -31% | 0.88 ? -19% |
Idle Average * | 1.27 | 1.5 -18% | 1.41 -11% | 3.3 -160% | 1.92 -51% | 1.7 -34% | 1.357 ? -7% | 1.444 ? -14% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.33 | 1.9 -43% | 1.47 -11% | 3.7 -178% | 1.94 -46% | 2.3 -73% | 1.437 ? -8% | 1.6 ? -20% |
Load Average * | 6.32 | 3.4 46% | 3.35 47% | 5.9 7% | 6.32 -0% | 5.8 8% | 6.42 ? -2% | 6.57 ? -4% |
Load Maximum * | 9.61 | 4.7 51% | 6.37 34% | 8.3 14% | 11.65 -21% | 11.8 -23% | 10.2 ? -6% | 9.91 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S21+ 4800 mAh | Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max 3687 mAh | Huawei P40 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 4600 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 40% | -9% | 13% | -24% | -1% | |
Reader / Idle | 1780 | 2611 47% | 1474 -17% | 2103 18% | 1144 -36% | 2041 15% |
H.264 | 1174 | 1356 16% | 1137 -3% | 1023 -13% | 971 -17% | 978 -17% |
WiFi v1.3 | 651 | 961 48% | 743 14% | 923 42% | 527 -19% | 794 22% |
Load | 282 | 423 50% | 198 -30% | 296 5% | 214 -24% | 218 -23% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Närmare Galaxy S21 än Galaxy S21 Ultra
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I egenskap av att vara "mitten"-modellen i Galaxy S21-serien hamnar Galaxy S21+ lite mellan två stolar. Även om flaggskeppet delar all sin funktionalitet med Galaxy S21 har den också en del gemensamma drag med toppmodellen Galaxy S21 Ultra.
Med en skärm på 6.7 tum är Galaxy S21+ nästan lika stor som Galaxy S21 Ultra och den ligger heller inte långt efter när det kommer till batteriets kapacitet (4800 respektive 5000 mAh). Galaxy S21 får nöja sig med 4000 mAh. Vidare har S21+ samma glasbaksida och ultra-bredbandschip (UWB) som toppmodellen.
Men totalt sett ligger Galaxy S21+ närmare Galaxy S21 än Galaxy S21 Ultra: den har samma kamerautrustning, samma storlek på RAM och lagring samt, tyvärr, samma skärmupplösning. 2400 x 1080 pixlar är lite magert för ett flaggskepp på 6.7 tum.
Galaxy S21+ har i likhet med sina Galaxy S21-syskon utmärkt prestanda, men bortsett från att den har större skärm och batteri finns det egentligen inget som skiljer den från Galaxy S21, som kostar 2.000 kronor mindre.
Även när det kommer till priset lägger sig Galaxy S21+ mellan Galaxy S21 (ca 8.490 kronor) och Galaxy S21 Ultra (från ca 12.490 kronor). Det som skiljer den från Galaxy S21 är egentligen bara en större skärm, ett större batteri och ultra-bredbandschippet. Prispåslaget på 2.000 kronor extra som du får betala för att istället få Galaxy S21 Ultra känns mer berättigat, då den har bäst skärm, bäst kamera och störst batteri.
Om du ignorerar den eleganta och betydligt modernare designen Galaxy S21+ har är det få saker som skiljer den från föregångaren, så har du redan en Galaxy S20+ behöver du inte nödvändigtvis byta upp dig.
Samsung Galaxy S21+
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero