Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Billig vatten- och dammskyddad Android-telefon (Sammanfattning)

IP53-certifierad.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S är en billig IP-certifierad smartphone. Redmi Note 10S kostar ungefär lika mycket som föregångaren Redmi Note 9S men har aningen bättre hårdvara. Läs vår recension för att få reda på hur vi upplever Redmi Note 10S.
Touchscreen Smartphone Android
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Redmi Note 12 Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G95 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-G76 MP4
Minne
6 GB 
Skärm
6.43 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv, AMOLED, glansig: ja, 60 Hz
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD (FAT, FAT32), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhetssensor, Accelerometer, Gyroskop, e-kompass, OTG, IR-Sändare
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.29 x 160.46 x 74.5
Batteri
5000 mAh Litiumjon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operativsystem
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Huvudkamera (1.97", 0.7 μm, f/1.79), 8 MP ultra-vidvinkel (118°, f/2.2), 2 MP makro (f/2.4), 2 MP djup (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.45)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter, USB-C kabel, Skyddsfodral, Sim-verktyg, MIUI 12.5, 12 Månader Garanti, SAR (Huvud): 0.599 W/kg, SAR (Kropp): 0.904 W/kg, IP53, Camera2 API: Level 3, SNR: 91,42 dBFS, fanless
Vikt
178.8 g, Strömförsörjning: 112 g
Pris
280 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
81.1 %
v7 (old)
06/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4		178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.7 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
SD 720G, Adreno 618		209 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81.7 %
v7 (old)
04/2021
Realme 8
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4		177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.9 %
v7 (old)
05/2021
Oppo A74
SD 662, Adreno 610		175 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
84.6 %
v7 (old)
06/2021
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
SD 860, Adreno 640		215 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S

Storleksjämförelse

❌
165.3 mm 76.8 mm 9.4 mm 215 g165.8 mm 76.7 mm 8.8 mm 209 g160.46 mm 74.5 mm 8.29 mm 178.8 g160.6 mm 73.9 mm 8 mm 177 g160.3 mm 73.8 mm 7.95 mm 175 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.62 MB/s +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15.75 MB/s -16%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø42.4 (35.4-50.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø84.9 (50.7-89.2)
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
652 (326min - 669max) MBit/s +130%
Realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (317min - 353max) MBit/s +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 (247min - 263max) MBit/s -10%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249 (155min - 290max) MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Adreno 640, SD 860, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
486 (425min - 550max) MBit/s +52%
Realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
335 (281min - 350max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 (225min - 321max) MBit/s -11%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (170min - 314max) MBit/s -14%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (299-340)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø283 (145-322)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Navigering

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Close-up shotPanoramic shotUltra wide-angle shot5X zoomLow-light shot
orginal image
click to load images
zoomed image
zoomed image
ColorChecker
2.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S: 6.84 ∆E min: 2.27 - max: 11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
65.4 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
37 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
43 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
91 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S: 46.44 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 91.04 ∆E
700
cd/m²		700
cd/m²		702
cd/m²
693
cd/m²		706
cd/m²		706
cd/m²
701
cd/m²		697
cd/m²		700
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Max: 706 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 700.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.63 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 706 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Realme 8
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Oppo A74
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"		Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-62%
-27%
-41%
7%
Brightness middle
706
622
-12%
590
-16%
606
-14%
567
-20%
Brightness
701
612
-13%
607
-13%
606
-14%
524
-25%
Brightness Distribution
98
94
-4%
92
-6%
98
0%
87
-11%
Black Level *
0.56
0.57
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
3.98
-90%
2.64
-26%
3.6
-71%
1
52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.9
7.33
-50%
6.85
-40%
6.2
-27%
2.1
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
4.5
-200%
2.4
-60%
3.3
-120%
1.7
-13%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.206 100%
2.265 97%
2.31 95%
2.16 102%
CCT
6447 101%
7361 88%
6913 94%
6704 97%
6343 102%
Contrast
1111
995
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 57 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 57 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Antutu v9 | AnTuTu v8 | AImark | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
559 Points +10%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
532 Points +5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
305 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
728 Points +44%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (506 - 532, n=6)
515 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +96%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points 0%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1689 Points 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1234 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2657 Points +58%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1622 - 1778, n=6)
1684 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +97%
Vulkan Score 5.5 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2258 Points
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2400 Points +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points -100%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2324 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2055 - 2400, n=5)
2207 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 16883, n=42, last 2 years)
6763 Points +200%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2248 Points
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2314 Points +3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points -83%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
2668 Points +19%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1943 - 2314, n=6)
2193 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (459 - 13578, n=35, last 2 years)
7074 Points +215%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10373 Points +26%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7554 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
11153 Points +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (7938 - 10373, n=4)
8820 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3202 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3501 Points +9%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2542 Points -21%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1797 Points -44%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2542 - 3511, n=4)
3127 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3558 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3647 Points +3%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2398 Points -33%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1681 Points -53%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2398 - 3592, n=4)
3201 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2372 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3070 Points +29%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3222 Points +36%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2368 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2372 - 3253, n=4)
3024 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3120 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3669 Points +18%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3293 Points +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1819 Points -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
7752 Points +148%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3120 - 3336, n=4)
3230 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)
11109 Points +256%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3335 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3803 Points +14%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3285 Points -1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1737 Points -48%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
12070 Points +262%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3148 - 3335, n=4)
3272 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)
19708 Points +491%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2547 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3267 Points +28%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3323 Points +30%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2182 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3442 Points +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2547 - 3392, n=4)
3128 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)
5001 Points +96%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2587 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2507 Points -3%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2745 Points +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1151 Points -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2587 - 2786, n=5)
2719 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2633 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2369 Points -10%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2633 Points 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
998 Points -62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2599 - 2644, n=5)
2630 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2436 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3152 Points +29%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3228 Points +33%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2474 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
Points -100%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2436 - 3389, n=5)
3109 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2682 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2680 Points 0%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2754 Points +3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1152 Points -57%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6871 Points +156%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2682 - 2855, n=5)
2785 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +190%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2743 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2551 Points -7%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2712 Points -1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1015 Points -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8218 Points +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2682 - 2745, n=5)
2721 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +321%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2488 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3256 Points +31%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2914 Points +17%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2177 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
4367 Points +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2488 - 3581, n=5)
3120 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2641 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2353 Points -11%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2826 Points +7%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1113 Points -58%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5406 Points +105%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2641 - 2856, n=5)
2794 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)
2846 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2845 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2257 Points -21%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2878 Points +1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
968 Points -66%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
6987 Points +146%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2788 - 2878, n=5)
2842 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)
3095 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2110 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
2765 Points +31%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2656 Points +26%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2349 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3017 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2110 - 2813, n=5)
2621 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)
2704 Points +28%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1493 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3488 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1373 - 1493, n=3)
1433 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2840 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1502 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
3455 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1352 - 1502, n=3)
1443 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7533 Points
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
987 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (387 - 421, n=2)
404 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2053 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
974 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (381 - 418, n=2)
400 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2051 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps -2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
119 fps +98%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (45 - 68, n=4)
58 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
85 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
86 fps +1%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
184 fps +116%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (78 - 85, n=4)
82.3 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +229%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps -24%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps -61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
103 fps +110%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (42 - 49, n=4)
45 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +54%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
52 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
42 fps -19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
110 fps +112%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (43 - 53, n=4)
50 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +218%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
31 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps -13%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps -58%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
74 fps +139%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (26 - 31, n=4)
28.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +112%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
32 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps -3%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
77 fps +141%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (29 - 33, n=4)
31.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +266%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps -11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7 fps -61%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
44 fps +144%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (15 - 18, n=4)
16.8 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +166%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps -5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps -63%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps +142%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (18 - 21, n=4)
19.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +272%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps -11%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps -56%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
45 fps +137%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (16 - 19, n=6)
18.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +161%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
20 fps
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
21 fps +5%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.2 fps -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46 fps +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (19 - 22, n=6)
20.7 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +299%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
12 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps -8%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12 fps 0%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.9 fps -59%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
29 fps +142%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (10 - 12, n=6)
11.3 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +212%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
7 fps -5%
Realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps +4%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps -62%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps +130%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6.8 - 7.8, n=6)
7.5 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +332%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
330876 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
198053 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
563850 Points +70%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (326670 - 330876, n=2)
328773 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points +141%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
282417 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
275931 Points -2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
185542 Points -34%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
483527 Points +71%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (282417 - 295778, n=2)
289098 Points +2%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6118 Points
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15832 Points +159%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
46152 Points +654%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6118 - 12983, n=3)
10500 Points +72%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1566 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3542 Points +126%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2247 Points +43%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5224 Points +234%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1566 - 3198, n=4)
2750 Points +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +302%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2083 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
6828 Points +228%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4921 Points +136%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
8549 Points +310%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2083 - 5830, n=4)
4602 Points +121%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +388%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1012 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
4295 Points +324%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2618 Points +159%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
5716 Points +465%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1012 - 4108, n=4)
3216 Points +218%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +569%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3178 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
3807 Points +20%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1832 Points -42%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
10549 Points +232%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3178 - 3807, n=4)
3579 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +432%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
898 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144
1410 Points +57%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860, Adreno 640, 6144
1445 Points +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (898 - 1288, n=4)
1149 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +74%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +612%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
62 Points +266%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
48.53 Points +187%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (16.9 - 50.8, n=5)
36.4 Points +115%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
32.19 Points +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
16.92 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
110.2 Points +313%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
89.5 Points +236%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (26.7 - 72.4, n=3)
56.6 Points +112%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
47.84 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
26.66 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +827%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
59 runs/min +301%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)
44.1 runs/min +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (14.7 - 34.2, n=4)
29.1 runs/min +98%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
26.5 runs/min +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
14.7 runs/min
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points +431%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
90 Points +221%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
69 Points +146%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
59 Points +111%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (28 - 57, n=5)
48 Points +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
28 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +673%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
23902 Points +397%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
17303 Points +260%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (4808 - 16289, n=4)
13050 Points +171%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
8958 Points +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
4808 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
10797 ms *
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (2673 - 10797, n=5)
4586 ms * +58%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
4322 ms * +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)
2794 ms * +74%
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro (Chrome 90.0.4430.210)
2155 ms * +80%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +85%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SXiaomi Redmi Note 9SRealme 8Oppo A74Xiaomi Poco X3 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-1%
1%
85%
54%
215%
Sequential Read 256KB
498.8
496.6
0%
526
5%
515
3%
1330
167%
728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71)
46%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
269%
Sequential Write 256KB
372
214.8
-42%
187.8
-50%
255.3
-31%
527
42%
527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71)
42%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
283%
Random Read 4KB
110.5
137
24%
144
30%
139.4
26%
203.1
84%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
73%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
151%
Random Write 4KB
121
123.6
2%
133
10%
126.4
4%
176.9
46%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
54%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
155%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; Armajet: Ø43.8 (20-58)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø50.5 (31-59)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø30.6 (19-41)
Hög belastning
 38.6 °C37.3 °C32.8 °C 
 37.8 °C36.8 °C31.7 °C 
 36.7 °C35.3 °C31 °C 
Max: 38.6 °C
Medel: 35.3 °C
32.9 °C35.9 °C37.5 °C
32.2 °C34.1 °C37.3 °C
30.8 °C33.7 °C34.6 °C
Max: 37.5 °C
Medel: 34.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  26.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203032.92526.725.63125.624.54026.121.65036.434.66329.222.6802528.210017.824.912518.328.816018.638.920017.442.225014.247.831515.955.940012.857.85001462.763013.368.780012.274.4100012.376.4125011.977.9160012.876.2200012.777.5250012.178315012.978.7400013.280500013.479630013.677.2800013.473.11000013.970.51250014711600014.266.7SPL25.288.9N0.775median 13.4median 73.1Delta1.211.233.640.33541.124.824.924.927.128.5272724.815.715.316.52415.722.214.431.89.137.29.641.27.551.110.654.912.358.718.763.517.664.115.768.711.568.810.872.69.972.61372.216.47015.466.81761.318.263.420.266.820.465.917.366.717.850.128.380.90.945.6median 15.7median 63.53.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 10SRealme 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Realme 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.46 / 1.5 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.67 / 5.58 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh		Oppo A74
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh		Average Mediatek Helio G95
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-61%
-2%
-53%
-43%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
1.5
-117%
0.62
10%
0.79
-14%
1.273 ?(0.69 - 2.5, n=4)
-84%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Average *
1.46
2.1
-44%
1.59
-9%
2.21
-51%
1.865 ?(0.9 - 3.6, n=4)
-28%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
2.5
-67%
1.63
-9%
2.26
-51%
2.05 ?(1.2 - 3.7, n=4)
-37%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-8%
Load Average *
3.67
5.2
-42%
4.05
-10%
6.17
-68%
4.87 ?(3.67 - 6.5, n=4)
-33%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-76%
Load Maximum *
5.58
7.5
-34%
5.2
7%
10.09
-81%
7.32 ?(5.58 - 8.9, n=4)
-31%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-76%

* ... smaller is better

Energiförbrukning: Geekbench, GFXBench och tomgång (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.048 (0.954-1.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.16 (1.315-6.05)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.74 (0.892-8.04)
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
60tim 12min
WiFi Websurfing
18tim 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19tim 32min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 08min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
5020 mAh		Realme 8
5000 mAh		Oppo A74
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
5160 mAh
Battery Runtime
-11%
-4%
-15%
-24%
Reader / Idle
3612
2263
-37%
2386
-34%
2372
-34%
H.264
1172
1269
8%
1179
1%
973
-17%
WiFi v1.3
1087
1187
9%
1039
-4%
982
-10%
879
-19%
Load
368
279
-24%
314
-15%
276
-25%

För

+ Ljusstark skärm
+ Stereohögtalare
+ IP53-certifiering
+ Kan använda två SIM-kort och ett microSD-kort samtidigt

Emot

- Marginella prestandaförbättringar jämfört med föregångaren
- Allt för aggressiv energihantering påverkar GNSS negativt
- Har inte stöd för Widevine DRM L1
- Instabil bilduppdatering när man spelar spel
- Saknar stöd för exFAT-formaterade SD-kort
- Endast 12 månaders garanti

Omdöme - Gedigen prestanda, bra hårdvara

Recension av Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany
Recension av Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Recensionsex från Xiaomi Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Redmi Note 10S är ytterligare en väl prissatt mittenskiktstelefon från Xiaomi. Den har skaplig prestanda och kan hantera de flesta apparna. Väldigt krävande applikationer kan dock kännas långsamma på Xiaomis telefon. Det kan också ta en tag för innehåll att läsas in på riktigt tunga sidor. Däremot är batteritiden bra och kamerasystemet skapligt.         

Redmi Note 10 har en riktigt bra hårdvarumix.

Frågan är vilken man ska välja: Redmi Note 10, Redmi Note 10S eller Redmi Note 10 Pro. Priset på dessa varierar mellan 2.000 - 3.000 kronor. Väljer du rätt kan du spara en del pengar. Redmi Note 10 har inte har något NFC-chip, men det har Note 10 Pro och den kommer också med ett bättre kamerasystem. Redmi Note 10S framstår som en bra kompromiss. Den största konkurrenten till Redmi Note 10S är realme 8, som har liknande prestanda. Har man redan en Redmi Note 9S finns det ingen anledning att byta till Redmi Note 10S.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Design
87%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
48 / 70 → 68%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
29 / 64 → 45%
Programprestanda
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
63%
Medel
75%
81%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S - Billig vatten- och dammskyddad Android-telefon (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2021-06-28 (Update: 2021-06-28)