Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) recension: En kompakt RTX 4070-bärbar dator för spelare och skapare

Powerhouse.

Den lätta och kompakta XMG Fusion 15 har inte en konventionell skärmstorlek: Istället för en 16- eller 15,6-tumsskärm är den utrustad med en 15,3-tums panel (2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, 240 Hz) med bildförhållandet 16:10. En Core i9-processor, RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4 och mycket bra körtider avrundar det totala paketet.

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - en 15,3-tums bärbar dator för gamers och kreatörer - är baserad på ett barebone (GM5IX7A) från tillverkaren Tongfang. Raptor Lake, Ada Lovelace och 32 GB RAM utrustar den bärbara datorn för streaming, rendering och spel. Den nuvarande varianten kan köpas för cirka 2 500 USD. Konkurrenter inkluderar enheter som t.ex Aorus 16X (2024), Alienware m16 R2, HP Omen Transcend 16 och Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9.

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) (XMG Fusion 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 170 W PL2 / Short Burst, 160 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2175 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.5222, Optimus + MUX-Switch
Minne
32 GB 
, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Skärm
15.30 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 197 PPI, BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, sRGB, glansig: nej, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Moderkort
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Hårddisk
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 894 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Conexant SN6140
Anslutningar
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Audiokombo, Kortläsare: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Motorcomm YT6801 (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 21.9 x 342.5 x 245
Batteri
99.8 Wh, 6450 mAh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB Thundrive (drivers, manuals), stickers, mousepad, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.13 kg, Strömförsörjning: 864 g
Pris
2293 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.9 %
v7 (old)
05/2024
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg21.9 mm15.30"2560x1600
87.4 %
v7 (old)
04/2024
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
90.2 %
v7 (old)
03/2024
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
02/2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
v7 (old)
04/2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.95 mm16.00"2560x1600

Fodral - Den bärbara datorn XMG med ett aluminiumfodral

Schenker har valt ett elegant, mattsvart aluminiumhölje med släta ytor. Den bärbara datorn har inga iögonfallande designelement eller LED-remsor - det är bara tangentbordets bakgrundsbelysning (RGB) som ger enheten lite färg. Den bärbara datorn skulle knappt sticka ut i professionella miljöer.

Vi noterade inga materialutsprång och alla luckor är perfekt anpassade. Basenheten och locket kan vridas en aning, men det är inget utöver det vanliga. Att trycka på baksidan av locket resulterar inte i några bildförändringar. De styva gångjärnen medger en maximal öppningsvinkel på 180 grader. Det är möjligt att öppna den med en hand.

XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)

Det är ingen överraskning: I jämförelsefältet är Fusion den mest kompakta enheten - den har den minsta skärmen. Samtidigt är den också den lättaste av dem alla.

Storleksjämförelse

363.4 mm 261.75 mm 26.95 mm 2.5 kg363.9 mm 249.4 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg356 mm 254 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg356 mm 269 mm 20 mm 2.3 kg342.5 mm 245 mm 21.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Anslutningsmöjligheter - Fusion 15 med Thunderbolt 4

Fusion har tre USB-A-portar (USB 3.2 Gen 1) och två USB-C-portar (1x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 1x Thunderbolt 4). TB4-porten stöder Power Delivery och kan mata ut en DisplayPort-signal. Totalt har den bärbara datorn två videoutgångar (1x HDMI, 1x DP). Ett ljuduttag och en Gigabit Ethernet-port kompletterar anslutningsmöjligheterna. Dess videoutgångar och strömanslutning är placerade på enhetens baksida. Motsvarande kablar löper ut på baksidan, så att de inte kommer i vägen.

Vänster sida: Plats för kabellås, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), ljudkombination
Vänster sida: Plats för kabellås, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C), ljudkombination
Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Höger sida: SD-kortläsare, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)
Baksida: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, strömanslutning
Baksida: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, strömanslutning

SD-kortläsare

Med överföringshastigheter på 81 MB/s (överföring av 250 jpg-bilder, vardera 5 MB i storlek) och 82 MB/s (kopiering av stora datablock) är SD-kortläsaren (referenskort: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) av medelhastighet. Konkurrensen erbjuder till stor del snabbare läsare.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
186 MB/s +130%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
81 MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75.3 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
205.32 MB/s +150%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
188 MB/s +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +46%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
82 MB/s

Kommunikation

Fusion använder ett WiFi 6E-chip (Intel AX211) som i bästa fall (inga WiFi-enheter i närheten, kort avstånd mellan bärbar dator och server) uppnår mycket bra datahastigheter. Trådbundna anslutningar sköts av en Gigabit Ethernet-kontroller (YT6801) från Motorcomm - en tillverkare som vi inte har stött på tidigare.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1378min - 1489max) MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=149, last 2 years)
1233 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1205 (875min - 1438max) MBit/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
636 (485min - 769max) MBit/s -56%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
469 (304min - 548max) MBit/s -68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1632 (1454min - 1700max) MBit/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1577 (1237min - 1665max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)
1394 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202
1227 (1074min - 1317max) MBit/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1040 (739min - 1218max) MBit/s -36%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1631 (1454-1700)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1576 (1237-1665)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1227 (1074-1317)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (739-1218)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1378-1489)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø469 (304-548)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1205 (875-1438)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (485-769)

Webbkamera

Dess webbkamera (2,1 MP) är av genomsnittlig kvalitet. Den misslyckas när det gäller färgprecision: Med en avvikelse på cirka 9 har målvärdet (DeltaE<3) missats. Den har dock stöd för Windows Hello. Dessutom är den utrustad med ett mekaniskt skydd.

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24): 8.97 ∆E min: 2.36 - max: 15.16 ∆E

Tillbehör

Den bärbara datorn levereras med ett USB-minne (drivrutin, manualer), klistermärken och en musmatta.

Underhåll

Efter att ha tagit bort alla skruvar på enhetens undersida kan den nedre delen av höljet tas bort ganska enkelt - du kan bara behöva ett plektrum eller en platt spatel för att hjälpa till med detta. Därefter kan du komma åt RAM-bankerna (båda upptagna), SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), andra SSD-platsen (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), WLAN-modul, fläktar, BIOS-batteri och den bärbara datorns batteri.

Hårdvara XMG Fusion 15 (början av 2024)
Hårdvara XMG Fusion 15 (början av 2024)
Hårdvara XMG Fusion 15 (början av 2024)
Hårdvara XMG Fusion 15 (början av 2024)
Hårdvara XMG Fusion 15 (början av 2024)

Garanti

Enheten omfattas av en basgaranti som varar i två år - detta inkluderar upphämtningsservice och en 6-månaders snabb reparationsservice (reparation inom 48 timmar). Du kan förlänga garantin till 36 månader mot en avgift.

Inmatningsenheter - RGB-bakgrundsbelysning med en knapp

Tangentbord

Tangenterna på chiclet-tangentbordet (RGB-bakgrundsbelysning i fyra nivåer) har ett medelhögt lyft och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Motståndet kunde vara lite skarpare, men det är en smaksak. Tangentbordet ger efter minimalt när du skriver, men det visade sig inte vara irriterande under vårt test. Positiva egenskaper: De fyra piltangenterna har inte bara full storlek utan är också separerade från de andra tangenterna.

Pekplatta

En multi-touch clickpad (ca 12,3 x 7,8 cm) ersätter behovet av en mus och den släta ytan gör det lätt för fingrarna att glida över. Den har ett kort lyft och en tydlig tryckpunkt.

Tangentbord XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)
Tangentbord XMG Fusion 15 (tidig 24)

Skärm - Ljus panel med sRGB-täckning

Schenker har utrustat Fusion med en 15,3-tumsskärm (2.560 x 1.600 pixlar) med ett bildförhållande på 16:10. Den matta 240-Hz-panelen har Adaptive Sync, inget PWM-flimmer, korta svarstider och hög ljusstyrka. Alternativa skärmar är inte tillgängliga.

Sub-pixel matris
Sub-pixel matris
Ingen synlig blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen
Ingen synlig blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen
467
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 491 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 460 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 491 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1045:1 (Svärta: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.204
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
BOE NJ NE153QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3"
Aorus 16X 2024
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Alienware m16 R2
BOE NE16NYH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
BOE NE160QDM-NYC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
-7%
-3%
22%
-5%
Display P3 Coverage
73.5
67.2
-9%
71
-3%
99.8
36%
69.3
-6%
sRGB Coverage
100
96.7
-3%
100
0%
100
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
75
69.3
-8%
71.4
-5%
97
29%
70.1
-7%
Response Times
-27%
-41%
96%
-105%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5 ?(2.3, 2.7)
7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2)
-50%
5.7 ?(2.6, 3.1)
-14%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
11.9 ?(5.5, 6.4)
-138%
Response Time Black / White *
5.2 ?(1.5, 3.7)
5.4 ?(1.5, 3.9)
-4%
8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1)
-67%
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
96%
8.9 ?(4.8, 4.1)
-71%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
Screen
-1%
11%
182%
17%
Brightness middle
491
542
10%
345.8
-30%
390
-21%
384
-22%
Brightness
460
504
10%
337
-27%
392
-15%
366
-20%
Brightness Distribution
89
86
-3%
87
-2%
98
10%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.47
0.45
4%
0.3
36%
0.02
96%
0.35
26%
Contrast
1045
1204
15%
1153
10%
19500
1766%
1097
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.16
2.73
-26%
1.99
8%
1.94
10%
0.97
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.44
5.29
-19%
3.52
21%
4.26
4%
3.57
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.14
1.32
-16%
0.62
46%
4.21
-269%
0.77
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
2.9
12%
2.1
36%
1.5
55%
1.5
55%
Gamma
2.204 100%
2.192 100%
2.32 95%
2.221 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6286 103%
6173 105%
6369 102%
6395 102%
6709 97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-12% / -6%
-11% / 1%
100% / 135%
-31% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Displayen visade redan bra färgåtergivning direkt från förpackningen: Med en avvikelse på cirka 2,2 har målvärdet (DeltaE < 3) uppnåtts. Kalibrering av skärmen sänker avvikelsen till 1,14 och resulterar i mer balanserade gråtoner. Panelen kan täcka sRGB-färgrymden helt och hållet men inte färgrymderna AdobeRGB eller DCI P3. Detta skiljer sig inte från de flesta av konkurrenternas skärmar.

CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Gråskala
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: Färgmättnad
CalMAN: Färgkontroll
CalMAN: Färgkontroll
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: Färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
XMG Fusion 15 E24 jämfört med sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 jämfört med sRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 jämfört med AdobeRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 jämfört med AdobeRGB
XMG Fusion 15 E24 jämfört med DCI-P3
XMG Fusion 15 E24 jämfört med DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise
↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise
↘ 2.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Enhetens IPS-panel med stabil betraktningsvinkel förblir läsbar från alla vinklar. Utomhus kan du läsa på skärmen så länge solen inte skiner för starkt.

Fusion utanför.
Fusion utanför.
Fusion 15 (Early 24):s betraktningsvinklar
Fusion 15 (Early 24):s betraktningsvinklar

Prestanda - Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace driver den bärbara datorn

Den kraftfulla, kompakta XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) riktar sig till spelare och kreatörer. Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace levererar den prestanda som krävs. Den bärbara datorn kan konfigureras individuellt via Schenkers onlinebutik. Den aktuella varianten kostar ca 2.500 US-dollar. Billigare modeller börjar från ca 1.700 USD.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia Systeminformation
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Testförhållanden

Den bärbara datorn erbjuder tre tillverkarspecifika prestandalägen (se tabell), som snabbt kan växlas mellan med hjälp av en separat knapp (bredvid strömbrytaren). Individuella profiler kan skapas med hjälp av den förinstallerade programvaran Control Center. Till exempel kan CPU:ns effektgränser, GPU:ns TGP och/eller enhetens övre temperaturgränser justeras.

Lägena Enthusiast (benchmarks) och Balanced (batteritester) användes under vårt test. GPU-läget var inställt på Hybrid (= Optimus).

Entusiast Overboost Balanserad
Effektbegränsning 1 (HWInfo) 160 watt 160 watt 160 watt
Effektgräns 2 (HWInfo) 170 watt 170 watt 170 watt
Buller (Witcher 3) 51 dB(A) 53 dB(A) 39 dB(A)
Prestanda (Witcher 3) 128 fps 130 fps 14-128 fps
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter
Kontrollcenter

Undervolting

Processorn kan drivas med lägre spänningar än vad tillverkaren har avsett (undervolting). På så sätt minskar enhetens strömförbrukning och värmeutsläpp. Men var försiktig: Om du sänker spänningen för mycket kan det leda till ett instabilt eller felaktigt system. I så fall måste ändringarna återställas - undervolting sker på egen risk.

BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15
BIOS XMG Fusion 15

Processor

Core Core i9-14900HX (Raptor Lake) 24 CPU-kärnor (8P + 16E = 32 trådar) uppnår maximala klockfrekvenser på 5,8 GHz (P) och 4,1 GHz (E). Permanent belastning med flera trådar (CB15 Loop) resulterar i stabila klockfrekvenser - nivån beror på det valda strömläget.

Enthusiast levererar benchmark-värden under CPU-genomsnittet, medan Overboost höjer dem betydligt över genomsnittet - detta gäller främst den bärbara datorns multi-thread-prestanda. Dess single-thread-prestanda ligger på en hög och mycket likartad nivå när alla tre profilerna används.

Mer information om Core i9 finns i vår analysartikel.

Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3246 (3155.57-3458.12)
Aorus 16X 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3877 (3701.99-4280.82)
Alienware m16 R2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2777 (2743.86-2839.9)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4230 (4151.1-4590.84)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX; Overboost: Ø4247 (4169.27-4354.93)
CB15 Loop (Entusiast)
CB15 Loop (Entusiast)
CB15-slinga (överladdning)
CB15-slinga (överladdning)
CB15-slinga (balanserad)
CB15-slinga (balanserad)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
86.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.7 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
81.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
74.5 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65.4 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.2 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
30709 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
29686 (26317.7min - 29686max) Points +28%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=36)
28815 Points +25%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27818 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
23124 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21842 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18419 (18019.3min - 18419.5max) Points -20%
Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2211 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2188 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=36)
2149 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2122 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2043 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)
1888 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -14%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
11673 Points +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
11319 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=36)
10958 Points +29%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10655 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8465 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8311 Points -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7050 Points -17%
CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
844 Points +8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
841 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=36)
824 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
812 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
779 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
726 Points -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
674 Points -13%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4591 (4151.1min - 4590.84max) Points +33%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
4557 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=37)
4420 Points +28%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4280 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3458 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3421 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2840 (2743.86min - 2839.9max) Points -18%
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
312 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
312 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=36)
305 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
299 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
287 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
170.3 Seconds * -23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
138 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
126 Seconds * +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=36)
121.2 Seconds * +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
113 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
110 Seconds * +20%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
121665 MIPS +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
115585 MIPS +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=36)
111340 MIPS +14%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
106866 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
97929 MIPS
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85304 MIPS -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
67581 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7508 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
7409 MIPS -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7297 MIPS -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=36)
7021 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6776 MIPS -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6311 MIPS -16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5037 MIPS -33%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
18126 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
18056 Points +11%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17408 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=36)
17312 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16196 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
16011 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=111, last 2 years)
14175 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
12670 Points -22%
Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3081 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3054 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
3032 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=36)
2967 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2889 Points -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2800 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=111, last 2 years)
2648 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
2383 Points -23%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
21299 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
20994 Points +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
19607 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=36)
19403 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17214 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
15010 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12328 Points -28%
Single-Core
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2183 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
2152 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2107 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=36)
2093 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2046 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1894 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1741 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32.4 fps +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
30.1 fps +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=36)
29.3 fps +22%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
27 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
24 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.5 fps -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
21.2 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
53.1 s * -37%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.3.4.2)
49.8 s * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)
47.4 s * -22%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=36)
43.3 s * -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
40.7 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.9 s *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
38.5 s * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Overboost)
36.1 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.487 sec * -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.4374 sec * -20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec * -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3917 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=36)
0.3853 sec * -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3782 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
0.3684 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.365 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3458 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
276 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
287 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8465 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
779 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
23124 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2043 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1342 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
120.1 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
88.7 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67.6 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63.6 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
27412 KRay/s +36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
25072 KRay/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=35)
24776 KRay/s +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23082 KRay/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)
21864 KRay/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
20224 KRay/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
18470 KRay/s -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
17244 KRay/s -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
137215 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
129169 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=35)
124243 Points +19%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
116836 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)
106582 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
104545 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
92996 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
88537 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
6905 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6285 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=35)
6137 MB/s +16%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5723 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5293 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)
4896 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4267 MB/s -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4242 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
142503 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
139673 Points +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
139355 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=35)
138178 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
131076 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
118405 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)
116926 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
84180 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
15756 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
15401 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=35)
15240 Points +10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14830 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13913 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)
13244 Points -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12217 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10617 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
68400 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
62567 Points +22%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=35)
61114 Points +20%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
57633 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)
53651 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
51088 Points
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47685 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
43302 Points -15%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
236096 MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
190740 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=35)
139720 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
120213 MB/s -37%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
112833 MB/s -41%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)
109303 MB/s -43%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
86964 MB/s -54%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
82757 MB/s -57%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
1957 MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1866 MB/s +26%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=35)
1792 MB/s +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1662 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1485 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)
1361 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1265 MB/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1219 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
14882 KRay/s +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13776 KRay/s +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=35)
13343 KRay/s +21%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12355 KRay/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)
11775 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11009 KRay/s
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9802 KRay/s -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9170 KRay/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49676 MPixel/s +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49507 MPixel/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49217 MPixel/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Overboost)
47721 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
47411 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=35)
46809 MPixel/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)
40126 MPixel/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
39532 MPixel/s -17%

Systemets prestanda

Det välfungerande systemet saknar inte datorkraft. Spel, streaming och rendering utgör inga större utmaningar för den bärbara datorn. RAM-minnets överföringshastigheter ligger inom en normal nivå för DDR5-5600 RAM. Dess PCMark-resultat var också bra.

RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel-läge.
RAM-minnet körs i dual-channel-läge.
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8550 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8522 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8389 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7768 - 8550, n=8)
8193 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)
7799 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7761 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11815 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11286 Points -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11071 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10104 - 11815, n=8)
10896 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years)
10832 Points -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points -10%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10330 Points -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11103 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10731 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9577 - 11103, n=8)
10431 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10139 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years)
9904 Points -8%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9422 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14827 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
13247 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=8)
13160 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
13036 Points -2%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13035 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years)
12117 Points -9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points -9%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2312 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2203 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=7)
2186 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2002 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=146, last 2 years)
1908 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1762 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2191 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2109 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=7)
2066 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1827 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=146, last 2 years)
1808 Points -14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1684 Points -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2458 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2258 - 2458, n=7)
2363 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2358 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2287 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=146, last 2 years)
2095 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1913 Points -19%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2259 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1734 - 2330, n=7)
2056 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2049 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1769 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=146, last 2 years)
1708 Points -17%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1576 Points -23%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
342 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
330 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
322 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (269 - 342, n=8)
322 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)
304 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
294 Points -14%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 304, n=6)
298 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
291 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 - 328, n=149, last 2 years)
267 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
257 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
546 ms * -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)
503 ms * -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
449 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 469, n=8)
448 ms * -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms * -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
436 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
431 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
8522 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78979 MB/s +2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78854 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77669 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=35)
74992 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)
65265 MB/s -16%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63008 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86538 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86376 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85867 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=35)
81259 MB/s -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76370 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)
69175 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s +7%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77406 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77346 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72287 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=35)
72271 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)
67077 MB/s -7%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66009 MB/s -9%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.2 ns * -52%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)
93.7 ns * -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=35)
84.8 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.4 ns * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.1 ns *
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.5 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Det standardiserade latensmonitortestet (surfing på webben, 4k-videouppspelning, Prime95 hög belastning) avslöjade vissa avvikelser. Systemet verkar inte vara lämpligt för video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida programuppdateringar kan leda till förbättringar eller till och med försämringar.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2037.7 μs * -192%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs * -124%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1162.9 μs * -66%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
989.1 μs * -42%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
698.6 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

Fusion har plats för totalt två PCIe-4 SSD-enheter i M.2-2280-format. RAID-0/1 stöds. Samsung SSD (1 TB) i vår testenhet levererade utmärkta datahastigheter. Positivt: Vi noterade inte någon termisk strypning.

Den bärbara datorn har plats för två PCIe-4 SSD-enheter.
Den bärbara datorn har plats för två PCIe-4 SSD-enheter.
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7119 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6895 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 550.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2954 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4529 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.05 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 281.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
89.9 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
 
83.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.5 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.4 pt
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
68.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
57.7 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4480 (4426.62min - 4479.73max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4037 (3964.04min - 4036.7max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3645 (3579.03min - 3644.85max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3475 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2556 - 4234, n=19)
3283 MB/s -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2620 (2556.56min - 2619.76max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3598 - 5842, n=19)
4816 MB/s +11%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4757 (4720.06min - 4757.31max) MB/s +10%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4371 (4342.15min - 4371.09max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4342 (4320.81min - 4342.28max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4093 (4016.82min - 4092.8max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3805 MB/s -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s -30%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7079 (6575.14min - 7078.73max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7011 (6063.46min - 7010.81max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4958 - 7148, n=19)
6979 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6636 (6205.02min - 6635.75max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6322 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5181 (4323.23min - 5181.35max) MB/s -26%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6897 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (6531 - 6898, n=19)
6796 MB/s -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5250 (5191.5min - 5250.22max) MB/s -24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4949 (4932.28min - 4948.61max) MB/s -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4850 MB/s -30%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4821 (4606.6min - 4820.72max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
92.7 (91.49min - 92.68max) MB/s +29%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.5 (82.8min - 83.52max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (55.3 - 99, n=19)
77.1 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
71.8 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
66 MB/s -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s -29%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
47.2 (45.9min - 47.16max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
340 (329.38min - 339.78max) MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
290 (278.05min - 290.22max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (249.74min - 251.16max) MB/s -13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (133.9 - 343, n=19)
235 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -23%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
198.1 (195.9min - 198.06max) MB/s -32%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4860.82min - 4914.87max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4055 (4044.11min - 4055.48max) MB/s -17%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3630 (3471.35min - 3629.9max) MB/s -26%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (818 - 4926, n=19)
3398 MB/s -31%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3302 (3194.22min - 3302.44max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2568 MB/s -48%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3542 (3491.17min - 3541.69max) MB/s +4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3443 (3007.99min - 3443.05max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3406 (3365.94min - 3405.88max) MB/s
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3003 (2991.33min - 3002.71max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (413 - 4683, n=19)
2584 MB/s -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2133 MB/s -37%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9475 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
8778 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8364 Points -12%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (5405 - 10591, n=19)
8285 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8059 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)
6746 Points -29%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points -46%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3530 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3233 Points -8%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3152 Points -11%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3005 Points -15%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1349 - 4721, n=19)
2874 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)
2446 Points -31%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points -59%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4145 Points
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (2308 - 4852, n=19)
4041 Points -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4006 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3573 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3543 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)
3112 Points -25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points -27%
Seq Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5760.15 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s -2%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5592.15 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5355.36 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (4362 - 5760, n=19)
5223 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)
4945 MB/s -14%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4161.31 MB/s -28%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5243.63 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (3376 - 5651, n=19)
4740 MB/s -10%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4431.76 MB/s -15%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4431.18 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3950.35 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)
3760 MB/s -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s -32%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.62 MB/s +29%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (52.7 - 90.9, n=19)
71.9 MB/s +13%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.52 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)
65.2 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
63.85 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
61.86 MB/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
283.44 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
242.28 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (172.3 - 306, n=19)
221 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
213.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)
213 MB/s -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s -21%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
179.15 MB/s -26%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2982.47 MB/s
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2673.76 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2615.17 MB/s -12%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2374.63 MB/s -20%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (787 - 3182, n=19)
2235 MB/s -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)
1881 MB/s -37%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s -72%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3413.79 MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (1592 - 4090, n=19)
3352 MB/s -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3279.44 MB/s -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2951.09 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2933.74 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)
2527 MB/s -26%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.088 ms * -76%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)
0.05576 ms * -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.05 ms *
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.047 ms * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.018 - 0.074, n=19)
0.03384 ms * +32%
Access Time Write
Alienware m16 R2
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.07 ms * -268%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.059 ms * -211%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)
0.04728 ms * -149%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms * -5%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
  (0.012 - 0.053, n=19)
0.01995 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.019 ms *
Aorus 16X 2024
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6988 (6262.46-7033.01)
Aorus 16X 2024 Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5164 (4823.45-5192.86)
Alienware m16 R2 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7063 (6446.85-7107.46)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5723 (3286.38-6614.84)

Grafikkort

Schenker har låtit den bärbara datorns GeForce RTX 4070 en maximal TGP på 140 watt (115 watt + 25 watt Dynamic Boost) - mer rekommenderas inte av Nvidia. GPU:n har tillgång till 8 GB VRAM (GDDR6) - lite i underkant för dagens krav. Riktmärkena levererade resultat över RTX-4070-genomsnittet (Enthusiast) och Overboost resulterade bara i en liten fördel. Att växla mellan dGPU och Optimus kräver en omstart.

Fire Strike (Entusiast, ansluten till elnätet)
Fire Strike (Entusiast, ansluten till elnätet)
Fire Strike (Entusiast, batteriläge)
Fire Strike (Entusiast, batteriläge)
Fire Strike (Överladdning, ansluten till elnätet)
Fire Strike (Överladdning, ansluten till elnätet)
Fire Strike (Balanserad, ansluten till elnätet)
Fire Strike (Balanserad, ansluten till elnätet)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
96.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
96.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
95.8 pt
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
94.4 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
89.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
87.7 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
85.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
46434 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
44902 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
43689 Points -3%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
42296 Points -6%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
41457 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=63)
40427 Points -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
39424 Points -12%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
32533 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31274 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
31105 Points -1%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30932 Points -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
29156 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12242 - 33451, n=67)
29070 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
28461 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
13391 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
13336 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +3%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12997 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12682 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
12048 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (5012 - 13391, n=65)
11605 Points -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11181 Points -12%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
63892 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
36008 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26661 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
13067 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 30, n=64)
21.5 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
21 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -0%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
20 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
19 Seconds * +10%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 181, n=66)
40.3 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.5 Seconds * -14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
36 Seconds * -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
33 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
32 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
32 Seconds * -0%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
298 Seconds * -23%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3.3.3)
296 Seconds * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)
294 Seconds * -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 440, n=63)
291 Seconds * -20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
243 Seconds *
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
227 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
205 Seconds * +16%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Overboost)
185 Seconds * +24%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
129366 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
128643 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years)
127274 Points -2%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
126537 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
118601 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=64)
113923 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112841 Points -13%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
111153 Points -14%
Vulkan Score 5.5
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Overboost)
93143 Points +32%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
75575 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=119, last 2 years)
73245 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
70440 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (28158 - 102618, n=35)
69106 Points -2%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
65414 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
58476 Points -17%
Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
129836 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
129433 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120468 Points -7%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
120176 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=110, last 2 years)
116145 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
115718 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85488 - 129836, n=40)
113934 Points -12%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
112875 Points -13%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Overboost)
120033 Points +14%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6.2.1)
110951 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
105334 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
104883 Points
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
90584 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=105, last 2 years)
83044 Points -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18099 - 120033, n=37)
72500 Points -31%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)
2190 mpaths +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1868 mpaths +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1854 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1758 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1738 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1737 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (171 - 1872, n=37)
1650 mpaths -6%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)
1574 mpaths +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1333 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
1325 mpaths +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1266 mpaths
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
1259 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1256 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 1356, n=37)
1195 mpaths -6%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Overboost)
20388 mpaths +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
19077 mpaths +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
17465 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
15556 mpaths
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years)
15137 mpaths -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9339 - 20388, n=36)
14421 mpaths -7%
Alienware m16 R2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5.0.1)
12776 mpaths -18%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
709 mpaths +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
675 mpaths +12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
635 mpaths +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (434 - 686, n=48)
603 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
602 mpaths
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
596 mpaths -1%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
587 mpaths -2%
CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Overboost)
30730 ksamples +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
28791 ksamples +23%
Aorus 16X 2024
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
26677 ksamples +14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
23407 ksamples
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
21634 ksamples -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21459 ksamples -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12638 - 35173, n=48)
20853 ksamples -11%

* ... smaller is better

Prestanda för spel

Hårdvaran är avsedd för QHD-spel med höga till maximala inställningar. Genom att använda DLSS 3 och Frame Generation kan du spela spel med högre upplösningar och maximala inställningar inklusive raytracing - men bara med spel som stöder dessa funktioner. Vi noterade bildfrekvenser över genomsnittet för RTX-4070 (Enthusiast) och Overboost resulterade i en liten fördel.

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
87.4 pt
Alienware m16 R2 -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
80.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
133.7 (126min) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
133 fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128 (110min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
122 fps -5%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.3 (115min) fps -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)
112.5 fps -12%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
140.5 (9.33min, 90.9P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 (8.45min, 90.9P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
127.2 (5.17min, 83.3P1) fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.7 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (48.3 - 140.5, n=59)
110.7 fps -20%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
107.2 (4.31min, 71.4P1) fps -22%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)
131.9 fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
131 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
124.6 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
119.8 fps -4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
119.3 fps -4%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
111.5 fps -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (41 - 131.9, n=61)
110.9 fps -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
108.3 fps -13%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
234 (27.8min, 175.8P1) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)
222 (29.4min, 167.7P1) fps +4%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
219 (38.5min, 163.7P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
214 (38.2min, 161.4P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
204 (69.2min, 153P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (76.3 - 234, n=61)
196 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps -9%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
187.5 (160.5min) fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
185.3 (161min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
182.1 (158.8min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
180.9 (156.5min) fps -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.1 (133.3min) fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151 fps -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 191.2, n=63)
147.9 fps -19%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
139.7 (120.9min) fps -23%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Overboost)
138.4 fps +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
137.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
136.9 fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
114.9 fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)
108.2 fps -21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (52.1 - 147.9, n=65)
104.6 fps -24%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90.8 fps -34%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
90.7 (67.4min) fps +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87.1 (52.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
87 (55.2min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps -1%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
83.1 (28.4min) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 90.7, n=34)
79.2 fps -9%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
75.8 (32.9min) fps -13%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (24.8 - 110, n=69, last 2 years)
64.9 fps +23%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
55.6 (42.5min) fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.8 (33.2min) fps 0%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.7 (40.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
52.6 (39.5min) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
49.4 (29.5min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24.8 - 57.1, n=32)
49.1 fps -7%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02, Overboost)
46.8 (23.6min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.9 - 77.7, n=54, last 2 years)
45.3 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
44.8 (15.7min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
43.8 (34.3min) fps
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
42.4 (28.4min) fps -3%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
40.9 (21.5min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (19.1 - 46.8, n=20)
40.6 fps -7%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (32.5min, 42.2P0.1, 60.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.3 - 80, n=5)
67.8 fps -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years)
64.5 fps -19%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61.3 (37.3min, 38.9P0.1, 48.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (47.7 - 61.3, n=5)
55.3 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 61.3, n=5, last 2 years)
51.8 fps -15%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
128.5 fps +22%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
125.6 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105 (60.3min, 63.9P0.1, 89.7P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=45, last 2 years)
103.5 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66.7 - 128.5, n=24)
101.9 fps -3%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.6 fps +9%
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88.3 fps +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 155.2, n=34, last 2 years)
82.2 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.1 (30.4min, 49.4P0.1, 68.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54.4 - 89.6, n=20)
73.8 fps -10%
Alone in the Dark
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 189.9, n=6, last 2 years)
126.3 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126 (31.5min, 37.7P0.1, 88.8P1) fps
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
124.7 (21.3min, 36.4P0.1, 57.1P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (105.5 - 126, n=5)
119.2 fps -5%
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (64.7 - 133.6, n=4, last 2 years)
91.6 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76.6 (24.8min, 34.2P0.1, 53.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (37.4 - 76.6, n=5)
65.2 fps -15%
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64.7 (22.8min, 23.8P0.1, 30.9P1) fps -16%
Alan Wake 2
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 123.3, n=18, last 2 years)
70.8 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.1 (30.2min, 35.2P0.1, 41.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (65.1 - 71, n=6)
68.7 fps -2%
2560x1440 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (22.5 - 87.1, n=13, last 2 years)
62 fps +45%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
42.8 (10.4min, 22.7P0.1, 29.2P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (40.2 - 44.5, n=6)
42.5 fps -1%
The Witcher 3 v4.00
1920x1080 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 150, n=17, last 2 years)
87.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 (7.86min, 52.7P0.1, 64.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (85 - 86.5, n=2)
85.8 fps -1%
1920x1080 RT Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 66, n=11, last 2 years)
42.3 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
40.4 (8.77min, 13.8P0.1, 30.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (36 - 40.4, n=2)
38.2 fps -5%

För att testa om bildfrekvenserna förblir stabila under en längre tid lät vi spelet The Witcher 3 köra i cirka 60 minuter i Full HD och med inställningarna inställda på max. Vi flyttade inte spelkaraktären. Vi noterade ingen kollaps i bildfrekvensen, men den sjönk med några procent efter cirka 50 minuter (Enthusiast). Med profilen Overboost aktiverad uppstod inte detta beteende.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø123.4 (111-129)
Aorus 16X 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; FPS: Ø118.6 (114-123)
Alienware m16 R2 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø110 (97-116)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.3 (114-125)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Overboost: Ø130.2 (125-135)
Witcher 3 (Entusiast)
Witcher 3 (Entusiast)
Witcher 3 (Överdriven)
Witcher 3 (Överdriven)
lågmed.högultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 187.8 187 186.4 137.6 98.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 603.3 418.4 246.2 128 92.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 234 207 196.5 182.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 226 175.5 124.6 90.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 205 173.3 136.9
Far Cry 5 (2018) 204 176 166 157 124
Strange Brigade (2018) 558 313 245 214 139.2
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 271 215 176.2 86.5
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 157.2 121.2 106.1 105 82.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 156.6 124.5 103.6 87 52.6
Alan Wake 2 (2023) 74.3 71.4 70.1 42.8
Alone in the Dark (2024) 222 209 196.5 126 76.6
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 83.9 80 61.3

Utsläpp - Schenkers laptop blir ganska varm

Bullerutsläpp

I vardagen och vid tomgångskörning är den bärbara datorn mycket tyst. Fläktarna är visserligen permanent aktiverade (de kan avaktiveras via BIOS), men de hörs bara i mycket tysta miljöer. Under belastning förändras saker och ting snabbt: Vi noterade näsutsläpp på upp till 53 dB(A) (Enthusiast). Läget Overboost resulterade i ännu högre värden. Enheten är betydligt tystare när du använder läget Balanced- på bekostnad av viss prestanda.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
27 / 28 / 33 dB(A)
Hög belastning
52 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.640.242.642.940.92534.736.639.140.936.73141.545.949.24645.5402729.331.532.932.15028.427.32825.227.96337.128.428.924.435.38044.725.218.817.543.810025.319.91916.826.112524.319.719.717.327.516027.622.419.918.429.620029.326.525.324.531.225030.325.521.419.431.231531.520.818.416.233.240034.921.217.613.135.850036.924.716.911.638.263038.923.516.711.339.480040.523.215.311.540.5100041.322.115.311.341.5125041.922.315.411.142.7160043.122.415.111.643.3200043.321.314.611.843.4250042.919.914.312.243.2315042.319.713.512.742.1400040.817.513.512.740.8500039.615.713.612.839.2630038.716.513.912.738.7800036.11613.813.236.11000033.416.91412.833.11250030.117.514.113.229.81600027.226.118.920.827.4SPL52.932.927.425.153.1N8.71.80.90.68.8median 36.9median 21.2median 15.3median 12.8median 38.2Delta5.82.52.22.45.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-5%
8%
5%
6%
off / environment *
25
26
-4%
24.7
1%
24
4%
23.9
4%
Idle Minimum *
27
26
4%
25.3
6%
29
-7%
24.3
10%
Idle Average *
28
32
-14%
25.3
10%
30
-7%
24.3
13%
Idle Maximum *
33
38
-15%
25.3
23%
31
6%
28.9
12%
Load Average *
52
54
-4%
31.7
39%
45
13%
45.8
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
50
2%
53.8
-5%
44
14%
51
-0%
Load Maximum *
53
55
-4%
62
-17%
47
11%
56.6
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Stresstestet och Witcher 3 testet ledde till att den bärbara datorn värmdes upp avsevärt. Ibland nådde den värden inom det övre 50-graders celciusområdet. Vid daglig användning (kontor, internet) ligger värdena i allmänhet kvar inom den gröna zonen.

 48 °C48 °C47 °C 
 43 °C44 °C42 °C 
 33 °C34 °C33 °C 
Max: 48 °C
Medel: 41.3 °C
54 °C56 °C49 °C
50 °C51 °C41 °C
33 °C33 °C32 °C
Max: 56 °C
Medel: 44.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  44 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
-5%
-14%
-6%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
41
15%
44.8
7%
49
-2%
43.8
9%
Maximum Bottom *
56
41
27%
48
14%
63
-13%
55.4
1%
Idle Upper Side *
28
37
-32%
37.2
-33%
30
-7%
32.8
-17%
Idle Bottom *
29
38
-31%
42
-45%
29
-0%
36
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Det extrema scenario som simuleras av stresstestet (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig drift) kontrollerar systemets stabilitet under full belastning. CPU-klockan sjönk långsamt och kontinuerligt från värden något över basklockfrekvensen till värden under den. Grafikkärnan kördes med höga hastigheter hela tiden.

Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Högtalare

Den bärbara datorns stereohögtalare ger ett hyfsat ljud, men de saknar bas. En bättre ljudupplevelse kan uppnås genom att ansluta hörlurar eller externa högtalare.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.9452540.939.5314650.94032.933.45025.232.86324.433.88017.527.410016.826.912517.339.916018.453.620024.564.525019.468.731516.268.440013.171.950011.68163011.380.480011.574100011.369.9125011.170.6160011.670.6200011.872.8250012.270315012.769.3400012.768.3500012.865.9630012.773.8800013.273.31000012.869.31250013.268.91600020.869.5SPL25.185.1N0.667median 12.8median 69.5Delta2.42.640.238.141.53751.448.536.534.544.244.429.432.924.739.221.449.129.258.225.563.323.564.621.26716.267.21470.614.377.615.777.812.574.711.770.211.666.911.970.512.369.312.872.913.370.814.176.813.770.91465.513.868.213.270.112.971.612.465.826.584.50.865.9median 13.8median 70.13.53.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)Aorus 16X 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Aorus 16X 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - Fusion 15 levererar mycket bra drifttider

Strömförbrukning

Dess strömbehov är i stort sett normalt för den installerade hårdvaran. Undantag: Trots ett fulladdat batteri uppmätte vi ett strömförbrukningsvärde på ca 20 watt när den bärbara datorn var avstängd. Detta är sannolikt en bugg. Testet Witcher 3 test och stresstest kördes med något sjunkande strömförbrukningsvärden. Strömförsörjningen (280 watt) är tillräckligt kraftfull.

Strömförbrukning
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 8 / 14 / 26 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 118 / 244 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-3%
-10%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
8
13
-63%
8.1
-1%
10
-25%
Idle Average *
14
18
-29%
13
7%
18
-29%
Idle Maximum *
26
35
-35%
40.3
-55%
32
-23%
Load Average *
118
138
-17%
79
33%
128
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
192.7
172.6
10%
188.1
2%
148.4
23%
Load Maximum *
244
222
9%
254.9
-4%
242
1%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø192.7 (182.8-220)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø195.5 (184.9-229)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.5 (8.11-25.8)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø111.6 (110.9-114.8)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø109.5 (108.4-112.6)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø167.2 (164.2-172.9)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø187.8 (163.3-206)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.1 (16.6-24.4)

Körtider

Under vårt WiFi-test (laddning av webbplatser via ett skript) och videotest (kortfilmen Big Buck Bunny (H.264-kodning, FHD) i en loop) uppmätte vi körtider på 8:00 timmar respektive 10:02 timmar. Det här är mycket bra värden.

Batteriet har en kapacitet på 99,8 Wh.
Batteriet har en kapacitet på 99,8 Wh.
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
15tim 11min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 124)
8tim 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 44min
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Aorus 16X 2024
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware m16 R2
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-17%
-26%
-39%
-52%
-35%
Reader / Idle
911
753
-17%
758
-17%
403
-56%
H.264
602
541
-10%
WiFi v1.3
480
481
0%
483
1%
292
-39%
290
-40%
Load
164
100
-39%
60
-63%
65
-60%

För

+ ljusstark QHD+-skärm med bildförhållande 16:10 (240 Hz, Adaptive Sync, sRGB)
+ hög systemprestanda
+ två SSD-platser (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)
+ RAM-minne kan bytas ut/utökas
+ rGB-bakgrundsbelysning med en knapp
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Power Delivery
+ mycket bra drifttider

Emot

- högljudd och varm under full belastning
- 8 GB VRAM inte särskilt framtidssäkert
- ingen avancerad Optimus

Omdöme - Bärbar, kraftfull, uthållig

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24), testexemplar tillhandahållet av Schenker.
XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24), testexemplar tillhandahållet av Schenker.

Kompakta mått och låg vikt (ca 2,1 kg) innebär inte att hårdvarans prestanda försämras. Den nya Core i9 processorn och GeForce RTX 4070 kan arbeta med genomgående höga klockfrekvenser. Den bärbara datorns kombination av prestanda och bärbarhet kan betecknas som en framgång.

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - en kraftfull, bärbar bärbar dator för spelare och kreatörer.

Den bärbara datorn blir ganska varm under belastning och när den gör det producerar den en hel del buller. Mer måttliga utsläpp kräver att man offrar en del datorkraft. Dess 15,3-tumsskärm (2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, IPS, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync) med ett bildförhållande på 16:10 är överlag imponerande. Den höga ljusstyrkan är anmärkningsvärd.

En full laddning (99,8 Wh) räcker för en praktisk drifttid på cirka 8-10 timmar - mycket bra värden. Positiva egenskaper: Batteriet kan laddas via en USB-C-strömförsörjning (min. 100 watt, 20 V) - den bärbara datorns TB4-port stöder Power Delivery. Därmed behöver du inte nödvändigtvis bära med dig den egenutvecklade strömförsörjningen (280 watt) hela tiden.

Ett alternativ skulle kunna vara Aorus 16X (2024). Denna bärbara dator erbjuder jämförbar datorkraft såväl som lika bra körtider.

Pris och tillgänglighet

XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) kan konfigureras och beställas direkt via Schenkers webbshop. Den aktuella testenheten kostar ca 2.500 US-dollar. Priserna börjar från ca 1.700 USD.

SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) - 05/01/2024 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
83 / 98 → 84%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
86%
Anslutningar
72 / 80 → 90%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batteri
82 / 95 → 86%
Skärm
92%
Spelprestanda
99%
Programprestanda
97%
Temperatur
81 / 95 → 85%
Ljudnivå
68 / 90 → 76%
Audio
82%
Camera
46 / 85 → 54%
Medel
79%
89%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) recension: En kompakt RTX 4070-bärbar dator för spelare och skapare
Sascha Mölck, 2024-05- 4 (Update: 2024-05- 4)