HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) laptop recension: En RTX 4070-spelmaskin med en OLED-skärm

Name: HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Brand: HP

Kraftfull bild.

Med Omen 16 kan köparna välja mellan den "normala" versionen och den så kallade Transcend-varianten, som i många avseenden knappast skiljer sig från varandra. Läs vår recension för att upptäcka hur 16-tums enheten klarar sig mot konkurrenterna.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/15/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Geforce Intel Raptor Lake

Testmodellen Omen Transcend 16 - med ändelsen u1095ng - kan för närvarande köpas för strax under 3 000 USD. För detta pris får köparen en Core i9-14900HX i kombination med en GeForce RTX 4070 som tenderar att tillhöra mer mellanklassen och inte high-end-kategorin på grund av dess ganska magra 8 GB VRAM. Detta kompletteras med 32 GB DDR5-5600 RAM-minne (2x 16 GB SO-DIMM) och en 1 TB M.2 NVMe SSD. Höjdpunkten är den livfulla OLED-panelen som sägs ha 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, 240 Hz, 400 cd/m² och 100 % DCI P3. Paketet avrundas med Windows 11 Home.

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng (Omen Transcend 16 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1980 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.56, Optimus

Minne

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)

Skärm

16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, WQXGA, glansig: nej, HDR, 240 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Hårddisk

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB

, NVMe SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)

Ljudkort

Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Anslutningar

2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: Combo (Headset/Mic)

Nätverk

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 356 x 269

Batteri

97 Wh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webbkamera: 2 MP

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 230 W Power Supply, Hyper X Cloud II Core Wireless Gaming Headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.284 kg, Strömförsörjning: 790 g

Pris

3000 EUR

Amazon

$1,459.99

Länkar

HP hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Omen Transcend 16-konkurrenten finns i form av andra 16-tums spelare utrustade med GeForce RTX 4070 samt Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 (Ultra 7 155H), Schenker Schenker XMG Core 16 L23 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) och Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (Ryzen 7 7745HX) som alla visas i vår jämförelseenhetstabell.

Eftersom chassit är mestadels identiskt med föregångaren som hade en Core i9-13900HX (se vår recension), kommer vi bara kortfattat att gå in på kategorierna hölje, funktioner och inmatningsenhet.

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	02/2024	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	08/2023	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
92.3 % v7 ^(old)	02/2024	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	10/2023	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	05/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

Fall

Transcend 16 har en iögonfallande design och ur en visuell synvinkel är den imponerande smal (alla konkurrerande enheter är tjockare förutom Zephyrus G16). När det gäller stabiliteten levererar åtminstone basenheten en stabil prestanda. Däremot hade locket - som med så många andra enheter - behövt bättre vridstyvhet. Vid första anblicken har den matta ytan ett premiumutseende, men HP har mestadels bara använt plast. Inga klagomål kan göras när det gäller byggkvalitet. Tillverkaren förtjänar beröm för den generösa 180° öppningsvinkeln även om gångjärnen kunde vara starkare. När det gäller vikten, 2,3 kg, ligger enheten i mitten av paketet och detta gör 16-tumsskärmen varken särskilt lätt eller tung.

Storleksjämförelse

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) HP Omen Transcend 16 HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M DIN A4 ❌

Funktioner

Portvalet kan beskrivas som mycket modernt. Medan baksidan rymmer en RJ45-port (tyvärr inte 2,5 Gbit LAN), en HDMI 2.1-utgång och en USB 3.0-port (typ A), är vänster sida hem för två Thunderbolt 4-portar (inklusive Power Delivery) och ett ljuduttag. På höger sida finns endast en ensam USB 3.0-port (typ A). Köparna får nöja sig med ett Kensington-lås och en kortläsare.

Vänster sida: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3,5 mm ljuduttag

Baksida: nätverksanslutning, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0

Kommunikation

Wi-Fi-prestandan ligger på en hög nivå och med en sändningshastighet på nästan 1 400 Mbit/s och cirka 1 700 Mbit/s när det gäller att ta emot data (1 m avstånd från referensroutern) ligger prestandan någonstans mellan bra och mycket bra. I Wi-Fi 6E AX211 har HP installerat en uppdaterad trådlös Intel-modul.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1654 (1599^min, 1600.16^P1 - 1713^max) MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1494 (1257^min - 1548^max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1170^min - 1766^max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1411 (1327^min - 1472^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1173 (839^min - 1366^max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1697 (849^min - 1712^max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1600 (1564^min, 1564.87^P1 - 1627^max) MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1583 (1176^min - 1662^max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1438 (767^min - 1513^max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -19%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s -19%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1339 (1216^min - 1449^max) MBit/s -21%

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Webbkamera

Vi har blandade känslor när det gäller webbkameran på 2 MP. Medan bildskärpan är över genomsnittet lämnar färgåtergivningen mycket att önska. Det som är bra är den manuella slutaren för integritet.

ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: 11.02 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 23.85 ∆E

Tillbehör

Vår testenhet levererades också med en mycket tunn 230-watts PSU samt ett HyperX-headset (Cloud II Core trådlöst).

Underhåll

När det gäller underhåll är Omen 16 inte särskilt komplicerad. Efter att ha tagit hand om sex, små, korsade skruvar kan basplattan lyftas från sin förankrade position med hjälp av ett platt verktyg. Inuti enheten är alla viktiga komponenter tillgängliga, vare sig det gäller RAM-banker, batteri, M.2-plats, fläktar eller den trådlösa modulen.

Garanti

Garantin gäller i 24 månader.

Inmatningsenheter

Tangentbord

Med sina transparenta WASD-tangenter har HP satsat på en viss gamer-look. Layouten är mycket unik och det tar till och med lite tid att vänja sig vid den. Tillverkaren har valt att inte installera en numerisk knappsats och har istället gett 16-tumsenheten separata, väl tilltagna piltangenter. Andra beslut (till exempel placeringen av strömknappen) är verkligen svåra att förstå sig på. Skrivupplevelsen är medioker och HP har varit tvungna att använda en mekanisk modell för att få bättre feedback. Fans av bakgrundsbelysta tangenter kan se fram emot flera färger.

Pekplatta

Med en storlek på ca 13,5 x 8,5 cm kan den behagligt stora pekplattan beskrivas som anspråkslös när det gäller precision, jämnhet och klickytor. På samma sätt är stödet för gester intuitivt.

Display

Åsikterna går isär när det gäller OLED-paneler. På den negativa sidan finns några problem med de mycket reflekterande ytorna (vilket kan göra det svårt att använda dem utomhus), skärmen flimrar på alla ljusstyrkor och problemet med potentiell inbränning.


393 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	391 cd/m²
393 cd/m²	390 cd/m²	389 cd/m²
392 cd/m²	395 cd/m²	390 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 98 %
Mitt på batteriet: 390 cd/m²
Kontrast: 19500:1 (Svärta: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.221

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen Transcend 16 AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-4%	0%	-20%	-18%
Display P3 Coverage	99.8	99.2 -1%	99.9 0%	68.3 -32%	70.4 -29%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%	100 0%	98.6 -1%	99.6 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	97	87.6 -10%	96.9 0%	69.6 -28%	72.6 -25%
Response Times		-8093%	222%	-4850%	-3925%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)	26.4 ?(15, 11.4) -13100%	0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11) -10%	13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1) -6500%	7 ?(3.2, 3.8) -3400%
Response Time Black / White *	0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)	28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6) -14000%	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12) -25%	6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1) -3200%	9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2) -4450%
PWM Frequency	120 ?(100)	3506 ?(100) 2822%	960 ?(60) 700%
Screen		-47%	0%	-203%	-161%
Brightness middle	390	791.1 103%	416 7%	376 -4%	355.3 -9%
Brightness	392	800 104%	418 7%	358 -9%	340 -13%
Brightness Distribution	98	95 -3%	96 -2%	88 -10%	91 -7%
Black Level *	0.02	0.04 -100%		0.33 -1550%	0.32 -1500%
Contrast	19500	19778 1%		1139 -94%	1110 -94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.94	4.37 -125%	1.6 18%	2.74 -41%	1.13 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.26	10.39 -144%	2.1 51%	6.78 -59%	2.78 35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.21	1.04 75%		0.88 79%	0.32 92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	6.5 -333%	2.7 -80%	3.57 -138%	1.4 7%
Gamma	2.221 ^99%	2.28 ^96%	2.16 ^102%	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6395 ^102%	6000 ^108%	6331 ^103%	7246 ^90%	6372 ^102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2715% / -1647%	74% / 56%	-1691% / -828%	-1368% / -668%

* ... smaller is better

I gengäld får OLED-tekniken bra betyg med underbara svarta nivåer (nästan 0,0 cd/m²) vilket leder till ett utmärkt kontrastförhållande som IPS-paneler inte kommer i närheten av. Detsamma gäller för betraktningsvinkelns stabilitet.

En ytterligare höjdpunkt är den rika färgrymden: 100 % DCI P3 och 97 % AdobeRGB är inte något man tar för givet i spelvärlden. Detsamma gäller för färgnoggrannheten, som var imponerande redan före kalibreringen.

De korta svarstiderna får också beröm: Klassiska IPS-paneler kan bara drömma om 0,2 ms. Föregångarens mini-LED-skärm var betydligt ljusstarkare (800 vs. 392 cd/m²) men också betydligt långsammare.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.1 ms rise
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.1 ms rise
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Prestanda

Prismässigt börjar Omen Transcend 16 på cirka 1 600 USD. Instegsvarianten är utrustad med en Core i7-13700HX, a GeForce RTX 406016 GB RAM-minne och en IPS-skärm med dålig upplösning. Vår granskningsmodell befinner sig mer i den övre änden av pris- och specifikationsskalan.

Testförhållanden

Den förinstallerade spelhubbens prestandahantering är något svåråtkomlig. I den tillhörande menyn väntar tre energilägen och en värmehanterare. Eftersom prestandaläget - analogt med de flesta bärbara speldatorer - säkerställer både bättre prestanda men också oproportionerlig bullerproduktion, utfördes alla mätningar med det balanserade läget. Därför kan de fastställda värdena endast jämföras med föregångaren i begränsad utsträckning. Utöver detta var både den automatiska fläktkontrollen och den automatiska grafikomkopplingen aktiva.

Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra)	Eco	Ausgegleichen	Leistung
Buller	39 dB(A)	44 dB(A)	53 dB(A)
Prestanda	60 fps lås	114 fps	126 fps

Processor

Core i9-14900HX är nästan överdimensionerad jämfört med GPU-kraften och höljets tjocklek. Raptor Lake-seriens 10 nm-modell erbjuder 8 prestandakärnor med hyper threading och 16 effektivitetskärnor utan HT, vilket resulterar i totalt 32 trådar. I det balanserade läget når processorn bara sin potential i begränsad utsträckning. Det bästa exemplet är vår Cinebench-loop: Även om prestandan var relativt hög under de första körningarna, sjönk poängen ganska kraftigt efter en kort tid (men sedan låg den kvar på en konstant nivå). Sammantaget är det bara tillräckligt för att nå nivån på Ultra 7 155H (ROG Zephyrus G16) eller Ryzen 7 7840HS (Schenker XMG Core 16).

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	86.6 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13900HX	79.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	75.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 ^-2! AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	66.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	61.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	60.2 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17078 - 36249, n=34)	29130 Points +41%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	25932 (23977.8^min - 25931.6^max) Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	20702 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	18060 (17729.5^min - 18059.9^max) Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17267 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	17205 Points -17%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	2182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1720 - 2245, n=34)	2157 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2105 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	1846 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1767 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1681 Points -23%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6579 - 13832, n=34)	11084 Points +32%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	9895 Points +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	8427 Points
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7072 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6682 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6656 Points -21%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	836 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=34)	826 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	717 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	693 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	686 Points -18%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 5589, n=35)	4462 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4100 (3846.15^min - 4100.04^max) Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	3905 (2582.31^min - 3904.72^max) Points
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2978 (2861.03^min - 2977.96^max) Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2681 (2635.57^min - 2681.14^max) Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2679 (2383.65^min - 2679.17^max) Points -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (247 - 323, n=34)	306 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	294 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	270 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	264 Points -11%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	193 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	186 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	174 Seconds * -6%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	164 Seconds *
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	123 Seconds * +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (91 - 206, n=34)	119.5 Seconds * +27%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (66769 - 136645, n=34)	112494 MIPS +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	105001 MIPS +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	88012 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	75557 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	73035 MIPS -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68500 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7244 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	7142 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (5452 - 7545, n=34)	7017 MIPS -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6866 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6632 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5439 MIPS -24%

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13158 - 19665, n=34)	17369 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	16011 Points
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)	14171 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13323 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13088 Points -18%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=34)	2973 Points +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	2800 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2694 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)	2641 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2410 Points -14%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 23194, n=34)	19540 Points +11%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19012 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	17612 Points
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12905 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12378 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11803 Points -33%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=34)	2092 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2058 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	2053 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2040 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1951 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -15%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (16.8 - 38.9, n=34)	29.7 fps +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	26.2 fps +15%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	23.2 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	21.6 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.9 fps -12%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	68.1 s * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	53.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	49.6 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43.8 s * +18%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (31.4 - 85.1, n=34)	43.4 s * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	37.9 s * +29%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4654 sec * -18%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4352 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	0.421 sec * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4028 sec * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3955 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=34)	0.3845 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3905 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

270 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

298 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

8427 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

836 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2182 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

20702 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	95.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29656 KRay/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27731 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13098 - 33474, n=33)	25096 KRay/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23600 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17244 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16431 KRay/s -5%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (67573 - 166040, n=33)	125765 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120974 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118600 Points +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117390 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88537 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85461 Points -3%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3589 - 7979, n=33)	6212 MB/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5888 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4974 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4920 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4267 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3814 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=33)	138709 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126954 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126217 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118405 Points
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105028 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90347 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15887 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (10475 - 18517, n=33)	15369 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15189 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13440 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12217 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10641 Points -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64255 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63114 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (32543 - 83662, n=33)	61872 Points +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58716 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points +23%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	43302 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41806 Points -3%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=33)	137399 MB/s +58%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111789 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88619 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86964 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	79475 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71191 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1054 - 2292, n=33)	1815 MB/s +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1689 MB/s +34%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1265 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1147 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1128 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1099 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15975 KRay/s +74%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14776 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6809 - 18349, n=33)	13525 KRay/s +47%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12891 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9170 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8449 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50609 MPixel/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49507 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49238 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (23903 - 54702, n=33)	46637 MPixel/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39928 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28499 MPixel/s -42%

Systemets prestanda

Systemprestandan gör en bra figur utan att vara bland de främsta. När det gäller RAM-hastigheten säkrar Transcend andraplatsen i jämförelsefältet.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7866 - 8550, n=6)	8253 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8206 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8183 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	8153 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	7866 Points
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7123 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11302 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10621 - 11815, n=6)	11079 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11074 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10934 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10621 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10038 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10526 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9701 - 11103, n=6)	10493 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10268 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10235 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9735 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9208 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	13370 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13229 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12114 - 14827, n=6)	13153 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	12920 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	12114 Points
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10612 Points -12%

CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2002 - 2312, n=5)	2179 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2027 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1970 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1694 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1827 - 2191, n=5)	2042 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1812 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1629 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1624 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2287 - 2458, n=5)	2385 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2316 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2222 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1942 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1862 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1734 - 2330, n=5)	2028 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1785 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1557 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1424 Points

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	345 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (319 - 342, n=6)	333 Points -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	331 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=165, last 2 years)	303 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	288 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	283 Points -17%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	300 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (291 - 301, n=4)	298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	283 Points
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=153, last 2 years)	266 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	256 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	548 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	533 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years)	506 ms * -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	471 ms * -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	455 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (431 - 461, n=6)	443 ms * -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	438 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7866 poäng
Hjälp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89414 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78330 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77103 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (38028 - 83392, n=33)	74739 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67907 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50007 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86576 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85070 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84131 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43306 - 87568, n=33)	80919 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60730 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50703 MB/s -40%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84517 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77579 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76244 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73337 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (37146 - 80589, n=33)	71949 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54587 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	140 ns * -62%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.9 ns * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.8 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=33)	84.8 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-fördröjningar

Precis som föregångaren måste även nya Omen 16 kämpa med relativt höga latenser, vilket kan leda till problem i vissa tillämpningsscenarier (t.ex. bearbetning av ljud och video i realtid).

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2484.4 μs * -59%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1566 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1518 μs * +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	673.1 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	603 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Jämfört med CPU-prestandan observerade vi inga nedgångar i SSD-prestandan. Den installerade Kioxia-enheten är lite långsammare än SK hynix-enheten som finns i den gamla Transcend, men trots detta levererar den tillräckligt höga hastigheter. Det som är synd är att 16-tummaren bara har en M.2-plats och det betyder att den inbyggda SSD-enheten måste bytas ut för att utöka lagringsutrymmet.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6967 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5341 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 511.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3599 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3651 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.34 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.3 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	90 pt
Average of class Gaming	73.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	70.8 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	68.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	66.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	61.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	48.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4677 (4664.17^min - 4676.56^max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s +12%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2735 - 4156, n=9)	3471 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3449 (3368.24^min - 3448.79^max) MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3202 (3129.61^min - 3201.93^max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3102 (3080.64^min - 3101.78^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3023 (3010.73^min - 3023.25^max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4326 (4313.21^min - 4326.48^max) MB/s +42%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (3038 - 4893, n=9)	3943 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3637 (3591.53^min - 3636.88^max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3152 (3026.22^min - 3152.01^max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3038 (2862.26^min - 3038.15^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2526 (2498.97^min - 2525.81^max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7137 (6595.15^min - 7137.45^max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6899 (5306.42^min - 6899.46^max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6660 (6017.57^min - 6659.93^max) MB/s +4%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (6169 - 6985, n=9)	6644 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	6388 (5544.27^min - 6387.72^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5008 (4421.01^min - 5007.74^max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6818 (6604.35^min - 6817.63^max) MB/s +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5716 (5661.68^min - 5716.31^max) MB/s +9%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (5144 - 5667, n=9)	5420 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5234 (5167.11^min - 5234.47^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4926^min - 4942.6^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3230 (3169.22^min - 3230.03^max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.1 (78.57^min - 80.12^max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	64.2 (63.05^min - 64.22^max) MB/s +25%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (51.3 - 69.6, n=9)	59.2 MB/s +15%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	56.3 (55.9^min - 56.3^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	52.9 (51.15^min - 52.91^max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	51.3 (50.48^min - 51.25^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	244 (243^min - 243.65^max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +73%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (116.4 - 219, n=9)	164.7 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	146.3 (140.58^min - 146.31^max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	128.4 (126.56^min - 128.36^max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	128.1 (123.78^min - 128.05^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	127 (124.67^min - 127.01^max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4166.98^min - 4173.4^max) MB/s +364%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s +184%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (561 - 3829, n=9)	2173 MB/s +141%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1077 (1013.53^min - 1077.14^max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	932 (919.54^min - 932.39^max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	900 (832.36^min - 900.34^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	604 (565.74^min - 603.6^max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3552 (3546.24^min - 3551.63^max) MB/s +711%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s +380%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (365 - 2682, n=9)	1414 MB/s +223%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	501 (456.23^min - 501.33^max) MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	438 (405.08^min - 437.5^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	413 (372.31^min - 412.68^max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	402 (389.17^min - 402.07^max) MB/s -8%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8963 Points +74%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6291 Points +22%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (4465 - 8212, n=9)	6264 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6198 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5138 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3272 Points -36%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3449 Points +137%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points +67%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (1359 - 3403, n=9)	2277 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1603 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1523 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1020 Points -30%
Score Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4064 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3832 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3812 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3029 Points
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2518 - 3244, n=9)	2908 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1808 Points -40%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5625.54 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5621.18 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5588.41 MB/s -1%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (5197 - 5837, n=9)	5560 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4362 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3662 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4010.3 MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3875.81 MB/s +8%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2824 - 5175, n=9)	3759 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3587.95 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3376 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1921 MB/s -46%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.46 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	61.2 MB/s +23%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (49.8 - 65.6, n=9)	59.3 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	54.59 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	49.79 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	42.2 MB/s -15%
4K Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.54 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	191.79 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (147.9 - 224, n=9)	189 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	181.9 MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	177.87 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	157.9 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2813.87 MB/s +233%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s +122%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (773 - 2766, n=9)	1661 MB/s +96%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1105 MB/s +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	909.92 MB/s +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	845.48 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	612 MB/s -28%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3498.72 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3293 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3219.74 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2478.06 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2083 - 2535, n=9)	2344 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1458 MB/s -41%
Access Time Read
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (0.037 - 0.126, n=9)	0.07367 ms * -36%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.054 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.032 ms * +41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.023 ms * +57%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.022 ms * +59%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.064 ms * -220%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.054 ms * -170%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -142%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (0.018 - 0.071, n=9)	0.03678 ms * -84%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.023 ms * -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.022 ms * -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)

HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7119 (6237.25-7138.29)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

Grafikkort

GeForce RTX 4070 är baserad på Ada Lovelace-arkitekturen och ligger prestandamässigt närmare RTX 4060 än RTX 4080 RTX 4080. Trots den generösa 130-watts TGP, navigerade Omen 16 vår benchmarkbana på ett sätt som var något under genomsnittet, även om skillnaden mot konkurrenterna ibland är mycket liten. RTX 4070: s framtidssäkring är ganska dålig på grund av den låga mängden VRAM. I vissa spel kan 8 GB redan bli en begränsande faktor. I våra ögon borde Nvidia ha gett GPU: n minst 12 GB, särskilt eftersom bärbara datorer av detta slag inte är exakt billiga.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	93.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	45606 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41090 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=59)	40410 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39424 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	38784 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	37313 Points -5%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	169253 Points +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=24)	148053 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points +27%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	112162 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	32810 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30936 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=62)	29041 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28461 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27343 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	26568 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13040 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12617 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11960 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=60)	11603 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11181 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10989 Points -2%

3DMark 11 Performance		32528 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		53528 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23683 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		11682 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	23 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	22 Seconds * +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=60)	21.5 Seconds * +7%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	19 Seconds * +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=63)	40.6 Seconds * -13%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	36 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	36 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	33 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	32 Seconds * +11%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	330 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	298 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	298 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=191, last 2 years)	297 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=59)	290 Seconds * +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	277 Seconds * +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	222 Seconds * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Spelprestanda

Transcend 16 är tillräckligt snabb för att kunna spela nästan alla spel med sin ursprungliga upplösning på 2 560 x 1 600 och med höga till maximala inställningar. Saker och ting blir bara problematiska i mycket krävande eller dåligt optimerade spel som t.ex Omsvept. För 4K-skärmar rekommenderar vi åtminstone en RTX 4080.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	96.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	93.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	92 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	88.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	87.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	71.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	120 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.8 (114^min) fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=55)	112.2 fps -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	111.8 (102^min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	98.6 (94^min, 94^P1) fps -14%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 (3.81^min, 76.9^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	116.1 (4.31^min, 83.3^P1) fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	115.8 (21.8^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 140.5, n=55)	110.9 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	98.8 (3.78^min, 58.8^P1) fps -15%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	124.8 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41 - 131.9, n=57)	111 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	108.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	100.8 fps -7%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	223 (89^min, 167.8^P1) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	218 (57.2^min, 162.5^P1) fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	208 (60.7^min, 153.8^P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=58)	196.1 fps +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	194.2 (59.2^min, 144.5^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	129.3 (30.4^min, 84.7^P1) fps -33%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	182 (152.8^min) fps +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	168.4 (146.6^min) fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	154.1 (133.3^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 187.5, n=59)	147.6 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	134.8 (119.8^min) fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	131.6 (114.5^min) fps -15%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	132.9 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	117.8 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	114.9 fps
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (58.9 - 144.4, n=61)	104.6 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	85.5 fps -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H	81.2 fps -29%

Enshrouded | Palworld | Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | Ready or Not | The Finals

Enshrouded - 2560x1440 Max. Quality AA:FX
Average of class Gaming (25.3 - 76, n=6, last 2 years)	55 fps +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	42.3 (24.7^min, 28.4^P0.1, 30.5^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (38.9 - 42.3, n=2)	40.6 fps -4%
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	38.9 (26.5^min, 28.9^P0.1, 30.1^P1) fps -8%

Palworld - 2560x1440 Epic Preset AA:TSR
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	81.3 (33.5^min, 35.1^P0.1, 56.1^P1) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (39.4 - 119.8, n=3, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.1 - 81.3, n=2)	75.2 fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	69.1 (19.7^min, 22^P0.1, 49.9^P1) fps

Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	354 (18.9^min, 190.3^P0.1, 305^P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (325 - 354, n=2)	340 fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	325 (13.8^min, 53.2^P0.1, 210^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (35.3 - 355, n=4, last 2 years)	235 fps -28%

Ready or Not - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (53.2 - 144.3, n=5, last 2 years)	99.4 fps +17%
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	95.6 (20.2^min, 38.9^P0.1, 55.1^P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (84.8 - 95.6, n=2)	90.2 fps +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	84.8 (20.1^min, 21.4^P0.1, 51.1^P1) fps

The Finals - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
XMG Pro 15 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX	94.6 (58.2^min, 65.2^P0.1, 71.9^P1) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (82.8 - 94.6, n=3)	90.2 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming (13.2 - 147.4, n=7, last 2 years)	85.2 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX	82.8 (50.1^min, 52.1^P0.1, 61.1^P1) fps

Vi använde rollspelet, Det Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) för att se hur 3D-prestandan fungerar under en längre tidsperiod och även efter ungefär en timme förblev bildfrekvensen mycket stabil.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)

HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø98.6 (94-104)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.4 (110-125)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)		181.2	175.3	115.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)				114
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	202	178.9	167	154.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		147.5	108.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	166.6	141.7	114.9
Strange Brigade (2018)		272	220	194.2
The Finals (2023)			168	130.2	82.8
Ready or Not (2023)			194.2	134	84.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024)			358	358	325
Palworld (2024)			102.2	96.6	69.1
Enshrouded (2024)			66.6	56.5	42.3
Helldivers 2 (2024)			91.5	91.1	69.2

Utsläpp

Utsläpp av buller

Om du begränsar dig till att använda balanserat läge blir 16-tumsenheten inte alltför högljudd. 3D-ljudnivån på 44 till 47 dB(A) är hörbar men inte irriterande (det senare skulle gälla för prestandaläget med en inspelning på 50+ dB). I viloläget är fläktarna ständigt aktiva och arbetar med en hörbar ljudnivå på 29 till 31 dB(A), vilket inte är helt optimalt.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		29 / 30 / 31 dB(A)
Hög belastning		45 / 47 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-4%	7%	5%	10%
off / environment *	24	22.9 5%	23.9 -0%	23 4%	23.2 3%
Idle Minimum *	29	29.1 -0%	23.9 18%	23 21%	23.2 20%
Idle Average *	30	29.1 3%	27.8 7%	28.48 5%	23.2 23%
Idle Maximum *	31	29.1 6%	30.1 3%	28.48 8%	26.2 15%
Load Average *	45	45.7 -2%	34.2 24%	30 33%	31.4 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44	54.3 -23%	46.4 -5%	54.12 -23%	48.4 -10%
Load Maximum *	47	54.3 -16%	46.4 1%	54.12 -15%	53.8 -14%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Medan temperaturerna på ovansidan av den bärbara datorn ligger i mitten av paketet, blir botten av höljet varmare än konkurrenterna under belastning. En maxtemperatur på 63 °C (vid spel) kommer att hindra användare från att använda enheten i knät. I viloläge är situationen betydligt bekvämare med ett chassi som förblir behagligt svalt med en maximal temperatur på 30 °C.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


47 °C	49 °C	45 °C
43 °C	46 °C	42 °C
31 °C	34 °C	33 °C

Max: 49 °C
Medel: 41.1 °C


62 °C	63 °C	53 °C
49 °C	49 °C	41 °C
36 °C	37 °C	34 °C

Max: 63 °C
Medel: 47.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 50 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


27 °C	30 °C	27 °C
26 °C	27 °C	27 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Max: 30 °C
Medel: 26.6 °C


29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Max: 29 °C
Medel: 26.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 32 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


43 °C	47 °C	44 °C
42 °C	45 °C	42 °C
31 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Max: 47 °C
Medel: 40.3 °C


56 °C	56 °C	49 °C
48 °C	49 °C	40 °C
36 °C	35 °C	33 °C

Max: 56 °C
Medel: 44.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 48 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		5%	6%	4%	12%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	47.4 3%	50.3 -3%	46 6%	41.8 15%
Maximum Bottom *	63	54.4 14%	48 24%	44 30%	41.4 34%
Idle Upper Side *	30	28.4 5%	28.8 4%	32 -7%	29 3%
Idle Bottom *	29	29.2 -1%	29.8 -3%	33 -14%	30.4 -5%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

I stresstestet med Furmark- och Prime95-verktygen, efter 60 minuter, stabiliserades CPU:n till cirka 85 °C, medan GPU:n nådde 81 °C (en hotspot på 88 °C) - båda relativt höga men ofarliga värden.

Högtalare

Ljudkvaliteten är något bättre än genomsnittet för bärbara speldatorer, men som så ofta kämpar basen och den skulle kunna vara mer kraftfull och exakt. Den maximala volymen på 82 dB(A) är mer än anständig.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energiförvaltning

Strömförbrukning

Energikraven liknar de standardvärden som finns i denna prestandakategori. 10 till 32 watts tomgångsförbrukning och 128 till 242 watts förbrukning under belastning är varken särskilt högt eller lågt.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / Watt
Låg belastning	10 / 18 / 32 Watt
Hög belastning	128 / 242 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-42%	33%	12%	1%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	10	19.2 -92%	8.3 17%	11 -10%	8.1 19%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	18	22.7 -26%	12.5 31%	15.2 16%	15.9 12%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) -5%
Idle Maximum *	32	55.4 -73%	12.8 60%	16 50%	37.2 -16%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 17%
Load Average *	128	128.4 -0%	71.3 44%	64 50%	90.9 29%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	148.4	206 -39%	127.5 14%	179 -21%	189.6 -28%
Load Maximum *	242	292 -21%	169.1 30%	280 -16%	263.5 -9%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø148.4 (143.6-156)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø186.1 (161-242)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.2 (10.5-31.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø110 (93.2-197)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø159.9 (158.2-163.7)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.2 (134-145.6)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø142.9 (132.4-150.1)

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.3 (11.5-34.3)

Batteriets livslängd

När det gäller energikraven i batteriläge har HP fortfarande en del att göra. Trots det kraftfulla 97 Wh-batteriet klarade 16-tumsmaskinen bara knappt 5 timmar i vårt Wi-Fi-test med en reducerad ljusstyrka på 150 cd/m². Som en jämförelse: ROG Zyphrus G16 klarade över 7 timmar och XMG Core 16 klarade till och med över 8 timmar.

Batteritid

WiFi Websurfing

4tim 52min

	HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-14%	49%	72%	-18%	29%
WiFi v1.3	292	250 -14%	435 49%	501 72%	240 -18%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 29%
Reader / Idle		375			392	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
Load		73	71	143	61	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
H.264			671	609		408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

För

+ OLED:s fördelar: responstid, kontrast, betraktningsvinkel

+ hyfsade högtalare

+ 2x Thunderbolt 4

+ sekretesslucka

+ snabbt Wi-Fi

Emot

- begränsad prestanda för Core i9-14900HX

- OLED: s nackdelar: flimmer, glansig yta

- ganska dyrt för en RTX 4070-bärbar dator

- batteritiden skulle kunna vara bättre

- endast en M.2-plats

Dom

Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: Granskningsenhet tillhandahållen av HP Tyskland

Först och främst försöker Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng locka potentiella kunder med en lysande OLED-skärm som tilltalar både spelare och kreatörer.

Om du kan hantera en mycket reflekterande skärm och inte har problem med flimmer, får du en färgstark skärm med ett utmärkt kontrastförhållande och bra svarstider, utöver suveräna svartnivåer och betraktningsvinklar.

Det finns några minuspoäng för utsläpp och hastighet. Medan 16-tumsmaskinen blir obehagligt högljudd i prestandaläget, verkar prestandan i det balanserade läget vara något under genomsnittet. Bortsett från detta liknar Omen Transcend 16 andra bärbara speldatorer när det gäller chassits kvalitet, inmatningsenheter och portval.

Sammantaget är den totala poängen jämförbar med den för XMG Core 16 L23 eller Legion Pro 5 16ARX8. Den som letar efter en särskilt lätt och kompakt enhet i 16-tums kategorin bör titta på den nya ROG Zeyphrus G16.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Vid tidpunkten för vår recension är HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng med Core i9-14900HX och GeForce RTX 4070 för närvarande inte tillgänglig i HP:s onlinebutik, Amazon eller Best Buy.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng - 02/12/2024 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Design

83 / 98 → 85%

Tangentbord

81%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

67 / 80 → 83%

Vikt

61 / 10-66 → 91%

Batteri

63 / 95 → 66%

Skärm

94%

Spelprestanda

99%

Programprestanda

97%

Temperatur

80 / 95 → 84%

Ljudnivå

76 / 90 → 85%

Audio

78%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Medel

77%

88%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 114 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) laptop recension: En RTX 4070-spelmaskin med en OLED-skärm

Florian Glaser, 2024-02-15 (Update: 2024-02-15)

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Fall

Storleksjämförelse

Funktioner

Kommunikation

Webbkamera

Tillbehör

Underhåll

Garanti

Inmatningsenheter

Tangentbord

Pekplatta

Display

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Prestanda

Testförhållanden

Processor

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Systemets prestanda

DPC-fördröjningar

Masslagring

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafikkort

Spelprestanda

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Utsläpp

Utsläpp av buller

Temperatur

Stresstest

Högtalare

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng audio analysis

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

Energiförvaltning

Strömförbrukning

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

Batteriets livslängd

För

Emot

Dom

Pris och tillgänglighet

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison