Geekom XT13 Pro recension: NUC mini-PC klarar sig utan Meteor Lake och får bara en Intel Core i9-13900H

Name: Geekom XT13 Pro
Brand: Geekom

Begränsad utveckling!

Geekom har presenterat XT13 Pro som en kraftfull NUC mini-PC baserad på en Intel Core i9-13900H. Detta innebär att Intels Meteor Lake-processorer fortfarande är utelämnade. Vi har analyserat hur väl high-end-modellen i Raptor Lake H-serien presterar mot de nyare processorerna med hjälp av ett flertal mätningar och benchmarks.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (översatt av DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/05/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Mini PC Desktop Intel Raptor Lake Windows Thunderbolt

Geekom XT13 Pro ärver Geekom XT12 Pro Geekom XT12 Pro och kommer i toppkonfigurationen med en Intel Core i9-13900H utrustad. Det finns också 32 GB DDR4 RAM och en 2 TB SSD, även om detta kommer till ett pris. Priset är 999 euro, så det är verkligen inget fynd. För 769 euro finns Geekom XT13 Pro tillgänglig med en Intel Core i7-13620H och en 1 TB SSD. Geekom har valt att inte använda de nyare Meteor Lake-processorerna utan håller sig till de äldre Raptor Lake-processorerna. Detta test kommer att visa om detta är rätt sätt att stå upp mot konkurrensen.

Frågan uppstår också om denna prissättning är motiverad. Vi kommer också att ta upp denna viktiga punkt specifikt efter prestandaanalysen. I vilket fall som helst sätter tillverkaren själv ribban mycket högt.

Test device courtesy of Geekom

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Geekom XT13 Pro

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, Raptor Lake-H

Grafikkort

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 32.0.101.5762 DHC

Minne

32 GB

, DDR4-3200, 2 von 2 belegt, max. 64 GB

Moderkort

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Hårddisk

Acer N7000, 2048 GB

, 1760 GB ledigt

Ljudkort

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5mm Klinke

Nätverk

Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 37 x 117 x 112

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Övrigt

120-Watt-Netzteil, VESA-Mount, 36 Månader Garanti

Vikt

555 g, Strömförsörjning: 260 g

Pris

999 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Memory	Weight	Height
72.4 %	v8	08/2024	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	555 g	37 mm
80.8 %	v8	06/2024	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	653 g	60 mm
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	863 g	48.6 mm
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04/2024	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	32768 MB	768 g	57 mm
84.1 %	v8	04/2024	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	32768 MB	545 g	37 mm
82.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03/2024	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	32768 MB	417 g	38 mm

Obs: Vi har uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7 som finns här.

Geekom XT13 Pro med strömförsörjningsenhet (19 V; 6,32 A)

Case - Perfekt bearbetning av metall och plast

Höljet på Geekom XT13 Pro är bekant, det användes för Geekom XT12 Pro. En likhet med Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit kan inte heller förnekas. I grund och botten är det inget fel på utseendet. Vårt testexemplar är återigen perfekt färdigt och allt passar ihop på ett underbart sätt. Ändå skulle vi ha velat se ett nytt hölje för att skilja det något från den interna konkurrensen. Mini-PC:n tar bara upp 11,7 x 11,2 centimeter på skrivbordet, vilket gör den till en av de mer kompakta enheterna. Geekom XT13 Pro kan också fästas direkt på en bildskärm med hjälp av det medföljande VESA-fästet.

Storleksjämförelse

Utrustning - Bra urval och 2x USB4

När det gäller externa gränssnitt har Geekom XT13 Pro samma alternativ som Geekom XT12 Pro. Även om enheten är mycket kompakt finns det många olika anslutningar. De två USB-C-uttagen på baksidan är moderna USB4-portar, vilket utökar användningsområdet avsevärt med rätt tillbehör. Totalt fyra skärmar kan användas samtidigt och det finns även en LAN-anslutning.

Anslutningsutrustningen på Geekom XT13 Pro (Källa: Geekom)

Kommunikation

Geekom XT13 Pro använder en välkänd trådlös modul som Geekom installerar i många av sina enheter. MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN-modulen kan ge adekvat prestanda i vår testenhet. Om möjligt bör dock frekvensområdet 6 GHz användas i första hand. Alternativt kan kabelanslutningen också användas. Datahastigheter på upp till 2,5 GBit/s är då till och med möjliga.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1770 (1584^min - 1790^max) MBit/s +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1761 (1734^min - 1774^max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1716 (1560^min - 1782^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (684 - 1771, n=39)	1433 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC (684 - 1771, n=55, last 2 years)	1380 MBit/s -20%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1375 (688^min - 1438^max) MBit/s -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1152 (576^min - 1273^max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1615 (767^min - 1670^max) MBit/s +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1562 (1198^min - 1713^max) MBit/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1440 (1352^min - 1553^max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (394 - 1800, n=38)	1399 MBit/s -3%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1367 (1268^min - 1443^max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Mini PC (394 - 1800, n=55, last 2 years)	1330 MBit/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1315 (691^min - 1352^max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1599 (802^min - 1683^max) MBit/s +65%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (707 - 1775, n=55)	1397 MBit/s +44%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	969 (946^min - 981^max) MBit/s
Average of class Mini PC (320 - 1796, n=113, last 2 years)	945 MBit/s -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	892 (460^min - 921^max) MBit/s -8%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	858 (827^min - 886^max) MBit/s -11%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	838 (728^min - 926^max) MBit/s -14%
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	740 (676^min - 758^max) MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	1566 (904^min - 1695^max) MBit/s +94%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (358 - 1785, n=55)	1279 MBit/s +59%
Average of class Mini PC (184.1 - 1776, n=113, last 2 years)	874 MBit/s +8%
Geekom A7 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	831 (755^min - 940^max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	806 (765^min - 844^max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM12 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	736 (369^min - 756^max) MBit/s -9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz	709 (369^min - 977^max) MBit/s -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	589 (295^min - 624^max) MBit/s -27%

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (1352-1553)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1198-1713)

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1715 (1560-1782)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1734-1774)

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (946-981)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (802-1683)

Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (765-844)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (904-1695)

Tillbehör

Omfattningen av leveransen av Geekom XT13 Pro erbjuder den vanliga standarden. Förutom själva enheten innehåller lådan också 120-watts strömförsörjningsenhet och ett VESA-fäste med monteringsmaterial. En HDMI-kabel och det obligatoriska tackkortet från Geekom ingår också.

Omfattning av leveransen av Geekom XT13 Pro

Underhåll

Geekom XT13 Pro är lätt att öppna. Endast fyra små skruvar behöver lossas på undersidan, som fäster bottenplattan mot resten av chassit. Det finns en SSD-kylare på själva basplattan, varför du bör vara lite mer försiktig vid denna punkt. RAM-minnet och masslagringen är sedan lättåtkomliga. I vårt fall kan en extra SSD installeras. Den korrekta standarden måste dock följas här, eftersom endast SATA SSD-enheter med en längd på 42 millimeter är kompatibla.

Hållbarhet

Geekom XT13 Pro levereras i en jämförelsevis stor låda med mycket "luft". Vi har sett Geekom göra saker annorlunda. Dessutom är de standardtillbehör som medföljer förpackade i separata plastpåsar, vilket kan förbättras när det gäller hållbarhet. Själva enheten är huvudsakligen tillverkad av metall och plast. Vi vet dock inte om återvunna material har använts vid tillverkningen. Positivt är att tillverkaren erbjuder 36 månaders garanti.

Prestanda - Intel Core i9-13900H med 14 kärnor och 20 trådar

Geekom XT13 Pro levereras i toppkonfigurationen med Intel Core i9-13900H i toppkonfigurationen. Alternativt kan NUC PC också utrustas med en något svagare Intel Core i7-13620H som också är utrustad med 6P-kärnor och bara bör ha en liten nackdel jämfört med toppmodellen när det gäller prestanda. 32 GB DDR4 RAM ingår alltid, även om den snabba NVMe SSD-enheten ger en solid grundkonfiguration. Geekom XT13 Pro är inte heller en oöverstiglig uppgift för prestandahungriga applikationer. Ändå är 3D-prestandan hos iGPU den största svaga punkten, men detta kan förbättras märkbart med en eGPU.

Testförhållanden

För alla prestandatester med Geekom XT13 Pro använder vi energiprofilen "High performance". Det fanns bara avvikelser från detta i mätningarna av strömförbrukning och buller enligt våra Testkriterier. I enlighet med tillverkarens specifikationer låter Geekom SoC:n arbeta med lägsta möjliga strömförbrukning. I siffror innebär detta en effektgräns på 35 watt under kontinuerlig belastning, även om upp till 64 watt tillåts under korta perioder.

Processor

Intel Core Intel Core i9-13900H är baserad på Raptor Lake-arkitekturen och kombinerar 6P- och 8E-kärnor. Tekniskt sett finns det Intel Core i9-12900H som vi kan se från våra benchmarkresultat i prestandaklassificeringen jämfört med Geekom XT12 Pro. I detalj ser vi dock en liten fördel till förmån för Intel Core i9-13900H, som kan uppmärksamma sig själv med en något bättre flerkärnig prestanda. En AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS eller Intels nyare modeller från Meteor Lake-serien. Gapet till konkurrenternas något snabbare modeller är dock inte särskilt stort. Det är ingen fråga om en märkbar skillnad i prestanda vid daglig användning på grund av de små skillnaderna.

Du kan hitta fler benchmarks för processorerna här.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	57.3 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	57 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	56.9 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	55.6 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	53.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	52.1 pt

Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1067 Points +57%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1022 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	933 Points +37%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	922 Points +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	680 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	578 Points -15%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	110 Points +7%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	108 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	108 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	107 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	106 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	103 Points

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18497 Points +54%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18016 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16130 Points +34%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15556 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11997 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11036 Points -8%
Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1851 Points +8%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1824 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1783 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1771 Points +3%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1747 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1719 Points

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	279 Points +14%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	278 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	268 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	251 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	245 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2746 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2738 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2537 Points +4%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2470 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2448 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2121 Points -13%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	715 Points +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	701 Points +8%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	692 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	691 Points +6%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	679 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	649 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7196 Points +46%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7188 Points +46%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6346 Points +29%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6277 Points +27%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	4935 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4294 Points -13%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3.34 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3.32 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.27 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.13 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	2.99 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.93 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.95 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	33.49 Points +18%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	29.8 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	29.76 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	28.47 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	21.11 Points -26%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14374 Points +6%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	14300 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14163 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13938 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13515 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	13378 Points -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95005 Points +24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	88902 Points +16%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85872 Points +12%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	84721 Points +11%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	76558 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	69621 Points -9%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	296 Seconds * -13%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	261 Seconds *
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	202 Seconds * +23%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	197 Seconds * +25%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	178 Seconds * +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	171 Seconds * +34%

wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	4.111 s * -17%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3.523 s * -0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	3.521 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3.254 s * +8%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2.703 s * +23%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.648 s * +25%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	441.275 s * -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	429.446 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	202.68 s * +53%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	139.617 s * +67%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	98.896 s * +77%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	98.222 s * +77%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	335.5 (329^min - 340^max) fps +13%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	325 (323^min - 328^max) fps +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	297.5 (283^min - 313^max) fps
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	292.5 (291^min - 296^max) fps -2%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	289 (286^min - 292^max) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	262 (259^min - 282^max) fps -12%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	158.2 (157.4^min - 158.8^max) fps +44%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	154.15 (153.8^min - 154.3^max) fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	143.7 (143^min - 145.2^max) fps +30%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	140.8 (138.2^min - 144.7^max) fps +28%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	110.15 (104.3^min - 134.9^max) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	92.2 (91^min - 114.5^max) fps -16%

WinRAR - Result
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7945 KB/s +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7940 KB/s +25%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7723 KB/s +21%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7490 KB/s +18%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7327 KB/s +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	6365 KB/s

TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15.1 GB/s +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	14.4 GB/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	13.3 GB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11.3 GB/s -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	11.2 GB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10.6 GB/s -20%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	2.3 GB/s
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2.1 GB/s -9%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2 GB/s -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.9 GB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.8 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1.7 GB/s -26%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1.3 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1.3 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1.3 GB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1.1 GB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1 GB/s -23%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13392 Points +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12662 Points +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12261 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12143 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11536 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	10028 Points -13%
Single-Core
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2008 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1958 Points +15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1856 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1790 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1746 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1708 Points

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	13228 Points +15%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12438 Points +8%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12127 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12086 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	11464 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	9892 Points -14%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1918 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1900 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1821 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	1710 Points +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	1678 Points

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8253 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8034 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7635 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7602 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7389 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6927 Points -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	48723 Points +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	47960 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47777 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45250 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	42713 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	37359 Points -13%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	22600 Points +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	21875 Points +21%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21762 Points +20%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	20846 Points +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	18126 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16634 Points -8%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	71934 MIPS +28%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	70733 MIPS +26%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70707 MIPS +26%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66438 MIPS +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	56068 MIPS
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	47146 MIPS -16%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6744 MIPS +16%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6644 MIPS +14%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 MIPS +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	5828 MIPS
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5560 MIPS -5%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5485 MIPS -6%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	20.9 fps +42%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.6 fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.5 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.6 fps +33%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	14.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	12.3 fps -16%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4693 sec *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4652 sec * +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4632 sec * +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	0.4627 sec * +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4392 sec * +6%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4351 sec * +7%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	54.8 s * -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	49.5 s * -6%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.5 s * -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	46.8 s *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	44.5 s * +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	39.6 s * +15%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	333 Points +23%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	300 Points +11%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	291 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	276 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	271 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	264 Points -3%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	550 ms *
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	535 ms * +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	532 ms * +3%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	517 ms * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	511 ms * +7%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	503 ms * +9%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26194 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	26038 Points +10%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25816 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	25043 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	23640 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	22242 Points -6%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11481 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	10824 Points +11%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	10397 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10014 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	9741 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7985 Points -18%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	7.512 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	7.454 s * +1%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7.442 s * +1%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	7.331 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7.168 s * +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6.751 s * +10%

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	18.402 s * -12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.138 s * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	16.436 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	16.424 s * -0%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.125 s * +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	14.879 s * +9%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	665.289 s * -57%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	529.929 s * -25%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H	424.723 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H	396.475 s * +7%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	394.754 s * +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	304.446 s * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

9326

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

14274 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

76558 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

13515 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

13392

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

53904

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

23.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

91.64 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.93 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

28.47 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

90.43 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

245 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2448 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

104 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

649 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4935 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

11997 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1719 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

103 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

680 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Performance Rating
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	96.2 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	92.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	82.4 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58 pt
Average of class Mini PC	57.9 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25916 KRay/s +120%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	25359 KRay/s +115%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	17544 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	17312 KRay/s +47%
Average of class Mini PC (646 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years)	12878 KRay/s +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	11780 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10476 KRay/s -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	109747 Points +84%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	107540 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	91112 Points +52%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	88829 Points +49%
Average of class Mini PC (3857 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years)	64921 Points +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59787 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54166 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	4753 MB/s +69%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4695 MB/s +67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	4343 MB/s +54%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	4246 MB/s +51%
Average of class Mini PC (260 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years)	2856 MB/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2813 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2504 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	118174 Points +29%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	116083 Points +26%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	91925 Points
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89748 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	87291 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	82291 Points -10%
Average of class Mini PC (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years)	80187 Points -13%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14876 Points +82%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	14663 Points +79%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	10759 Points +32%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	10247 Points +25%
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years)	8812 Points +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8181 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7317 Points -11%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58597 Points +99%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	57402 Points +95%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	45718 Points +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	44874 Points +53%
Average of class Mini PC (1987 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years)	33863 Points +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	29407 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	26850 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	164414 MB/s +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	154066 MB/s +46%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	144741 MB/s +37%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	105740 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95500 MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years)	88382 MB/s -16%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	85572 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	1233 MB/s +51%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1183 MB/s +44%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1048 MB/s +28%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	1020 MB/s +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	819 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	745 MB/s -9%
Average of class Mini PC (74.9 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years)	740 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13875 KRay/s +122%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	13517 KRay/s +117%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9284 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	9270 KRay/s +49%
Average of class Mini PC (350 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years)	6881 KRay/s +10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6242 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5777 KRay/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	45560 MPixel/s +61%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	40570 MPixel/s +43%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	40245 MPixel/s +42%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33092 MPixel/s +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28315 MPixel/s
Average of class Mini PC (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years)	28301 MPixel/s 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24858 MPixel/s -12%

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Den kontinuerliga Cinebench R15-slingan för vårt testexemplar löper nästan parallellt med den för Geekom XT12 Pro. I slutändan kan dock den nyare XT13 Pro-modellen dra iväg med en klar ledning. Man kan också se att det lilla kylsystemet inte lyckas bibehålla SoC:ns turbo över en längre tidsperiod. Den maximala effektgränsen på 64 watt nås bara under en kort tid eftersom strömförbrukningen måste strypas på grund av de höga temperaturerna.

CPU-mätvärden under Cinebench R15-loopen

Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1851 (1675.95-2471.58)

Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)

Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)

Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)

Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81)

Systemets prestanda

I testerna av systemprestanda är den dokumenterade prestandan hos Geekom XT13 Pro bara tillräckligt bra för en plats längst ner i rankningen. Subjektivt kan vi dock säga att Geekom XT13 Pro erbjuder anständig prestanda. Vi kunde inte observera några märkbara latenser när vi arbetade med enheten under testfasen. När det gäller valet av RAM-minne tar den långsammare DDR4-standarden sin hämnd, vilket framgår av AIDA64-riktmärkena. Tekniskt sett är Intel Core i9-13900H kombineras med DDR5 (5 200 MT/s).

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity

PCMark 10 / Score
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	7510 Points +23%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	7455 Points +22%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	7431 Points +22%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	7120 Points +17%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	6295 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	6102 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11273 Points +3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	11125 Points +2%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	11114 Points +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	11030 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	10908 Points
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10822 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	10484 Points +40%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10482 Points +40%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	10291 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	8901 Points +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	8114 Points +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	7490 Points

CrossMark: Overall | Responsiveness | Creativity | Productivity

CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1939 Points +6%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1861 Points +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1837 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1802 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1675 Points -9%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1931 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1919 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1849 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1700 Points -12%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1540 Points -20%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1378 Points -29%

CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	2072 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	2040 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1929 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1889 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1883 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1870 Points -1%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1872 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1831 Points +4%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000	1781 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000	1756 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1717 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1589 Points -10%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	71990 MB/s +54%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67777 MB/s +45%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	67161 MB/s +44%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	62397 MB/s +34%
Average of class Mini PC (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years)	48357 MB/s +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	46670 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45792 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	75449 MB/s +64%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	64323 MB/s +40%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	61542 MB/s +34%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	61006 MB/s +33%
Average of class Mini PC (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years)	49177 MB/s +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48963 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	45998 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	86810 MB/s +84%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86677 MB/s +83%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	70596 MB/s +49%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	65057 MB/s +38%
Average of class Mini PC (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years)	52856 MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47241 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47201 MB/s 0%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	149 ns * -80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	146.1 ns * -76%
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years)	92.1 ns * -11%
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	89 ns * -7%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	88.6 ns * -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83 ns *
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	74.7 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Vi ser inga extremt överdrivna DPC-latenstider med Geekom XT13 Pro. Detta var fallet med Geekom XT12 Pro. Ändå är vårt testprov långt ifrån enastående resultat. Vi nådde det maximala värdet även när vi helt enkelt surfar med Edge-webbläsaren.

Maximal fördröjning när flera webbläsarflikar öppnas

Maximal latenstid vid uppspelning av 4K-videomaterial

Maximal fördröjning efter tio sekunder med Prime95

Förare rangordnade efter längsta genomförandetid

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2724 μs * -63%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2151 μs * -29%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2069.2 μs * -24%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	1671.7 μs *
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	1616.1 μs * +3%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	1001.9 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Geekom XT13 Pro är utrustad med en SSD med 2 TB lagringsutrymme från Acer. Samma modell fanns redan i Geekom GT13 och levererade en fantastisk prestanda i alla tester. Den tekniska anslutningen är optimal och de resulterande överföringshastigheterna är mycket höga. Under kontinuerlig belastning har Acer N7000 små problem med att hålla läsprestandan stabil. Lyckligtvis finns det ingen extrem nackdel. Som framgår av diagrammet kan Acer N7000 fortfarande prestera betydligt bättre med minskad läsprestanda än Geekom XT12 Pro eller Acemagic F2A. Testet av Geekom XT12 Pro avslöjade ett problem med termokuddens position, vilket inte är fallet med Geekom XT13 Pro. Värmedynorna är i rätt position. Som vi redan nämnt i underhållsavsnittet kan en extra SSD installeras i Geekom XT13 Pro. Den andra M.2-platsen stöder dock endast SATA SSD-enheter med en längd på 42 millimeter (M.2-2242).

För ytterligare jämförelser och benchmarks, vänligen se vår Jämförelsetabell.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Acer N7000

Sequential Read: 3706 MB/s

Sequential Write: 4324 MB/s

512K Read: 2122 MB/s

512K Write: 3620 MB/s

4K Read: 73.35 MB/s

4K Write: 330.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 1038 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 770 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	88.9 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	82.1 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	65.8 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	58.2 pt
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	54.8 pt
Average of class Mini PC	47.8 pt
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	45.6 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3755 (3733.85^min - 3754.99^max) MB/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3690 (2901.41^min - 3690.32^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3108 (3065.99^min - 3107.56^max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC (277 - 4357, n=119, last 2 years)	2333 MB/s -37%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2315 (2293.84^min - 2315.26^max) MB/s -37%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2178 (2158.39^min - 2177.68^max) MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1674 (1242.56^min - 1673.54^max) MB/s -55%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4619 (4584.79^min - 4619.39^max) MB/s +10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4196 (3895.46^min - 4196.19^max) MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3492 (3398.43^min - 3491.76^max) MB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3386 (3076.94^min - 3385.64^max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Mini PC (229 - 5595, n=119, last 2 years)	2509 MB/s -40%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2341 (2252.02^min - 2341.4^max) MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1348 (1117.85^min - 1347.87^max) MB/s -68%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	6932 (5986.51^min - 6931.53^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	5213 (4500.71^min - 5212.95^max) MB/s -25%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	4861 (4468.61^min - 4860.57^max) MB/s -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4769 (3791.02^min - 4769.24^max) MB/s -31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4676 (4310.07^min - 4675.81^max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Mini PC (236 - 8430, n=119, last 2 years)	3790 MB/s -45%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3194 (2810.81^min - 3194.17^max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	5793 (5555.78^min - 5793.38^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4754 (4738.27^min - 4754.03^max) MB/s -18%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	4695 (4470.16^min - 4694.73^max) MB/s -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3729 (3700.15^min - 3728.95^max) MB/s -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3255 (2485.13^min - 3254.57^max) MB/s -44%
Average of class Mini PC (239 - 6669, n=119, last 2 years)	2810 MB/s -51%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2212 (1222.43^min - 2212.27^max) MB/s -62%
4k q1 t1 read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	78.7 (78.09^min - 78.69^max) MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	70.3 (66.06^min - 70.34^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	64.1 (56.32^min - 64.06^max) MB/s -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.5 (59.81^min - 63.5^max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC (6.85 - 86.6, n=119, last 2 years)	55.3 MB/s -21%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	52.3 (51.85^min - 52.27^max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	47.3 (47.07^min - 47.31^max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	335 (332.49^min - 335.43^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	279 (237.61^min - 279.08^max) MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	274 (271.38^min - 273.89^max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Mini PC (30.4 - 435, n=119, last 2 years)	196.9 MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	187.2 (181.54^min - 187.2^max) MB/s -44%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	184.4 (177.6^min - 184.36^max) MB/s -45%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	165.9 (164.35^min - 165.92^max) MB/s -50%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4158 (4048.89^min - 4158.05^max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3197 (3174.44^min - 3196.85^max) MB/s -23%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1824 (1239.47^min - 1824.09^max) MB/s -56%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1560 (1546.89^min - 1559.94^max) MB/s -62%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1452 (1402.67^min - 1451.9^max) MB/s -65%
Average of class Mini PC (26.1 - 4158, n=119, last 2 years)	1411 MB/s -66%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1143 (1091.01^min - 1142.98^max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3639 (3534.46^min - 3639.09^max) MB/s +16%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3142 (2751.87^min - 3141.57^max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1499 (1114.25^min - 1499.4^max) MB/s -52%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1434 (1410.26^min - 1433.71^max) MB/s -54%
Average of class Mini PC (32.6 - 4288, n=119, last 2 years)	1332 MB/s -58%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	595 (582.97^min - 594.71^max) MB/s -81%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	497 (467.49^min - 497.28^max) MB/s -84%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	10021 Points +50%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	6667 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	5975 Points -10%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	5177 Points -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	4987 Points -25%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	4412 Points -34%
Average of class Mini PC (211 - 10021, n=117, last 2 years)	4244 Points -36%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3741 Points +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2635 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2119 Points -20%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1685 Points -36%
Average of class Mini PC (76 - 3741, n=117, last 2 years)	1578 Points -40%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1561 Points -41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1482 Points -44%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4371 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2807 Points +2%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2777 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2741 Points
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2676 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2082 Points -24%
Average of class Mini PC (88 - 4371, n=117, last 2 years)	1902 Points -31%
Seq Read
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	4882 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	4349.85 MB/s -11%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4317 MB/s -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	3779 MB/s -23%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	3650 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC (291 - 6620, n=117, last 2 years)	3231 MB/s -34%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	3010 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	4188 MB/s +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	3936.64 MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	3506 MB/s
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2611 MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	2369 MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC (242 - 5783, n=117, last 2 years)	2292 MB/s -35%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2285 MB/s -35%
4K Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	89.3 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	84.3 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	80.89 MB/s -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	63.3 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC (21.4 - 104.3, n=117, last 2 years)	59.7 MB/s -29%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	49.7 MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	41.8 MB/s -50%
4K Write
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	316.33 MB/s +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	291 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	238 MB/s -18%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	221 MB/s -24%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	196.9 MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC (30.9 - 366, n=117, last 2 years)	177.5 MB/s -39%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	160 MB/s -45%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3220 MB/s +56%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2062 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	1602.91 MB/s -22%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	1270 MB/s -38%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1218 MB/s -41%
Average of class Mini PC (23.4 - 3220, n=117, last 2 years)	1195 MB/s -42%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	1041 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	3731 MB/s +78%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	2340 MB/s +11%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	2255 MB/s +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	2100 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	2066.57 MB/s -2%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	1649 MB/s -21%
Average of class Mini PC (32.8 - 3731, n=117, last 2 years)	1495 MB/s -29%
Access Time Read
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	0.138 ms * -100%
Average of class Mini PC (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, last 2 years)	0.09579 ms * -39%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.076 ms * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.069 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.067 ms * +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.049 ms * +29%
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.046 ms * +33%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	0.126 ms * -125%
Average of class Mini PC (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, last 2 years)	0.1133 ms * -102%
Geekom A7 Acer N5000	0.072 ms * -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	0.059 ms * -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000	0.056 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	0.02 ms * +64%
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	0.017 ms * +70%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5637 (4899.21-6932.56)

Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)

Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)

Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)

Geekom A7 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4848 (4561.2-4857.36)

Grafik

Intel Iris Intel Iris Xe-grafik G7 hanterar 3D-beräkningarna och är ansvarig för bildutmatningen. Med 96 EUs är Intel Core i9-13900H är den snabbaste modellen i serien. Den föråldrade modellen har dock svårt att hävda sig mot de moderna representanterna. Om Geekom redan hade vågat ta steget att installera en Meteor Lake SoC i XT13 Pro, hade man kunnat förvänta sig en tydligt märkbar ökning av 3D-prestandan. Prestandan hos en Intel Arc 8-kärnig iGPU kan ses perfekt i jämförelsedata. Samtidigt får du ännu mer 3D-prestanda om en AMD Radeon 780M installeras i systemet. Geekom själva erbjuder nu flera enheter med denna iGPU, vilket innebär att tillverkaren gör livet svårt för sig själv i denna disciplin. Ett exempel på detta är Geekom A7, den Geekom A8eller Geekom AE7.

Ytterligare jämförelser och riktmärken finns i vår GPU-jämförelsetabell.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	97.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	93.5 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	92.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	91.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	58.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	54.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13932 Points +88%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13410 Points +81%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12085 Points +63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	11691 Points +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7428 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	6975 Points -6%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3205 Points +91%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3193 Points +90%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2968 Points +76%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2846 Points +69%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1682 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1581 Points -6%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	8391 Points +44%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8007 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7710 Points +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	7599 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5845 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5421 Points -7%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	34.6 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31.6 fps +27%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	29.7 fps +19%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26 fps +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	24.9 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	21.8 fps -12%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	36.3 fps +41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	33.2 fps +29%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32.7 fps +27%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	32 fps +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	25.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	22.7 fps -12%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	24.5 fps +61%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	18.5 fps +22%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17.7 fps +16%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.2 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.3 fps -12%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	32.4 fps +108%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	21 fps +35%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	18.3 fps +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	15.6 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	13.9 fps -11%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12.2 fps -22%

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12174 Points +84%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10491 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	10102 Points +53%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9725 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	6603 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	5950 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p High
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3592 Points +59%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3391 Points +50%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	3341 Points +48%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3129 Points +39%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	2254 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	2035 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1920 Points +70%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1812 Points +61%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1737 Points +54%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1577 Points +40%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1128 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1042 Points -8%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9796 Points +171%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	9494 Points +163%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	7480 Points +107%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	6270 Points +73%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	3616 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3390 Points -6%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	483 Points +67%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	479 Points +65%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	469 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	427 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	290 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	231 Points -20%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	484 Points +69%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	481 Points +68%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	462 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	422 Points +48%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	286 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	246 Points -14%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2574 Points +202%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2477 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1961 Points +130%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1620 Points +90%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2608 Points +201%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2519 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1594 Points +84%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	1274 Points +47%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	872 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	3650 Points +176%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	3535 Points +167%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3076 Points +133%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2444 Points +85%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1323 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	1182 Points -11%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	817 Samples/s +30%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	801 Samples/s +28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	640 Samples/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	627 Samples/s
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	549 Samples/s -12%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	2732 Samples/s +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2319 Samples/s +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1970 Samples/s
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1522 Samples/s -23%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1496 Samples/s -24%

Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H	5308 Points +23%
Acemagic F2A Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	4928 Points +14%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	4332 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H	3830 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1709 Points -61%
Geekom A7 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1396 Points -68%

	Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H	Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H	Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 7 155H	Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-12900H	Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M R9 7940HS	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020		309%	36%	25%	-4%	278%	192%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	3.63	11.2 209%	4.23 17%	5.05 39%	3.49 -4%	11.1 206%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, last 2 years) 116%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	3.15	19.9 532%	6.03 91%	4.61 46%	3.05 -3%	14.1 348%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, last 2 years) 259%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	16	33.4 109%	18.5 16%	17.9 12%	14.8 -7%	31.4 96%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, last 2 years) 92%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	7.9	23.2 194%	11.1 41%	10 27%	7.78 -2%	24.8 214%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, last 2 years) 135%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	10.3	20.4 98%	14.9 45%	12.9 25%	9.69 -6%	20.9 103%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, last 2 years) 118%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	6.13	64.1 946%	6.24 2%	5.7 -7%	6.29 3%	61.4 902%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, last 2 years) 507%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	26.8	47.7 78%	37.7 41%	35.4 32%	23.9 -11%	47 75%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, last 2 years) 120%

3DMark 05 Standard		29045 poäng
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768		30156 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result		28599 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance		8024 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		155640 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		28112 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5448 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		2570 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		1920 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Score		183 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		1276 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Prestanda för spel

Intel Iris Xe iGPU klarar inte av de flesta spel. Den åldrade iGPU:n uppnår bara adekvata bildfrekvenser, om ens det, i låga upplösningar och en låg eller medelhög grafikförinställning. Om du fortfarande vill använda Geekom XT13 Pro för spel måste du ta omvägen via ett externt grafikkort. Olika modeller kan användas med enheten via USB4.

Dota 2 Reborn | GTA V | Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	155.8 (135.9^min) fps +33%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	152.7 (134.2^min) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	117.2 (74.5^min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	106.5 (61^min) fps -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	106.3 (81.7^min) fps -9%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	103.2 (59.8^min) fps -12%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	87.6 (75^min) fps +21%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	86.6 (72.2^min) fps +19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	79 (48.2^min) fps +9%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	77.3 (52.5^min) fps +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	72.5 (53^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	61.3 (54.1^min) fps -15%

GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	167.5 (5.17^min, 125^P1) fps +36%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	165.1 (4.83^min, 125^P1) fps +34%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	163.6 (4.63^min, 111.1^P1) fps +32%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	161 (4.76^min, 100^P1) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	123.5 (30.5^min, 66.7^P1) fps
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Geekom A7 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000	66.6 (4.46^min, 37^P1) fps +201%
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	65.3 (4.57^min, 45.5^P1) fps +195%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	41.2 (3.12^min, 30.3^P1) fps +86%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	31.3 (2.94^min, 22.7^P1) fps +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	22.1 (7.08^min, 16.4^P1) fps

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	42.4 (35.7^min) fps +128%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	34.3 (29.1^min) fps +84%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	29.5 (24.1^min) fps +59%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	18.6 (15.4^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	16.4 (13.6^min) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	26.3 (22.2^min) fps +102%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0	24 (20.6^min) fps +85%
Acemagic F2A Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0	20.4 (13.8^min) fps +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13 (11^min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB	11.5 (10^min) fps -12%

Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	60.3 (21.3^min, 36^P0.1, 46.1^P1) fps +114%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	28.2 (13.8^min, 15.1^P0.1, 19.8^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset
Aoostar GEM12 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8	24.7 (16.6^min, 17.1^P0.1, 19.4^P1) fps +83%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13.5 (11.2^min, 11.2^P0.1, 11.6^P1) fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	43.1 (36^min, 26^P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	26.7 (23^min, 17^P1) fps

FPS chart

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.2 (9.21-12.9)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
GTA V (2015)	123.5	105.9	22.1	9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	117.2	82.9	72.5	66.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	46	25.7	18.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	19.9	15.4	13.5	13
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	18.6	15	13	11.4
F1 24 (2024)	43.1	37.3	26.7

Geekom XT13 Pro prestandakontroll med en Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Geekom XT13 Pro har två USB4-portar, som stöder användningen av externa grafikkort. Utan att påverka det övergripande resultatet genomförde vi några tester med Razer Core X och ett Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Jämfört med den åldrade iGPU: n i Intel Core i9-13900H kan 3D-prestandan ökas massivt. Jämförelsen med de andra testenheterna visar ett nästan identiskt resultat i de syntetiska testerna. Spelprestanda kan också ökas avsevärt med denna kombination, vilket kan ses från de testade spelen. Ibland kan till och med de mest moderna spelen avnjutas i full detalj.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	99 pt
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	99 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	98 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	96.2 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	95.2 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	94.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	34666 Points +367%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34034 Points +358%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	33454 Points +350%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	33219 Points +347%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	32654 Points +340%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	32085 Points +332%
	7428 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	11182 Points +565%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	11156 Points +563%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	11118 Points +561%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	11085 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	11062 Points +558%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10935 Points +550%
	1682 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	25842 Points +342%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	25468 Points +336%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	25462 Points +336%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	25415 Points +335%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	24809 Points +324%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	24796 Points +324%
	5845 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7139 Points +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7079 Points +464%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	7047 Points +461%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7046 Points +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7044 Points +461%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6997 Points +457%
	1256 Points

Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34726 Points +426%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	34168 Points +417%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	33894 Points +413%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	31986 Points +384%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	31903 Points +383%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	25121 Points +280%
	6603 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	15240 Points +576%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	15076 Points +569%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	15008 Points +566%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	14959 Points +564%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	14859 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	14853 Points +559%
	2254 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7193 Points +538%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	7098 Points +529%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	7089 Points +528%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	7064 Points +526%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	7055 Points +525%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7029 Points +523%
	1128 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	9419 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	9315 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	9240 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	9205 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	9188 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9149 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	4079 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	4061 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	4042 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	4016 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	4013 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	4009 Points

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	144.5 fps +851%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	143.9 fps +847%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	142.2 fps +836%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	141.6 fps +832%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	140.6 fps +825%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	135.9 fps +794%
	15.2 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	138.6 fps +788%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	138.2 fps +786%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	137.6 fps +782%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	137.5 fps +781%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	137 fps +778%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	133.5 fps +756%
	15.6 fps

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	174.9 fps +602%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	174.5 fps +601%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	173.6 fps +597%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	173.5 fps +597%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	172.3 fps +592%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	172.1 fps +591%
	24.9 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	164.2 fps +539%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	163.6 fps +537%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	163.2 fps +535%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	162.5 fps +532%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	162 fps +530%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	158.8 fps +518%
	25.7 fps

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	28156 Points +679%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	28076 Points +676%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	27929 Points +672%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	27843 Points +670%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	27669 Points +665%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	25975 Points +618%
	3616 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2719 Points +838%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2715 Points +836%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2708 Points +834%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2687 Points +827%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2681 Points +824%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	2527 Points +771%
	290 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2663 Points +831%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2657 Points +829%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	2641 Points +823%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	2622 Points +817%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	2614 Points +814%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	2463 Points +761%
	286 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	5769 Points +578%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	5760 Points +577%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	5742 Points +575%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	5726 Points +573%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	5652 Points +564%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	5342 Points +528%
	851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	6335 Points +632%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6319 Points +630%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	6283 Points +626%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	6275 Points +625%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	6223 Points +619%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	5881 Points +579%
	866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	10671 Points +707%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	10626 Points +703%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	10594 Points +701%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	10548 Points +697%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	10445 Points +689%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	9762 Points +638%
	1323 Points

Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	100.6 Points +32%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	98.3 Points +28%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	93.7 Points +22%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	81.6 Points +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	81.2 Points +6%
	76.5 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	66.3 Points -13%

Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS	55.8 Points +598%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	55.8 Points +598%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	48 Points +500%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core Ultra 5 125H	47.9 Points +499%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-13900H	47.3 Points +491%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) Intel Core i9-12900H	45.6 Points +470%
	8 Points

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	106 (82.3^min) fps +233%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	101.4 (78.7^min) fps +219%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	88.7 (68^min) fps +179%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	84.9 (65.5^min) fps +167%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	79.5 (59.3^min) fps +150%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	70.2 (53.5^min) fps +121%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	31.8 (24.6^min) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	81.5 (64.7^min) fps +443%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	81.4 (65.1^min) fps +443%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	81.2 (65.1^min) fps +441%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	80.4 (63.9^min) fps +436%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	78.9 (63^min) fps +426%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	72.2 (55.8^min) fps +381%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	15 (12.4^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	64.5 (50.7^min) fps +466%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	64.4 (49.9^min) fps +465%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	63.9 (49.4^min) fps +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	63.5 (50.1^min) fps +457%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	63.3 (47.6^min) fps +455%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	60.8 (43.6^min) fps +433%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	11.4 (9.68^min) fps

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	113.4 (62.4^min, 69.4^P0.1, 78.1^P1) fps +470%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	113.3 (60^min, 68.1^P0.1, 78.5^P1) fps +469%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	113 (47.4^min, 65.4^P0.1, 77.5^P1) fps +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	110.4 (37.6^min, 67.1^P0.1, 77.2^P1) fps +455%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	110.1 (57.6^min, 68.5^P0.1, 75.3^P1) fps +453%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	109.5 (51.8^min, 62.3^P0.1, 74.4^P1) fps +450%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	19.9 (15.5^min, 15.6^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	91.3 (51.4^min, 53.4^P0.1, 61.1^P1) fps +493%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	90.8 (48.5^min, 55.2^P0.1, 61.7^P1) fps +490%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	90.4 (50.6^min, 54.8^P0.1, 59.8^P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	90.1 (50.2^min, 55.2^P0.1, 61.6^P1) fps +485%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	88.5 (53.2^min, 55.5^P0.1, 59.9^P1) fps +475%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	87.3 (36.9^min, 43.6^P0.1, 57.2^P1) fps +467%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	15.4 (11.8^min, 11.9^P0.1, 12.7^P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	79 (45.4^min, 46^P0.1, 53.2^P1) fps +508%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	78.5 (46.2^min, 47^P0.1, 53.1^P1) fps +504%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	78.3 (46.6^min, 47.4^P0.1, 51.3^P1) fps +502%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	78.2 (40.1^min, 46.3^P0.1, 52.6^P1) fps +502%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	76.8 (44.1^min, 46.7^P0.1, 49.8^P1) fps +491%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	76.3 (41.3^min, 43.7^P0.1, 50^P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	13 (10.1^min, 10.1^P0.1, 11^P1) fps

F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	88.2 (48^min, 52^P1) fps +105%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	88.1 (48^min, 49^P1) fps +104%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	77.3 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +79%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	76.9 (42^min, 44^P1) fps +78%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	75 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +74%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	72.6 (41^min, 43^P1) fps +68%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	43.1 (36^min, 26^P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	84.5 (47^min, 49^P1) fps +127%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	82.2 (47^min, 49^P1) fps +120%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	74.1 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +99%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	73.1 (42^min, 43^P1) fps +96%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	72.8 (41^min, 41^P1) fps +95%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	70 (41^min, 42^P1) fps +88%
Geekom XT13 Pro Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000	37.3 (32^min, 26^P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 7940HS	46.4 (27^min, 26^P1) fps
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , R9 8945HS	46.1 (27^min, 27^P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	42.2 (24^min, 25^P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-13900H	42 (24^min, 25^P1) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , i9-12900H	41.8 (24^min, 24^P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE) , Ultra 5 125H	39.5 (22^min, 23^P1) fps

	Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs i9-13900H	Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-13900H	Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), i9-12900H	Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), Ultra 5 125H	Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 7940HS	Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE), R9 8945HS	Average of class Mini PC
SPECviewperf 2020		391%	387%	321%	182%	395%	516%	192%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)	3.63	13 258%	10.8 198%	11.8 225%	10.9 200%	13 258%	10.8 198%	7.85 ?(0.78 - 30.8, n=66, last 2 years) 116%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)	3.15	20.9 563%	21 567%	18.9 500%	17.8 465%	20.9 563%	50.3 1497%	11.3 ?(0.52 - 47.9, n=66, last 2 years) 259%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)	16	74.2 364%	76.4 378%	62.7 292%	26.6 66%	76.8 380%	76.6 379%	30.7 ?(7.73 - 97.5, n=66, last 2 years) 92%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)	7.9	39.4 399%	40.1 408%	32.8 315%	23.6 199%	39.2 396%	38.8 391%	18.6 ?(4.61 - 64.1, n=65, last 2 years) 135%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)	10.3	47.2 358%	47.3 359%	40 288%	28.7 179%	46.5 351%	45.9 346%	22.5 ?(5.53 - 87.5, n=66, last 2 years) 118%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)	6.13	16.5 169%	16.5 169%	15.2 148%	11.4 86%	16.6 171%	16.6 171%	37.2 ?(2.25 - 224, n=64, last 2 years) 507%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)	26.8	194 624%	196 631%	155 478%	47.5 77%	199 643%	195 628%	58.9 ?(12.2 - 223, n=66, last 2 years) 120%

	låg	med.	hög	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	182.2	178.4	170.3	104.2	92.7	103.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	165.8	138.3	132	121.9		104.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	183.7	142.2	98.8		77.6	48.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	146.4	137.9	106.3			92.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	113	91.3	79	78.5	61.6	37.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	88.2	81.4	71.7	64.4	44.5	22.2
F1 24 (2024)	76.9	73.1	60.5	42.2	36.9	19.2

Utsläpp - Svag kylning och låg energiförbrukning

Bullerutsläpp

Inte ens enheterna med samma design kunde imponera med toppvärden när det gäller bulleremissioner. Detta gäller även Geekom XT13 Pro, åtminstone under belastning. Mini-PC:n är mycket tyst när den är i viloläge och knappt hörbar. Fläkten är dock alltid igång, vilket innebär att semipassiv drift inte är möjlig. Under belastning varvar fläkten ibland upp rejält, och vi kunde mäta en maximal ljudtrycksnivå på 49,5 dB(A). Den maximala volymen är dock inte alltid närvarande. Under stresstestet varierade fläkthastigheten om och om igen, så att Geekom XT13 Pro bara nådde 38 dB(A) under belastning. Vi observerade samma fenomen under genomsnittlig belastning. Här fluktuerar den mätbara volymen mellan 38 och 42,2 dB(A)

Tyvärr är Geekom XT12 Pro inte en av de tystaste enheterna. Enheten arbetar nästan ljudlöst på tomgång, endast ett tyst fläktljud hörs. Detta förändras under belastning, då mini-PC:n är tydligt hörbar med upp till 44,2 dB(A). Vi kunde till och med mäta upp till 47,2 dB(A) under spel. Vi kunde dock inte upptäcka en permanent hög ljudtrycksnivå under spel. Här fluktuerade resultatet mellan 39 och 47,2 dB(A).

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		27.6 / 27.8 / 27.9 dB(A)
Hög belastning		42.2 / 49.5 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Noise		10%	1%	2%	2%	-9%
off / environment *	25	24.3 3%	24.1 4%	24.9 -0%	25.4 -2%	25.4 -2%
Idle Minimum *	27.6	27.5 -0%	29.8 -8%	25.4 8%	28 -1%	33.3 -21%
Idle Average *	27.8	27.6 1%	29.9 -8%	25.7 8%	28.1 -1%	33.6 -21%
Idle Maximum *	27.9	27.6 1%	30 -8%	25.7 8%	28.5 -2%	33.7 -21%
Load Average *	42.2	36 15%	37.3 12%	47.8 -13%	39.6 6%	43.3 -3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	46.6	35.4 24%
Load Maximum *	49.5	38.2 23%	43.5 12%	49 1%	44.2 11%	43.3 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *		35.4	40.2	45.23	47.2	43.2

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Höljet värms upp märkbart under belastning. Vi kan dock inte hitta några kritiska värden. SoC:n ser lite annorlunda ut, eftersom Geekom inte begränsar den maximala temperaturen, som snabbt når 100 °C under belastning. Till skillnad från Cinebench R15 multi-loop överskrider Intel Core i9-13900H inte 64-wattsgränsen i stresstestet. SoC:n värms upp för snabbt och prestandan måste sänkas. Under en längre tid stabiliseras temperaturen sedan på cirka 90 °C, vilket inte är något problem för processorn. Den extremt kompakta designen gör det helt enkelt omöjligt att installera ett mer kraftfullt kylsystem.

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


43.4 °C	45.7 °C	45.1 °C
35.7 °C	42 °C	40.9 °C
32 °C	37.3 °C	32.9 °C

Max: 45.7 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C


40 °C	40.1 °C	40.3 °C
34.2 °C	37.8 °C	35.8 °C
34.7 °C	35.4 °C	32.1 °C

Max: 40.3 °C
Medel: 36.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 45.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.3 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.3 °C / 90 F.

Strömförbrukning

Strömförbrukningen för Geekom XT13 Pro står sig mycket bra i jämförelse med konkurrenterna. Vi uppmätte endast låga värden även i viloläge. De låga effektgränserna (PL1 och PL2) för Intel Core i9-13900H säkerställer ett relativt lågt energibehov under belastning. Under genomsnittlig belastning klarar sig systemet med lite mindre än 50 watt. Under belastning ser vi bara 94,5 watt under en kort tid när systemet fortfarande kan använda Turbo. Vi kunde observera ett något märkligt beteende. I Cinebench R23 Sigle-testet dokumenterade vi många spikar, vilket aldrig har setts i andra testanordningar. Vi upprepade testet flera gånger - med samma resultat. Det är rimligt att anta att SoC upprepade gånger arbetar vid en temperaturgräns i det här fallet, vilket gör att den kortvarigt kan absorbera mer ström. Strömförsörjningen tillhandahålls av en liten strömförsörjningsenhet med 120 watt. Samma strömförsörjningsenhet ingår i många Geekom-enheter.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	1.6 / 2.8 Watt
Låg belastning	6.3 / 7.1 / 9 Watt
Hög belastning	49.8 / 94.5 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	Geekom XT12 Pro i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	Geekom A7 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Mini PC
Power Consumption		-38%	-34%	-35%	-21%	11%	3%	-43%
Idle Minimum *	6.3	8.2 -30%	8.2 -30%	9.1 -44%	5.7 10%	3.8 40%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) 15%	9.69 ?(1.9 - 45.7, n=121, last 2 years) -54%
Idle Average *	7.1	10 -41%	12.1 -70%	10.3 -45%	9.5 -34%	4.8 32%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) -20%	11.9 ?(1.9 - 47.5, n=119, last 2 years) -68%
Idle Maximum *	9	14.6 -62%	14 -56%	14.4 -60%	16.5 -83%	6.5 28%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) -20%	15.2 ?(2.6 - 57.1, n=121, last 2 years) -69%
Load Average *	49.8	73.9 -48%	53.1 -7%	54.9 -10%	53.3 -7%	71.9 -44%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) 9%	59 ?(11.3 - 170.6, n=121, last 2 years) -18%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	54	79.9 -48%
Load Maximum *	94.5	95.3 -1%	100.4 -6%	110.4 -17%	87.8 7%	94.7 -0%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) 29%	100.5 ?(18.1 - 423, n=121, last 2 years) -6%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency

Performance Rating | Power Consumption

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	100 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	86.3 pt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	72.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67.3 pt

Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	251 Points per Watt +31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	205 Points per Watt +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	192.3 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	183.7 Points per Watt -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	182.7 (48.6^min, 48.7^P1 - 81.3^max) Points per Watt -5%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	61.7 Points per Watt +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	55.6 Points per Watt +39%
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	54.2 Points per Watt +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	39.9 Points per Watt
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37.1 Points per Watt -7%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom A8 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M	35.8 Points per Watt +30%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core	31.2 Points per Watt +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	27.5 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	26.6 Points per Watt -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	24.7 Points per Watt -10%

Power consumption with external monitor

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.45 (6.3-9.04)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.2 (53.8-88.4)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø54 (52.8-55.9)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø49.8 (46-53.2)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø53.1 (49.6-57.6)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57)

Power consumption with external monitor

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89 (87.1-94.5)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø89 (83.2-91.1)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø43.1 (15.9-70.3)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.4 (49.8-87.7)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)

Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.1 (50.2-55.2)

Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)

Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

För

+ Robust och kompakt hölje

+ modern design och högkvalitativa metallytor

+ perfekt utförande

+ snabb SoC med P- och E-kärnor

+ 2x USB4

+ lätt att öppna

+ snabb 2 TB SSD

+ 36 månaders garanti

Emot

- låg iGPU-prestanda

- tydligt hörbar under belastning

- högt inköpspris

Bedömning - Premiumpris utan premiumprestanda

Geekom XT13 Pro i test - tillhandahållen av Geekom

Geekom XT13 Pro är en kraftfull mini-PC. Vi kunde dock redan intyga detta med Geekom XT12 Pro. Om vi bara jämför dessa två modeller med varandra kan du välja den äldre enheten utan någon märkbar prestandaförlust. Den nya Intel Core i9-13900H i Geekom XT13 Pro kan inte ge en märkbar ökning av prestanda. De tekniska skillnaderna jämfört med Intel Core i9-12900H är för små. Geekom vågar inte ta det djärva steget med en mini-PC baserad på Meteor Lake-serien. Detta innebär att Geekom hamnar på efterkälken, eftersom många andra tillverkare redan har utrustat sina modellserier med de senaste processorerna från Intel. Den största nackdelen med Geekom XT13 Pro är iGPU: n, som är sämre än de moderna representanterna i alla tester. Geekom är dock inte bara sämre än sina konkurrenter här utan också för sig själv. Geekoms egen portfölj innehåller mini-PC: er med de senaste AMD SoC: erna, som tekniskt sett inte är mycket sämre, men som ger ett bättre resultat. Vi har inte ens tittat på priset än. Tyvärr är Geekom XT13 Pro helt utanför linjen här. 999 euro är det som gäller om den ska vara toppmodellen. Andra mini-PC:er kostar lite mindre men erbjuder mer prestanda.

Geekom XT13 Pro levererar adekvat prestanda med Intel Core i9-13900H och imponerar med sina mångsidiga funktioner. Pris-prestanda-förhållandet för Geekom XT13 Pro matchar dock inte alls.

De goda anslutningsmöjligheterna, med vilka Geekom upprepade gånger har fått poäng tidigare, bör betonas positivt. De många anslutningarna inkluderar två USB4-portar, vilket kan påverka köpbeslutet när det gäller framtidssäkring. Den treåriga tillverkargarantin talar också till förmån för en enhet från Geekom. Naturligtvis är detta också tillgängligt för andra enheter från tillverkaren. Effektiviteten kunde bara ökas något jämfört med Geekom XT12 Pro. I denna disciplin är Intel Core i9-13900H tydligt underlägsen de modernare Meteor Lake-processorerna. Av denna anledning kan vi inte ge Geekom XT13 Pro en köprekommendation, inte ens i förhållande till det höga inköpspriset. Om Geekom XT13 Pro inte ska bli en hyllvärmare måste Geekom snarast se över sin nuvarande prissättning.

Obs: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Ytterligare information hittar du här.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Geekom XT13 Pro finns att köpa från Geekom eller Amazon.

Geekom XT13 Pro - 07/30/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Design

88 / 98 → 89%

Anslutningar

65 / 81 → 80%

Vikt

82%

Spelprestanda

29 / 80 → 36%

Programprestanda

80 / 92 → 86%

Workstation

24%

AI Performance

75%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

75%

Medel

50%

72%

Mini PC - Vägt medel

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
25%

Power Use
66.2%

Repairability
12.5%

Software Updates
39%

Total Sustainability Score: 28%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core jämför
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 (min) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28.1
...
Dell XPS 13 9340 Core Ultra 7 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	675
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	677
Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	677
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	680
Lenovo LOQ 15IRH8 Core i7 i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	691
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	698
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	703
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	5372

Geekom XT13 Pro recension: NUC mini-PC klarar sig utan Meteor Lake och får bara en Intel Core i9-13900H

Begränsad utveckling!

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Case - Perfekt bearbetning av metall och plast

Storleksjämförelse

Utrustning - Bra urval och 2x USB4

Kommunikation

Tillbehör

Underhåll

Hållbarhet

Prestanda - Intel Core i9-13900H med 14 kärnor och 20 trådar

Testförhållanden

Processor

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Systemets prestanda

DPC-latenstider

Masslagring

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Grafik

Prestanda för spel

FPS chart

Geekom XT13 Pro prestandakontroll med en Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Utsläpp - Svag kylning och låg energiförbrukning

Bullerutsläpp

Temperatur

Strömförbrukning

Efficiency

Power consumption with external monitor

Power consumption with external monitor

För

Emot

Bedömning - Premiumpris utan premiumprestanda

Pris och tillgänglighet

Transparency

Price comparison

More articles related to this device

3DMark 11 jämför
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS (min) i5-8550U, GeForce MX130	28
...
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7946
Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7957
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	7974
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8024
Geekom GT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8027
R7 5700G, Vega 8	8050
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8095
...
(max) R7 9800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	77609