Notebookcheck Logo

Geekom XT13 Pro recension: NUC mini-PC klarar sig utan Meteor Lake och får bara en Intel Core i9-13900H

Begränsad utveckling!

Geekom har presenterat XT13 Pro som en kraftfull NUC mini-PC baserad på en Intel Core i9-13900H. Detta innebär att Intels Meteor Lake-processorer fortfarande är utelämnade. Vi har analyserat hur väl high-end-modellen i Raptor Lake H-serien presterar mot de nyare processorerna med hjälp av ett flertal mätningar och benchmarks.

Geekom XT13 Pro ärver Geekom XT12 Pro Geekom XT12 Pro och kommer i toppkonfigurationen med en Intel Core i9-13900H utrustad. Det finns också 32 GB DDR4 RAM och en 2 TB SSD, även om detta kommer till ett pris. Priset är 999 euro, så det är verkligen inget fynd. För 769 euro finns Geekom XT13 Pro tillgänglig med en Intel Core i7-13620H och en 1 TB SSD. Geekom har valt att inte använda de nyare Meteor Lake-processorerna utan håller sig till de äldre Raptor Lake-processorerna. Detta test kommer att visa om detta är rätt sätt att stå upp mot konkurrensen.

Frågan uppstår också om denna prissättning är motiverad. Vi kommer också att ta upp denna viktiga punkt specifikt efter prestandaanalysen. I vilket fall som helst sätter tillverkaren själv ribban mycket högt.

Geekom XT13 Pro
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, Raptor Lake-H
Grafikkort
Minne
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 2 von 2 belegt, max. 64 GB
Moderkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Hårddisk
Acer N7000, 2048 GB 
, 1760 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 2 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5mm Klinke
Nätverk
Intel Ethernet Controller I226-V (10/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 37 x 117 x 112
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Övrigt
120-Watt-Netzteil, VESA-Mount, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
555 g, Strömförsörjning: 260 g
Pris
999 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Memory
Weight
Height
72.4 %v8
08/2024
Geekom XT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
32768 MB555 g37 mm
80.8 %v8
06/2024
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
32768 MB653 g60 mm
87.5 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05/2024
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
32768 MB863 g48.6 mm
83.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
04/2024
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
32768 MB768 g57 mm
84.1 %v8
04/2024
Geekom XT12 Pro
i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
32768 MB545 g37 mm
82.6 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03/2024
Geekom A7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
32768 MB417 g38 mm

Obs: Vi har uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7 som finns här.

Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro med strömförsörjningsenhet (19 V; 6,32 A)
Strömförsörjningsenhet (19 V; 6,32 A)
Geekom XT13 Pro - DDR4-RAM

Case - Perfekt bearbetning av metall och plast

Höljet på Geekom XT13 Pro är bekant, det användes för Geekom XT12 Pro. En likhet med Intel NUC 13 Pro Desk Edition Kit kan inte heller förnekas. I grund och botten är det inget fel på utseendet. Vårt testexemplar är återigen perfekt färdigt och allt passar ihop på ett underbart sätt. Ändå skulle vi ha velat se ett nytt hölje för att skilja det något från den interna konkurrensen. Mini-PC:n tar bara upp 11,7 x 11,2 centimeter på skrivbordet, vilket gör den till en av de mer kompakta enheterna. Geekom XT13 Pro kan också fästas direkt på en bildskärm med hjälp av det medföljande VESA-fästet.

Storleksjämförelse

146 mm 146 mm 57 mm 768 g145 mm 145 mm 48.6 mm 863 g130 mm 130 mm 60 mm 653 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 555 g117 mm 112 mm 37 mm 545 g112 mm 112 mm 38 mm 417 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

Utrustning - Bra urval och 2x USB4

När det gäller externa gränssnitt har Geekom XT13 Pro samma alternativ som Geekom XT12 Pro. Även om enheten är mycket kompakt finns det många olika anslutningar. De två USB-C-uttagen på baksidan är moderna USB4-portar, vilket utökar användningsområdet avsevärt med rätt tillbehör. Totalt fyra skärmar kan användas samtidigt och det finns även en LAN-anslutning.

Anslutningsutrustningen på Geekom XT13 Pro (Källa: Geekom)
Anslutningsutrustningen på Geekom XT13 Pro (Källa: Geekom)

Kommunikation

WLAN-modul
WLAN-modul

Geekom XT13 Pro använder en välkänd trådlös modul som Geekom installerar i många av sina enheter. MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 WLAN-modulen kan ge adekvat prestanda i vår testenhet. Om möjligt bör dock frekvensområdet 6 GHz användas i första hand. Alternativt kan kabelanslutningen också användas. Datahastigheter på upp till 2,5 GBit/s är då till och med möjliga.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1770 (1584min - 1790max) MBit/s +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1761 (1734min - 1774max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1716 (1560min - 1782max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (684 - 1771, n=38)
1440 MBit/s -16%
Average of class Mini PC
  (684 - 1771, n=53, last 2 years)
1381 MBit/s -20%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1375 (688min - 1438max) MBit/s -20%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1152 (576min - 1273max) MBit/s -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1615 (767min - 1670max) MBit/s +12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1562 (1198min - 1713max) MBit/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1440 (1352min - 1553max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (394 - 1800, n=37)
1407 MBit/s -2%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1367 (1268min - 1443max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Mini PC
  (394 - 1800, n=53, last 2 years)
1328 MBit/s -8%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1315 (691min - 1352max) MBit/s -9%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1599 (802min - 1683max) MBit/s +65%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (707 - 1775, n=54)
1407 MBit/s +45%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
969 (946min - 981max) MBit/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (192.9 - 1796, n=113, last 2 years)
932 MBit/s -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
892 (460min - 921max) MBit/s -8%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
858 (827min - 886max) MBit/s -11%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
838 (728min - 926max) MBit/s -14%
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
740 (676min - 758max) MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
1566 (904min - 1695max) MBit/s +94%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (358 - 1785, n=54)
1288 MBit/s +60%
Average of class Mini PC
  (184.1 - 1776, n=113, last 2 years)
864 MBit/s +7%
Geekom A7
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
831 (755min - 940max) MBit/s +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
806 (765min - 844max) MBit/s
Aoostar GEM12
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
736 (369min - 756max) MBit/s -9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz
709 (369min - 977max) MBit/s -12%
Geekom XT12 Pro
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
589 (295min - 624max) MBit/s -27%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1441 (1352-1553)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1198-1713)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1715 (1560-1782)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1760 (1734-1774)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø969 (946-981)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1572 (802-1683)
Geekom XT13 Pro MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (765-844)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (904-1695)

Tillbehör

Omfattningen av leveransen av Geekom XT13 Pro erbjuder den vanliga standarden. Förutom själva enheten innehåller lådan också 120-watts strömförsörjningsenhet och ett VESA-fäste med monteringsmaterial. En HDMI-kabel och det obligatoriska tackkortet från Geekom ingår också.

Omfattning av leveransen av Geekom XT13 Pro
Omfattning av leveransen av Geekom XT13 Pro

Underhåll

Geekom XT13 Pro är lätt att öppna. Endast fyra små skruvar behöver lossas på undersidan, som fäster bottenplattan mot resten av chassit. Det finns en SSD-kylare på själva basplattan, varför du bör vara lite mer försiktig vid denna punkt. RAM-minnet och masslagringen är sedan lättåtkomliga. I vårt fall kan en extra SSD installeras. Den korrekta standarden måste dock följas här, eftersom endast SATA SSD-enheter med en längd på 42 millimeter är kompatibla.

Geekom XT13 Pro öppen
Geekom XT13 Pro demonterad
Geekom XT13 Pro utan RAM och SSD
Kylaggregat på Geekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro demonterad

Hållbarhet

Geekom XT13 Pro levereras i en jämförelsevis stor låda med mycket "luft". Vi har sett Geekom göra saker annorlunda. Dessutom är de standardtillbehör som medföljer förpackade i separata plastpåsar, vilket kan förbättras när det gäller hållbarhet. Själva enheten är huvudsakligen tillverkad av metall och plast. Vi vet dock inte om återvunna material har använts vid tillverkningen. Positivt är att tillverkaren erbjuder 36 månaders garanti.

Prestanda - Intel Core i9-13900H med 14 kärnor och 20 trådar

Geekom XT13 Pro levereras i toppkonfigurationen med Intel Core i9-13900H i toppkonfigurationen. Alternativt kan NUC PC också utrustas med en något svagare Intel Core i7-13620H som också är utrustad med 6P-kärnor och bara bör ha en liten nackdel jämfört med toppmodellen när det gäller prestanda. 32 GB DDR4 RAM ingår alltid, även om den snabba NVMe SSD-enheten ger en solid grundkonfiguration. Geekom XT13 Pro är inte heller en oöverstiglig uppgift för prestandahungriga applikationer. Ändå är 3D-prestandan hos iGPU den största svaga punkten, men detta kan förbättras märkbart med en eGPU.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO

Testförhållanden

För alla prestandatester med Geekom XT13 Pro använder vi energiprofilen "High performance". Det fanns bara avvikelser från detta i mätningarna av strömförbrukning och buller enligt våra Testkriterier. I enlighet med tillverkarens specifikationer låter Geekom SoC:n arbeta med lägsta möjliga strömförbrukning. I siffror innebär detta en effektgräns på 35 watt under kontinuerlig belastning, även om upp till 64 watt tillåts under korta perioder.

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H (Källa: Geekom)
Intel Core i9-13900H (Källa: Geekom)

Intel Core Intel Core i9-13900H är baserad på Raptor Lake-arkitekturen och kombinerar 6P- och 8E-kärnor. Tekniskt sett finns det Intel Core i9-12900H som vi kan se från våra benchmarkresultat i prestandaklassificeringen jämfört med Geekom XT12 Pro. I detalj ser vi dock en liten fördel till förmån för Intel Core i9-13900H, som kan uppmärksamma sig själv med en något bättre flerkärnig prestanda. En AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS eller Intels nyare modeller från Meteor Lake-serien. Gapet till konkurrenternas något snabbare modeller är dock inte särskilt stort. Det är ingen fråga om en märkbar skillnad i prestanda vid daglig användning på grund av de små skillnaderna.

Du kan hitta fler benchmarks för processorerna här.

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench R23
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench 2024
Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
57.3 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
57 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
56.9 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
55.6 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
53.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
52.1 pt
Cinebench 2024
CPU Multi Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1067 Points +57%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1022 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
933 Points +37%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
922 Points +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
680 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
578 Points -15%
CPU Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
110 Points +7%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
108 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
108 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
107 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
106 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
103 Points
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18497 Points +54%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18016 Points +50%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
16130 Points +34%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15556 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11997 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
11036 Points -8%
Single Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1851 Points +8%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1824 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1783 Points +4%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1771 Points +3%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1747 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1719 Points
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
279 Points +14%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
278 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
268 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
258 Points +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
251 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
245 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2746 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2738 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2537 Points +4%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2470 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2448 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
2121 Points -13%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
715 Points +10%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
701 Points +8%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
692 Points +7%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
691 Points +6%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
679 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
649 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7196 Points +46%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7188 Points +46%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6346 Points +29%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6277 Points +27%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
4935 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
4294 Points -13%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3.34 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.32 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.27 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.13 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
2.99 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.93 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
33.95 Points +19%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
33.49 Points +18%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
29.8 Points +5%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
29.76 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
28.47 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
21.11 Points -26%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14374 Points +6%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
14300 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14163 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13938 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13515 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
13378 Points -1%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
95005 Points +24%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
88902 Points +16%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
85872 Points +12%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
84721 Points +11%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
76558 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
69621 Points -9%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
296 Seconds * -13%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
261 Seconds *
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
202 Seconds * +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
197 Seconds * +25%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
178 Seconds * +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
171 Seconds * +34%
wPrime 2.10
32m
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
4.111 s * -17%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3.523 s * -0%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
3.521 s *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3.254 s * +8%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2.703 s * +23%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.648 s * +25%
1024m
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
441.275 s * -3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
429.446 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
202.68 s * +53%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
139.617 s * +67%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
98.896 s * +77%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.222 s * +77%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 1
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
335.5 (329min - 340max) fps +13%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
325 (323min - 328max) fps +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
297.5 (283min - 313max) fps
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
292.5 (291min - 296max) fps -2%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
289 (286min - 292max) fps -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
262 (259min - 282max) fps -12%
Pass 2
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
158.2 (157.4min - 158.8max) fps +44%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
154.15 (153.8min - 154.3max) fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
143.7 (143min - 145.2max) fps +30%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
140.8 (138.2min - 144.7max) fps +28%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
110.15 (104.3min - 134.9max) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
92.2 (91min - 114.5max) fps -16%
WinRAR - Result
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7945 KB/s +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7940 KB/s +25%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7723 KB/s +21%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7490 KB/s +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7327 KB/s +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
6365 KB/s
TrueCrypt
AES Mean 100MB
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15.1 GB/s +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
14.4 GB/s +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
13.3 GB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11.3 GB/s -15%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
11.2 GB/s -16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10.6 GB/s -20%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
2.3 GB/s
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2.1 GB/s -9%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2 GB/s -13%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1.9 GB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.8 GB/s -22%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1.7 GB/s -26%
Serpent Mean 100MB
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1.3 GB/s 0%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1.3 GB/s 0%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1.3 GB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1.1 GB/s -15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1.1 GB/s -15%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1 GB/s -23%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13392 Points +16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12662 Points +10%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12261 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12143 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11536 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
10028 Points -13%
Single-Core
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2008 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1958 Points +15%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1856 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1790 Points +5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1746 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1708 Points
Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Multi-Core
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
13228 Points +15%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12438 Points +8%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12127 Points +6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12086 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
11464 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
9892 Points -14%
5.0 Single-Core
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1918 Points +14%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1900 Points +13%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1821 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
1710 Points +2%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1708 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
1678 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
8253 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8034 Points +9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7635 Points +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7602 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7389 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6927 Points -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
48723 Points +14%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
47960 Points +12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47777 Points +12%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
45250 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
42713 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
37359 Points -13%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
22600 Points +25%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
21875 Points +21%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21762 Points +20%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
20846 Points +15%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
18126 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
16634 Points -8%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
71934 MIPS +28%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
70733 MIPS +26%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
70707 MIPS +26%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
66438 MIPS +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
56068 MIPS
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
47146 MIPS -16%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6744 MIPS +16%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
6644 MIPS +14%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
5881 MIPS +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
5828 MIPS
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5560 MIPS -5%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5485 MIPS -6%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
20.9 fps +42%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
20.6 fps +40%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
20.5 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.6 fps +33%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
14.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
12.3 fps -16%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4693 sec *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4652 sec * +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4632 sec * +1%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
0.4627 sec * +1%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
0.4392 sec * +6%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
0.4351 sec * +7%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
54.8 s * -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
49.5 s * -6%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
47.5 s * -1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
46.8 s *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
44.5 s * +5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.6 s * +15%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
333 Points +23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
300 Points +11%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
291 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
276 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
271 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
264 Points -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
550 ms *
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
535 ms * +3%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
532 ms * +3%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
517 ms * +6%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
511 ms * +7%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
503 ms * +9%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
26194 Points +11%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
26038 Points +10%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
25816 Points +9%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
25043 Points +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
23640 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
22242 Points -6%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11481 Points +18%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
10824 Points +11%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
10397 Points +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10014 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
9741 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7985 Points -18%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
7.512 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
7.454 s * +1%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7.442 s * +1%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
7.331 s * +2%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7.168 s * +5%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6.751 s * +10%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
18.402 s * -12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
18.138 s * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
16.436 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
16.424 s * -0%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16.125 s * +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
14.879 s * +9%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
665.289 s * -57%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
529.929 s * -25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H
424.723 s *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H
396.475 s * +7%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
394.754 s * +7%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
304.446 s * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
9326
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
14274 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
76558 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
13515 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
13392
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
53904
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
2.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
23.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
91.64 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.93 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
28.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
90.43 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
245 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2448 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
104 fps
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
649 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4935 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11997 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1719 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
680 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
96.2 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
92.2 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
82.4 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
56.1 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
25916 KRay/s +120%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
25359 KRay/s +115%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
17544 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
17312 KRay/s +47%
Average of class Mini PC
  (561 - 51004, n=119, last 2 years)
12449 KRay/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11780 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
10476 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
109747 Points +84%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
107540 Points +80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
91112 Points +52%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88829 Points +49%
Average of class Mini PC
  (3604 - 214250, n=119, last 2 years)
62645 Points +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
59787 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
54166 Points -9%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
4753 MB/s +69%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
4695 MB/s +67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
4343 MB/s +54%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
4246 MB/s +51%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2813 MB/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (225 - 9399, n=119, last 2 years)
2760 MB/s -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2504 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
118174 Points +29%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
116083 Points +26%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
91925 Points
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
89748 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
87291 Points -5%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
82291 Points -10%
Average of class Mini PC
  (8172 - 184747, n=119, last 2 years)
77998 Points -15%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
14876 Points +82%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
14663 Points +79%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
10759 Points +32%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
10247 Points +25%
Average of class Mini PC
  (408 - 29064, n=119, last 2 years)
8538 Points +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
8181 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7317 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
58597 Points +99%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
57402 Points +95%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
45718 Points +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
44874 Points +53%
Average of class Mini PC
  (1958 - 113499, n=119, last 2 years)
32689 Points +11%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
29407 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
26850 Points -9%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
164414 MB/s +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
154066 MB/s +46%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
144741 MB/s +37%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
105740 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
95500 MB/s -10%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
85572 MB/s -19%
Average of class Mini PC
  (3691 - 325960, n=119, last 2 years)
85358 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
1233 MB/s +51%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1183 MB/s +44%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
1048 MB/s +28%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
1020 MB/s +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
819 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
745 MB/s -9%
Average of class Mini PC
  (74.8 - 2039, n=119, last 2 years)
714 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
13875 KRay/s +122%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
13517 KRay/s +117%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
9284 KRay/s +49%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
9270 KRay/s +49%
Average of class Mini PC
  (308 - 26952, n=119, last 2 years)
6658 KRay/s +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6242 KRay/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5777 KRay/s -7%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
45560 MPixel/s +61%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
40570 MPixel/s +43%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
40245 MPixel/s +42%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
33092 MPixel/s +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28315 MPixel/s
Average of class Mini PC
  (4408 - 50500, n=119, last 2 years)
27805 MPixel/s -2%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24858 MPixel/s -12%

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Den kontinuerliga Cinebench R15-slingan för vårt testexemplar löper nästan parallellt med den för Geekom XT12 Pro. I slutändan kan dock den nyare XT13 Pro-modellen dra iväg med en klar ledning. Man kan också se att det lilla kylsystemet inte lyckas bibehålla SoC:ns turbo över en längre tidsperiod. Den maximala effektgränsen på 64 watt nås bara under en kort tid eftersom strömförbrukningen måste strypas på grund av de höga temperaturerna.

CPU-mätvärden under Cinebench R15-loopen
CPU-mätvärden under Cinebench R15-loopen
01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1851 (1675.95-2471.58)
Aoostar GEM12 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2530 (2503.13-2552.81)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H: Ø2784 (2721.64-2831.86)
Acemagic F2A Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2759 (2690.7-2800.92)
Geekom XT12 Pro Intel Core i9-12900H, Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1545 (1395.97-2133.22)
Geekom A7 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2410 (2285.58-2581.81)

Systemets prestanda

I testerna av systemprestanda är den dokumenterade prestandan hos Geekom XT13 Pro bara tillräckligt bra för en plats längst ner i rankningen. Subjektivt kan vi dock säga att Geekom XT13 Pro erbjuder anständig prestanda. Vi kunde inte observera några märkbara latenser när vi arbetade med enheten under testfasen. När det gäller valet av RAM-minne tar den långsammare DDR4-standarden sin hämnd, vilket framgår av AIDA64-riktmärkena. Tekniskt sett är Intel Core i9-13900H kombineras med DDR5 (5 200 MT/s).

PCMark 10 / Score
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
7510 Points +23%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
7455 Points +22%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7431 Points +22%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
7120 Points +17%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
6295 Points +3%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
6102 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
11273 Points +3%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
11125 Points +2%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
11114 Points +2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
11030 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
10908 Points
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10822 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
10484 Points +40%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10482 Points +40%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
10291 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
8901 Points +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
8114 Points +8%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
7490 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1939 Points +6%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1861 Points +1%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1837 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1802 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1675 Points -9%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1931 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1919 Points -1%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1849 Points -4%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1700 Points -12%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1540 Points -20%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1378 Points -29%
CrossMark / Creativity
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
2072 Points +10%
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
2040 Points +8%
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1929 Points +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1889 Points
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1883 Points 0%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1870 Points -1%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1872 Points +7%
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Core i9-12900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1831 Points +4%
Geekom A7, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
AMD Radeon 780M, Acer N5000
1781 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Core i9-13900H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Acer N7000
1756 Points
Acemagic F2A, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1717 Points -2%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1589 Points -10%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
71990 MB/s +54%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
67777 MB/s +45%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
67161 MB/s +44%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
62397 MB/s +34%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6481 - 89287, n=119, last 2 years)
47585 MB/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46670 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45792 MB/s -2%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
75449 MB/s +64%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
64323 MB/s +40%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
61542 MB/s +34%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
61006 MB/s +33%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48963 MB/s +6%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6914 - 99171, n=119, last 2 years)
48328 MB/s +5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
45998 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
86810 MB/s +84%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
86677 MB/s +83%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
70596 MB/s +49%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
65057 MB/s +38%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6862 - 98583, n=119, last 2 years)
52056 MB/s +10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47241 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47201 MB/s 0%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
149 ns * -80%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
146.1 ns * -76%
Average of class Mini PC
  (44.9 - 184.8, n=119, last 2 years)
91.9 ns * -11%
Geekom A7
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
89 ns * -7%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
88.6 ns * -7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
83 ns *
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
74.7 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Vi ser inga extremt överdrivna DPC-latenstider med Geekom XT13 Pro. Detta var fallet med Geekom XT12 Pro. Ändå är vårt testprov långt ifrån enastående resultat. Vi nådde det maximala värdet även när vi helt enkelt surfar med Edge-webbläsaren.

Maximal fördröjning när flera webbläsarflikar öppnas
Maximal fördröjning när flera webbläsarflikar öppnas
Maximal latenstid vid uppspelning av 4K-videomaterial
Maximal latenstid vid uppspelning av 4K-videomaterial
Maximal fördröjning efter tio sekunder med Prime95
Maximal fördröjning efter tio sekunder med Prime95
Förare rangordnade efter längsta genomförandetid
Förare rangordnade efter längsta genomförandetid
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2724 μs * -63%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2151 μs * -29%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2069.2 μs * -24%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
1671.7 μs *
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
1616.1 μs * +3%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1001.9 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

Masslagring

Acer N7000 SSD (2 TB)
Acer N7000 SSD (2 TB)

Geekom XT13 Pro är utrustad med en SSD med 2 TB lagringsutrymme från Acer. Samma modell fanns redan i Geekom GT13 och levererade en fantastisk prestanda i alla tester. Den tekniska anslutningen är optimal och de resulterande överföringshastigheterna är mycket höga. Under kontinuerlig belastning har Acer N7000 små problem med att hålla läsprestandan stabil. Lyckligtvis finns det ingen extrem nackdel. Som framgår av diagrammet kan Acer N7000 fortfarande prestera betydligt bättre med minskad läsprestanda än Geekom XT12 Pro eller Acemagic F2A. Testet av Geekom XT12 Pro avslöjade ett problem med termokuddens position, vilket inte är fallet med Geekom XT13 Pro. Värmedynorna är i rätt position. Som vi redan nämnt i underhållsavsnittet kan en extra SSD installeras i Geekom XT13 Pro. Den andra M.2-platsen stöder dock endast SATA SSD-enheter med en längd på 42 millimeter (M.2-2242).

För ytterligare jämförelser och benchmarks, vänligen se vår Jämförelsetabell.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
Acer N7000
Sequential Read: 3706 MB/s
Sequential Write: 4324 MB/s
512K Read: 2122 MB/s
512K Write: 3620 MB/s
4K Read: 73.35 MB/s
4K Write: 330.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 1038 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 770 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
88.9 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
82.1 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
65.8 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
58.2 pt
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
54.8 pt
Average of class Mini PC
 
46.7 pt
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
45.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
3755 (3733.85min - 3754.99max) MB/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3690 (2901.41min - 3690.32max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3108 (3065.99min - 3107.56max) MB/s -16%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2315 (2293.84min - 2315.26max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Mini PC
  (233 - 4357, n=119, last 2 years)
2288 MB/s -38%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2178 (2158.39min - 2177.68max) MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1674 (1242.56min - 1673.54max) MB/s -55%
seq write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4619 (4584.79min - 4619.39max) MB/s +10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4196 (3895.46min - 4196.19max) MB/s
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
3492 (3398.43min - 3491.76max) MB/s -17%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3386 (3076.94min - 3385.64max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Mini PC
  (222 - 5595, n=119, last 2 years)
2448 MB/s -42%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2341 (2252.02min - 2341.4max) MB/s -44%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1348 (1117.85min - 1347.87max) MB/s -68%
seq q8 t1 read
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
6932 (5986.51min - 6931.53max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
5213 (4500.71min - 5212.95max) MB/s -25%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
4861 (4468.61min - 4860.57max) MB/s -30%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
4769 (3791.02min - 4769.24max) MB/s -31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4676 (4310.07min - 4675.81max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Mini PC
  (236 - 8430, n=119, last 2 years)
3706 MB/s -47%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
3194 (2810.81min - 3194.17max) MB/s -54%
seq q8 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
5793 (5555.78min - 5793.38max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4754 (4738.27min - 4754.03max) MB/s -18%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
4695 (4470.16min - 4694.73max) MB/s -19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3729 (3700.15min - 3728.95max) MB/s -36%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
3255 (2485.13min - 3254.57max) MB/s -44%
Average of class Mini PC
  (228 - 6669, n=119, last 2 years)
2743 MB/s -53%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2212 (1222.43min - 2212.27max) MB/s -62%
4k q1 t1 read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
78.7 (78.09min - 78.69max) MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
70.3 (66.06min - 70.34max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
64.1 (56.32min - 64.06max) MB/s -9%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
63.5 (59.81min - 63.5max) MB/s -10%
Average of class Mini PC
  (5.67 - 86.6, n=119, last 2 years)
54.7 MB/s -22%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
52.3 (51.85min - 52.27max) MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
47.3 (47.07min - 47.31max) MB/s -33%
4k q1 t1 write
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
335 (332.49min - 335.43max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
279 (237.61min - 279.08max) MB/s -17%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
274 (271.38min - 273.89max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.4 - 435, n=119, last 2 years)
194.7 MB/s -42%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
187.2 (181.54min - 187.2max) MB/s -44%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
184.4 (177.6min - 184.36max) MB/s -45%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
165.9 (164.35min - 165.92max) MB/s -50%
4k q32 t16 read
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4158 (4048.89min - 4158.05max) MB/s
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3197 (3174.44min - 3196.85max) MB/s -23%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1824 (1239.47min - 1824.09max) MB/s -56%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
1560 (1546.89min - 1559.94max) MB/s -62%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1452 (1402.67min - 1451.9max) MB/s -65%
Average of class Mini PC
  (26.1 - 4158, n=119, last 2 years)
1360 MB/s -67%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1143 (1091.01min - 1142.98max) MB/s -73%
4k q32 t16 write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3639 (3534.46min - 3639.09max) MB/s +16%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3142 (2751.87min - 3141.57max) MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1499 (1114.25min - 1499.4max) MB/s -52%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1434 (1410.26min - 1433.71max) MB/s -54%
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.2 - 4288, n=119, last 2 years)
1287 MB/s -59%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
595 (582.97min - 594.71max) MB/s -81%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
497 (467.49min - 497.28max) MB/s -84%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10021 Points +50%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
6667 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
5975 Points -10%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
5177 Points -22%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
4987 Points -25%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
4412 Points -34%
Average of class Mini PC
  (181.5 - 10021, n=117, last 2 years)
4121 Points -38%
Score Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3741 Points +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2635 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2119 Points -20%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
1685 Points -36%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1561 Points -41%
Average of class Mini PC
  (61 - 3741, n=117, last 2 years)
1534 Points -42%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1482 Points -44%
Score Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4371 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2807 Points +2%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2777 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2741 Points
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
2676 Points -2%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2082 Points -24%
Average of class Mini PC
  (88 - 4371, n=117, last 2 years)
1851 Points -32%
Seq Read
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
4882 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
4349.85 MB/s -11%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4317 MB/s -12%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
3779 MB/s -23%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
3650 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC
  (291 - 6620, n=117, last 2 years)
3161 MB/s -35%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
3010 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
4188 MB/s +19%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
3936.64 MB/s +12%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
3506 MB/s
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
2611 MB/s -26%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
2369 MB/s -32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2285 MB/s -35%
Average of class Mini PC
  (240 - 5783, n=117, last 2 years)
2212 MB/s -37%
4K Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
89.3 MB/s +6%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
84.3 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
80.89 MB/s -4%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
63.3 MB/s -25%
Average of class Mini PC
  (6.08 - 104.3, n=117, last 2 years)
58.9 MB/s -30%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
49.7 MB/s -41%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
41.8 MB/s -50%
4K Write
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
316.33 MB/s +9%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
291 MB/s
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
238 MB/s -18%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
221 MB/s -24%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
196.9 MB/s -32%
Average of class Mini PC
  (30.9 - 366, n=117, last 2 years)
175.1 MB/s -40%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
160 MB/s -45%
4K-64 Read
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3220 MB/s +56%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2062 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
1602.91 MB/s -22%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
1270 MB/s -38%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1218 MB/s -41%
Average of class Mini PC
  (23.4 - 3220, n=117, last 2 years)
1159 MB/s -44%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
1041 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Write
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
3731 MB/s +78%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
2340 MB/s +11%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
2255 MB/s +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
2100 MB/s
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
2066.57 MB/s -2%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
1649 MB/s -21%
Average of class Mini PC
  (32.8 - 3731, n=117, last 2 years)
1455 MB/s -31%
Access Time Read
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
0.138 ms * -100%
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.022 - 0.489, n=117, last 2 years)
0.09726 ms * -41%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.076 ms * -10%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.069 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.067 ms * +3%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
0.049 ms * +29%
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
0.046 ms * +33%
Access Time Write
Acemagic F2A
Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
0.126 ms * -125%
Average of class Mini PC
  (0.014 - 0.765, n=117, last 2 years)
0.1153 ms * -106%
Geekom A7
Acer N5000
0.072 ms * -29%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
0.059 ms * -5%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Acer N7000
0.056 ms *
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
0.02 ms * +64%
Aoostar GEM12
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
0.017 ms * +70%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro Acer N7000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5637 (4899.21-6932.56)
Aoostar GEM12 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5121 (4152.57-5218.34)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4683 (3872.18-4767.25)
Acemagic F2A Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1320 (771.89-3141.95)
Geekom XT12 Pro Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø1764 (1425.22-4795.56)
Geekom A7 Acer N5000; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4848 (4561.2-4857.36)

Grafik

Intel Iris Intel Iris Xe-grafik G7 hanterar 3D-beräkningarna och är ansvarig för bildutmatningen. Med 96 EUs är Intel Core i9-13900H är den snabbaste modellen i serien. Den föråldrade modellen har dock svårt att hävda sig mot de moderna representanterna. Om Geekom redan hade vågat ta steget att installera en Meteor Lake SoC i XT13 Pro, hade man kunnat förvänta sig en tydligt märkbar ökning av 3D-prestandan. Prestandan hos en Intel Arc 8-kärnig iGPU kan ses perfekt i jämförelsedata. Samtidigt får du ännu mer 3D-prestanda om en AMD Radeon 780M installeras i systemet. Geekom själva erbjuder nu flera enheter med denna iGPU, vilket innebär att tillverkaren gör livet svårt för sig själv i denna disciplin. Ett exempel på detta är Geekom A7, den Geekom A8eller Geekom AE7.

Ytterligare jämförelser och riktmärken finns i vår GPU-jämförelsetabell.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
97.5 pt
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
93.5 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
92.9 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
91.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
58.5 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
54.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
13932 Points +88%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
13410 Points +81%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12085 Points +63%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
11691 Points +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
7428 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
6975 Points -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3205 Points +91%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3193 Points +90%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2968 Points +76%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2846 Points +69%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1682 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
1581 Points -6%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
8391 Points +44%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
8007 Points +37%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7710 Points +32%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
7599 Points +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
5845 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
5421 Points -7%
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
34.6 fps +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
31.6 fps +27%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
29.7 fps +19%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
26 fps +4%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
24.9 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
21.8 fps -12%
Extreme Preset DX11
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
36.3 fps +41%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
33.2 fps +29%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32.7 fps +27%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
32 fps +25%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
25.7 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
22.7 fps -12%
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
24.5 fps +61%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
18.5 fps +22%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
17.7 fps +16%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17.1 fps +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.2 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
13.3 fps -12%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
32.4 fps +108%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
21 fps +35%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
18.3 fps +17%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
15.6 fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
13.9 fps -11%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
12.2 fps -22%
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
12174 Points +84%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10491 Points +59%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
10102 Points +53%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9725 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
6603 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
5950 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p High
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3592 Points +59%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3391 Points +50%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3341 Points +48%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3129 Points +39%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
2254 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
2035 Points -10%
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1920 Points +70%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1812 Points +61%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1737 Points +54%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1577 Points +40%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1128 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
1042 Points -8%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9796 Points +171%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
9494 Points +163%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7480 Points +107%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
6270 Points +73%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
3616 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
3390 Points -6%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
483 Points +67%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
479 Points +65%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
469 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
427 Points +47%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
290 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
231 Points -20%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
484 Points +69%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
481 Points +68%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
462 Points +62%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
422 Points +48%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
286 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
246 Points -14%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2574 Points +202%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2477 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1961 Points +130%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1620 Points +90%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
860 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2608 Points +201%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
2519 Points +191%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1594 Points +84%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
1274 Points +47%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
872 Points +1%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3650 Points +176%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
3535 Points +167%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3076 Points +133%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2444 Points +85%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1323 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
1182 Points -11%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
817 Samples/s +30%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
801 Samples/s +28%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
640 Samples/s +2%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
627 Samples/s
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
549 Samples/s -12%
Sala GPUs-only
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
2732 Samples/s +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2319 Samples/s +18%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
1970 Samples/s
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1522 Samples/s -23%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1496 Samples/s -24%
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
5308 Points +23%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4928 Points +14%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
4332 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-12900H
3830 Points -12%
Aoostar GEM12
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
1709 Points -61%
Geekom A7
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
1396 Points -68%
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-13900H
Aoostar GEM12, AMD Radeon 780M
R7 8845HS
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 9 185H
Acemagic F2A, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Ultra 7 155H
Geekom XT12 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-12900H
Geekom A7, AMD Radeon 780M
R9 7940HS
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
309%
36%
25%
-4%
278%
187%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
3.63
11.2
209%
4.23
17%
5.05
39%
3.49
-4%
11.1
206%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
3.15
19.9
532%
6.03
91%
4.61
46%
3.05
-3%
14.1
348%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
16
33.4
109%
18.5
16%
17.9
12%
14.8
-7%
31.4
96%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
7.9
23.2
194%
11.1
41%
10
27%
7.78
-2%
24.8
214%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
10.3
20.4
98%
14.9
45%
12.9
25%
9.69
-6%
20.9
103%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
6.13
64.1
946%
6.24
2%
5.7
-7%
6.29
3%
61.4
902%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
26.8
47.7
78%
37.7
41%
35.4
32%
23.9
-11%
47
75%
3DMark 05 Standard
29045 poäng
3DMark 06 Score 1366x768
30156 poäng
3DMark Vantage P Result
28599 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
8024 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
155640 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
28112 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5448 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2570 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
1920 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
183 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score
1276 poäng
Hjälp

Prestanda för spel

Intel Iris Xe iGPU klarar inte av de flesta spel. Den åldrade iGPU:n uppnår bara adekvata bildfrekvenser, om ens det, i låga upplösningar och en låg eller medelhög grafikförinställning. Om du fortfarande vill använda Geekom XT13 Pro för spel måste du ta omvägen via ett externt grafikkort. Olika modeller kan användas med enheten via USB4.

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
155.8 (135.9min) fps +33%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
152.7 (134.2min) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
117.2 (74.5min) fps
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
106.5 (61min) fps -9%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
106.3 (81.7min) fps -9%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
103.2 (59.8min) fps -12%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
87.6 (75min) fps +21%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
86.6 (72.2min) fps +19%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
79 (48.2min) fps +9%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
77.3 (52.5min) fps +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
72.5 (53min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
61.3 (54.1min) fps -15%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
167.5 (5.17min, 125P1) fps +36%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
165.1 (4.83min, 125P1) fps +34%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
163.6 (4.63min, 111.1P1) fps +32%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
161 (4.76min, 100P1) fps +30%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
123.5 (30.5min, 66.7P1) fps
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Geekom A7
Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS, Acer N5000
66.6 (4.46min, 37P1) fps +201%
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
65.3 (4.57min, 45.5P1) fps +195%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
41.2 (3.12min, 30.3P1) fps +86%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
31.3 (2.94min, 22.7P1) fps +42%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
22.1 (7.08min, 16.4P1) fps
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
42.4 (35.7min) fps +128%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
34.3 (29.1min) fps +84%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
29.5 (24.1min) fps +59%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
18.6 (15.4min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
16.4 (13.6min) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
26.3 (22.2min) fps +102%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
24 (20.6min) fps +85%
Acemagic F2A
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kingston OM8SEP1024Q-A0
20.4 (13.8min) fps +57%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
13 (11min) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-12900H, Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
11.5 (10min) fps -12%
Baldur's Gate 3
1280x720 Low Preset
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
60.3 (21.3min, 36P0.1, 46.1P1) fps +114%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
28.2 (13.8min, 15.1P0.1, 19.8P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset
Aoostar GEM12
Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
24.7 (16.6min, 17.1P0.1, 19.4P1) fps +83%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
13.5 (11.2min, 11.2P0.1, 11.6P1) fps
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
43.1 (36min, 26P1) fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
26.7 (23min, 17P1) fps

FPS chart

05101520Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø11.2 (9.21-12.9)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.7 (20.1-23.3)
lågmed.högultra
GTA V (2015) 123.5 105.9 22.1 9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 117.2 82.9 72.5 66.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 46 25.7 18.2
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 19.9 15.4 13.5 13
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 18.6 15 13 11.4
F1 24 (2024) 43.1 37.3 26.7

Geekom XT13 Pro prestandakontroll med en Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Geekom XT13 Pro har två USB4-portar, som stöder användningen av externa grafikkort. Utan att påverka det övergripande resultatet genomförde vi några tester med Razer Core X och ett Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Jämfört med den åldrade iGPU: n i Intel Core i9-13900H kan 3D-prestandan ökas massivt. Jämförelsen med de andra testenheterna visar ett nästan identiskt resultat i de syntetiska testerna. Spelprestanda kan också ökas avsevärt med denna kombination, vilket kan ses från de testade spelen. Ibland kan till och med de mest moderna spelen avnjutas i full detalj.

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
99 pt
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
99 pt
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
98 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
96.2 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
95.2 pt
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
94.8 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
34666 Points +367%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
34034 Points +358%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
33454 Points +350%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
33219 Points +347%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
32654 Points +340%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
32085 Points +332%

7428 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
11182 Points +565%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
11156 Points +563%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
11118 Points +561%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
11085 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
11062 Points +558%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10935 Points +550%

1682 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
25842 Points +342%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
25468 Points +336%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
25462 Points +336%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
25415 Points +335%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
24809 Points +324%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
24796 Points +324%

5845 Points
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7139 Points +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7079 Points +464%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
7047 Points +461%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7046 Points +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
7044 Points +461%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6997 Points +457%

1256 Points
Unigine Superposition
1280x720 720p Low
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
34726 Points +426%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
34168 Points +417%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
33894 Points +413%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
31986 Points +384%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
31903 Points +383%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
25121 Points +280%

6603 Points
1920x1080 1080p High
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
15240 Points +576%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
15076 Points +569%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
15008 Points +566%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
14959 Points +564%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
14859 Points +559%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
14853 Points +559%

2254 Points
1920x1080 1080p Extreme
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7193 Points +538%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
7098 Points +529%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
7089 Points +528%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
7064 Points +526%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
7055 Points +525%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
7029 Points +523%

1128 Points
3840x2160 4k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
9419 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
9315 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
9240 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
9205 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
9188 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
9149 Points
7680x4320 8k Optimized
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
4079 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
4061 Points
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
4042 Points
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
4016 Points
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
4013 Points
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
4009 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
144.5 fps +851%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
143.9 fps +847%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
142.2 fps +836%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
141.6 fps +832%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
140.6 fps +825%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
135.9 fps +794%

15.2 fps
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
138.6 fps +788%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.2 fps +786%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
137.6 fps +782%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
137.5 fps +781%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
137 fps +778%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
133.5 fps +756%

15.6 fps
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
174.9 fps +602%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
174.5 fps +601%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
173.6 fps +597%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
173.5 fps +597%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
172.3 fps +592%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
172.1 fps +591%

24.9 fps
Extreme Preset DX11
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
164.2 fps +539%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
163.6 fps +537%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
163.2 fps +535%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
162.5 fps +532%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
162 fps +530%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
158.8 fps +518%

25.7 fps
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, Score
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
28156 Points +679%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
28076 Points +676%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
27929 Points +672%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
27843 Points +670%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
27669 Points +665%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
25975 Points +618%

3616 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2719 Points +838%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2715 Points +836%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2708 Points +834%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2687 Points +827%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2681 Points +824%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2527 Points +771%

290 Points
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2663 Points +831%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
2657 Points +829%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
2641 Points +823%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
2622 Points +817%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
2614 Points +814%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2463 Points +761%

286 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
5769 Points +578%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
5760 Points +577%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
5742 Points +575%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
5726 Points +573%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
5652 Points +564%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5342 Points +528%

851 Points
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6335 Points +632%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
6319 Points +630%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
6283 Points +626%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
6275 Points +625%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
6223 Points +619%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5881 Points +579%

866 Points
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
10671 Points +707%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
10626 Points +703%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
10594 Points +701%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
10548 Points +697%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
10445 Points +689%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
9762 Points +638%

1323 Points
Photoshop PugetBench - GPU Score
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
100.6 Points +32%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
98.3 Points +28%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
93.7 Points +22%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
81.6 Points +7%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
81.2 Points +6%

76.5 Points
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
66.3 Points -13%
Premiere Pro PugetBench - GPU 0.9
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
55.8 Points +598%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
55.8 Points +598%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
48 Points +500%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
47.9 Points +499%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-13900H
47.3 Points +491%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
Intel Core i9-12900H
45.6 Points +470%

8 Points
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
106 (82.3min) fps +233%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
101.4 (78.7min) fps +219%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
88.7 (68min) fps +179%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
84.9 (65.5min) fps +167%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
79.5 (59.3min) fps +150%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
70.2 (53.5min) fps +121%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
31.8 (24.6min) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
81.5 (64.7min) fps +443%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
81.4 (65.1min) fps +443%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
81.2 (65.1min) fps +441%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
80.4 (63.9min) fps +436%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
78.9 (63min) fps +426%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
72.2 (55.8min) fps +381%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
15 (12.4min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
64.5 (50.7min) fps +466%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
64.4 (49.9min) fps +465%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
63.9 (49.4min) fps +461%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
63.5 (50.1min) fps +457%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
63.3 (47.6min) fps +455%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
60.8 (43.6min) fps +433%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
11.4 (9.68min) fps
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
113.4 (62.4min, 69.4P0.1, 78.1P1) fps +470%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
113.3 (60min, 68.1P0.1, 78.5P1) fps +469%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
113 (47.4min, 65.4P0.1, 77.5P1) fps +468%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
110.4 (37.6min, 67.1P0.1, 77.2P1) fps +455%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
110.1 (57.6min, 68.5P0.1, 75.3P1) fps +453%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
109.5 (51.8min, 62.3P0.1, 74.4P1) fps +450%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
19.9 (15.5min, 15.6P0.1, 16.4P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
91.3 (51.4min, 53.4P0.1, 61.1P1) fps +493%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
90.8 (48.5min, 55.2P0.1, 61.7P1) fps +490%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
90.4 (50.6min, 54.8P0.1, 59.8P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
90.1 (50.2min, 55.2P0.1, 61.6P1) fps +485%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
88.5 (53.2min, 55.5P0.1, 59.9P1) fps +475%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
87.3 (36.9min, 43.6P0.1, 57.2P1) fps +467%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
15.4 (11.8min, 11.9P0.1, 12.7P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
79 (45.4min, 46P0.1, 53.2P1) fps +508%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
78.5 (46.2min, 47P0.1, 53.1P1) fps +504%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
78.3 (46.6min, 47.4P0.1, 51.3P1) fps +502%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
78.2 (40.1min, 46.3P0.1, 52.6P1) fps +502%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
76.8 (44.1min, 46.7P0.1, 49.8P1) fps +491%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
76.3 (41.3min, 43.7P0.1, 50P1) fps +487%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
13 (10.1min, 10.1P0.1, 11P1) fps
F1 24
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
88.2 (48min, 52P1) fps +105%
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
88.1 (48min, 49P1) fps +104%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
77.3 (42min, 43P1) fps +79%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
76.9 (42min, 44P1) fps +78%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
75 (42min, 43P1) fps +74%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
72.6 (41min, 43P1) fps +68%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
43.1 (36min, 26P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
84.5 (47min, 49P1) fps +127%
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
82.2 (47min, 49P1) fps +120%
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
74.1 (42min, 43P1) fps +99%
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
73.1 (42min, 43P1) fps +96%
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
72.8 (41min, 41P1) fps +95%
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
70 (41min, 42P1) fps +88%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Acer N7000
37.3 (32min, 26P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 7940HS
46.4 (27min, 26P1) fps
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, R9 8945HS
46.1 (27min, 27P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
42.2 (24min, 25P1) fps
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-13900H
42 (24min, 25P1) fps
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, i9-12900H
41.8 (24min, 24P1) fps
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE)
, Ultra 5 125H
39.5 (22min, 23P1) fps
Geekom XT13 Pro, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
i9-13900H
Geekom XT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
i9-13900H
Geekom GT13 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
i9-13900H
Geekom XT12 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
i9-12900H
Minisforum UH125 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
Ultra 5 125H
Geekom AE7 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
R9 7940HS
Geekom A8 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE),
R9 8945HS
Average of class Mini PC
 
SPECviewperf 2020
391%
387%
321%
182%
395%
516%
187%
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
3.63
13
258%
10.8
198%
11.8
225%
10.9
200%
13
258%
10.8
198%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
3.15
20.9
563%
21
567%
18.9
500%
17.8
465%
20.9
563%
50.3
1497%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
16
74.2
364%
76.4
378%
62.7
292%
26.6
66%
76.8
380%
76.6
379%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
7.9
39.4
399%
40.1
408%
32.8
315%
23.6
199%
39.2
396%
38.8
391%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
10.3
47.2
358%
47.3
359%
40
288%
28.7
179%
46.5
351%
45.9
346%
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
6.13
16.5
169%
16.5
169%
15.2
148%
11.4
86%
16.6
171%
16.6
171%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
26.8
194
624%
196
631%
155
478%
47.5
77%
199
643%
195
628%
lågmed.högultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 182.2 178.4 170.3 104.2 92.7 103.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 165.8 138.3 132 121.9 104.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 183.7 142.2 98.8 77.6 48.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 146.4 137.9 106.3 92.1
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 113 91.3 79 78.5 61.6 37.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 88.2 81.4 71.7 64.4 44.5 22.2
F1 24 (2024) 76.9 73.1 60.5 42.2 36.9 19.2

Utsläpp - Svag kylning och låg energiförbrukning

Bullerutsläpp

Inte ens enheterna med samma design kunde imponera med toppvärden när det gäller bulleremissioner. Detta gäller även Geekom XT13 Pro, åtminstone under belastning. Mini-PC:n är mycket tyst när den är i viloläge och knappt hörbar. Fläkten är dock alltid igång, vilket innebär att semipassiv drift inte är möjlig. Under belastning varvar fläkten ibland upp rejält, och vi kunde mäta en maximal ljudtrycksnivå på 49,5 dB(A). Den maximala volymen är dock inte alltid närvarande. Under stresstestet varierade fläkthastigheten om och om igen, så att Geekom XT13 Pro bara nådde 38 dB(A) under belastning. Vi observerade samma fenomen under genomsnittlig belastning. Här fluktuerar den mätbara volymen mellan 38 och 42,2 dB(A)

Tyvärr är Geekom XT12 Pro inte en av de tystaste enheterna. Enheten arbetar nästan ljudlöst på tomgång, endast ett tyst fläktljud hörs. Detta förändras under belastning, då mini-PC:n är tydligt hörbar med upp till 44,2 dB(A). Vi kunde till och med mäta upp till 47,2 dB(A) under spel. Vi kunde dock inte upptäcka en permanent hög ljudtrycksnivå under spel. Här fluktuerade resultatet mellan 39 och 47,2 dB(A).

 

 

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
27.6 / 27.8 / 27.9 dB(A)
Hög belastning
42.2 / 49.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.837.340.737.134.738.802542.342.638.836.335.140.403139.538.632.935.634.735.704029.127.5242424.229.305033.136.53230.831.428.206328.929.926.226.323.822.408024.922.221.820.220.214.9010027.721.620.318.318.516.8012524.72116.615.3159.1016025.922.215.915.816.110.1020026.228.915.615.115.213.3025027.623.715.115.214.18.6031528.923.614.915.715.28.304002925.121.820.119.18.7050030.625.714.915.114.68.106303329.314.114.314.78.8080036.232.414.414.814.59.70100041.233.215.415.415.710.80125038.831.914.714.91511.90160035.428.41313.112.911020004032.417.817.817.511.70250040.532.618.81918.712.6031503728.914.11414.113.10400040.433.314.814.714.414.50500036.526.714.614.514.414.60630030.820.414.714.814.614.90800027.817.71515.114.914.801000022.516.815.515.515.315.201250018.315.615.115.21515.30160001615.715.815.615.114.80SPL49.542.227.927.827.6250N6.43.710.90.90.60median 30.6median 25.7median 15.1median 15.2median 15median 11.9Delta5.54.61.31.20.62.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGeekom XT13 Pro
Geekom XT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom XT12 Pro
i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Geekom A7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Noise
10%
1%
2%
2%
-9%
off / environment *
25
24.3
3%
24.1
4%
24.9
-0%
25.4
-2%
25.4
-2%
Idle Minimum *
27.6
27.5
-0%
29.8
-8%
25.4
8%
28
-1%
33.3
-21%
Idle Average *
27.8
27.6
1%
29.9
-8%
25.7
8%
28.1
-1%
33.6
-21%
Idle Maximum *
27.9
27.6
1%
30
-8%
25.7
8%
28.5
-2%
33.7
-21%
Load Average *
42.2
36
15%
37.3
12%
47.8
-13%
39.6
6%
43.3
-3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
46.6
35.4
24%
Load Maximum *
49.5
38.2
23%
43.5
12%
49
1%
44.2
11%
43.3
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
35.4
40.2
45.23
47.2
43.2

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Höljet värms upp märkbart under belastning. Vi kan dock inte hitta några kritiska värden. SoC:n ser lite annorlunda ut, eftersom Geekom inte begränsar den maximala temperaturen, som snabbt når 100 °C under belastning. Till skillnad från Cinebench R15 multi-loop överskrider Intel Core i9-13900H inte 64-wattsgränsen i stresstestet. SoC:n värms upp för snabbt och prestandan måste sänkas. Under en längre tid stabiliseras temperaturen sedan på cirka 90 °C, vilket inte är något problem för processorn. Den extremt kompakta designen gör det helt enkelt omöjligt att installera ett mer kraftfullt kylsystem.

Stresstest Prime95, solo
Stresstest Prime95, solo
FurMark stresstest, solo
FurMark stresstest, solo
Prime95 och FurMark stresstest
Prime95 och FurMark stresstest
Geekom XT13 Pro stresstest (överst)
Geekom XT13 Pro stresstest (överst)
Geekom XT13 Pro stresstest (botten)
Geekom XT13 Pro stresstest (botten)
Geekom XT13 Pro stresstest (baksida)
Geekom XT13 Pro stresstest (baksida)
Strömförsörjningsenhet under stresstest
Strömförsörjningsenhet under stresstest
Hög belastning
 43.4 °C45.7 °C45.1 °C 
 35.7 °C42 °C40.9 °C 
 32 °C37.3 °C32.9 °C 
Max: 45.7 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C
40 °C40.1 °C40.3 °C
34.2 °C37.8 °C35.8 °C
34.7 °C35.4 °C32.1 °C
Max: 40.3 °C
Medel: 36.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  45.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.2 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Mini PC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 24 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.2 °C / 97 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.2 °C / 90 F.

Strömförbrukning

Strömförbrukningen för Geekom XT13 Pro står sig mycket bra i jämförelse med konkurrenterna. Vi uppmätte endast låga värden även i viloläge. De låga effektgränserna (PL1 och PL2) för Intel Core i9-13900H säkerställer ett relativt lågt energibehov under belastning. Under genomsnittlig belastning klarar sig systemet med lite mindre än 50 watt. Under belastning ser vi bara 94,5 watt under en kort tid när systemet fortfarande kan använda Turbo. Vi kunde observera ett något märkligt beteende. I Cinebench R23 Sigle-testet dokumenterade vi många spikar, vilket aldrig har setts i andra testanordningar. Vi upprepade testet flera gånger - med samma resultat. Det är rimligt att anta att SoC upprepade gånger arbetar vid en temperaturgräns i det här fallet, vilket gör att den kortvarigt kan absorbera mer ström. Strömförsörjningen tillhandahålls av en liten strömförsörjningsenhet med 120 watt. Samma strömförsörjningsenhet ingår i många Geekom-enheter.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 1.6 / 2.8 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 6.3 / 7.1 / 9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 49.8 / 94.5 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Geekom XT13 Pro
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Aoostar GEM12
R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
Acemagic F2A
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
Geekom XT12 Pro
i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
Geekom A7
R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Mini PC
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-34%
-35%
-21%
11%
3%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
6.3
8.2
-30%
8.2
-30%
9.1
-44%
5.7
10%
3.8
40%
Idle Average *
7.1
10
-41%
12.1
-70%
10.3
-45%
9.5
-34%
4.8
32%
8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193)
-20%
Idle Maximum *
9
14.6
-62%
14
-56%
14.4
-60%
16.5
-83%
6.5
28%
10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193)
-20%
Load Average *
49.8
73.9
-48%
53.1
-7%
54.9
-10%
53.3
-7%
71.9
-44%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
54
79.9
-48%
Load Maximum *
94.5
95.3
-1%
100.4
-6%
110.4
-17%
87.8
7%
94.7
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Efficiency

Performance Rating - Percent
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
100 pt
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
86.3 pt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
78.4 pt
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
72.7 pt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
67.3 pt
Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
251 Points per Watt +31%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
205 Points per Watt +7%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
192.3 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
183.7 Points per Watt -4%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
182.7 (48.6min, 48.7P1 - 81.3max) Points per Watt -5%
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
61.7 Points per Watt +55%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
55.6 Points per Watt +39%
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
54.2 Points per Watt +36%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
39.9 Points per Watt
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
37.1 Points per Watt -7%
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor)
Geekom A8
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, Radeon 780M
35.8 Points per Watt +30%
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core
31.2 Points per Watt +13%
Geekom XT13 Pro
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
27.5 Points per Watt
Acemagic F2A
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
26.6 Points per Watt -3%
Geekom XT12 Pro
Intel Core i9-12900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
24.7 Points per Watt -10%

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.45 (6.3-9.04)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10 (9.28-14.3)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.2 (10.9-14.1)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.4 (9.08-14.4)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.6 (76-85.2)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø43.8 (42.6-45.7)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.4 (45.6-52.4)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.2 (53.8-88.4)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø84.4 (83.6-85.1)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.8 (87.6-95.4)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø92.2 (78.7-114)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø54 (52.8-55.9)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR - external Monitor: Ø79.9 (75.5-83.5)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø49.8 (46-53.2)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø73.9 (55.4-87)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø53.1 (49.6-57.6)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø54.9 (50.2-57)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø89 (87.1-94.5)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø83.6 (80.7-95.3)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.1 (94.2-100.4)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø99.6 (92-110.4)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø89 (83.2-91.1)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (74.2-89.2)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø88 (87.7-88.3)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103 (99.2-107)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø43.1 (15.9-70.3)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34 (31.1-57.1)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø33.3 (28.9-63)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø32.7 (19.4-55.3)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø62.4 (49.8-87.7)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.3 (72.3-87.5)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø87.7 (87.3-88.3)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.7 (97.2-108.6)
Geekom XT13 Pro i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø52.1 (50.2-55.2)
Aoostar GEM12 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø83.1 (79.2-88.5)
Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø50.3 (47.7-65.3)
Acemagic F2A Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø49.7 (47.3-60.6)

För

+ Robust och kompakt hölje
+ modern design och högkvalitativa metallytor
+ perfekt utförande
+ snabb SoC med P- och E-kärnor
+ 2x USB4
+ lätt att öppna
+ snabb 2 TB SSD
+ 36 månaders garanti

Emot

- låg iGPU-prestanda
- tydligt hörbar under belastning
- högt inköpspris

Bedömning - Premiumpris utan premiumprestanda

Geekom XT13 Pro i test - tillhandahållen av Geekom
Geekom XT13 Pro i test - tillhandahållen av Geekom

Geekom XT13 Pro är en kraftfull mini-PC. Vi kunde dock redan intyga detta med Geekom XT12 Pro. Om vi bara jämför dessa två modeller med varandra kan du välja den äldre enheten utan någon märkbar prestandaförlust. Den nya Intel Core i9-13900H i Geekom XT13 Pro kan inte ge en märkbar ökning av prestanda. De tekniska skillnaderna jämfört med Intel Core i9-12900H är för små. Geekom vågar inte ta det djärva steget med en mini-PC baserad på Meteor Lake-serien. Detta innebär att Geekom hamnar på efterkälken, eftersom många andra tillverkare redan har utrustat sina modellserier med de senaste processorerna från Intel. Den största nackdelen med Geekom XT13 Pro är iGPU: n, som är sämre än de moderna representanterna i alla tester. Geekom är dock inte bara sämre än sina konkurrenter här utan också för sig själv. Geekoms egen portfölj innehåller mini-PC: er med de senaste AMD SoC: erna, som tekniskt sett inte är mycket sämre, men som ger ett bättre resultat. Vi har inte ens tittat på priset än. Tyvärr är Geekom XT13 Pro helt utanför linjen här. 999 euro är det som gäller om den ska vara toppmodellen. Andra mini-PC:er kostar lite mindre men erbjuder mer prestanda.

Geekom XT13 Pro levererar adekvat prestanda med Intel Core i9-13900H och imponerar med sina mångsidiga funktioner. Pris-prestanda-förhållandet för Geekom XT13 Pro matchar dock inte alls.

De goda anslutningsmöjligheterna, med vilka Geekom upprepade gånger har fått poäng tidigare, bör betonas positivt. De många anslutningarna inkluderar två USB4-portar, vilket kan påverka köpbeslutet när det gäller framtidssäkring. Den treåriga tillverkargarantin talar också till förmån för en enhet från Geekom. Naturligtvis är detta också tillgängligt för andra enheter från tillverkaren. Effektiviteten kunde bara ökas något jämfört med Geekom XT12 Pro. I denna disciplin är Intel Core i9-13900H tydligt underlägsen de modernare Meteor Lake-processorerna. Av denna anledning kan vi inte ge Geekom XT13 Pro en köprekommendation, inte ens i förhållande till det höga inköpspriset. Om Geekom XT13 Pro inte ska bli en hyllvärmare måste Geekom snarast se över sin nuvarande prissättning.

Obs: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Ytterligare information hittar du här.

Pris och tillgänglighet

Geekom XT13 Pro finns att köpa från Geekom eller Amazon.

Geekom XT13 Pro - 07/30/2024 v8
Sebastian Bade

Design
88 / 98 → 89%
Anslutningar
65 / 81 → 80%
Vikt
82%
Spelprestanda
29 / 80 → 36%
Programprestanda
80 / 92 → 86%
Workstation
24%
AI Performance
75%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
75%
Medel
50%
72%
Mini PC - Vägt medel
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
66.2%
Repairability
12.5%
Software Updates
39%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 28%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Geekom XT13 Pro recension: NUC mini-PC klarar sig utan Meteor Lake och får bara en Intel Core i9-13900H
Sebastian Bade, 2024-08- 5 (Update: 2024-08- 5)