Notebookcheck Logo

RedMagic Titan 16 Pro recension: En spelbärbar dator tillverkad av en smarttelefontillverkare

Debut.

Tillverkaren Nubia, som är känd för sina spel-smartphones, har gått in på marknaden för bärbara speldatorer med sin RedMagic Titan 16 Pro: Core i9, en GeForce RTX 4060 och en 16-tums skärm (QHD+, DCI-P3, 240 Hz, G-Sync) lovar alla en solid mellanklassenhet. Vår recension kommer att avslöja om denna första lansering var en framgång.

Regelbundna besökare på denna webbplats kanske redan känner till varumärket "RedMagic" från gaming-smarttelefonsegmentet (till exempel Nubia RedMagic 9 Pro). RedMagic Titan 16 Pro är Nubias första utflykt till den bärbara datorvärlden för spel. Dess datablad innehåller inga överraskningar: A Core i9-14900HX är ihopkopplad med en GeForce RTX 4060. Till detta kommer en 16-tumsskärm med bildförhållandet 16:10, Thunderbolt 4, DDR5 RAM och 2 SSD-platser.

Huruvida Nubia kan stå upp mot den redan väletablerade konkurrensen återstår att se. Titan konkurrerar mot följande enheter: Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9, HP Victus 16 (2024), Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024), XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) och Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024).

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 2250 MHz, Minne: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP, GDDR6, 32.0.15.6081, Advanced Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR5-5600, Single-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (one in use)
Skärm
16.00 tum 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixlar 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS, G-Sync, DCI-P3, glansig: nej, 240 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Moderkort
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Hårddisk
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 891 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Conexant CX8070
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Headset combined port, Kortläsare: SD, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 23.9 x 358 x 262
Batteri
80.1 Wh, 5182 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD + IR
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja
Vikt
2.388 kg, Strömförsörjning: 860 g
Pris
1759 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
81.2 %v8
08/2024
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
82.3 %v8
07/2024
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.55 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.3 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05/2024
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.9 mm16.10"1920x1080
86.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05/2024
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
81.2 %v8
07/2024
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
83.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
03/2024
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25.1 mm16.00"1920x1200

Observera: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Mer information finns tillgänglig här.

Fodral - Nubia har valt ett aluminiumfodral

Du bör alltid ha en rengöringsduk i närheten: Det mattsvarta fodralets ytor är superkänsliga för att samla fingeravtrycksmärken. Aluminiumfodralets basenhet och lock kan bara vridas en liten bit och vi stötte inte på några byggfel. Att trycka på baksidan av locket resulterar inte i några bildförändringar. De mycket täta gångjärnen håller locket stadigt på plats och det vickar bara minimalt. Dess maximala öppningsvinkel är 130 grader och du kan öppna det med en hand.

Tillsammans med den bärbara datorns bakgrundsbelysta tangentbord ger två LED-element lite färg i mixen: RedMagic-bokstäverna på gångjärnskåpan och logotypen på locket lyser i regnbågens alla färger. Alla element kan styras individuellt. Bokstäverna fungerar också som en batteriindikator: ett rött blinkande ljus indikerar en låg laddningsnivå.

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro

Inom jämförelsefältet visar sig Titan vara en av de mest kompakta och lätta enheterna. Ändå är skillnaderna jämfört med tävlingen ganska små.

Storleksjämförelse

369 mm 259.4 mm 23.9 mm 2.4 kg363.4 mm 261.75 mm 26.55 mm 2.5 kg361 mm 259 mm 25.1 mm 2.6 kg357.78 mm 278.63 mm 25.95 mm 2.6 kg358 mm 262 mm 23.9 mm 2.4 kg359.5 mm 273 mm 19.9 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

Anslutningsmöjligheter - Titan har Thunderbolt 4

Titan är utrustad med tre USB-A-portar (2x USB 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1) samt en USB-C-port (Thunderbolt 4). Den senare har stöd för Power Delivery och DP Alt-läge. Den har totalt två videoutgångar (1x HDMI, 1x DP). Ett ljuduttag och en ethernet-port (1 GBit/s) kompletterar det totala paketet.

Videoutgångarna, nätverksuttaget och strömanslutningen är alla placerade på enhetens baksida, så motsvarande kablar bör inte vara i vägen under användning. En positiv sak är att det finns en USB-A-port på vänster och höger sida av den bärbara datorn.

Vänster sida: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), SD-kortläsare
Vänster sida: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), SD-kortläsare
Höger sida: ljudkombination, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), plats för ett Kensington-lås
Höger sida: ljudkombination, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), plats för ett Kensington-lås
Baksida: strömanslutning, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DP Alt-läge), HDMI 2.1, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Gigabit Ethernet
Baksida: strömanslutning, Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, DP Alt-läge), HDMI 2.1, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Gigabit Ethernet

SD-kortläsare

SD-kortläsaren (referenskort: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) är inte en av de snabbaste i sitt slag, men den levererar stabila datahastigheter i det medelsnabba intervallet. Om man jämför detta med värdena för Blade 16 (2024) visar att betydligt högre överföringshastigheter skulle kunna vara möjliga.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
171 (169.48min - 194.55max) MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
86 MB/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
85 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20 MB/s -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Intel Core i9-14900HX
181.81 MB/s +104%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
25.8 MB/s -71%

Kommunikation

Det finns inga överraskningar när det gäller nätverksalternativen: Trådbundna anslutningar hanteras av en etablerad Gigabit Ethernet-kontroller (RTL8168/8111, 1 GBit/s) från Realtek. Intels WiFi 6E-chip (AX211) levererar bra till mycket bra datahastigheter under optimala förhållanden (inga WiFi-enheter i närheten, kort avstånd mellan bärbar dator och server).

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1549 (752min - 1707max) MBit/s +46%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1337 (789min - 1521max) MBit/s +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=149, last 2 years)
1233 MBit/s +17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1143 (930min - 1352max) MBit/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1058 (543min - 1423max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
980 (886min - 1077max) MBit/s -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Realtek RTL8852BE
776 (487min - 929max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1683 (1630min - 1706max) MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1672 (1316min - 1721max) MBit/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1658 (1631min - 1690max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1477 (1386min - 1517max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)
1394 MBit/s -16%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -17%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Realtek RTL8852BE
978 (960min - 990max) MBit/s -41%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
957 (475min - 998max) MBit/s -42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1040 (543-1423)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1550 (752-1707)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (487-929)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø980 (886-1077)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1143 (930-1352)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1336 (789-1521)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1631-1690)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1477 (1386-1517)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø978 (960-990)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø941 (475-998)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1671 (1316-1721)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (1630-1706)

Webbkamera

Webbkameran (2,1 MP) är av standardtyp, inklusive stöd för Windows Hello. Kameran har inget mekaniskt lock eller någon fysisk på/av-strömbrytare.

ColorChecker
11.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro: 10.69 ∆E min: 3.37 - max: 20.32 ∆E

Tillbehör

Förutom de vanliga dokumenten (snabbstartsguide och garantiinformation) medföljer inga ytterligare tillbehör till den bärbara datorn.

Underhåll

Efter att alla skruvar på undersidan av höljet har lossats kan den nedre delen av höljet tas bort med hjälp av ett plektrum eller en platt spatel. Då kommer man åt minnesbankerna (varav en är upptagen), SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), andra SSD-platsen (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) WLAN-modul, BIOS-batteri, fläktar och batteri.

Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Hårdvara Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro

Hållbarhet

Mycket kartong, lite plast: Den bärbara datorn är omsluten av en film, medan en tunn skummatta skyddar enhetens ovansida. Den tryckta snabbstartsguiden ligger i en plastpåse. En löstagbar bottenplatta gör det möjligt att reparera den bärbara datorn - hela hårdvaran är åtkomlig. Mjukvaruuppdateringar borde inte vara något problem under de närmaste åren - Windows 11 används trots allt som operativsystem.

Det återstår att se hur Nubia kommer att hantera leverans av reservdelar och support för sin egen programvara. Vid testtillfället finns det fortfarande inget nedladdningsområde för Titan på Nubias webbplats.

Garanti

Vi kan inte ge någon information om garantin för den bärbara datorn - den är troligen cirka 12 månader, vilket är standard i USA. Vi anser att utökade garantier är osannolika.

Inmatningsenheter - RedMagic bärbar dator med RGB-belysning

Tangentbord

Nubia har valt ett chiclet-tangentbord med en numerisk knappsats. De jämnt upplysta tangenterna har en kort rörelse och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Tangentbordet ger inte efter när du skriver på det. En positiv sak är att de förskjutna piltangenterna är i full storlek. RGB-bakgrundsbelysningen är uppdelad i fyra zoner, och vår testenhet har en QWERTY-tangentbordslayout. Vi kan inte säga om tillverkaren erbjuder lokaliserade layouter.

Pekplatta

En multi-touch clickpad (ca 11,7 x 7,5 cm) med glasyta fungerar som musersättning. Den har en kort rörelseväg och en tydlig tryckpunkt. Dynan kan avaktiveras vid behov.

Tangentbord Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Tangentbord Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro

Skärm - En IPS-panel med DCI-P3-täckning

Det verkar som att det arbetsvänliga bildförhållandet 16:10 har etablerat sig, eftersom de flesta bärbara datorer i jämförelsefältet har skärmar med detta bildförhållande - inklusive Titan. Nubia har utrustat sin bärbara dator med en matt, betraktningsvinkelstabil IPS-skärm (2 560 x 1 600 pixlar) med en diagonal på 16 tum. Panelen är superljus och dess kontrast uppfyller målvärdet. Det är fullt möjligt att läsa på skärmen utomhus. Positivt är att 240-Hz-panelen inte visar några tecken på PWM-flimmer och stöder G-Sync. Alternativa skärmar är inte tillgängliga.

Sub-pixlar
Sub-pixlar
Blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen
Blödning i bakgrundsbelysningen
Friluftsliv
Friluftsliv
Betraktningsvinklar
Betraktningsvinklar
542
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
545
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 545 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 515.7 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 543 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1065:1 (Svärta: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.69
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.999
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
BOE NE160QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Chi Mei CMN163E, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1", 144 Hz
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, LED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
BOE NE160WUM-NX6, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 165 Hz
Display
2%
-48%
1%
-15%
-48%
Display P3 Coverage
96.3
99.22
3%
41.3
-57%
95.9
0%
68.8
-29%
41.8
-57%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.93
0%
61.7
-38%
99.8
0%
99.5
0%
62.4
-38%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
84.1
87.81
4%
42.7
-49%
86.4
3%
70.8
-16%
43.3
-49%
Response Times
-54%
-454%
-52%
-126%
-635%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
3.9 ?(1.7, 2.2)
4.8 ?(2.2, 2.6)
-23%
28.6 ?(13.3, 15.3)
-633%
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
-28%
12.7 ?(6, 6.7)
-226%
40.5 ?(19, 21.5)
-938%
Response Time Black / White *
5 ?(1.2, 3.8)
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
-84%
18.7 ?(9.6, 9.1)
-274%
8.8 ?(4.7, 4.1)
-76%
6.3 ?(2.5, 3.8)
-26%
21.6 ?(11.1, 10.5)
-332%
PWM Frequency
Screen
4%
-74%
18%
-2%
-68%
Brightness middle
543
518
-5%
287
-47%
521
-4%
416
-23%
353
-35%
Brightness
516
491
-5%
288
-44%
506
-2%
392
-24%
318
-38%
Brightness Distribution
86
90
5%
86
0%
85
-1%
86
0%
81
-6%
Black Level *
0.51
0.36
29%
0.19
63%
0.44
14%
0.38
25%
0.21
59%
Contrast
1065
1439
35%
1511
42%
1184
11%
1095
3%
1681
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.19
4.32
-35%
5.46
-71%
1.74
45%
2.33
27%
5.21
-63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.09
6.37
10%
20.36
-187%
3.88
45%
6.07
14%
19.95
-181%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.69
0.75
-9%
3.52
-410%
0.52
25%
1.02
-48%
3.61
-423%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
3.66
13%
4.8
-14%
3
29%
3.7
12%
3.6
14%
Gamma
1.999 110%
2.19 100%
2.108 104%
2.164 102%
2.161 102%
2.367 93%
CCT
7431 87%
6841 95%
6442 101%
6816 95%
7102 92%
7138 91%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -4%
-192% / -123%
-11% / 4%
-48% / -22%
-250% / -145%

* ... smaller is better

Panelen täcker sRGB- och DCI-P3-färgrymderna helt eller nästan helt, men inte AdobeRGB-färgrymden - detta liknar skärmarna hos de flesta konkurrenter. Dess anständiga färgåtergivning direkt ur lådan kan ökas till mycket bra genom att utföra en kalibrering: Då sjunker dess färgavvikelse från 3,19 till 0,69 (mål: DeltaE < 3). Samtidigt ser dess gråskaleavbildning mycket mer balanserad ut.

Vår färgprofil kan laddas ner och användas kostnadsfritt. En länk finns i informationsrutan på displayen.

CalMAN: gråskala
CalMAN: gråskala
CalMAN: färgmättnad
CalMAN: färgmättnad
CalMAN: Färgkontroll
CalMAN: Färgkontroll
CalMAN: gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: gråskala (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: färgmättnad (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (kalibrerad)
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs sRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs sRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro jämfört med AdobeRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro jämfört med AdobeRGB
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs DCI-P3
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro vs DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 3.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.7 ms rise
↘ 2.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100 % ljusstyrka
100 % ljusstyrka
75 % ljusstyrka
75 % ljusstyrka
50 % ljusstyrka
50 % ljusstyrka
25 % ljusstyrka
25 % ljusstyrka
0 % ljusstyrka
0 % ljusstyrka

Prestanda - Raptor Lake och Ada Lovelace driver den bärbara datorn

Titan 16 Pro riktar sig till spelare och kreatörer, och fokus ligger förmodligen på det förstnämnda. A Core i9-14900HX och en GeForce RTX 4060 driver den bärbara datorn. Dess MRSP är US $ 1,699. Nubia erbjuder ytterligare varianter av den här enheten, men de kan ännu inte hittas globalt.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia systeminformation
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Testförhållanden

Tre tillverkarspecifika prestandaprofiler (se tabell) finns att välja mellan. Balanserat läge (benchmarks) och kontorsläge (batteritester) användes under vårt test. GPU-läget var inställt på dynamiskt (= Optimus). Varje profil kan hämtas direkt via en separat knapp i den övre raden på det numeriska tangentbordet. Alternativt kan du ändra dem via Goper-applikationen (den bärbara datorns kontrollcenter).

Direktval av profil via knappar. Knappsymbolerna representerar sannolikt fläktens rotationshastighet.
Direktval av profil via knappar. Knappsymbolerna representerar sannolikt fläktens rotationshastighet.
Balanserat läge Spelläge Kontorsläge
Effektgräns 1 (HWInfo) 45 watt 100 watt 35 watt
Effektgräns 2 (HWInfo) 140 watt 140 watt 140 watt
Buller (Cyberpunk 2077) 50 dB(A) 53 dB(A) 47 dB(A)
Prestanda (Cyberpunk 2077) 66 fps 66 fps 60 fps
Goper
Goper
Goper

Processor

Titan har endast ett CPU-alternativ tillgängligt, nämligen Core i9-14900HX (Raptor Lake). Dess 24 CPU-kärnor (8P + 16E = 32 trådar) når maximala klockfrekvenser på 5,8 GHz (P) och 4,1 GHz (E). Kontinuerlig belastning med flera trådar (CB15-loop) fick CPU-klockan att sjunka avsevärt från första till tredje körningen. Därefter bibehölls en ganska konstant nivå. Profilen för spelläget säkerställer en betydligt högre prestandanivå.

De tre strömlägena ger mycket likartad prestanda i enstaka trådar på ungefär samma nivå som CPU:ns genomsnitt. Prestandan i flera trådar skiljer sig åt i mycket större utsträckning: Endast gaming-läget resulterade i värden i nivå med CPU:ns genomsnitt under vårt test, medan de andra två lägena var betydligt lägre.

Mer information om Core i9 finns i vår analysartikel.

Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Multi-thread (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)
Enkel tråd (ansluten till elnätet)

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2240 (2071.36-3453.93)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3774 (3668.72-4136.93)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø2658 (2509.88-3812.18)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Intel Core i7-14700HX: Ø3274 (3212.59-3455.14)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø3394 (3129.4-4350.66)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Intel Core i7-13650HX: Ø2018 (1801.23-2863.69)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Intel Core i9-14900HX; Gaming Mode: Ø3831 (3628.12-4559.96)
CB15 Loop (balanserat läge)
CB15 Loop (balanserat läge)
CB15 Loop (spelläge)
CB15 Loop (spelläge)
CB15 Loop (kontorsläge)
CB15 Loop (kontorsläge)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
85.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
82.5 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
81.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
80.8 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
78.3 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
70.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.5 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
66.3 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
62.8 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17078 - 36249, n=36)
28815 Points +69%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
28122 Points +65%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
28122 Points +65%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28075 Points +64%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23887 Points +40%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
23207 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)
21784 Points +28%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
18879 Points +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17078 Points
Single Core
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2165 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1720 - 2245, n=36)
2149 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2128 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
2104 Points -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2103 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2049 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1886 Points -13%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
1813 Points -16%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
1702 Points -21%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
11396 Points +73%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6579 - 13832, n=36)
10958 Points +67%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
10498 Points +60%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
10474 Points +59%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
9244 Points +41%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
8361 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years)
8290 Points +26%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
7197 Points +9%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6579 Points
CPU (Single Core)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
826 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (657 - 859, n=36)
824 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
818 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
813 Points -2%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
803 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
789 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years)
725 Points -12%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
700 Points -15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
651 Points -21%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
4560 Points +32%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 5589, n=37)
4420 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4350 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
4137 (3668.72min - 4136.93max) Points +20%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3812 Points +10%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3455 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3454 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years)
3413 Points -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
2864 Points -17%
CPU Single 64Bit
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
314 Points
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
310 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (247 - 323, n=36)
305 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
300 Points -4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
294 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
281 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years)
277 Points -12%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
256 Points -18%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
238 Points -24%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
226 Seconds * -10%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
206 Seconds *
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
173 Seconds * +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=183, last 2 years)
170.9 Seconds * +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
140 Seconds * +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
130 Seconds * +37%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
129 Seconds * +37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
126 Seconds * +39%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (91 - 206, n=36)
121.2 Seconds * +41%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (66769 - 136645, n=36)
111340 MIPS +67%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
104730 MIPS +57%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
104193 MIPS +56%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
93134 MIPS +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=187, last 2 years)
85120 MIPS +27%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
84900 MIPS +27%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
84799 MIPS +27%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
73927 MIPS +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
66769 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7161 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (5452 - 7545, n=36)
7021 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
6979 MIPS -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
6914 MIPS -3%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
6890 MIPS -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=187, last 2 years)
6306 MIPS -12%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
5828 MIPS -19%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
5747 MIPS -20%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
5641 MIPS -21%
Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
17562 Points +33%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13158 - 19665, n=36)
17312 Points +32%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
17292 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
17086 Points +30%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
14807 Points +13%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
14434 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 19665, n=111, last 2 years)
14175 Points +8%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
13554 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
13158 Points
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
3036 Points
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
3031 Points 0%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
2975 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2419 - 3129, n=36)
2967 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
2884 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
2764 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1490 - 3129, n=111, last 2 years)
2648 Points -13%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
2505 Points -17%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
2378 Points -22%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
19597 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 23194, n=36)
19403 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
18749 Points +31%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
18225 Points +28%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
16732 Points +17%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
16612 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=188, last 2 years)
14972 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
14270 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
13434 Points -6%
Single-Core
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2160 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2133 Points -1%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2131 Points -1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
2117 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=36)
2093 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
1941 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=188, last 2 years)
1892 Points -12%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
1810 Points -16%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
1700 Points -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
29.4 fps +75%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (16.8 - 38.9, n=36)
29.3 fps +74%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
27.4 fps +63%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
26.5 fps +58%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
24.6 fps +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=187, last 2 years)
23.4 fps +39%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
22 fps +31%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
18.9 fps +13%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16.8 fps
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.3.4.2)
55.3 s * -63%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.3.4.2)
52.3 s * -54%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=184, last 2 years)
47.4 s * -39%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
46.4 s * -36%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (31.4 - 85.1, n=36)
43.3 s * -27%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.3.4.2)
42.5 s * -25%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2, Gaming Mode)
39.4 s * -16%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.3.4.2)
38.9 s * -14%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.3.4.2)
34 s *
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.4896 sec * -32%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX
0.4407 sec * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=188, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.409 sec * -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.4003 sec * -8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=36)
0.3853 sec * -4%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX
0.3821 sec * -3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3699 sec *
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
0.3668 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3454 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
287 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
314 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
826 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6579 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2165 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17078 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
817 Points
Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
128.4 Points
Hjälp
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
94.2 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85.2 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
79.3 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58.6 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
56.4 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (13098 - 33474, n=35)
24776 KRay/s +89%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
24078 KRay/s +84%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23676 KRay/s +81%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=184, last 2 years)
21813 KRay/s +67%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
21558 KRay/s +65%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
21393 KRay/s +63%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
16932 KRay/s +29%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13404 KRay/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13098 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (67573 - 166040, n=35)
124243 Points +84%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
121025 Points +79%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
116556 Points +72%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
110279 Points +63%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
107531 Points +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=184, last 2 years)
106435 Points +58%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
86338 Points +28%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
68241 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
67573 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
6137 MB/s +71%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3589 - 7979, n=35)
6137 MB/s +71%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5615 MB/s +56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5567 MB/s +55%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
5056 MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=184, last 2 years)
4884 MB/s +36%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
4008 MB/s +12%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
3589 MB/s
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
3127 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
152200 Points +23%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
150835 Points +22%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
139355 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148966, n=35)
138178 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
136489 Points +11%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
129836 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
123488 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=184, last 2 years)
116781 Points -5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
110589 Points -10%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
15467 Points +48%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (10475 - 18517, n=35)
15240 Points +45%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
14434 Points +38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13846 Points +32%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
13605 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=184, last 2 years)
13235 Points +26%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11704 Points +12%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
10475 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9134 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (32543 - 83662, n=35)
61114 Points +88%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
59744 Points +84%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
58380 Points +79%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
54174 Points +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=184, last 2 years)
53598 Points +65%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
52621 Points +62%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
42125 Points +29%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
33391 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
32543 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
216070 MB/s +58%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=35)
139720 MB/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
136951 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
113157 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=184, last 2 years)
108960 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
107172 MB/s -22%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
98391 MB/s -28%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
82161 MB/s -40%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
64436 MB/s -53%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
1911 MB/s +81%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1054 - 2292, n=35)
1792 MB/s +70%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1682 MB/s +60%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1643 MB/s +56%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1494 MB/s +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=184, last 2 years)
1358 MB/s +29%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1177 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1136 MB/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
1054 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6809 - 18349, n=35)
13343 KRay/s +96%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
12928 KRay/s +90%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
12778 KRay/s +88%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=184, last 2 years)
11747 KRay/s +73%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11481 KRay/s +69%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
11438 KRay/s +68%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
9029 KRay/s +33%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
7270 KRay/s +7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
6809 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
49671 MPixel/s +107%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
48831 MPixel/s +104%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (23903 - 54702, n=35)
46809 MPixel/s +95%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
46636 MPixel/s +95%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=185, last 2 years)
40045 MPixel/s +67%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
39448 MPixel/s +65%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
36796 MPixel/s +54%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600)
23970 MPixel/s
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (v6.92.6600, Gaming Mode)
23903 MPixel/s 0%

Systemets prestanda

Det välfungerande systemet ger tillräckligt med kraft för krävande applikationer som spel, rendering och streaming. En del av datorkraften förblir dock oanvänd eftersom RAM-minnet (16 GB, DDR5-5600) endast körs i enkanaligt läge - den bärbara datorns låga minnesöverföringshastigheter jämfört med konkurrenterna bekräftar detta. Att installera en andra minnesmodul (= dual-channel mode aktivt) skulle kunna råda bot på detta.

RAM-minnet körs i enkanaligt läge.
RAM-minnet körs i enkanaligt läge.
PCMark 10 / Score
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
8302 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8278 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8166 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7830 - 8322, n=2)
8076 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7789 Points -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
7613 Points -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
7528 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
11708 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (11022 - 11413, n=2)
11218 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11087 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11022 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years)
10828 Points -2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
10778 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10725 Points -3%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
10333 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
11014 Points +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
10273 Points +5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
10204 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (9776 - 10558, n=2)
10167 Points +4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
9910 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years)
9897 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9823 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9776 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
14135 Points +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
12909 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (12091 - 12979, n=2)
12535 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12511 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12091 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years)
12085 Points 0%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
11359 Points -6%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
10841 Points -10%
CrossMark / Overall
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2235 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (2103 - 2184, n=2)
2144 Points +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2132 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2103 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2067 Points -2%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1951 Points -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1923 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)
1905 Points -9%
CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2093 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2042 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (2040 - 2042, n=2)
2041 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1973 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1911 Points -6%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1864 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)
1805 Points -12%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1782 Points -13%
CrossMark / Creativity
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2455 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2399 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2371 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (2240 - 2472, n=2)
2356 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2240 Points
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2107 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)
2090 Points -7%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2057 Points -8%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2053 Points +8%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
1907 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1899 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1885 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1849 - 1899, n=2)
1874 Points -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
1835 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1734 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)
1704 Points -10%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (329 - 339, n=2)
334 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
329 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
323 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
319 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=163, last 2 years)
303 Points -8%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
302 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
301 Points -9%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
276 Points -16%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (309 - 319, n=2)
314 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
309 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
307 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
273 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=149, last 2 years)
267 Points -14%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
260 Points -16%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
251 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
542 ms * -23%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
511 ms * -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=177, last 2 years)
504 ms * -15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
467 ms * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
461 ms * -5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
447 ms * -2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
439 ms *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (430 - 439, n=2)
435 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7830 poäng
Hjälp
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78788 MB/s +82%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78742 MB/s +82%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
75827 MB/s +75%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (38028 - 83392, n=35)
74992 MB/s +73%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
66599 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=184, last 2 years)
65173 MB/s +51%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
59896 MB/s +39%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43236 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
86175 MB/s +81%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85460 MB/s +80%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83034 MB/s +74%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43306 - 87568, n=35)
81259 MB/s +71%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
81049 MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=184, last 2 years)
69015 MB/s +45%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
68612 MB/s +44%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
47588 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76689 MB/s +97%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73167 MB/s +88%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (37146 - 80589, n=35)
72271 MB/s +85%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70034 MB/s +80%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=184, last 2 years)
66990 MB/s +72%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65204 MB/s +67%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
60298 MB/s +55%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
39011 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.4 ns * -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=184, last 2 years)
94 ns * -18%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * -14%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.4 ns * -13%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (76.1 - 105, n=35)
84.8 ns * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84 ns * -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
82.7 ns * -4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
79.7 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC-latenstider

Höga latenser förhindrar video- och ljudredigering i realtid. Framtida programuppdateringar kan leda till förbättringar eller till och med försämringar.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2500.7 μs *
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2316.1 μs * +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1791.8 μs * +28%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
1451.9 μs * +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
951.7 μs * +62%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
853.9 μs * +66%

* ... smaller is better

Lagringsenheter

PCIe 4 SSD (M.2-2280) från Samsung erbjuder en lagringskapacitet på 1 TB och levererar mycket bra datahastigheter. Positivt: Vi observerade ingen termiskt inducerad strypning. Den bärbara datorn har plats för en andra PCIe 4 SSD.

En PCIe 4 SSD fungerar som systemenhet.
En PCIe 4 SSD fungerar som systemenhet.
Det finns plats för en andra SSD.
Det finns plats för en andra SSD.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7001 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5205 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 997.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 747.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4034 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3774 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 79.06 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 211.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
91.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
90.8 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.8 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.2 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
72 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
71.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.2 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4104 (4091.75min - 4103.68max) MB/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3795 (3728.41min - 3794.55max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=85)
3764 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3497 (3441.46min - 3497.42max) MB/s -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3469 (3344.35min - 3469.11max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)
3468 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2556 (2209.35min - 2555.51max) MB/s -33%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2366 (2263.79min - 2365.89max) MB/s -38%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4834 (4439.32min - 4834.12max) MB/s +33%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4659 (4410.1min - 4659.12max) MB/s +29%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4533 (4522.27min - 4532.95max) MB/s +25%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3895 (3747.67min - 3894.8max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)
3802 MB/s +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3625 (3598.44min - 3624.51max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=85)
3578 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3403 (3360.48min - 3402.53max) MB/s -6%
seq q8 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
7058 (6624.24min - 7058.17max) MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7049 (5964.33min - 7049.37max) MB/s +6%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
6933 (6552.34min - 6933.16max) MB/s +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6654 (5651.22min - 6654.47max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6599 (5813.31min - 6598.9max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=85)
6477 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)
6305 MB/s -5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
5152 (4288.44min - 5152.1max) MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6896 (6883.77min - 6896.11max) MB/s +38%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5265 (5223.42min - 5264.69max) MB/s +6%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4990 (4969.33min - 4989.54max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4934 (4925.79min - 4933.55max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)
4841 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=85)
4814 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4775 (4754.8min - 4775.22max) MB/s -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
4392 (3922.93min - 4391.65max) MB/s -12%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
95.2 (94.25min - 95.19max) MB/s +44%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
84.4 (72.17min - 84.41max) MB/s +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.5 (78.06min - 80.5max) MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)
76.7 MB/s +16%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
66.2 (61.1min - 66.24max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
56.2 (54.05min - 56.2max) MB/s -15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
46.2 (45.32min - 46.24max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
298 (287.37min - 297.91max) MB/s +24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
280 (277.46min - 279.66max) MB/s +16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
270 (268.96min - 269.65max) MB/s +12%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
251 (249.24min - 250.87max) MB/s +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
251 (246.36min - 251.38max) MB/s +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
241 (231.88min - 240.59max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=85)
188.5 MB/s -22%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4915 (4891.5min - 4914.51max) MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4117 (4077.22min - 4117.27max) MB/s +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3822 (3797.23min - 3821.59max) MB/s
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3764 (3700.88min - 3763.72max) MB/s -2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3330 (3310.23min - 3329.64max) MB/s -13%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3293 (2898.17min - 3292.73max) MB/s -14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=85)
2579 MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)
2561 MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3717 (3584.28min - 3717.4max) MB/s +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3539 (3004.21min - 3539.13max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3534 (3522.28min - 3534.26max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3522 (3439.08min - 3521.99max) MB/s 0%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3074 (2966.78min - 3074.2max) MB/s -13%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2405 (937.07min - 2405.2max) MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)
2132 MB/s -40%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=85)
1957 MB/s -45%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9122 Points +11%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
9056 Points +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8192 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
7807 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7769 Points -5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
7423 Points -9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=85)
6855 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=157, last 2 years)
6736 Points -18%
Score Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3590 Points +14%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3368 Points +7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3136 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3051 Points -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
3007 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2963 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=157, last 2 years)
2442 Points -22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=85)
2417 Points -23%
Score Write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4018 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3703 Points +5%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3524 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=85)
3272 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3262 Points -7%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
3191 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=157, last 2 years)
3109 Points -12%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2919 Points -17%
Seq Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
5622.8 MB/s +10%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
5247.63 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5214.03 MB/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5097.01 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=157, last 2 years)
4933 MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=85)
4891 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4212.96 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3027 MB/s -41%
Seq Write
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5143.63 MB/s +39%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
4617.83 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
4482.43 MB/s +21%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
4234.14 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=157, last 2 years)
3755 MB/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3690.18 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3510 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=85)
3320 MB/s -10%
4K Read
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
84.56 MB/s +21%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
78.34 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
76.57 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.4 MB/s +8%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)
72.4 MB/s +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
69.73 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=157, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s -6%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
51.41 MB/s -26%
4K Write
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
254.58 MB/s +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
231.38 MB/s +13%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
218.1 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
217 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=157, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
208.4 MB/s +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
204.43 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=85)
186 MB/s -9%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2991.57 MB/s +17%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
2721.41 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2585 MB/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2556.31 MB/s
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2551.05 MB/s 0%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2430.71 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=157, last 2 years)
1877 MB/s -27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=85)
1855 MB/s -27%
4K-64 Write
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
3338.79 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2980.22 MB/s +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2950.72 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=85)
2754 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2694 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=157, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s -14%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
2512.87 MB/s -15%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
2238.92 MB/s -24%
Access Time Read
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.137 ms * -163%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.067 ms * -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=156, last 2 years)
0.05556 ms * -7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.052 ms *
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.038 ms * +27%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)
0.03777 ms * +27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.032 ms * +38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.032 ms * +38%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=157, last 2 years)
0.04807 ms * -129%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)
0.03406 ms * -62%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * +5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
0.019 ms * +10%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
0.019 ms * +10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms * +14%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
0.015 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6623 (5874.12-6660.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4251 (3284.07-6624.06)
HP Victus 16 (2024) Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5625 (4912.19-6954.3)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7013 (6198.53-7048.48)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6971 (4271.48-7056.44)
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5086 (4094.28-5122.29)

Grafikkort

Den nya GeForce RTX 4060 (3 072 shaders, 128-bitars buss, 8 GB GDDR6) är för närvarande en spel-GPU i (lägre) mellanklassen. Nubia ger den en maximal TGP på 140 watt - mer är inte möjligt. Dess benchmarkresultat ligger något över genomsnittetför RTX-4060(balanserat läge). Spelläget resulterar inte i en ökning. Att växla mellan dGPU och Optimus kräver ingen omstart - avancerad Optimus stöds.

Steel Nomad (balanserat läge, ansluten till elnätet)
Steel Nomad (balanserat läge, ansluten till elnätet)
Steel Nomad (balanserat läge, batteridrift)
Steel Nomad (balanserat läge, batteridrift)
Steel Nomad (spelläge, ansluten till elnätet)
Steel Nomad (spelläge, ansluten till elnätet)
Steel Nomad (kontorsläge, ansluten till elnätet)
Steel Nomad (kontorsläge, ansluten till elnätet)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
99.5 pt
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
99.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
94.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
84.1 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.6 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
82.4 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
80.1 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
80 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
78.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
44538 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
42753 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
36945 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
36596 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
36548 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
35409 Points -3%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
35045 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28136 - 38912, n=56)
34832 Points -5%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +18%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
31091 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
30687 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
27046 Points +2%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
26964 Points +1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
26844 Points +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
26698 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
26573 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (20533 - 29656, n=53)
25748 Points -3%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +24%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
12900 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
11959 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
10919 Points +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
10580 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
10575 Points
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
9937 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (7484 - 11451, n=55)
9936 Points -6%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
9841 Points -7%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
55770 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
28427 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22307 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
10789 poäng
3DMark Steel Nomad Score
2288 poäng
Hjälp
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
23 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (19 - 28, n=52)
23 Seconds * -5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds * -0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
22 Seconds *
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Gaming Mode)
22 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
21 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * +5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (3.3.3)
20 Seconds * +9%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
19 Seconds * +14%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
44 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (39 - 53, n=52)
43.2 Seconds * +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Gaming Mode)
43 Seconds * +2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
41 Seconds * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
41 Seconds * +7%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (3.3.3)
40 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.5 Seconds * +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
34 Seconds * +23%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
33 Seconds * +25%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (3.3.3)
401 Seconds * -2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
394 Seconds *
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
312 Seconds * +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (189 - 452, n=52)
311 Seconds * +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
245 Seconds * +38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3)
233 Seconds * +41%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (3.3.3, Gaming Mode)
229 Seconds * +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (3.3.3)
228 Seconds * +42%
Geekbench 6.3
GPU OpenCL
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
119119 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
117097 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=110, last 2 years)
116145 Points +17%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
99553 Points 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
99373 Points
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
97899 Points -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
96607 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (4321 - 100831, n=39)
90125 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
85278 Points -14%
GPU Vulkan
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
101006 Points +26%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1, Gaming Mode)
93870 Points +17%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (6.2.1)
92895 Points +16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
89638 Points +12%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
88889 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4286 - 196201, n=105, last 2 years)
83044 Points +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (6.2.1)
80178 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (6.2.1)
78486 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (4286 - 101001, n=35)
65274 Points -19%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
127544 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 237138, n=190, last 2 years)
126769 Points +13%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
113950 Points +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
112238 Points
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
111296 Points -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
103588 Points -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
102604 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
101150 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (5039 - 112238, n=52)
99381 Points -11%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (Gaming Mode)
78642 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
78091 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (7995 - 163089, n=120, last 2 years)
72840 Points +7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
67999 Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
65791 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (28838 - 87612, n=30)
62733 Points -8%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
61926 Points -9%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
54630 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX
51949 Points -24%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (171 - 3824, n=113, last 2 years)
2190 mpaths +28%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1805 mpaths +5%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (5.0.1)
1803 mpaths +5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1782 mpaths +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Gaming Mode )
1738 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1717 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (1387 - 1817, n=28)
1711 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1690 mpaths -2%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 2797, n=115, last 2 years)
1574 mpaths +30%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1289 mpaths +7%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1244 mpaths +3%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (5.0.1)
1220 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Gaming Mode )
1220 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
1209 mpaths
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
1198 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (957 - 1294, n=29)
1170 mpaths -3%
CPU
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1, Gaming Mode )
18868 mpaths +62%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
16766 mpaths +44%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
16168 mpaths +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (3562 - 26944, n=117, last 2 years)
15137 mpaths +30%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (5.0.1)
13952 mpaths +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (8364 - 21065, n=28)
12813 mpaths +10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (5.0.1)
11935 mpaths +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (5.0.1)
11638 mpaths
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1334, n=151, last 2 years)
709 mpaths +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
673 mpaths +5%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
649 mpaths +2%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (v4.10.07 )
648 mpaths +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
639 mpaths
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Gaming Mode )
632 mpaths -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (483 - 715, n=45)
632 mpaths -1%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
628 mpaths -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
599 mpaths -6%
CPU
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07, Gaming Mode)
28574 ksamples +61%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
27069 ksamples +52%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
26235 ksamples +48%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
24305 ksamples +37%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14700HX (v4.10.07 )
21499 ksamples +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (5413 - 37629, n=151, last 2 years)
21459 ksamples +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (12680 - 32360, n=45)
19596 ksamples +10%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX (v4.10.07 )
18304 ksamples +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX (v4.10.07 )
17771 ksamples

* ... smaller is better

Prestanda för spel

Titan är designat för QHD-spel med höga till maximala inställningar. Den installerade hårdvaran genererar bildfrekvensersom ligger något över genomsnittetför RTX 4060(balanserat läge). Gaming-läget resulterar i ett plus när du kör spel som drar nytta av högre CPU-prestanda - till exempel Dota 2 Reborn och X-Plane 11. Dess grafikprestanda är i övrigt identisk.

Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
91.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
91.2 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
89.3 pt
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
83.8 pt
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
79.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
78.6 pt
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77.8 pt
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=80, last 2 years)
86.5 fps +16%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.02)
83.3 (37.9min) fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2.12)
82.5 (68.4min) fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.12)
79.5 (66.7min) fps +6%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.12, Gaming Mode)
74.9 (63.2min) fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.12)
74.7 (62min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (56.4 - 93.1, n=30)
71.5 fps -4%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.02)
69.7 (39min) fps -7%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2.02)
67.1 (20.8min) fps -10%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
122.1 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
119.8 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
119.7 fps +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
106.1 fps +1%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
105.4 fps
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Gaming Mode )
104.8 fps -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
101.5 fps -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.3)
98.1 fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (75.1 - 109.8, n=50)
97.3 fps -8%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +21%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
213 (26.4min, 161.7P1) fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
206 (37.8min, 155P1) fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
199.9 (40.2min, 143.4P1) fps +6%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Gaming Mode )
189.6 (50.2min, 139.1P1) fps 0%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
189.2 (10.3min, 139.1P1) fps
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
182.2 (56.5min, 132.3P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (135.3 - 210, n=49)
181.3 fps -4%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
179 (76.4min, 130.3P1) fps -5%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
183.8 (158.1min) fps +25%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
181.7 (153.5min) fps +24%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (Gaming Mode)
167.4 (144.9min) fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
160.8 (136.5min) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)
150.4 fps +2%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
149.7 (130.4min) fps +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
146.9 (123.2min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (115 - 183.8, n=52)
145 fps -1%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
142.4 (120.3min) fps -3%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (Gaming Mode)
140.3 fps +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
135.1 fps +15%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126.3 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.5 fps +2%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
117.2 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
107.8 fps -8%
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.1 fps -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (60.7 - 141.1, n=53)
102.1 fps -13%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
100.3 fps -14%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 High Preset
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.1 (67.5min, 84.5P0.1, 92.4P1) fps +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.3 (32.4min, 76.7P0.1, 97.8P1) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (35.7 - 209, n=42, last 2 years)
105 fps +8%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97.5 (46.7min, 63.1P0.1, 79.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (68.7 - 110.7, n=17)
87.1 fps -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71.1 fps -27%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117 (72.8min, 80.4P0.1, 90.5P1) fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111.8 (87.2min, 87.8P0.1, 95.1P1) fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (34.5 - 208, n=45, last 2 years)
103.5 fps +7%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
96.5 (62.4min, 71.2P0.1, 81.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (66.5 - 105.5, n=18)
84.6 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
66.5 fps -31%
Once Human
1920x1080 Very High Preset
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
94.2 (17.2min, 29.8P0.1, 57.6P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (88.7 - 94.2, n=2)
91.5 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.2 - 94.2, n=2, last 2 years)
54.2 fps -42%
2560x1440 Very High Preset
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
62.3 (16.9min, 24.7P0.1, 44.3P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
62.3 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (59.1 - 62.3, n=2)
60.7 fps -3%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality FSR
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
76.5 (19.7min, 36P0.1, 53.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
76.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
76.5 fps 0%
F1 24
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (54.1 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
78.2 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (57min, 56P1) fps +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
60.6 (49min, 49P1) fps +3%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
58.8 (48min, 47P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (47.5 - 60.9, n=9)
56.1 fps -5%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (36.7 - 84.7, n=11, last 2 years)
54.6 fps +49%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45.1 (36min, 36P1) fps +23%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
36.7 (30min, 30P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (24.3 - 38.8, n=6)
34.3 fps -7%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (59.2 - 129.5, n=9, last 2 years)
78.4 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.8 (58min, 58P1) fps +21%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
59.2 (48min, 48P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (48.6 - 61, n=3)
56.3 fps -5%
Ghost of Tsushima
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.7 (30min, 46.2P0.1, 55.4P1) fps +16%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.4 (33.6min, 39.6P0.1, 50.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (55.6 - 63.4, n=5)
60 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.5 - 73.7, n=7, last 2 years)
59 fps -7%
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
56.1 (32min, 37.7P0.1, 43.8P1) fps +18%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
47.7 (30.7min, 33.5P0.1, 38P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 47.7, n=3)
44.3 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (22.7 - 56.1, n=5, last 2 years)
44.1 fps -8%
2560x1440 Very High Preset + Quality DLSS
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.2 (40.6min, 44.9P0.1, 57.2P1) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (63.6 - 74.2, n=3, last 2 years)
69.1 fps +9%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.6 (32.3min, 35.9P0.1, 49.9P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
63.6 fps 0%
Dragon's Dogma 2
1920x1080 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.4 (29.5min, 31P0.1, 35.9P1) fps +4%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
67.7 (23.9min, 34P0.1, 45P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (49.5 - 80, n=8, last 2 years)
64.5 fps -5%
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
63.3 (25.6min, 34.9P0.1, 46.2P1) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (57.2 - 67.7, n=5)
62.3 fps -8%
2560x1440 High Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58.5 (31.3min, 34.1P0.1, 45.9P1) fps +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
52.9 (28.2min, 31P0.1, 42.7P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34.6 - 61.3, n=5, last 2 years)
51.8 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (45.8 - 52.9, n=2)
49.4 fps -7%
The First Descendant
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
80 (53.7min, 54.9P0.1, 62.7P1) fps +15%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
69.4 (31.4min, 48.1P0.1, 56.5P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (67.6 - 69.4, n=3)
68.2 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.4 - 80, n=5, last 2 years)
62.2 fps -10%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.2 (34min, 38.1P0.1, 43.3P1) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.7 - 51.2, n=3, last 2 years)
48.3 fps +11%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43.7 (30.9min, 33.5P0.1, 36.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  (43.5 - 43.7, n=2)
43.6 fps 0%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + DLSS Quality
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
51.8 (23.7min, 31.9P0.1, 40.2P1) fps +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (43.3 - 51.8, n=2, last 2 years)
47.6 fps +10%
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
43.3 (21.5min, 25.2P0.1, 34.1P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
  ()
43.3 fps 0%

Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty levererade något fluktuerande bildfrekvenser på en ganska stabil nivå under vårt 30-minuterstest (max. inställningar, FHD). Vi noterade ingen märkbar nedgång i prestanda.

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø67.6 (60.1-69.2)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø68.5 (65-69.4)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø77.5 (72.5-79.1)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Gaming Mode: Ø68.2 (62.6-69.4)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (balanserat läge)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (balanserat läge)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (spelläge)
Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom (spelläge)
lågmed.högultraQHD FSRQHD
GTA V (2015) 186.1 184 177.7 118.4 89.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 206 170.9 160.2 146.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 199.7 146 105.4 76.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 167 142.8 117.2
Strange Brigade (2018) 480 277 219 189.2 126.9
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 140.3 110.8 97.5 96.5 65.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 121.4 101.1 86.2 74.7 46.9
Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) 71.9 67.7 52.9
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) 91.3 86.8 78.2 63.4 47.7
F1 24 (2024) 243 225 175.8 58.8 36.7
The First Descendant (2024) 159 100.9 80.6 69.4 43.7
Once Human (2024) 164.8 132.9 108.3 94.2 76.5 62.3

Utsläpp - För högt, för varmt

Bullerutsläpp

Titan är inte på något sätt en tystgående bärbar dator. Även i viloläge är de två fläktarna ständigt hörbara. Cyberpunk fick nivån att stiga till högljudda 50 dB(A)(balanserat läge) eller ännu mer högljudda 53 dB(A)(spelläge). Kontorsläget resulterade i ett bara något mer måttligt värde på 47 dB(A). Fläktarna är tystare i batteriläge och står ibland stilla.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
35 / 36 / 40 dB(A)
Hög belastning
49 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.739.342.838.636.22534.236.637.735353145.145.549.345.646.84032.830.832.431.931.85033.231.335.432.528.26333.524.232.423.730.38023.821.720.6182310021.626.720.916.724.512526.724.323.517.62816027.525.124.218.729.820030.727.526.621.731.425030.225.322.71732.731532.226.72314.134.540034.128.826.213.437.65003730.227.215.239.663035.829.726.212.938.180035.728.824.713.838.8100037.130.226.213.440.2125038.530.726.213.841160038.931.12713.441.8200037.629.124.113.440.4250037.82823.513.340.9315039.629.623.613.242.7400037.726.520.513.641.2500036.624.919.113.640.8630030.519.115.614.335800029.218.214.814.533.71000025.516.914.114.430.31250021.916.614.414.726.1160001916.213.514.120.4SPL48.940.335.926.152N6.53.42.30.88.2median 34.1median 26.7median 23.5median 14.1median 37.6Delta5.34.64.21.65.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseNubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
HP Victus 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-14700HX, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
Noise
17%
13%
10%
5%
5%
off / environment *
26
23
12%
25
4%
25.2
3%
25
4%
26
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
23
34%
28
20%
27.8
21%
28
20%
30
14%
Idle Average *
36
23
36%
29
19%
32
11%
31
14%
32
11%
Idle Maximum *
40
25
37%
33
17%
29.6
26%
35
12%
35
12%
Load Average *
49
45.18
8%
45
8%
45.2
8%
52
-6%
51
-4%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
50
52.69
-5%
53
-6%
Load Maximum *
52
53.13
-2%
48
8%
55.8
-7%
52
-0%
54
-4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
51

* ... smaller is better

Temperatur

Den bärbara datorn värms upp avsevärt under belastning: Cyberpunk 2077 och stresstestet orsakade temperaturer på över 50 grader Celsius vid vissa tillfällen. Handledsstödets temperaturer var ibland nästan för varma. Vi noterade också värden över genomsnittet i viloläge.

 48 °C50 °C48 °C 
 46 °C49 °C48 °C 
 40 °C39 °C38 °C 
Max: 50 °C
Medel: 45.1 °C
57 °C58 °C50 °C
53 °C58 °C41 °C
38 °C37 °C35 °C
Max: 58 °C
Medel: 47.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  49 °C | Rumstemperatur 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat
-9%
13%
-3%
-13%
6%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
50
-0%
50
-0%
58
-16%
51
-2%
41
18%
Maximum Bottom *
58
57
2%
50
14%
45.2
22%
66
-14%
43
26%
Idle Upper Side *
31
36
-16%
25
19%
31.1
-0%
35
-13%
32
-3%
Idle Bottom *
32
39
-22%
26
19%
37.2
-16%
39
-22%
37
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Stresstest

Det extrema stresstestscenariot (Prime95 och Furmark i kontinuerlig drift) kontrollerade systemets stabilitet under full belastning. CPU:n arbetade med höga klockfrekvenser i början av testet, men stryptes sedan till värden under 2 GHz. GPU:n arbetade med full effekt.

Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95
Furmark &amp; Prime95

Högtalare

Stereohögtalarna ger ett ganska hyfsat ljud överlag. Basen skulle kunna vara lite mer uttalad.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.639.3253536.53145.643.24031.928.65032.531.16323.723.4801828.810016.74012517.650.916018.755.120021.758.62501763.631514.166.740013.470.550015.271.563012.974.380013.870.1100013.469125013.867.8160013.473.6200013.471.6250013.365.3315013.270.1400013.672.4500013.675.1630014.374.1800014.573.11000014.470.11250014.761.71600014.157.3SPL26.183.8N0.862.9median 14.1median 70.1Delta1.65.331.324.831.322.123.422.12628.22623.616.523.625.122.125.127.823.827.821.212.321.224.619.724.62814.92838.51138.543.216.543.249.414.749.454.812.454.85510.95558.19.258.161.87.861.866.48.766.469.48.669.468.1968.166.99.866.968.110.168.165.61165.663.811.263.860.811.760.85511.85562.81262.865.112.165.157.312.157.350.712.550.747.411.147.477.12377.138.70.438.7median 58.1median 11.2median 58.19.11.99.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia RedMagic Titan 16 ProLenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energihantering - Titan 16 ger medelmåttiga drifttider

Strömförbrukning

Dess strömförbrukning är normal för den installerade hårdvaran. Cyberpunk 2077 och stresstestet kördes med konstant strömförbrukning. Strömförsörjningen (280 watt) är tillräcklig i storlek.

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 16 / 19 / 27 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 123 / 240 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-4%
16%
-23%
-35%
17%
20%
6%
Idle Minimum *
16
13.7
14%
9
44%
26.7
-67%
31
-94%
12
25%
11.6 ?(3 - 33, n=47)
27%
Idle Average *
19
17.7
7%
15
21%
24.4
-28%
33
-74%
13
32%
16.1 ?(6.9 - 35, n=47)
15%
Idle Maximum *
27
18.5
31%
23
15%
32.7
-21%
41
-52%
27
-0%
20.4 ?(7.6 - 45, n=47)
24%
Load Average *
123
124
-1%
123
-0%
122.1
1%
114
7%
105
15%
93.1 ?(59 - 190, n=46)
24%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *
174.2
224
-29%
196.8
-13%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
184.3
229
-24%
218
-18%
Load Maximum *
240
297
-24%
241
-0%
241
-0%
250
-4%
210
12%
210 ?(99 - 364, n=47)
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
143.7
190.6
167.8

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø190.2 (172.7-240)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.6 (15.8-27.1)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø184.3 (180.1-188.2)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø73.6 (69-117.5)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø86.2 (69.3-116.7)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø161.7 (154.7-170.4)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø20.8 (18.5-30.6)
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø174.2 (169-179.5)

Körtider

16-tumsenheten uppnådde körtider på 4:40 timmar under WiFi-testet (åtkomst till webbplatser med hjälp av ett skript) och 5:16 timmar under videotestet (kortfilmen Big Buck Bunny (H.264-kodning, FHD) i en loop) - inga fantastiska värden. Några av konkurrenterna kör betydligt längre.

Batteriet har en kapacitet på 80 Wh.
Batteriet har en kapacitet på 80 Wh.
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
8tim 01min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 127)
4tim 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5tim 16min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 16min
Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80.1 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX9 G9
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
HP Victus 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90.61 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24)
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
16%
83%
-16%
20%
69%
23%
Reader / Idle
481
356
-26%
H.264
316
312
-1%
242
-23%
WiFi v1.3
280
308
10%
511
83%
227
-19%
337
20%
474
69%
Load
76
105
38%
79
4%

För

+ ljusstark QHD+-skärm med bildförhållandet 16:10 (240 Hz, G-Sync, DCI-P3)
+ två SSD-platser (PCIe 4, M.2-2280)
+ RAM-minne kan bytas ut/uppgraderas
+ aluminiumhölje
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Strömförsörjning

Emot

- höga bullernivåer
- blir ganska varm
- nedslående körtider
- RAM-minnet körs i enkanalsläge
- höljet är känsligt för att samla fingeravtrycksmärken

Utlåtande - Utrymme för förbättringar

RedMagic Titan 16 Pro, testprov tillhandahållet av Nubia.
RedMagic Titan 16 Pro, testprov tillhandahållet av Nubia.

A Core i9-14900HX och en GeForce RTX 4060 säkerställer QHD-spel vid höga till maximala inställningar. Den installerade hårdvaran används inte till sin fulla potential, eftersom RAM-minnet körs i enkanaligt läge. Det rekommenderas att en andra minnesmodul installeras.

Nubias debutprodukt gör vad den är utformad för att göra: Att få upp spel på skärmen på ett smidigt sätt. Men konkurrenterna behöver inte precis någon anledning att vara rädda.

Dess utsläppsvärden är extremt nedslående: Den bärbara datorn producerar (för) mycket buller över hela belastningsområdet - och den värms dessutom upp mycket. Den ljusa IPS-skärmen (16 tum, 2 560 x 1 600 pixlar, 240 Hz, G-Sync, DCI-P3) med äkta färger och ett arbetsvänligt bildförhållande på 16:10 gjorde däremot ett gott intryck på oss.

Den bärbara datorns batteritid kommer inte att få någon att tappa hakan. Man kan förvänta sig (något) mer av en bärbar speldator med ett 80 Wh-batteri. Åtminstone stöder den installerade USB-C-porten (Thunderbolt 4) Power Delivery (och DP Alt-läge). Detta innebär att du inte nödvändigtvis alltid behöver bära med dig den skrymmande egenutvecklade strömförsörjningen.

Ett faktum som du bör tänka på innan du köper enheten: I motsats till etablerade tillverkare som Acer, Lenovo eller HP har Nubia inte riktigt någon global närvaro. Därför är det inte möjligt att uppskatta hur situationen kommer att se ut när det gäller reservdelsförsörjning, support och reparationer.

Priset på 1 699 USD talar verkligen inte till den bärbara datorns fördel: Till exempel, en nästan identisk konfiguration av Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (med undantag för RAM-minnet som är 32 GB istället för 16 GB) kostar för närvarande endast 1 350 USD. Ett annat alternativ skulle kunna vara XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 24). Priset för en jämförbar version av denna enhet är ca 2.000 US-dollar (med Windows 11) eller 1.950 US-dollar (utan Windows som operativsystem).

Pris och tillgänglighet

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro finns tillgänglig från och med 2024-08-29 och kan köpas för 1 699 USD via RedMagic-butiken på https://eu.redmagic.gg/de/pages/redmagic-titan-16-pro-launch.

Observera: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Mer information finns tillgänglig på här.

Nubia RedMagic Titan 16 Pro - 08/21/2024 v8
Sascha Mölck

Design
79 / 98 → 80%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
86%
Anslutningar
69 / 80 → 87%
Vikt
61 / 10-68 → 87%
Batteri
62 / 95 → 65%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
83%
Programprestanda
83%
AI Performance
95%
Temperatur
76 / 95 → 80%
Ljudnivå
53 / 90 → 59%
Audio
87%
Camera
38 / 75 → 51%
Medel
63%
81%
Gaming - Vägt medel
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
79.3%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 39.4%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > RedMagic Titan 16 Pro recension: En spelbärbar dator tillverkad av en smarttelefontillverkare
Sascha Mölck, 2024-08-23 (Update: 2024-08-23)