Schenker XMG Evo 14 (M24) recension av bärbar dator - En bra allroundmaskin med Ryzen 8000 och upp till 96 GB RAM
Schenkers nya XMG Evo 14 är en kompakt 14-tums laptop som vill sticka ut från mängden med sitt stora utbud av anslutningar och goda underhållsmöjligheter. Som användare kan du välja mellan en AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (från ca. 1 060 USD) eller en Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (från ca. 1 223 USD) med tillhörande iGPU. Vår testenhet är AMD-varianten med 32 GB RAM, en 1 TB SSD och Windows förinstallerat, som kan köpas för cirka 1 335 US-dollar. Dessutom har Schenker publicerat en extremt detaljerad djupdykning med all information om Evo 14 och Evo 15.
Alternativt erbjuder Tuxedo InfinityBook Pro 14 Gen9, som är identiskt byggda enheter med Linux. AMD-modellen https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en/TUXEDO-InfinityBook-Pro-14-Gen9-AMD.tuxedo kan köpas från cirka 1 345 USD, medan Intel-varianten https://www.tuxedocomputers.com/en/TUXEDO-InfinityBook-Pro-14-Gen9-INTEL.tuxedo kostar ca 1.470 USD.
Potentiella konkurrenter i jämförelse
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.9 % | v8 | 09/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.9 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
85.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
85.3 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Observera: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Mer information finns tillgänglig här.
Fodral och anslutningsmöjligheter
På samma sätt som med de större XMG Evo 15har tillverkaren valt att använda ett robust aluminiumhölje - förutom att Evo 14 inte är svart, utan snarare mörkgrå. Det är därför mycket mindre känsligt för att samla fingeravtrycksmärken. Den övergripande stabiliteten är mycket bra och gångjärnen är också snygga och täta, vilket är anledningen till att det bara är minimal gungning när du justerar lockets vinkel. Den maximala öppningsvinkeln är nästan 180 grader.
Jämfört med de flesta andra aktuella 14-tums bärbara datorer har Evo 14 ett stort antal anslutningar, inklusive Gigabit Ethernet och en komplett kortläsare. Det är dock ett mysterium för oss varför en av de tre vanliga USB-A-portarna bara stöder den gamla 2.0-standarden. Underhållsalternativen är också bra, eftersom det finns två platser för RAM (max 96 GB) och två platser för M.2 2280 SSD-enheter. Trots detta är chassit fortfarande ganska kompakt och med en vikt på 1,46 kg är det inte heller alltför tungt.
WLAN-modulen (Intel AX210) levererar mycket bra och stabila överföringshastigheter, men den stöder ännu inte Wi-Fi 7. Webbkameran, som har stöd för Microsofts Studio Effects, tar hyfsade bilder och tack vare IR-sensorn kan man även använda ansiktsigenkänning via Windows Hello. Den fullfjädrade kortläsaren verkade inte gilla vårt referenskort (max 90 MB/s) särskilt mycket; den klarade mer än 250 MB/s med ett annat kort (ADATA V90). Detta innebär att du kan förvänta dig ganska stora skillnader beroende på vilket kort du använder.
Det svarta bakgrundsbelysta tangentbordet ger en bra kontrast till det gråa höljet och känns normalt att skriva på, men de större tangenterna ger ifrån sig ett ganska högt ljud. Klickplattan i glas (12,3 x 7,7 cm) fungerar i allmänhet bra, men vi rekommenderar att du bara trycker på plattan för inmatningar. Mekaniska klick ger ifrån sig ett högt ljud, vilket inte känns särskilt högkvalitativt.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Skärm - IPS med 400 nits & 100 % sRGB
Evo 14:s 14-tums IPS-skärm ger en mycket skarp bild tack vare sina 2 880 x 1 800 pixlar i bildförhållandet 16:10. Dess matta yta hjälper till att förhindra reflektioner, men bilden ser tack och lov inte kornig ut. Färgerna är levande, men inte jämförbara med OLED-paneler. I sin tur används ingen PWM och dess 120 Hz uppdateringsfrekvens säkerställer smidiga rörelser. Ljusstyrkan är mer än 400 cd/m² och tillsammans med den anständiga svartnivån resulterar detta i ett maximalt kontrastförhållande på mer än 1 300:1. Varken ljusstyrkan eller färgtemperaturen kan dock justeras automatiskt.
En förkalibrerad profil kan laddas ner från Control Center, vilket gjorde ett mycket bra intryck under vårt test. I vår analys med den professionella programvaran CalMAN låg färg- och gråskaleavvikelserna redan under den viktiga gränsen på 3. Vi skulle kunna förbättra skärmen ytterligare med vår egen kalibrering (kan laddas ner gratis i rutan till höger), men det är inte absolut nödvändigt. Tillsammans med sin kompletta sRGB-täckning är panelen lämplig för redigering av bilder utan några begränsningar.
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 421 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1316:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.14
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE NV140WUM-N49, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 25% | -1% | -1% | 1% | -46% | 26% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71 | 99.9 41% | 70.3 -1% | 70.1 -1% | 72.42 2% | 37.7 -47% | 99.9 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 97.7 -2% | 99.79 0% | 56.1 -44% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.8 | 97.2 34% | 72.1 -1% | 72.3 -1% | 73.94 2% | 39 -46% | 98.9 36% |
Response Times | 93% | -19% | -23% | 5% | -15% | 97% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26.3 ? | 1.3 ? 95% | 32.7 ? -24% | 31.1 ? -18% | 7 ? 73% | 23.5 ? 11% | 0.61 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 13.4 ? | 1.2 ? 91% | 15.2 ? -13% | 17.1 ? -28% | 22 ? -64% | 18.8 ? -40% | 0.67 ? 95% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238 ? | 240 ? | ||||
Screen | 92% | -7% | -44% | 197% | -250% | -52% | |
Brightness middle | 421 | 385 -9% | 418 -1% | 466 11% | 373 -11% | 419 0% | 411 -2% |
Brightness | 412 | 382 -7% | 408 -1% | 467 13% | 377 -8% | 399 -3% | 414 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 99 10% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.03 91% | 0.3 6% | 0.29 9% | 0.015 95% | 0.31 3% | |
Contrast | 1316 | 12833 875% | 1393 6% | 1607 22% | 24867 1790% | 1352 3% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.99 -53% | 1.6 -23% | 2.5 -92% | 1.47 -13% | 7.5 -477% | 2.8 -115% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 3.69 -54% | 2.5 -4% | 6.1 -154% | 2.49 -4% | 28.3 -1079% | 5.5 -129% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 -63% | 1.1 -0% | 1.3 -18% | 1.78 -62% | 6.2 -464% | 2.2 -100% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 0.8 43% | 2 -43% | 4.1 -193% | 1.7 -21% | 4.6 -229% | 1.8 -29% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6446 101% | 6474 100% | 6851 95% | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6057 107% | 6319 103% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 70% /
78% | -9% /
-7% | -23% /
-32% | 68% /
127% | -104% /
-172% | 24% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
13.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.3 ms rise | |
↘ 8.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Prestanda - Ryzen 7 8845HS & upp till 96 GB RAM
XMG Evo 14 har tre prestandaprofiler att välja mellan(Balanced, Enthusiast, Overboost) och vi har sammanfattat uppgifterna i följande tabell. Standardläget Enthusiast användes för våra benchmarks och mätningar.
Energiprofil | CPU TDP | CPU TDP batteri | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy Grafik | max. fläktljud |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balanserad | 25 watt | 25 watt | 12 318 poäng | 2 661 poäng | 29 dB(A) |
Enthusiast | 45 watt | 35 watt | 15 494 poäng | 2 860 poäng | 37,6 dB(A) |
Overboost | 60 watt | 50 watt | 16 315 punkter | 2 914 punkter | 44,6 dB(A) |
XMG Evo 14 är en supersnabb bärbar dator och den AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Zen 4) levererade mycket bra och stabil prestanda överlag, även om den inte kunde hålla jämna steg med den nya Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Zen 5). Trots detta är Zen 5-processorerna för närvarande endast tillgängliga med RAM-minne som är löddrat på. Under vårt test var Evo 14 alltid en responsiv enhet och vi noterade inga problem med systemstabiliteten - dessutom var dess latenser också mycket låga. Vår testenhet använder 1 TB-versionen av Samsung 990 Pro, som klarade mycket höga överföringshastigheter. Dessa förblev också stabila under långvarig belastning, vilket inte är en självklarhet.
Den integrerade Radeon 780M iGPU uppnådde anständiga prestandavärden och visade sig vara särskilt imponerande vid spel, och kom in strax bakom Intel Arc Graphics med 8 Xe-kärnorsom fortfarande var i klar ledning under de syntetiska testerna. Men den nya Radeon 890M var dock märkbart snabbare i våra standardbenchmarks för spel. Dess grafikprestanda förblev stabil under långvarig belastning.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=11) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=11) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (7592 - 25760, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=15) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 3927, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=13) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=12) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=12) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=11) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=11) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=11) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=7) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2040, n=7) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=7) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=7) | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7284 poäng | |
Hjälp |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=11) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=11) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 13295 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7728 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3215 poäng | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 500 poäng | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2816 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=54) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Multimedia (203 - 215, n=3, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 164.4 | 152.9 | 65 | 27.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 147 | 47 | 36 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.1 | 127.5 | 85.9 | 78.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78 | 38.3 | 27.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.6 | 46.7 | 39.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 83 | 49 | 45 | 43 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 161.3 | 66.7 | 56 | 48.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.4 | 32.6 | 26.3 | 23 |
Utsläpp & kraft
Evo 14 använder två fläktar och är en mycket tyst enhet under daglig användning. Även vid spel eller i stresstestet uppmätte vi maximalt 37,6 dB(A) i Enthusiast-läget. När du använder Balanced-läget blir enheten dock ännu tystare (max. 29 dB(A)) om detta är din prioritet. I Overboost-läget noterade vi höga 44,6 dB(A), vilket knappast är värt det eftersom du inte får mycket mer effekt. Det kom inga andra elektroniska ljud från vår testenhet.
Dess yttemperaturer var helt ofarliga bortsett från en hotspot på undersidan. Särskilt tangentbordsområdet höll alltid en behaglig temperatur. Hudkontakt med undersidan bör dock undvikas vid intensiv användning.
Trots sin högupplösta 120 Hz-panel är den bärbara datorns tomgångsförbrukning mycket låg och vi noterade inga problem under belastning heller. Vi uppmätte maximalt 83 watt, med ett värde som snabbt planade ut på ~76 watt under stresstestet. Strömförsörjningsenheten på 100 watt är helt tillräcklig. Enhetens 80 Wh-batteri möjliggör bra batteritider, men dessa överträffades till och med av vissa konkurrenter. I WLAN-testet uppmätte vi strax under 12 timmar (150 cd/m²) och 9:40 timmar (max. ljusstyrka). Vid 120 Hz var det cirka 60 minuter mindre i båda fallen. I videotestet varade den i mycket bra 15,5 timmar.
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 26.3 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) |
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE Radeon 660M, R5 7535U, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPETJ512MKP1QDQ | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -2% | -5% | -3% | -2% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24 3% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 25.7 -4% | 25.11 -2% | 24.5 1% | 23.9 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.3 | 27 -3% | 27.1 -3% | 25.7 2% | 27.2 -3% | 24.5 7% | 23.9 9% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 34.9 7% | 36.2 4% | 31.3 17% | 38 -1% | 44.3 -18% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 37.6 | 39 -4% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 41.4 -10% | ||
Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 40 -6% | 43.7 -16% | 43.6 -16% | 46.61 -24% | 41.5 -10% | 44.3 -18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.1 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE AMD Ryzen 5 7535U, AMD Radeon 660M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -11% | -2% | -1% | -6% | 0% | 11% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.7 | 49 -18% | 43.7 -5% | 44.6 -7% | 45.2 -8% | 43.1 -3% | 39.6 5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.1 | 59 -18% | 49.4 1% | 50.9 -2% | 49.2 2% | 45.7 9% | 38.6 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.1 | 28 -3% | 27.7 -2% | 26.5 2% | 29.6 -9% | 27.9 -3% | 24.8 8% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.7 | 29 -5% | 28.6 -3% | 26.3 5% | 30.2 -9% | 28.3 -2% | 25.3 9% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.46 / 1.39 Watt |
Låg belastning | 4.6 / 7.8 / 8 Watt |
Hög belastning |
71.7 / 83 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 75 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G5 21L50014GE R5 7535U, Radeon 660M, 57 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 53% | 20% | -30% | 51% | -8% | 7% | -7% | |
H.264 | 929 | 1251 35% | 612 -34% | 1031 11% | 847 ? -9% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 990 38% | 888 24% | 571 -20% | 758 6% | 748 5% | 710 -1% | 640 ? -10% |
Load | 99 | 165 67% | 101 2% | 64 -35% | 194 96% | 79 -20% | 110 11% | 97.1 ? -2% |
Reader / Idle | 1902 | 1168 ? | ||||||
Gaming | 85 | 92 ? |
För
Emot
Omdöme - XMG Evo 14 är ett bra totalpaket utan de vanliga kompromisserna
Schenkers XMG Evo 14 bevisar att även moderna bärbara datorer inte behöver vara utan många anslutningar och omfattande underhållsmöjligheter. Med hjälp av båda RAM-platserna kan du få upp till 96 GB, SSD-kapaciteten kan utökas superenkelt och det finns en hel del anslutningar ombord. Dessutom kan enheten konfigureras i stor utsträckning.
AMD-processorn erbjuder bra och framför allt stabil prestanda - samma sak kan sägas om Radeon 780M. Enhetens IPS-skärm har en hög upplösning, en uppdateringsfrekvens på 120 Hz samt exakta färger, vilket innebär att du enkelt kan redigera bilder inom sRGB-färgrymden.
Den nya Schenker XMG Evo 14 levererar ett bra totalpaket inklusive ett metallhölje till ett introduktionspris på drygt 1.000 USD. Trots det relativt kompakta höljet behöver du inte avstå från solida prestandavärden, många anslutningar och bra underhållsalternativ.
Drifttiderna är överlag bra, även om det finns en hel del konkurrenter som erbjuder ännu bättre uthållighet. Du bör ta en titt på den nya XMG Evo 14 i synnerhet på grund av dess introduktionspris på cirka 1 000 US-dollar. Även om Intel-modellen har Thunderbolt 4-stöd, är dess begränsade prestandaökning inte värd tillägget i våra ögon.
Pris och tillgänglighet
XMG Evo 14 AMD är inte tillgänglig i USA, men den kan köpas från internationella butiker som bestware.com, med priser från cirka 1.000 USD.
Observera: Vi har nyligen uppdaterat vårt betygssystem och resultaten från version 8 är inte jämförbara med resultaten från version 7. Mer information finns tillgänglig här.
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24)
- 09/22/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.