Test: Asus ZenBook 14 UX425E - Debut för 11:e generationens i7 "Tiger Lake" (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
82.4 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
85.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 375.1 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1103:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.79
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -12% | -4% | 3% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.6 | 64 -7% | 60.1 -12% | 65 -5% | 71.7 5% | 66.3 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.3 | 92 -6% | 85.5 -13% | 95.7 -3% | 99.3 1% | 97.3 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.8 | 65.3 -6% | 61.1 -12% | 66.7 -4% | 72.9 4% | 68.5 -2% |
Response Times | 8% | 11% | -17% | -2% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.6 ? | 37.6 ? 24% | 36 ? 27% | 54 ? -9% | 45.6 ? 8% | 50 ? -1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.4 ? | 28.8 ? -9% | 28 ? -6% | 32.8 ? -24% | 29.6 ? -12% | 33.2 ? -26% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | |||||
Screen | -58% | -40% | -24% | -26% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 375.1 | 355.8 -5% | 280 -25% | 322.2 -14% | 399.6 7% | 607.6 62% |
Brightness | 371 | 341 -8% | 286 -23% | 301 -19% | 385 4% | 595 60% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 78 -14% | 86 -5% | 89 -2% | 96 5% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.38 -12% | 0.208 39% | 0.25 26% | 0.37 -9% | 0.4 -18% |
Contrast | 1103 | 936 -15% | 1346 22% | 1289 17% | 1080 -2% | 1519 38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.79 | 4.47 -150% | 3.97 -122% | 3.62 -102% | 3.2 -79% | 3.23 -80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.05 | 9.12 -199% | 8.29 -172% | 6.9 -126% | 6.44 -111% | 8.67 -184% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | 2.89 -61% | 3.42 -91% | 1.22 32% | 1.73 3% | 1.01 44% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 6.2 -170% | 2.83 -23% | 3.9 -70% | 4.7 -104% | 5.5 -139% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.34 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.21 100% | 2.12 104% |
CCT | 6405 101% | 8072 81% | 6556 99% | 6344 102% | 7184 90% | 6413 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.9 | 59.3 -7% | 56 -12% | 61.3 -4% | 66.3 4% | 63 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.8 | 91.6 -7% | 85 -14% | 95.6 -3% | 99.5 1% | 97.5 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-40% | -14% /
-28% | -15% /
-20% | -8% /
-18% | -12% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14IIL05 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4278 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3087 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4704 poäng | |
Hjälp |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | LG Gram 17 17Z90N-V.AA77G Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 46% | 21% | 3% | 40% | |
Seq Read | 1219 | 2722 123% | 2071 70% | 1237 1% | 2213 82% |
Seq Write | 947 | 2649 180% | 1462 54% | 1069 13% | 1401 48% |
4K Read | 50.9 | 52.2 3% | 49.82 -2% | 52.1 2% | 55.2 8% |
4K Write | 150.9 | 132.4 -12% | 140.7 -7% | 134.7 -11% | 130.3 -14% |
4K-64 Read | 587 | 886 51% | 869 48% | 585 0% | 878 50% |
4K-64 Write | 862 | 1074 25% | 729 -15% | 854 -1% | 1478 71% |
Access Time Read * | 0.083 | 0.041 51% | 0.069 17% | 0.05 40% | 0.036 57% |
Access Time Write * | 0.114 | 0.03 74% | 0.028 75% | 0.117 -3% | 0.086 25% |
Score Read | 760 | 1211 59% | 1126 48% | 761 0% | 1154 52% |
Score Write | 1108 | 1471 33% | 1016 -8% | 1095 -1% | 1748 58% |
Score Total | 2260 | 3309 46% | 2700 19% | 2255 0% | 3467 53% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1518 | 2096 38% | 1574 4% | 1714 13% | 2161 42% |
Copy Program MB/s | 549 | 395.6 -28% | 553 1% | 511 -7% | 572 4% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1164 | 1096 -6% | 993 -15% | 1187 2% | 1433 23% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 36% | 13% | 5% | 32% | |
Write 4K | 132.3 | 162.8 23% | 168.4 27% | 140.7 6% | 128.6 -3% |
Read 4K | 51.7 | 51 -1% | 55 6% | 55.6 8% | 45.25 -12% |
Write Seq | 1264 | 2078 64% | 1415 12% | 1949 54% | |
Read Seq | 1484 | 1991 34% | 1516 2% | 2359 59% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 478.4 | 440.1 -8% | 476.1 0% | 474.5 -1% | 445 -7% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 366.9 | 450.1 23% | 506 38% | 403.4 10% | 404.5 10% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1750 | 2998 71% | 1492 -15% | 1796 3% | 3019 73% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1970 | 3562 81% | 2357 20% | 1913 -3% | 3564 81% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 930 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 963 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
42% | 17% /
18% | 4% /
4% | 36% /
37% |
* ... smaller is better
Kontinuerlig inläsning: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 20836 poäng | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 20704 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6547 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 83826 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16127 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4471 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1541 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 81.7 | 66.6 | 18.7 | 7.95 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 74.4 | 41 | 25.4 | 11.9 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 76.9 | 67.4 | 46.4 | 42.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 35.4 | 20.8 | 15.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.1 | 35.4 | 32.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 77.5 | 35.2 | 28.3 | 23.1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 41 | 18 | 15 | |
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 25 | 19 | 16 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 70.6 | 30.8 | 24.8 | 22.3 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 38 | 23 | 20 | 19 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 28.2 | 15 | 11.6 | 9.5 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 113.6 | 43.8 | 29.9 | 20.1 |
The Division 2 (2019) | 30 | 17 | 12 | 8 |
Anno 1800 (2019) | 50.8 | 19.9 | 12.1 | 7.1 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 76.2 | 26.2 | 16.2 | 11 |
Control (2019) | 42.9 | 14.1 | 9.8 | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 39.3 | 19.7 | 13 | 9.7 |
GRID 2019 (2019) | 67.5 | 36.9 | 26.9 | 25.8 |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 11.8 | 10.2 | 10.3 | |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 38 | |||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 42.1 | 21.4 | 19.9 | 18.6 |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 97 | 39.3 | 21.2 | 16.2 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 70 | 40 | 29 | 18 |
Death Stranding (2020) | 37 | 22.6 | 21.8 | 21.3 |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Vega 8, R7 4800U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 3% | 7% | 3% | 11% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 29.8 | 26.2 12% | 30.1 -1% | 29 3% | 26.3 12% | 28.3 5% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.9 | 26.2 12% | 30.1 -1% | 30 -0% | 26.5 11% | 28.3 5% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 27.2 12% | 30.1 3% | 30 3% | 26.5 15% | 28.3 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 27.2 12% | 30.1 3% | 30 3% | 26.5 15% | 28.3 9% |
Load Average * | 35.6 | 41.5 -17% | 30.1 15% | 35.2 1% | 31.8 11% | 32.5 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.4 | 39.7 -6% | 35.9 4% | 39.3 -5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 40.8 | 41.1 -1% | 32.02 22% | 37 9% | 35.9 12% | 39.3 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.9 / 31 / 31 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 35.6 / 40.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.4 °C / -15.2 F).
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.38 / 0.76 Watt |
Låg belastning | 4.8 / 6.5 / 7.7 Watt |
Hög belastning |
29.6 / 57.8 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -8% | 15% | -19% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 2.9 40% | 3.6 25% | 2.9 40% | 4 17% | 4.2 12% |
Idle Average * | 6.5 | 6.2 5% | 7.5 -15% | 5.8 11% | 6.3 3% | 6.9 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 7 9% | 9.4 -22% | 6.2 19% | 7.7 -0% | 7.5 3% |
Load Average * | 29.6 | 47.1 -59% | 42 -42% | 32.9 -11% | 48.3 -63% | 33.3 -13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28.6 | 34.7 -21% | 49 -71% | 37.1 -30% | ||
Load Maximum * | 57.8 | 62.8 -9% | 51 12% | 48.5 16% | 57.6 -0% | 48.4 16% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, 61 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 52 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | -41% | 1% | -25% | -3% | |
Reader / Idle | 1554 | 966 -38% | 1966 27% | 1623 4% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 786 | 440 -44% | 461 -41% | 751 -4% | 619 -21% | 763 -3% |
Load | 194 | 171 -12% | 153 -21% | 79 -59% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Den största fördelen med ZenBook 14 UX425EA är att den har hög prestanda i förhållande till vikten. Den är lika lätt som LG Gram 14 men har betydligt högre prestanda och dessutom en mer ljusstark skärm. Vi gav 2018 års Razer Blade Stealth beröm på sin tid för den imponerande prestandan i förhållande till storleken, men UX425EA kan köra spel precis lika snabbt och kanske till och med snabbare samtidigt som den väger mindre och drar mindre ström.
Den låga vikten kommer på bekostnad av ett robust chassi och modeller som Dell XPS, HP Spectre, Blade Stealth, Huawei MateBook X Pro och Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 känns alla kraftigare och mer välbyggda. Den rena CPU-prestandan är inte högre än på många existerande Ice Lake-baserade Core i7-alternativ och GPU-prestandan är fortfarande instabil i många krävande titlar.
Intel har lyckats skapa en processor i sin 11:e generations Core i7 U-serie som är bättre än den 10:e generationens föregångare. Men exakt hur mycket bättre beror på arbetsbelastningen.
Om du gillar att spela en runda Rocket League eller DOTA 2 i farten kan denna superlätta Tiger Lake-baserade Ultrabook vara praktisk. Men när det kommer till surfande, epost, batteritid och videoströmning är prestandan i princip identisk med en äldre modell med 10:e generationens Ice Lake-processorer.
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA
- 09/29/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo